Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5500#issuecomment-92553404
[Test build #30206 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30206/consoleFull)
for PR 5500 at commit
[`04590bc`](https://gith
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5485#issuecomment-92553261
Thanks, merged to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have t
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5140
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5431#issuecomment-92552866
[Test build #30210 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30210/consoleFull)
for PR 5431 at commit
[`26ae2d7`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5431#issuecomment-92552876
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5140#issuecomment-92552856
Ok LGTM I'm merging this into master thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pr
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5173#issuecomment-92552765
[Test build #666 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/666/consoleFull)
for PR 5173 at commit
[`71535e9`](https://github
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5487#issuecomment-92552525
Thanks, merged to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have t
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5487
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4996
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user WangTaoTheTonic commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5491#issuecomment-92551078
Okay I made an observation on my cluster, the thrift server is started at
21:01:32 and it hadn't do anything from that. Its evnet log's modification time
is 21:01
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5247#issuecomment-92551194
You are correct, thanks for clarifying. Query planning was not the right
phrase, but really my point was that ideally the logic in DataFrame would
handle only ensuring
Github user squito commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4435#issuecomment-92550401
ping @JoshRosen . I think this is basically ready to go. The only open
issue is figuring how to test the authentication for the new endpoints. (I'm
not even sure how to
Github user WangTaoTheTonic commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5491#issuecomment-92550220
@vanzin
It is not just theoretical. I tested using a ThriftServer instance, before
this patch its event log is deleted by cleaner(when it expires).
A
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5480#discussion_r28293883
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLQuerySuite.scala
---
@@ -414,6 +414,10 @@ class SQLQuerySuite extends QueryTest with
BeforeAndAfte
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5431#issuecomment-92549813
[Test build #30212 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30212/consoleFull)
for PR 5431 at commit
[`d19236d`](https://githu
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5430#issuecomment-92549215
[Test build #30203 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30203/consoleFull)
for PR 5430 at commit
[`0a49021`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5430#issuecomment-92549221
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5459#issuecomment-92549076
[Test build #665 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/665/consoleFull)
for PR 5459 at commit
[`2ead85b`](https://github
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2342#issuecomment-92548877
[Test build #30211 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30211/consoleFull)
for PR 2342 at commit
[`19815ae`](https://githu
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5431#issuecomment-92548691
LGTM once tests pass
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5085#issuecomment-92548540
Looks like @davies filed a JIRA for this already:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-6890
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email a
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5501#issuecomment-92547808
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5501#issuecomment-92547798
[Test build #30207 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30207/consoleFull)
for PR 5501 at commit
[`d7a06b8`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5173#issuecomment-92547739
[Test build #30205 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30205/consoleFull)
for PR 5173 at commit
[`71535e9`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5173#issuecomment-92547751
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30
Github user yu-iskw commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5267#issuecomment-92547494
@freeman-lab, do you know any good evaluations of a hierarchical clustering
algorithm except Within Set Sumb of Squared Error(WSSSE)? For example, I know
Silhouette Coeff
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5236#issuecomment-92547091
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5236#issuecomment-92547081
[Test build #30204 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30204/consoleFull)
for PR 5236 at commit
[`4526c81`](https://gith
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5085#issuecomment-92546252
@vanzin @nishkamravi2 When I try to run `bin/spark-shell --master
local-cluster[2,1,512]` my executors keep failing complaining that the scala
classes are not found. I
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5503#issuecomment-92544614
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pro
Github user chenghao-intel commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5383#issuecomment-92544533
Thank you @liancheng I've updated the code and it passed the unit test.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appea
GitHub user mandar2812 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5503
[MLLIB][WIP] SPARK-4638: Kernels feature for MLLIB
1) Class hierarchy for SVM Kernels, with unit tests.
2) Entropy based subset selection for low rank approximation of Large
Kernel Matrices,
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5431#issuecomment-92544002
[Test build #30210 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30210/consoleFull)
for PR 5431 at commit
[`26ae2d7`](https://githu
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5383#issuecomment-92543221
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5383#issuecomment-92543213
[Test build #30202 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30202/consoleFull)
for PR 5383 at commit
[`d719983`](https://gith
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5431#discussion_r28291065
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/param/params.scala ---
@@ -179,52 +179,96 @@ trait Params extends Identifiable with Serializable {
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5431#discussion_r28290995
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/param/params.scala ---
@@ -55,58 +49,42 @@ class Param[T] (
*/
def ->(value: T): ParamPair[
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5502#issuecomment-92541715
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pro
GitHub user mtimper opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5502
Changes to support checkpointing to BlockRDD as described in http://apac...
...he-spark-user-list.1001560.n3.nabble.com/java-lang-StackOverflowError-when-calling-count-td5649.html#a11970
You can me
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5459#issuecomment-92541260
[Test build #664 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/664/consoleFull)
for PR 5459 at commit
[`2ead85b`](https://github
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5431#discussion_r28290778
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/param/params.scala ---
@@ -325,7 +379,7 @@ class ParamMap private[ml] (private val map:
mutable.Map[Param[An
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5431#discussion_r28290818
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/param/shared/SharedParamsCodeGen.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,169 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Softwar
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5459#issuecomment-92541203
I had triggered several runs in a row, waiting for the results. If they all
passed, we could merge this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5459#issuecomment-92541148
[Test build #663 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/663/consoleFull)
for PR 5459 at commit
[`2ead85b`](https://github
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5501#issuecomment-92541131
[Test build #30207 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30207/consoleFull)
for PR 5501 at commit
[`d7a06b8`](https://githu
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5459#issuecomment-92541125
[Test build #30208 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30208/consoleFull)
for PR 5459 at commit
[`2ead85b`](https://githu
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5432#issuecomment-92541143
[Test build #30209 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30209/consoleFull)
for PR 5432 at commit
[`86de638`](https://githu
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5431#discussion_r28290695
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/param/params.scala ---
@@ -179,52 +179,96 @@ trait Params extends Identifiable with Serializable {
/**
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5459#issuecomment-92540777
Alright, one last time. If this passes, I'd suggest re-enabling the test,
so that if it's still flaky we can look at logs and figure out why. (I worked
with Sean and have
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5493
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user calvinjia commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5354#issuecomment-92540562
For the first point, the conflict was in `httpclient` which was not
resolved correctly by the parent, leading to this iteration of the PR.
For the second point
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5459#issuecomment-92540457
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5431#discussion_r28290532
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/param/params.scala ---
@@ -179,52 +179,96 @@ trait Params extends Identifiable with Serializable {
/**
GitHub user ilganeli opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5501
[SPARK-6703][Core][WIP] Provide a way to discover existing SparkContext's
I've added a static getOrCreate method to the static SparkContext object
that allows one to either retrieve a previously cr
Github user shivaram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5493#issuecomment-92539716
LGTM. Thanks @hlin09 - Merging this
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5500#issuecomment-92539907
[Test build #30206 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30206/consoleFull)
for PR 5500 at commit
[`04590bc`](https://githu
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5431#discussion_r28290414
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/param/params.scala ---
@@ -179,52 +179,96 @@ trait Params extends Identifiable with Serializable {
/**
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5431#discussion_r28290419
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/param/params.scala ---
@@ -179,52 +179,96 @@ trait Params extends Identifiable with Serializable {
/**
GitHub user sryza opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5500
SPARK-5888. [MLLIB]. Add OneHotEncoder as a Transformer
This patch adds a one hot encoder for categorical features. Planning to
add documentation and another test after getting feedback on the approa
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5493#issuecomment-92538479
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5493#issuecomment-92538465
[Test build #30201 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30201/consoleFull)
for PR 5493 at commit
[`e67fc40`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5495#issuecomment-92537882
[Test build #30200 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30200/consoleFull)
for PR 5495 at commit
[`74ec303`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5495#issuecomment-92537908
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4688#issuecomment-92537887
Hi @harishreedharan - could you add some more documentation for this? The
high level architecture here may be hard for users to see. Here are some places
you might consi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5499#issuecomment-92537454
[Test build #30199 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30199/consoleFull)
for PR 5499 at commit
[`d169d33`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5499#issuecomment-92537484
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5431#discussion_r28289791
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/param/params.scala ---
@@ -55,58 +49,42 @@ class Param[T] (
*/
def ->(value: T): ParamPair[T]
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5431#discussion_r28289673
--- Diff: mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/param/ParamsSuite.scala
---
@@ -78,23 +81,42 @@ class ParamsSuite extends FunSuite {
}
t
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5431#discussion_r28289697
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/Classifier.scala ---
@@ -17,15 +17,16 @@
package org.apache.spark.ml.classificatio
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5459#issuecomment-92533768
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5459#issuecomment-92533725
[Test build #30198 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30198/consoleFull)
for PR 5459 at commit
[`2ead85b`](https://gith
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5140#discussion_r28289277
--- Diff: sbin/stop-slaves.sh ---
@@ -29,10 +29,4 @@ if [ -e "$sbin"/../tachyon/bin/tachyon ]; then
"$sbin/slaves.sh" cd "$SPARK_HOME" \; "$sbin"/../
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5354#issuecomment-92532627
That ship may have sailed for better or worse. Yes we have to be careful
about bringing things into core, so I'm glad to see the exclusions, but I think
there are simpler
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5236
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5236#issuecomment-92532459
Ok, LGTM I'm merging this into master. It's great to see things on your
todo list getting ticked off by others in the community. Thanks @ilganeli
@srowen @vanzin!
--
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/731#issuecomment-92532203
@CodingCat We shouldn't have to worry about the case when the user asks for
more resources per executors than are available on the cluster. If each machine
only has 2 c
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5173#issuecomment-92531906
[Test build #30205 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30205/consoleFull)
for PR 5173 at commit
[`71535e9`](https://githu
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/731#discussion_r28288632
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/master/Master.scala
---
@@ -582,32 +555,63 @@ private[master] class Master(
pos = (pos
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/731#discussion_r28288621
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/master/Master.scala
---
@@ -582,32 +555,63 @@ private[master] class Master(
pos = (pos
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/731#discussion_r28288516
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/master/Master.scala
---
@@ -582,32 +555,63 @@ private[master] class Master(
pos = (pos
Github user calvinjia commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5354#issuecomment-92531201
In the original PR, the dependency management was left to maven but it
caused dependency issues in tests which is why this new method is being
proposed.
For th
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/731#discussion_r28288450
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/master/Master.scala
---
@@ -524,52 +524,25 @@ private[master] class Master(
}
/**
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5236#issuecomment-92530750
[Test build #30204 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30204/consoleFull)
for PR 5236 at commit
[`4526c81`](https://githu
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/731#discussion_r28288173
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/master/Master.scala
---
@@ -524,52 +524,25 @@ private[master] class Master(
}
/**
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/731#discussion_r28288122
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/master/Master.scala
---
@@ -524,52 +524,25 @@ private[master] class Master(
}
/**
Github user ilganeli commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5236#discussion_r28288002
--- Diff: docs/running-on-yarn.md ---
@@ -48,9 +48,9 @@ Most of the configs are the same for Spark on YARN as for
other deployment modes
s
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5236#discussion_r28287888
--- Diff: docs/running-on-yarn.md ---
@@ -48,9 +48,9 @@ Most of the configs are the same for Spark on YARN as for
other deployment modes
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5236#discussion_r28287786
--- Diff: docs/running-on-yarn.md ---
@@ -48,9 +48,9 @@ Most of the configs are the same for Spark on YARN as for
other deployment modes
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4142#issuecomment-92528269
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4506
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4142#issuecomment-92528245
[Test build #30197 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30197/consoleFull)
for PR 4142 at commit
[`f5434b9`](https://gith
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4506#issuecomment-92527942
Thanks! Merged to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5430#issuecomment-92527921
[Test build #30203 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30203/consoleFull)
for PR 5430 at commit
[`0a49021`](https://githu
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5481
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5481#issuecomment-92527536
Thanks, merged to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have t
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5208#issuecomment-92526609
I think this is getting pretty close! If you run into trouble implementing
some of my suggestions on the `SparkPlan` interfaces for ordering please let me
know and I ca
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5208#discussion_r28287371
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/joins/SortMergeJoin.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,172 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Soft
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5208#discussion_r28287227
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/basicOperators.scala ---
@@ -41,6 +41,15 @@ case class Project(projectList: Seq[NamedExpress
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5208#discussion_r28287180
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/Exchange.scala ---
@@ -33,7 +32,11 @@ import org.apache.spark.util.MutablePair
* :: De
101 - 200 of 605 matches
Mail list logo
