Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3433#issuecomment-66389406
[Test build #24278 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24278/consoleFull)
for PR 3433 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/#issuecomment-66389384
[Test build #24277 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24277/consoleFull)
for PR at commit
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3636#discussion_r21578119
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/optimization/GradientDescentSuite.scala
---
@@ -138,6 +138,45 @@ class GradientDescentSuite extends
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3651#issuecomment-66389931
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2914#issuecomment-66389892
[Test build #24280 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24280/consoleFull)
for PR 2914 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3651#issuecomment-66389927
[Test build #24269 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24269/consoleFull)
for PR 3651 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3652#issuecomment-66390767
[Test build #24273 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24273/consoleFull)
for PR 3652 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3652#issuecomment-66390771
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3570#issuecomment-66391029
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3570#issuecomment-66391021
[Test build #24274 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24274/consoleFull)
for PR 3570 at commit
Github user chenghao-intel commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3429#issuecomment-66391400
@marmbrus I've updated the scala doc a little bit, I know that's quite
complicated now, but we need to make thing right (to integrated with Hive UDFs
seamlessly),
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3194#discussion_r21579057
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/HistoryPage.scala ---
@@ -81,6 +79,38 @@ private[spark] class HistoryPage(parent:
GitHub user ZhangBanger opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3654
Add hadoop-2.5 profile with upgraded jets3t
This contribution is my original work and I license the work to the project
under the project's open source license.
Adding support for
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3654#issuecomment-66392060
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3194#discussion_r21579370
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/HistoryPage.scala ---
@@ -51,10 +52,7 @@ private[spark] class HistoryPage(parent:
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3625#issuecomment-66392255
I'm merging this one in master branch-1.2.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3194#discussion_r21579395
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/HistoryPage.scala ---
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ import org.apache.spark.ui.{WebUIPage, UIUtils}
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3194#discussion_r21579401
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/HistoryPage.scala ---
@@ -81,6 +79,38 @@ private[spark] class HistoryPage(parent:
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3625
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
GitHub user harishreedharan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3655
[SPARK-4704][STREAMING] Reliable Kafka Receiver can lose data if the blo...
...ck generator fails to store data.
The Reliable Kafka Receiver commits offsets only when events are
GitHub user lawlerd opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3656
[SPARK-4808] Remove Spillable minimum threshold and sampling
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/lawlerd/spark branch-1.2
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3194#discussion_r21579476
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/HistoryPage.scala ---
@@ -51,10 +52,7 @@ private[spark] class HistoryPage(parent:
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3194#issuecomment-66392556
Hey just a few minor comments but the approach looks good. Thanks for
working on this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user shaneknapp commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2854#issuecomment-66392666
all of our worker nodes have numpy-1.4.1-9.el6.x86_64 installed on them,
and have had this for months. i'm home for the evening, but we can do git
archaeology
GitHub user rxin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3657
Config updates for the new shuffle transport.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/rxin/spark conf-update
Alternatively you can review
Github user sarutak commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3194#issuecomment-66392747
@andrewor14 Thanks for all of your comments! I'll fix soon.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user witgo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3050#issuecomment-66392860
OK, I'll try. But
Github user aarondav commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3657#issuecomment-66392926
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3656#issuecomment-66392891
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3657#issuecomment-66393158
[Test build #24281 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24281/consoleFull)
for PR 3657 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3655#issuecomment-66393175
[Test build #24282 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24282/consoleFull)
for PR 3655 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3633#issuecomment-66393315
[Test build #24283 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24283/consoleFull)
for PR 3633 at commit
Github user harishreedharan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3655#issuecomment-66393421
I messed up the jira number in the commit. Please fix it when merging.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
GitHub user vanzin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3658
[SPARK-4809] Rework Guava library shading.
The current way of shading Guava is a little problematic. Code that
depends on spark-core does not see the transitive dependency, yet
classes in
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3658#issuecomment-66393496
I ran the maven build + unit tests, and also audited the jar files in the
build using the tool I wrote:
https://gist.github.com/vanzin/bd9057fadf4a296220b7
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3633#issuecomment-66393517
[Test build #24283 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24283/consoleFull)
for PR 3633 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3633#issuecomment-66393520
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3614#issuecomment-66393706
[Test build #24286 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24286/consoleFull)
for PR 3614 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3627#issuecomment-66393716
[Test build #24284 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24284/consoleFull)
for PR 3627 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3590#issuecomment-66393724
[Test build #24287 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24287/consoleFull)
for PR 3590 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3658#issuecomment-66393963
[Test build #24285 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24285/consoleFull)
for PR 3658 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3564#issuecomment-66394104
[Test build #24289 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24289/consoleFull)
for PR 3564 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3607#issuecomment-66394345
[Test build #24288 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24288/consoleFull)
for PR 3607 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3653#issuecomment-66395160
[Test build #24276 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24276/consoleFull)
for PR 3653 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3653#issuecomment-66395163
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/#issuecomment-66395258
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/#issuecomment-66395254
[Test build #24277 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24277/consoleFull)
for PR at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3433#issuecomment-66395358
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3194#issuecomment-66395463
[Test build #24290 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24290/consoleFull)
for PR 3194 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3194#issuecomment-66395624
[Test build #24279 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24279/consoleFull)
for PR 3194 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3194#issuecomment-66395630
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3564#issuecomment-66395651
[Test build #24289 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24289/consoleFull)
for PR 3564 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2914#issuecomment-66395752
[Test build #24280 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24280/consoleFull)
for PR 2914 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2914#issuecomment-66395757
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3486#issuecomment-66395938
It seems there are two separate issues that we are discussing here:
(1) How to propagate the link from the AM to the driver
(2) How to propagate the link
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2914#issuecomment-66396333
Hey sorry @tsliwowicz for using your PRs as the battleground in fixing our
builds against older branches. There aren't a lot of PRs opened against older
branches so
Github user suyanNone commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3541#issuecomment-66396760
@davies IIUC, current executor-backlist or host-backlist is all for one
TaskSetManager. There is a chance that tow or more taskSetManager run on the
same host or
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3194#discussion_r21581438
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/HistoryPage.scala ---
@@ -48,13 +52,40 @@ private[spark] class HistoryPage(parent:
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3194#discussion_r21581430
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/HistoryPage.scala ---
@@ -39,6 +40,9 @@ private[spark] class HistoryPage(parent:
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3050#issuecomment-66396867
[Test build #24291 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24291/consoleFull)
for PR 3050 at commit
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3541#issuecomment-66396977
@suyanNone Yes.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3194#issuecomment-66397115
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3194#discussion_r21581544
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/HistoryPage.scala ---
@@ -48,13 +52,40 @@ private[spark] class HistoryPage(parent:
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3194#discussion_r21581561
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/HistoryPage.scala ---
@@ -48,13 +52,40 @@ private[spark] class HistoryPage(parent:
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3471#issuecomment-66397588
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3471#issuecomment-66397719
[Test build #24293 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24293/consoleFull)
for PR 3471 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3633#issuecomment-66397946
[Test build #24292 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24292/consoleFull)
for PR 3633 at commit
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3471#issuecomment-66397955
Hey @sryza unfortunately this will have to block until we figure out in
#3490 what the appropriate naming scheme for AM configs to use collectively.
Otherwise we
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3490#issuecomment-66398025
I agree. Would you mind closing this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3610#discussion_r21581983
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/clustering/KMeans.scala ---
@@ -353,6 +359,31 @@ object KMeans {
}
/**
+ *
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3610#discussion_r21581989
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/clustering/KMeansSuite.scala ---
@@ -90,6 +90,27 @@ class KMeansSuite extends FunSuite with
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3610#discussion_r21581991
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/clustering/KMeansSuite.scala ---
@@ -90,6 +90,27 @@ class KMeansSuite extends FunSuite with
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3610#discussion_r21581990
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/clustering/KMeansSuite.scala ---
@@ -90,6 +90,27 @@ class KMeansSuite extends FunSuite with
Github user jerryshao commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3655#issuecomment-66398284
Thanks Hari, seems this is a simple solution. BTW should we make `count =
3` as a configurable parameter? For others LGTM.
Original thoughts of introducing
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3610#discussion_r21581986
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/clustering/KMeans.scala ---
@@ -353,6 +359,31 @@ object KMeans {
}
/**
+ *
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3610#discussion_r21581982
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/clustering/KMeans.scala ---
@@ -43,7 +43,8 @@ class KMeans private (
private var runs: Int,
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2516#issuecomment-66398367
Hey @tigerquoll usually for large patches like this we require a design doc
on the JIRA. Especially because the priority of this is not super important, I
would
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3610#issuecomment-66398376
@nxwhite-str Thanks for the PR! Could you please update the title to
start with [SPARK-4749] [mllib] to help with automated tagging?
---
If your project is set up
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3570#issuecomment-66398459
LGTM. Just in case you missed my earlier comment, are you still planning
to update the PR description to reflect the actual changes vs. the ones you had
planned?
Github user nkronenfeld commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3570#issuecomment-66398560
I thought I'd done so, it looks like it lost my changes
I'll fix that asap
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3653#issuecomment-66398673
[Test build #24294 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24294/consoleFull)
for PR 3653 at commit
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3627#discussion_r21582109
--- Diff: docs/spark-standalone.md ---
@@ -272,6 +272,15 @@ should specify them through the `--jars` flag using
comma as a delimiter (e.g. `
To control the
Github user tdas commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3627#issuecomment-66398746
LGTM.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2980#issuecomment-66398809
Hey @devldevelopment given that there is no simple way to support this
across different cluster managers, I would recommend that we close this issue
for now. We can
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2546#issuecomment-66399032
@397090770 given that a lot of changes have gone in since this was opened,
I would recommend that we close this issue for now until we describe the issue
in a JIRA.
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3655#issuecomment-66399105
[Test build #24282 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24282/consoleFull)
for PR 3655 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3655#issuecomment-66399109
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3657#issuecomment-66399244
[Test build #24281 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24281/consoleFull)
for PR 3657 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3657#issuecomment-66399245
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3590#issuecomment-66399346
[Test build #24287 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24287/consoleFull)
for PR 3590 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3590#issuecomment-66399349
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user aarondav commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3657#issuecomment-66399456
Merging this into master and branch-1.2.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1222#discussion_r21582392
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/FsHistoryProvider.scala ---
@@ -149,41 +162,45 @@ private[history] class
Github user witgo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3050#issuecomment-66399472
In my local test, it works.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3627#issuecomment-66399537
[Test build #24284 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24284/consoleFull)
for PR 3627 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3627#issuecomment-66399541
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user nkronenfeld commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3570#issuecomment-66399588
sorry, must have accidentally hit cancel instead of comment the first time.
Should be set now.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
GitHub user JoshRosen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3659
[Minor] Use sup tag for help icon in web UI page header
This small commit makes the `(?)` web UI help link into a superscript,
which should address feedback that the current design makes it look
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3657
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3659#issuecomment-66399624
/cc @aarondav, who suggested the `sup` tag. I think this should go into
`branch-1.2`, since that's where this feature was introduced.
---
If your project is set up
301 - 400 of 468 matches
Mail list logo
