Github user zzcclp commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4537#issuecomment-91130762
@koeninger , I merge this RP into master and build, it is OK. then run
tests as follows:
>mvn -Pscala-2.10 -Phadoop-2.3 -Pyarn -Dyarn.version=2.3.0-cdh5.1.2
-Dhadoop.v
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5236#issuecomment-91130309
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/29
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5236#issuecomment-91130301
[Test build #29924 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/29924/consoleFull)
for PR 5236 at commit
[`642a06d`](https://gith
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5369#issuecomment-91129184
Okay. However, I think it is still important to make the query plan simpler
by removing redundant parts even those parts are fast operations.
E.g., for this pr, th
Github user viirya closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5369
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5385#issuecomment-91128786
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/29
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5385#issuecomment-91128782
[Test build #29926 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/29926/consoleFull)
for PR 5385 at commit
[`82ae607`](https://gith
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5435#issuecomment-91128109
cc @marmbrus, it's a follow-up of https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5304.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appea
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5435#issuecomment-91127640
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pro
GitHub user cloud-fan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5435
[SQL][minor] move `resolveGetField` into a object
The method `resolveGetField` isn't belong to `LogicalPlan` logically and
didn't access any members of it.
You can merge this pull request into a
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5385#issuecomment-91127152
[Test build #29926 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/29926/consoleFull)
for PR 5385 at commit
[`82ae607`](https://githu
Github user jerryshao commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5385#issuecomment-91126900
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not ha
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5414#discussion_r28037692
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/ui/StreamingJobProgressListener.scala
---
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ private[streaming] class
StreamingJob
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5382#issuecomment-91125785
Great LTM - @WangTaoTheTonic does that look okay to you?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user yinxusen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5266#discussion_r28037378
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/IDF.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,114 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) un
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5330#issuecomment-91124464
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/29
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5330#issuecomment-91124457
[Test build #29923 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/29923/consoleFull)
for PR 5330 at commit
[`67b5311`](https://gith
Github user concretevitamin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5096#issuecomment-91123979
:+1:
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user ilganeli commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5236#discussion_r28037051
--- Diff:
network/common/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/util/JavaUtils.java ---
@@ -121,4 +125,69 @@ private static boolean isSymlink(File file) thro
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5434#issuecomment-91122700
[Test build #29922 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/29922/consoleFull)
for PR 5434 at commit
[`8286a26`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5434#issuecomment-91122724
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/29
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1977#issuecomment-91121784
[Test build #29925 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/29925/consoleFull)
for PR 1977 at commit
[`67772dd`](https://githu
Github user shivaram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5096#issuecomment-91121381
Thanks @andrewor14 @pwendell for the reviews. Now that Jenkins is happy I
am going merge this in and I'll file follow up issues for things like YARN
cluster mode which w
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5096#issuecomment-91121091
[Test build #29919 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/29919/consoleFull)
for PR 5096 at commit
[`da64742`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5096#issuecomment-91121106
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/29
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5236#issuecomment-91119705
[Test build #29924 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/29924/consoleFull)
for PR 5236 at commit
[`642a06d`](https://githu
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4735#discussion_r28035557
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/LabelIndexer.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,126 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundati
Github user parente commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5382#issuecomment-91116274
@pwendell @WangTaoTheTonic Good catch. I misconnected the upper line. It
was not intentional.
I've updated the PR with the diagram fix.
---
If your project is s
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1977#issuecomment-91115066
[Test build #29921 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/29921/consoleFull)
for PR 1977 at commit
[`e78c15c`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1977#issuecomment-91115081
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/29
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5433#issuecomment-91114821
[Test build #29920 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/29920/consoleFull)
for PR 5433 at commit
[`527eac6`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5433#issuecomment-91114827
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/29
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2342#issuecomment-91114206
[Test build #29918 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/29918/consoleFull)
for PR 2342 at commit
[`dec85db`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2342#issuecomment-91114215
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/29
Github user MechCoder commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5330#issuecomment-91114211
@jkbradley I have fixed up your comment. So the idea is to broadcast each
tree across all data, right? Sorry for the mess up. I got confused a bit, by
your previous co
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5330#issuecomment-91114090
[Test build #29923 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/29923/consoleFull)
for PR 5330 at commit
[`67b5311`](https://githu
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5434#issuecomment-91113182
[Test build #29922 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/29922/consoleFull)
for PR 5434 at commit
[`8286a26`](https://githu
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5434#issuecomment-91113024
cc @tdas and @JoshRosen
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have thi
GitHub user zsxwing opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5434
[SPARK-6796][Streaming][WebUI] Add "Active Batches" and "Completed Batches"
lists to StreamingPage
This PR adds two lists, `Active Batches` and `Completed Batches`. Here is
the screenshot:
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5432#issuecomment-9161
[Test build #29917 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/29917/consoleFull)
for PR 5432 at commit
[`3a14503`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5432#issuecomment-9181
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/29
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4586#issuecomment-91110437
[Test build #29916 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/29916/consoleFull)
for PR 4586 at commit
[`efdd602`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4586#issuecomment-91110458
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/29
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5236#discussion_r28033893
--- Diff:
network/common/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/util/JavaUtils.java ---
@@ -121,4 +125,69 @@ private static boolean isSymlink(File file) throws
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5430#discussion_r28033633
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/OffHeapStore.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,142 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF)
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5357#issuecomment-91108793
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/29
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5357#issuecomment-91108787
[Test build #29915 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/29915/consoleFull)
for PR 5357 at commit
[`a012fc3`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1977#issuecomment-91108728
[Test build #29921 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/29921/consoleFull)
for PR 1977 at commit
[`e78c15c`](https://githu
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5430#issuecomment-91108743
Thanks - let's put the Tachyon patch with this. In this case, I think it
will be easier to review and understand the API semantics.
---
If your project is set up for it, yo
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1977#discussion_r28033500
--- Diff: python/pyspark/shuffle.py ---
@@ -529,6 +522,322 @@ def sorted(self, iterator, key=None, reverse=False):
return heapq.merge(chunks, key=k
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1977#issuecomment-91108456
@JoshRosen Thanks for the comments, it looks better now.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5412
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5412#issuecomment-91105998
Ok I've merged it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5433#issuecomment-91105448
[Test build #29920 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/29920/consoleFull)
for PR 5433 at commit
[`527eac6`](https://githu
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1977#discussion_r28032966
--- Diff: python/pyspark/shuffle.py ---
@@ -529,6 +522,322 @@ def sorted(self, iterator, key=None, reverse=False):
return heapq.merge(chunks, key=k
GitHub user vlyubin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5433
[SQL] [SPARK-6794] Use kryo-based SparkSqlSerializer for
GeneralHashedRelation
Benchmarking results: http://pastie.org/private/1dneo1mta5zpsw6gmsoeq
You can merge this pull request into a Git repos
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1977#discussion_r28032910
--- Diff: python/pyspark/shuffle.py ---
@@ -529,6 +522,322 @@ def sorted(self, iterator, key=None, reverse=False):
return heapq.merge(chunks, key=k
Github user MechCoder commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5355#issuecomment-91104754
@mengxr @davies Can some initial comments be given on this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as we
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5096#issuecomment-91104742
[Test build #29919 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/29919/consoleFull)
for PR 5096 at commit
[`da64742`](https://githu
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2342#issuecomment-91104394
[Test build #29918 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/29918/consoleFull)
for PR 2342 at commit
[`dec85db`](https://githu
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5432#issuecomment-91103821
[Test build #29917 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/29917/consoleFull)
for PR 5432 at commit
[`3a14503`](https://githu
Github user sarutak commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2342#issuecomment-91103750
retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fea
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4764#issuecomment-91093315
As a very rough sketch (this is totally untested and I'm probably missing
cases), I'd hope the solution could look something like the following:
```scala
obj
Github user KaiXinXiaoLei commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5386#issuecomment-91093107
ok. thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this featu
Github user KaiXinXiaoLei closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5386
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user KaiXinXiaoLei commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5386#issuecomment-91093099
ok. thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this featu
Github user WangTaoTheTonic commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5382#issuecomment-91092834
I have same question as Patrick too.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your proje
Github user viper-kun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5430#discussion_r28030832
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/OffHeapStore.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,142 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (
Github user viper-kun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5430#discussion_r28030751
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/OffHeapBlockManager.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,110 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Found
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4764#issuecomment-91089650
Thanks for working ont his and sorry for the delay in reviewing it. My
high level feedback is that I think we should optimize handling of distinct
aggregation, but ther
Github user shivaram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5096#issuecomment-91088926
@pwendell Its around 2 minutes on my laptop. Here is the output on my
machine
```
time ./run-tests.sh
./run-tests.sh 1:56.96 total
```
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5412#issuecomment-91088775
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/29
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5412#issuecomment-91088769
[Test build #29904 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/29904/consoleFull)
for PR 5412 at commit
[`9098a31`](https://gith
Github user kellyzly commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5307#discussion_r28030065
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/BlockObjectWriter.scala ---
@@ -123,12 +130,34 @@ private[spark] class DiskBlockObjectWriter(
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4851#issuecomment-91088528
Okay, lets close this issue then. I think we are on track to do the
metadata / execution split for hive in 1.4
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to t
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5349
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5349#issuecomment-91088466
Thanks, I merged this to master. Would be great to add a TestHive wrapper
in a followup PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5382#issuecomment-91088355
Great to have an improvement here. One thing I don't understand, there are
two curved arrows from the SparkContext to the Executors/Workers. However, in
the upper arrow
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4586#discussion_r28029928
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/HiveQuerySuite.scala
---
@@ -793,6 +793,20 @@ class HiveQuerySuite extends HiveCompari
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5407#issuecomment-91087655
[Test build #29914 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/29914/consoleFull)
for PR 5407 at commit
[`a754adc`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5407#issuecomment-91087668
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/29
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5419#discussion_r28029875
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/ScalaReflection.scala
---
@@ -95,10 +95,14 @@ trait ScalaReflection {
}
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5419#discussion_r28029884
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/QueryPlan.scala
---
@@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ abstract class QueryPlan[PlanType <:
Tree
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5138
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5138#issuecomment-91087439
Thanks, merged to master!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have t
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5407#issuecomment-91086071
[Test build #29914 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/29914/consoleFull)
for PR 5407 at commit
[`a754adc`](https://githu
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5236#issuecomment-91085117
[Test build #29913 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/29913/consoleFull)
for PR 5236 at commit
[`8927e66`](https://githu
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5144#issuecomment-91085082
@tnachen Thanks for following up on the reviews. This is much better than
before. However, I still find the code in `MesosClusterScheduler` very
difficult to follow fo
Github user kellyzly commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5307#discussion_r28029243
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/BlockObjectWriter.scala ---
@@ -123,12 +130,34 @@ private[spark] class DiskBlockObjectWriter(
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5096#issuecomment-91084853
@shivaram - hey one thing I forgot to ask, how much time do the SparkR
tests add to the overall Spark tests?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user hhbyyh commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5344#issuecomment-91084759
Let me know if more cases should be added.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4961#issuecomment-91084699
[Test build #29912 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/29912/consoleFull)
for PR 4961 at commit
[`76ace9a`](https://githu
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5144#discussion_r28029140
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/mesos/MesosClusterScheduler.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,546 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the A
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5350#issuecomment-91084587
[Test build #642 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/642/consoleFull)
for PR 5350 at commit
[`1314a37`](https://githu
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5350#issuecomment-91084318
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/29
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5350#issuecomment-91084313
[Test build #29901 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/29901/consoleFull)
for PR 5350 at commit
[`1314a37`](https://gith
Github user zzcclp commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4537#issuecomment-91084285
there is not any error, why?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user jerryshao commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4961#issuecomment-91084207
Hi @tdas , would you please take a look at this again, so I can move on to
another PR which is depending on this, thanks a lot and appreciate your time :).
---
If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5429#issuecomment-91084117
[Test build #29911 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/29911/consoleFull)
for PR 5429 at commit
[`c00aa17`](https://githu
Github user jerryshao commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4961#issuecomment-91084100
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not ha
1 - 100 of 616 matches
Mail list logo
