Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6548
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6351#issuecomment-107323104
[Test build #33875 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/33875/consoleFull)
for PR 6351 at commit
[`f8b9314`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6351#issuecomment-107323110
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6537#issuecomment-107322383
[Test build #33874 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/33874/consoleFull)
for PR 6537 at commit
[`f83d282`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6537#issuecomment-107322393
Build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does n
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6547#discussion_r31402480
--- Diff:
sql/hive-thriftserver/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/thriftserver/HiveThriftServer2Suites.scala
---
@@ -29,6 +27,8 @@ import scala.concur
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6430#issuecomment-107320528
[Test build #33881 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/33881/consoleFull)
for PR 6430 at commit
[`8211be0`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6430#issuecomment-107320335
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6430#issuecomment-107320286
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6549#issuecomment-107319654
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pr
GitHub user tarekauel opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6549
[SPARK-7966][GraphX] Implementation of Spreading Activation algorithm
I implemented the Spreading Activation algorithm and would love to get your
feedback
You can merge this pull request into a G
Github user jerryshao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6430#discussion_r31402047
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ExecutorAllocationManager.scala ---
@@ -261,14 +270,19 @@ private[spark] class ExecutorAllocationManager(
Github user jerryshao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6430#discussion_r31402037
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ExecutorAllocationManager.scala ---
@@ -261,14 +270,19 @@ private[spark] class ExecutorAllocationManager(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6548#issuecomment-107318873
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6548#issuecomment-107318918
[Test build #33880 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/33880/consoleFull)
for PR 6548 at commit
[`630efc3`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6548#issuecomment-107318861
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user jerryshao commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6430#issuecomment-107318741
Hi all, I just updated the code according to your comments, please help to
review, thanks a lot. There's two opening questions I didn't address yet:
1. Do we n
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6361#discussion_r31401873
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/serializer/KryoSerializerSuite.scala ---
@@ -328,6 +334,52 @@ class KryoSerializerSuite extends SparkFunSuite
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6361#discussion_r31401829
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/SerializableBuffer.scala ---
@@ -21,12 +21,16 @@ import java.io.{EOFException, IOException,
ObjectInput
GitHub user rxin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6548
Update README to include DataFrames and zinc.
Also cut trailing whitespaces.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/rxin/spark readme
Alte
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6361#discussion_r31401833
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/serializer/KryoClosureSerializerSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Soft
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6361#discussion_r31401808
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/Task.scala ---
@@ -126,6 +129,21 @@ private[spark] abstract class Task[T](val stageId:
Int, var par
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6361#issuecomment-107317880
[Test build #33879 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/33879/consoleFull)
for PR 6361 at commit
[`08c05d1`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6430#issuecomment-107317876
[Test build #33878 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/33878/consoleFull)
for PR 6430 at commit
[`f03c250`](https://gith
Github user coolfrood commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6361#discussion_r31401728
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/serializer/KryoClosureSerializerSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Soft
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6361#issuecomment-107317726
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6430#issuecomment-107317717
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6430#issuecomment-107317727
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6361#issuecomment-107317718
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6361#discussion_r31401724
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/Task.scala ---
@@ -126,6 +129,21 @@ private[spark] abstract class Task[T](val stageId:
Int, var par
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6361#discussion_r31401661
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/serializer/KryoClosureSerializerSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Soft
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6361#issuecomment-107315605
[Test build #33877 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/33877/consoleFull)
for PR 6361 at commit
[`fbb31a5`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6361#issuecomment-107315613
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user coolfrood commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6361#issuecomment-107315504
@JoshRosen I have rebased and updated the PR based on your suggestions and
the discussion on SPARK-7708. I switched to Kryo version 2.24.0 by excluding it
from `chill`
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6361#issuecomment-107315439
[Test build #33877 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/33877/consoleFull)
for PR 6361 at commit
[`fbb31a5`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6361#issuecomment-107315287
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6361#issuecomment-107315344
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6506#issuecomment-107312174
Thanks for checking the API docs. I created SPARK-7992 to track this issue.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear o
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6547#issuecomment-107308592
lgtm merging once tests pass
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6547#issuecomment-107307928
[Test build #33876 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/33876/consoleFull)
for PR 6547 at commit
[`72da795`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6547#issuecomment-107307711
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6547#issuecomment-107307702
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
GitHub user liancheng opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6547
[SQL] [TEST] [MINOR] Follow-up of PR #6493, use Guava API to ensure Java 6
friendliness
This is a follow-up of PR #6493, which has been reverted in branch-1.4
because it uses Java 7 specific APIs
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6511#issuecomment-107305583
Yes, these were pushed as hot fixes later. Unfortunately maven has stricter
requirements than SBT for some reason.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can repl
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6546#issuecomment-107305335
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6546#issuecomment-107305325
[Test build #33872 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/33872/consoleFull)
for PR 6546 at commit
[`3b69840`](https://git
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6351#issuecomment-107303509
[Test build #33875 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/33875/consoleFull)
for PR 6351 at commit
[`f8b9314`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6351#issuecomment-107303387
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6351#issuecomment-107303396
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6409#issuecomment-107302558
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6409#issuecomment-107302556
**[Test build #33871 timed
out](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/33871/consoleFull)**
for PR 6409 at commit
[`b76a102`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6351#issuecomment-107301638
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6537#issuecomment-107301231
[Test build #33874 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/33874/consoleFull)
for PR 6537 at commit
[`f83d282`](https://gith
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6505#discussion_r31399925
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/HiveTypeCoercion.scala
---
@@ -482,30 +482,66 @@ trait HiveTypeCoercion {
}
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6505#discussion_r31399932
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/HiveTypeCoercion.scala
---
@@ -482,30 +482,66 @@ trait HiveTypeCoercion {
}
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6537#issuecomment-107301171
Build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have thi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6537#issuecomment-107301185
Build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this f
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6505#discussion_r31399878
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/HiveTypeCoercion.scala
---
@@ -482,30 +482,66 @@ trait HiveTypeCoercion {
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6511#issuecomment-107300943
False alarm: I was building off a slightly-out-of-date branch.
Just saw the comment on your other commit; I see now that the issue is the
fact that Spark Core'
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6505#discussion_r31399860
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/HiveTypeCoercion.scala
---
@@ -482,30 +482,66 @@ trait HiveTypeCoercion {
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6505#discussion_r31399854
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/HiveTypeCoercion.scala
---
@@ -482,30 +482,66 @@ trait HiveTypeCoercion {
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6505
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6505#issuecomment-107300564
Merged in master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6351#issuecomment-107300585
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6351#issuecomment-107300593
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6505#issuecomment-107300581
@marmbrus if you have time would be great to take a look at this too.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHu
Github user liancheng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6505#issuecomment-107300521
LGTM, thanks for working on this!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6511#issuecomment-107300035
I'm running into Maven build breaks due to missing test-jar dependencies in
the `sql`, `mllib` and `flume-sink` projects. Why did you remove the test
dependency? I c
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6505#issuecomment-107299909
@yhuai , updated.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fe
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6537#discussion_r31399508
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/HiveTypeCoercion.scala
---
@@ -127,20 +127,20 @@ trait HiveTypeCoercion {
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6193#discussion_r31399451
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/types/UserDefinedType.scala ---
@@ -53,7 +53,12 @@ abstract class UserDefinedType[UserType] extends
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6537#discussion_r31399048
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/HiveTypeCoercion.scala
---
@@ -127,20 +127,20 @@ trait HiveTypeCoercion {
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6537#discussion_r31399027
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/HiveTypeCoercion.scala
---
@@ -127,20 +127,20 @@ trait HiveTypeCoercion {
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6546#issuecomment-107293380
[Test build #33872 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/33872/consoleFull)
for PR 6546 at commit
[`3b69840`](https://gith
Github user jerryshao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6430#discussion_r31398962
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ExecutorAllocationManager.scala ---
@@ -262,15 +267,22 @@ private[spark] class ExecutorAllocationManager(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6546#issuecomment-107293150
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6546#issuecomment-107293189
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
GitHub user zsxwing opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6546
[SPARK-7989][Core][Tests] Fix flaky tests in ExternalShuffleServiceSuite
and SparkListenerWithClusterSuite
The flaky tests in ExternalShuffleServiceSuite and
SparkListenerWithClusterSuite will fail
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6505#issuecomment-107290024
Can you update the description to explain what is the problem with more
information (e.g. a case that we do not handle correctly)?
---
If your project is set up for it, y
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6532
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user huangjs commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4989#issuecomment-107289662
Want to reopen this as in YARN mode, Spark app will run under user's
account.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply app
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6505#issuecomment-107288766
Is it ready to go? cc @rxin @liancheng @yhuai
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user yijieshen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6515#issuecomment-107288251
@JoshRosen, since the profile is tightly coupled with `compile` &
`test-compile` goals in maven, is it OK to run `mvn package` in
`bin/run-tests`? e.g. in `lint-java`?
Github user yijieshen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6515#issuecomment-107287257
@rxin, in error prone, some checks are `on` by default, and others are
experimental and `off` by default. Each of the checks is considered with a
`Severity level`, som
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6222#issuecomment-107285935
[Test build #33868 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/33868/consoleFull)
for PR 6222 at commit
[`740341b`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6222#issuecomment-107285941
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6545#issuecomment-107285299
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pr
GitHub user XuTingjun opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6545
[SPARK-7889] make sure click the "App ID" on HistoryPage, the SparkUI will
be refreshed.
The bug is that: When clicking the app in incomplete page, the tasks
progress is 100/2000. After the app
Github user jerryshao commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6495#issuecomment-107285068
Yes, as @srowen said, this implementation is not the intent of the JIRA.
According to my knowledge, this problem is not easy to handle with an elegant
solution, if you
Github user jerryshao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6430#discussion_r31397987
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ExecutorAllocationManager.scala ---
@@ -150,6 +151,9 @@ private[spark] class ExecutorAllocationManager(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6544#issuecomment-107283514
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pr
GitHub user nishkamravi2 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6544
[SPARK-7959][DOC] Minor modification to Streaming docs with regards to
parallel data receiving
@pwendell @tdas
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pul
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6409#issuecomment-107282252
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6409#issuecomment-107281357
[Test build #33871 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/33871/consoleFull)
for PR 6409 at commit
[`b76a102`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6409#issuecomment-107280891
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6409#issuecomment-107280850
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6515#issuecomment-107280681
Since this is now guarded behind a special Maven profile, we should also
make sure to update the Jenkins build to run with this enabled. AFAIK the
Jenkins Maven build
Github user Sephiroth-Lin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6409#discussion_r31397611
--- Diff: yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/Client.scala ---
@@ -849,6 +852,27 @@ private[spark] class Client(
}
}
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6409#issuecomment-107280587
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6409#issuecomment-107280578
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
1 - 100 of 348 matches
Mail list logo
