Github user MickDavies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4187#issuecomment-71326437
The dictionary already exists, the change will cause an additional array to
be created to hold the converted values, but I do not think this is very
significant. I
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4189#issuecomment-71330879
[Test build #26051 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26051/consoleFull)
for PR 4189 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4191#issuecomment-71333194
[Test build #26053 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26053/consoleFull)
for PR 4191 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4189#issuecomment-71333620
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4189#issuecomment-71333617
[Test build #26051 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26051/consoleFull)
for PR 4189 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4156#issuecomment-71334179
[Test build #26055 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26055/consoleFull)
for PR 4156 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4187#issuecomment-71334169
[Test build #26054 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26054/consoleFull)
for PR 4187 at commit
GitHub user sryza opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4192
SPARK-5393. Flood of util.RackResolver log messages after SPARK-1714
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/sryza/spark sandy-spark-5393
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4192#issuecomment-71340711
[Test build #26058 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26058/consoleFull)
for PR 4192 at commit
GitHub user srowen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4191
SPARK-2285 [CORE] Give various TaskEndReason subclass more descriptive names
Was this all that you had in mind @rxin -- just a rename? or did I miss the
point. The other subclasses look fairly
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4191#issuecomment-71335121
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4191#issuecomment-71335117
[Test build #26053 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26053/consoleFull)
for PR 4191 at commit
Github user MechCoder commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4073#issuecomment-71335512
ping @jkbradley Could you please have a final look?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4138#issuecomment-71337315
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4138#issuecomment-71337309
[Test build #26056 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26056/consoleFull)
for PR 4138 at commit
Github user nchammas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4162#discussion_r23499848
--- Diff: ec2/spark_ec2.py ---
@@ -349,6 +350,15 @@ def launch_cluster(conn, opts, cluster_name):
if opts.identity_file is None:
print
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4174#issuecomment-71332320
Thanks. Merging in master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user ankurdave commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4138#issuecomment-71334354
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4187#issuecomment-71336962
[Test build #26054 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26054/consoleFull)
for PR 4187 at commit
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3637#issuecomment-71338140
Ping
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4190#issuecomment-71331330
[Test build #26052 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26052/consoleFull)
for PR 4190 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4191#issuecomment-71333463
This is what I had in mind. @andrewor14 can you comment on whether this
will break the event log stuff?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4188#issuecomment-71330214
[Test build #26050 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26050/consoleFull)
for PR 4188 at commit
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4156#issuecomment-71334132
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4191#issuecomment-71338349
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user nchammas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4162#discussion_r23499744
--- Diff: ec2/spark_ec2.py ---
@@ -349,6 +350,15 @@ def launch_cluster(conn, opts, cluster_name):
if opts.identity_file is None:
print
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4174#issuecomment-71325114
[Test build #26049 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26049/consoleFull)
for PR 4174 at commit
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4174#discussion_r23497320
--- Diff: core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/util/EventLoopSuite.scala ---
@@ -185,4 +185,22 @@ class EventLoopSuite extends FunSuite with Timeouts {
GitHub user srowen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4190
SPARK-4147 [CORE] Reduce log4j dependency
Defer use of log4j class until it's known that log4j 1.2 is being used.
This may avoid dealing with log4j dependencies for callers that reroute slf4j
to
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4138#issuecomment-71334562
[Test build #26056 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26056/consoleFull)
for PR 4138 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4191#issuecomment-71338347
[Test build #26057 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26057/consoleFull)
for PR 4191 at commit
Github user nchammas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4162#discussion_r23499969
--- Diff: ec2/spark_ec2.py ---
@@ -349,6 +350,15 @@ def launch_cluster(conn, opts, cluster_name):
if opts.identity_file is None:
print
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4174#issuecomment-71328345
[Test build #26049 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26049/consoleFull)
for PR 4174 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4188#issuecomment-71333105
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4188#issuecomment-71333101
[Test build #26050 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26050/consoleFull)
for PR 4188 at commit
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4047#issuecomment-71337678
@EntilZha Thanks for sharing your code! I like that it doesn't really
change the model API, but I'm not quite clear on what will be public/private in
the learning
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4073#issuecomment-71338606
@MechCoder This is an addition instead of a correction, but I just
realized that Strategy.assertValid() does not check subsamplingRate. Would you
mind adding that
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4187#discussion_r23500894
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/parquet/ParquetConverter.scala ---
@@ -426,6 +423,33 @@ private[parquet] class
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4187#discussion_r23500891
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/parquet/ParquetConverter.scala ---
@@ -426,6 +423,33 @@ private[parquet] class
GitHub user srowen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4193
SPARK-3359 [CORE] [DOCS] `sbt/sbt unidoc` doesn't work with Java 8
These are more `javadoc` 8-related changes I spotted while investigating.
These should be helpful in any event, but this does not
Github user EntilZha commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4047#discussion_r23501071
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/clustering/LDA.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,472 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4187#discussion_r23501217
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/parquet/ParquetConverter.scala ---
@@ -426,6 +423,33 @@ private[parquet] class
Github user MechCoder commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4073#issuecomment-71349920
@jkbradley Fixed. I can haz merge?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4186#issuecomment-71352726
[Test build #26062 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26062/consoleFull)
for PR 4186 at commit
GitHub user ryan-williams opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4194
[SPARK-5401] set executor ID before creating MetricsSystem
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/ryan-williams/spark metrics
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4195#issuecomment-71357329
[Test build #26064 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26064/consoleFull)
for PR 4195 at commit
Github user EntilZha commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4047#discussion_r23502411
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/clustering/LDA.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,472 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4194#issuecomment-71357143
[Test build #26063 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26063/consoleFull)
for PR 4194 at commit
Github user EntilZha commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4047#discussion_r23502479
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/clustering/LDA.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,472 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
GitHub user ryan-williams opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4195
[SPARK-5402] log executor ID at executor-construction time
also rename slaveHostname to executorHostname
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4143#issuecomment-71345609
Actually we should stick to j.u.c. I'm not sure if we should trust the less
commonly used TrieMap.
Also make sure we don't use the Scala implicit conversions on
Github user EntilZha commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4047#discussion_r23501018
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/clustering/LDA.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,472 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user EntilZha commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4047#discussion_r23501086
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/clustering/LDA.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,472 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4193#issuecomment-71346272
[Test build #26060 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26060/consoleFull)
for PR 4193 at commit
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4047#discussion_r23501384
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/clustering/LDA.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,472 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4047#discussion_r23501379
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/clustering/LDA.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,472 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4047#discussion_r23501438
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/clustering/LDA.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,472 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user akopich commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4047#discussion_r23501440
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/clustering/LDA.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,472 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user squito commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4175#issuecomment-71348013
Jenkins this is OK to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user shenh062326 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4050#issuecomment-71347965
If we use a inputFormat that donât instanc of
org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.lib.input.{CombineFileSplit, FileSplit}, then we
can't get information of input
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4047#discussion_r23501523
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/clustering/LDA.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,472 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user lianhuiwang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4168#discussion_r23502021
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ExecutorAllocationManager.scala ---
@@ -199,14 +199,31 @@ private[spark] class ExecutorAllocationManager(
Github user EntilZha commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4047#discussion_r23501107
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/clustering/LDAModel.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,265 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user EntilZha commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4047#discussion_r23501109
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/clustering/LDAModel.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,265 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user shenh062326 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4150#issuecomment-71347933
If we use a inputFormat that donât instanc of
org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.lib.input.{CombineFileSplit, FileSplit}, then we
can't get information of input
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4118#issuecomment-71348459
Not yet. But as the original method dealing with it looks very inefficient,
I think it worth replacing it with small refactor. As you can see, this
refactor just mainly
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4143#issuecomment-71355225
@rxin I will send another PR to change to j.u.c.ConcurrentHashMap.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4193#issuecomment-71346292
[Test build #26060 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26060/consoleFull)
for PR 4193 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4193#issuecomment-71346294
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user EntilZha commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4047#discussion_r23501230
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/clustering/LDA.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,472 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4187#discussion_r23501242
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/parquet/ParquetConverter.scala ---
@@ -426,6 +423,33 @@ private[parquet] class
Github user squito commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4175#issuecomment-71348345
lets try this again ...
Jenkins this is OK to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user akopich commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4047#discussion_r23501548
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/clustering/LDA.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,472 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user lianhuiwang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4168#discussion_r23502091
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ExecutorAllocationManager.scala ---
@@ -226,8 +243,11 @@ private[spark] class ExecutorAllocationManager(
Github user lianhuiwang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4168#discussion_r23502082
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ExecutorAllocationManager.scala ---
@@ -237,39 +257,18 @@ private[spark] class ExecutorAllocationManager(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4186#issuecomment-71355052
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4186#issuecomment-71355050
[Test build #26062 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26062/consoleFull)
for PR 4186 at commit
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3951#issuecomment-71344973
@kazk1018 Thanks for the updates; sorry for the delayed response. Please
ping me if updates are added ready for review.
The 2 other items which would be good
Github user EntilZha commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4047#discussion_r23501143
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/clustering/LDA.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,472 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user EntilZha commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4047#discussion_r23501399
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/clustering/LDA.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,472 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4047#discussion_r23501394
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/clustering/LDA.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,472 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user EntilZha commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4047#discussion_r23501392
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/clustering/LDA.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,472 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user shenh062326 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4157#issuecomment-71348155
I think you are right, it's no need to change.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4152#issuecomment-71348152
@avulanov @mengxr Do you know how much of a hit we would take if we used a
type parameter for the type of data? I'm imagining a Datum type which would be
```Datum =
Github user squito commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4175#issuecomment-71348093
this is mentioned in the jira, but its worth noting again here that this
changes the behavior slightly, since it wouldn't throw an exception before.
---
If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4073#issuecomment-71349963
[Test build #26061 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26061/consoleFull)
for PR 4073 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4073#issuecomment-71352330
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4073#issuecomment-71352326
[Test build #26061 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26061/consoleFull)
for PR 4073 at commit
Github user lianhuiwang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4141#issuecomment-71355510
LGTM, i think @tdas you can take a look at this PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4192#issuecomment-71343059
[Test build #26059 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26059/consoleFull)
for PR 4192 at commit
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4118#issuecomment-71344552
Since executor losses are very infrequent, is it worth bothering to
optimize this? Have you seen this be a performance issue in practice?
---
If your project is set up
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3951#discussion_r23500731
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/api/python/PythonMLLibAPI.scala ---
@@ -529,6 +530,35 @@ class PythonMLLibAPI extends Serializable {
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3951#discussion_r23500733
--- Diff: python/pyspark/mllib/tree.py ---
@@ -24,7 +24,41 @@
from pyspark.mllib.linalg import _convert_to_vector
from pyspark.mllib.regression
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3951#discussion_r23500735
--- Diff: python/pyspark/mllib/tree.py ---
@@ -383,6 +387,129 @@ def trainRegressor(cls, data,
categoricalFeaturesInfo, numTrees, featureSubsetSt
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3951#discussion_r23500737
--- Diff: python/pyspark/mllib/tree.py ---
@@ -383,6 +387,129 @@ def trainRegressor(cls, data,
categoricalFeaturesInfo, numTrees, featureSubsetSt
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3951#discussion_r23500734
--- Diff: python/pyspark/mllib/tree.py ---
@@ -24,7 +24,41 @@
from pyspark.mllib.linalg import _convert_to_vector
from pyspark.mllib.regression
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3951#discussion_r23500732
--- Diff: python/pyspark/mllib/tree.py ---
@@ -24,7 +24,41 @@
from pyspark.mllib.linalg import _convert_to_vector
from pyspark.mllib.regression
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4192#issuecomment-71345047
[Test build #26059 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26059/consoleFull)
for PR 4192 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4192#issuecomment-71345048
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user EntilZha commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4047#discussion_r23500980
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/clustering/LDA.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,472 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
1 - 100 of 168 matches
Mail list logo
