Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6858#issuecomment-11295
[Test build #35061 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35061/console)
for PR 6858 at commit
GitHub user brennonyork opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6865
[SPARK-7017][HOTFIX][Project Infra]: Refactor dev/run-tests into Python
Fixed minor nits from the [previous
PR](https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5694) and removed unnecessary doc
build
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6039#discussion_r32689854
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/MinMaxScaler.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,171 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6039#discussion_r32689867
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/MinMaxScaler.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,171 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6039#discussion_r32689872
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/MinMaxScaler.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,171 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6039#discussion_r32689874
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/MinMaxScalerSuite.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6039#discussion_r32689869
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/MinMaxScaler.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,171 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6039#discussion_r32689862
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/MinMaxScaler.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,171 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6039#discussion_r32689859
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/MinMaxScaler.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,171 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6039#issuecomment-112986615
A bunch of mostly small cleanups. That's all for now!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user tarekauel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6804#discussion_r32690041
--- Diff:
unsafe/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/unsafe/types/UTF8String.java ---
@@ -125,30 +129,37 @@ public UTF8String substring(final int start, final
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6864#discussion_r32690469
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/hadoopFsRelationSuites.scala
---
@@ -470,6 +470,33 @@ abstract class HadoopFsRelationTest
Github user liancheng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6864#issuecomment-112973573
Background and alternative solutions for this issue can be a little bit
complex. Will give a summary of offline discussion with @yhuai here later.
---
If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6346#issuecomment-112975573
[Test build #35059 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35059/console)
for PR 6346 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6346#issuecomment-112975673
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6865#issuecomment-112978374
[Test build #35067 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35067/consoleFull)
for PR 6865 at commit
Github user harsha2010 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6654#issuecomment-112978405
@jkbradley , yes I agree... the pipeline needs to be more complex. The Hive
/ HDFS component is not covered much in SQL examples as far as I can see... but
you are
Github user koeninger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6863#issuecomment-112978856
I don't think a doc change caused a python test failure.
On Jun 17, 2015 5:27 PM, UCB AMPLab notificati...@github.com wrote:
Merged build finished. Test
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6853#issuecomment-112979975
[Test build #35063 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35063/console)
for PR 6853 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6853#issuecomment-112979996
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6864#issuecomment-112981099
[Test build #35066 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35066/console)
for PR 6864 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6864#issuecomment-112981114
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user sryza commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6394#issuecomment-112981135
Hi @jerryshao is this ready for review?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user chenghao-intel commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6404#issuecomment-112994338
Oh, sorry @JoshRosen the meaningless output is caused by #5671, I will fix
it with a followup PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6804#discussion_r32690530
--- Diff:
unsafe/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/unsafe/types/UTF8String.java ---
@@ -69,8 +73,8 @@ public UTF8String set(final String str) {
/**
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6844#issuecomment-112969894
Thanks, merged to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6864#issuecomment-112973514
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6864#issuecomment-112973535
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user brennonyork commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5694#issuecomment-112976517
Thanks for the PR merge @JoshRosen. I'll go ahead and make a hotfix branch
to capture the last few nits you have above!
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6865#issuecomment-112978022
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6865#issuecomment-112978032
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6039#issuecomment-112980823
@hhbyyh Sorry for the long delay around the release! I'll review this now.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6039#discussion_r32689870
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/MinMaxScaler.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,171 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6039#discussion_r32689875
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/MinMaxScalerSuite.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6039#discussion_r32689865
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/MinMaxScaler.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,171 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6039#discussion_r32689873
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/MinMaxScaler.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,171 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6039#discussion_r32689849
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/MinMaxScaler.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,171 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6039#discussion_r32689852
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/MinMaxScaler.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,171 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6039#discussion_r32689861
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/MinMaxScaler.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,171 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6039#discussion_r32689868
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/MinMaxScaler.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,171 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6039#discussion_r32689880
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/MinMaxScalerSuite.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6039#discussion_r32689850
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/MinMaxScaler.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,171 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6039#discussion_r32689857
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/MinMaxScaler.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,171 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user tarekauel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6804#discussion_r32690391
--- Diff:
unsafe/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/unsafe/types/UTF8String.java ---
@@ -69,8 +73,8 @@ public UTF8String set(final String str) {
/**
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6864#issuecomment-112973920
[Test build #35066 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35066/consoleFull)
for PR 6864 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6278#issuecomment-112974768
[Test build #35064 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35064/console)
for PR 6278 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6278#issuecomment-112974785
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6654#issuecomment-112980561
OK, that sounds good. Also, sorry about the long delay in commenting!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6854#issuecomment-112987424
@srowen Just commented on the JIRA. Let me know what you think.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user tarekauel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6804#discussion_r32690308
--- Diff:
unsafe/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/unsafe/types/UTF8String.java ---
@@ -55,13 +55,17 @@ public static UTF8String fromString(String str) {
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6856#discussion_r32673596
--- Diff: python/pyspark/mllib/feature.py ---
@@ -110,6 +110,15 @@ class JavaVectorTransformer(JavaModelWrapper,
VectorTransformer):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6758#issuecomment-112946929
[Test build #35055 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35055/console)
for PR 6758 at commit
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6856#discussion_r32673603
--- Diff: python/pyspark/mllib/feature.py ---
@@ -185,7 +180,7 @@ def __init__(self, withMean=False, withStd=True):
self.withMean = withMean
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6826
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5659#issuecomment-112952257
[Test build #35056 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35056/console)
for PR 5659 at commit
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6146#issuecomment-112956949
Please explain your change. Neither the JIRA nor the PR description
describe why you the original code is incorrect.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6326#issuecomment-112961301
Sorry for the delay here. Mind bringing this up to date?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user tdas commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6852#issuecomment-112962475
Merging this in Spark 1.4 and master
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6278#issuecomment-112963368
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6278#issuecomment-112963546
[Test build #35064 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35064/consoleFull)
for PR 6278 at commit
GitHub user koeninger opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6863
[Streaming][Kafka][SPARK-8390] fix docs related to HasOffsetRanges
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/koeninger/spark-1
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6788#issuecomment-112890118
[Test build #35048 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35048/consoleFull)
for PR 6788 at commit
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6839#issuecomment-112895403
Hi @XuTingjun can you update the title to something more specific:
RDDOperationGraph: getting cached nodes is slow or something?
---
If your project is set up
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6839#issuecomment-112895667
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6839#issuecomment-112895459
add to whitelist
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6839#issuecomment-112895599
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6825#discussion_r32656257
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/ExpressionEvalHelper.scala
---
@@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ trait ExpressionEvalHelper
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6839#discussion_r32656406
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/scope/RDDOperationGraph.scala ---
@@ -70,6 +70,13 @@ private[ui] class RDDOperationCluster(val id:
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6702#issuecomment-112904541
LGTM. I agree we should have a regression test, but we shouldn't block the
fix on it. The code before was clearly wrong since we never set the flag to
true.
---
If
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6859#issuecomment-112907290
That is going to be slower and use a lot more memory in allocating (big)
temp strings. Why would this be helpful?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6828#issuecomment-112911047
[Test build #35051 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35051/consoleFull)
for PR 6828 at commit
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5694#issuecomment-112914050
Some minor nits aside, this looks good enough to me, so I'm going to merge
it into master and will submit a series of followup PRs to perform more
modularization /
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6833#issuecomment-112914955
[Test build #35053 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35053/consoleFull)
for PR 6833 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5659#issuecomment-112920697
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5659#issuecomment-112920675
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6758#issuecomment-112930242
[Test build #35057 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35057/consoleFull)
for PR 6758 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6758#issuecomment-112929882
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6817#issuecomment-112935099
Hi @XuTingjun I'll look at this today if not tomorrow thanks for the ping.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6346#discussion_r32669748
--- Diff: python/pyspark/mllib/feature.py ---
@@ -525,6 +526,41 @@ def fit(self, data):
return Word2VecModel(jmodel)
+class
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6863#issuecomment-112969443
[Test build #35065 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35065/console)
for PR 6863 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6863#issuecomment-112969458
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6346#issuecomment-112942027
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6346#issuecomment-112942125
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6551#issuecomment-112942333
Thanks! Merging to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6346#issuecomment-112942612
[Test build #35059 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35059/consoleFull)
for PR 6346 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6788#issuecomment-112947509
[Test build #35060 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35060/consoleFull)
for PR 6788 at commit
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6817#discussion_r32675734
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ExecutorAllocationManager.scala ---
@@ -553,12 +562,13 @@ private[spark] class ExecutorAllocationManager(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6796#issuecomment-112955333
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6758#issuecomment-112961128
[Test build #35057 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35057/console)
for PR 6758 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6758#issuecomment-112961170
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6758
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5643#issuecomment-112967276
Mind bringing this up to date?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6863#issuecomment-112967694
[Test build #35065 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35065/consoleFull)
for PR 6863 at commit
Github user MechCoder commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6346#discussion_r32670198
--- Diff: python/pyspark/mllib/feature.py ---
@@ -525,6 +526,41 @@ def fit(self, data):
return Word2VecModel(jmodel)
+class
Github user mikeringenburg commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5403#issuecomment-112938589
We have one of the configurations to which @kayousterhout refers - a good
deal of local memory, but no local file system, only a global parallel file
system
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6828#issuecomment-112940276
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6828#issuecomment-112940239
[Test build #35051 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35051/console)
for PR 6828 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6346#issuecomment-112940805
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user MechCoder commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6346#issuecomment-112940733
@davies I fixed your comments and replaced vector with scalingVector for
consistency
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6346#issuecomment-112940829
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
101 - 200 of 714 matches
Mail list logo
