Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4754#issuecomment-76138000
[Test build #27989 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/27989/consoleFull)
for PR 4754 at commit
[`c73aabe`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4754#issuecomment-76138008
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/27
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4754#issuecomment-76138619
[Test build #27990 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/27990/consoleFull)
for PR 4754 at commit
[`7f958c1`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4754#issuecomment-76138628
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/27
Github user shivaram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4783#issuecomment-76138824
@advancedxy -- Thanks for the detailed writeup and the gist. I can see the
problem but I am not sure this is the complete fix. You are right that
shellSizes don't need
Github user advancedxy commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4783#issuecomment-76139869
Ok, Thanks for the update. I will look into the jol and the example when I
get some spare time.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4783#issuecomment-76140139
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/27
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4783#issuecomment-76140128
[Test build #27992 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/27992/consoleFull)
for PR 4783 at commit
[`8a127dc`](https://gith
Github user witgo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3744#issuecomment-76143785
```scala
test("bernoulli sampling benchmark") {
class BernoulliSamplerBenchmark(val fraction: Double, items: () =>
Iterator[Int]) extends scala.testing.Benchmark
Github user shenh062326 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4363#discussion_r25413198
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/HeartbeatReceiver.scala ---
@@ -17,33 +17,84 @@
package org.apache.spark
-import akka.a
Github user shenh062326 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4363#issuecomment-76145260
Sorry for late, I will change it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4363#issuecomment-76146091
[Test build #27993 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/27993/consoleFull)
for PR 4363 at commit
[`2dc456e`](https://githu
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4363#issuecomment-76146315
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/27
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4363#issuecomment-76146314
[Test build #27993 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/27993/consoleFull)
for PR 4363 at commit
[`2dc456e`](https://gith
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4764#issuecomment-76147005
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4764#issuecomment-76147388
[Test build #27994 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/27994/consoleFull)
for PR 4764 at commit
[`edee0d2`](https://githu
GitHub user liyezhang556520 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4785
SPARK-6036 avoid race condition between eventlogListener and akka actor
system
For detail description, pls refer to
[SPARK-6036](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-6036).
You can
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4780#discussion_r25414302
--- Diff: pom.xml ---
@@ -471,13 +471,6 @@
com.clearspring.analytics
stream
2.7.0
-
-
-
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4785#issuecomment-76148112
[Test build #27995 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/27995/consoleFull)
for PR 4785 at commit
[`79b15b3`](https://githu
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4781#discussion_r25414439
--- Diff: docs/configuration.md ---
@@ -1018,7 +1018,7 @@ Apart from these, the following properties are also
available, and may be useful
s
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4758#discussion_r25414445
--- Diff:
sql/hive-thriftserver/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/thriftserver/HiveThriftServer2Suites.scala
---
@@ -315,7 +315,14 @@ abstract class
GitHub user viirya opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4786
[SPARK-6037][SQL] Avoiding duplicate Parquet schema merging
`FilteringParquetRowInputFormat` manually merges Parquet schemas before
computing splits. However, it is duplicate because the schemas are
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4786#issuecomment-76148807
[Test build #27996 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/27996/consoleFull)
for PR 4786 at commit
[`ef78a5a`](https://githu
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4764#issuecomment-76149037
[Test build #27994 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/27994/consoleFull)
for PR 4764 at commit
[`edee0d2`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4764#issuecomment-76149044
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/27
Github user suyanNone commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4055#discussion_r25414968
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSetManager.scala ---
@@ -483,8 +483,9 @@ private[spark] class TaskSetManager(
//
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4363#issuecomment-76151469
[Test build #27997 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/27997/consoleFull)
for PR 4363 at commit
[`1a042ff`](https://githu
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4742#issuecomment-76152977
LGTM. I'll fix the space before the brace on merge. This seems like a
clean, simple fix.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
r
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4778#issuecomment-76153038
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabl
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4778#issuecomment-76153635
[Test build #27998 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/27998/consoleFull)
for PR 4778 at commit
[`6d7866d`](https://githu
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4055#discussion_r25416698
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSetManager.scala ---
@@ -483,8 +483,9 @@ private[spark] class TaskSetManager(
// a
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4785#issuecomment-76155748
[Test build #27995 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/27995/consoleFull)
for PR 4785 at commit
[`79b15b3`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4785#issuecomment-76155759
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/27
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4785#issuecomment-76156191
Looks like a legit test failure in `EventLoggingListenerSuite`, hm. I think
there may be a similar JIRA / PR for this, let me look.
---
If your project is set up for it,
GitHub user srowen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4787
SPARK-4300 [CORE] Race condition during SparkWorker shutdown
Close appender saving stdout/stderr before destroying process to avoid
exception on reading closed input stream.
(This also removes a
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4787#issuecomment-76159001
[Test build #27999 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/27999/consoleFull)
for PR 4787 at commit
[`e0cdabf`](https://githu
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4786#issuecomment-76159126
[Test build #27996 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/27996/consoleFull)
for PR 4786 at commit
[`ef78a5a`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4786#issuecomment-76159133
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/27
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4771#discussion_r25419499
--- Diff:
sql/hive-thriftserver/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/thriftserver/SparkSQLCLIDriver.scala
---
@@ -101,13 +104,16 @@ private[hive] object S
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4765#issuecomment-76161066
@kayousterhout can I get your second opinion on this? I know you've worked
on a lot of the UI code.
It's a tiny bit of extra code for a quite theoretical low-priority s
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4742
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4363#issuecomment-76161857
[Test build #27997 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/27997/consoleFull)
for PR 4363 at commit
[`1a042ff`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4363#issuecomment-76161867
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/27
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/304#issuecomment-76162378
SPARK-5888 tracks the same addition but for the new API. Let's close this
one and reopen a PR against that for the new impl.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4778#issuecomment-76163934
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/27
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4778#issuecomment-76163920
[Test build #27998 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/27998/consoleFull)
for PR 4778 at commit
[`6d7866d`](https://gith
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4778#discussion_r25421061
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/HistoryServerSuite.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Fou
GitHub user srowen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4788
SPARK-4704 [CORE] SparkSubmitDriverBootstrap doesn't flush output
Join on output threads to make sure any lingering output from process
reaches stdout, stderr before exiting
CC @andrewor14 s
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4787#issuecomment-76165482
[Test build #27999 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/27999/consoleFull)
for PR 4787 at commit
[`e0cdabf`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4787#issuecomment-76165494
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/27
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4788#issuecomment-76165690
[Test build #28000 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28000/consoleFull)
for PR 4788 at commit
[`ad7114e`](https://githu
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4787#issuecomment-76165744
Jenkins, retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have t
Github user suyanNone commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3629#discussion_r25421661
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/MemoryStore.scala ---
@@ -328,6 +330,7 @@ private[spark] class MemoryStore(blockManager:
BlockManager
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4787#issuecomment-76166356
[Test build #28001 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28001/consoleFull)
for PR 4787 at commit
[`e0cdabf`](https://githu
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4588#discussion_r25422335
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rpc/RpcEnv.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,345 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under on
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4588#discussion_r25422350
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rpc/ActionScheduler.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,207 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF)
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4588#discussion_r25422378
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/worker/WorkerWatcher.scala ---
@@ -45,30 +42,37 @@ private[spark] class WorkerWatcher(workerUrl: String)
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4588#issuecomment-76168122
[Test build #28002 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28002/consoleFull)
for PR 4588 at commit
[`04a106e`](https://githu
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4588#discussion_r25422602
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rpc/ActionScheduler.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,207 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF)
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4588#discussion_r25423137
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rpc/akka/AkkaRpcEnv.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,287 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF)
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4588#issuecomment-76169822
I will update this PR as per discussion in
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-5124
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have yo
GitHub user watermen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4789
[SPARK-6040][SQL] Fix the percent bug in tablesample
HiveQL expression like `select count(1) from src tablesample(1 percent);`
means take 1% sample to select. But it means 100% in the current versi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4789#issuecomment-76172235
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pro
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4788#issuecomment-76175633
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4788#issuecomment-76175625
[Test build #28000 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28000/consoleFull)
for PR 4788 at commit
[`ad7114e`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4787#issuecomment-76176233
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4787#issuecomment-76176221
[Test build #28001 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28001/consoleFull)
for PR 4787 at commit
[`e0cdabf`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4588#issuecomment-76178126
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4588#issuecomment-76178118
[Test build #28002 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28002/consoleFull)
for PR 4588 at commit
[`04a106e`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4767#issuecomment-76180179
[Test build #28003 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28003/consoleFull)
for PR 4767 at commit
[`a0e0f4b`](https://githu
GitHub user viirya opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4790
[SPARK-6041][GraphX] Compute shortest path for graph with edge distances
Add the function to compute shortest path for graph with edge distances.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4790#issuecomment-76186543
[Test build #28004 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28004/consoleFull)
for PR 4790 at commit
[`b8439d6`](https://githu
Github user saucam commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4764#issuecomment-76184234
Fixed the null count test failure. Optimization works only in case of
single count distinct in select clause
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this e
Github user tgravescs commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3916#issuecomment-76188802
Sorry I haven't had time to look at this in detail, one thing I was looking
for though was some documentation for the high level api. I realize java doc
will document
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4782
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user advancedxy commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4783#issuecomment-76190779
@shivaram -- I followed the
[JDK-8024912](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8024912),
[JDK-8024913](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8024913) and
[JDK-
Github user liancheng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4775#issuecomment-76192307
This LGTM, please help rebasing it, then I can merge it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4791#issuecomment-76191852
[Test build #28005 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28005/consoleFull)
for PR 4791 at commit
[`e3b4f51`](https://githu
Github user tgravescs commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4688#issuecomment-76193892
So actually one other option would be to build our own mechanism for
pushing new tgt's and updating the UGI. Storm actually has this functionality,
you could look ther
GitHub user srowen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4791
SPARK-4545 [STREAMING] [WIP] If first Spark Streaming batch fails, it waits
10x batch duration before stopping
Consider failed jobs completed too, to avoid excessive waiting dur...ing
shutdown for j
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4767#issuecomment-76198015
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4775#issuecomment-76198314
[Test build #28006 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28006/consoleFull)
for PR 4775 at commit
[`78787b1`](https://githu
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4767#issuecomment-76198005
[Test build #28003 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28003/consoleFull)
for PR 4767 at commit
[`a0e0f4b`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4754#issuecomment-76199342
[Test build #28007 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28007/consoleFull)
for PR 4754 at commit
[`b7a9e93`](https://githu
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4790#issuecomment-76200063
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4790#issuecomment-76200053
[Test build #28004 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28004/consoleFull)
for PR 4790 at commit
[`b8439d6`](https://gith
Github user piaozhexiu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4771#issuecomment-76203984
Thank you Sean for the review!
To answer your question, HiveThriftServer2.scala seems to have the same
issue because its shutdown hook is basically identical t
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4791#issuecomment-76207169
[Test build #28005 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28005/consoleFull)
for PR 4791 at commit
[`e3b4f51`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4791#issuecomment-76207186
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28
Github user jkleckner commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4780#discussion_r25440596
--- Diff: pom.xml ---
@@ -471,13 +471,6 @@
com.clearspring.analytics
stream
2.7.0
-
-
-
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4771#issuecomment-76209607
[Test build #28009 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28009/consoleFull)
for PR 4771 at commit
[`46e73b3`](https://githu
Github user piaozhexiu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4771#issuecomment-76209601
Done. Thanks again!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4771#issuecomment-76204252
I think it would be good to try to give those the same treatment while
we're at it, yes. I think you're welcome to add that.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4754#issuecomment-76212311
[Test build #28007 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28007/consoleFull)
for PR 4754 at commit
[`b7a9e93`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4771#issuecomment-76200389
[Test build #28008 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28008/consoleFull)
for PR 4771 at commit
[`86d1baa`](https://githu
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4754#issuecomment-76212327
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4780#issuecomment-76214312
Since the PR is the implementation of an issue resolution, if the
discussion is about the implementation it can happen here on the PR.
Shading isn't the issue in
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4780#issuecomment-76214905
(PS good news, I see that `parquet-column`'s shading is set to only include
classes that are used from `fastutil`. That's great; there are only tens of
classes added. That
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4775#issuecomment-76215068
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4775#issuecomment-76215053
[Test build #28006 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28006/consoleFull)
for PR 4775 at commit
[`78787b1`](https://gith
1 - 100 of 502 matches
Mail list logo
