Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7058#issuecomment-116763579
The PySpark ML tests passed, so this looks fine to me.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7087#issuecomment-116763775
[Test build #35991 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35991/console)
for PR 7087 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7087#issuecomment-116763888
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user tnachen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5563#issuecomment-116763524
@squito Thanks for reviewing and commenting, sorry I wasn't really clear I
also don't think anything about Mesos should be merged without being tested
with a real mesos
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7026#discussion_r33487305
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/client/package.scala ---
@@ -32,13 +32,36 @@ package object client {
// Hive 0.14 depends
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7077#issuecomment-116764897
[Test build #36004 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36004/consoleFull)
for PR 7077 at commit
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6796#discussion_r33487350
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/parquet/CatalystSchemaConverter.scala
---
@@ -383,20 +386,14 @@ private[parquet] class
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6796#discussion_r33487385
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/parquet/CatalystSchemaConverter.scala
---
@@ -169,11 +169,12 @@ private[parquet] class
Github user markhamstra commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6361#issuecomment-116742527
@koertkuipers While it may be convenient for you that Scalding and Spark
have a common serialization format when using chill/kryo, that can't be
considered anything
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7029#issuecomment-116740165
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7077#issuecomment-116744229
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7077#issuecomment-116744260
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6947#issuecomment-116747028
@shivaram, I think the motivation here is to address local `dev/run-tests`
failures that are caused by the presence of these documentation files:
```
Github user shivaram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6947#issuecomment-116747612
Ah okay. In that case I'm fine with adding this. If the existing patch
fixes the problem feel free to merge it
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6338#issuecomment-116751025
[Test build #35995 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35995/console)
for PR 6338 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6338#issuecomment-116751053
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7088#issuecomment-116753470
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4229#issuecomment-116753493
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7058#issuecomment-116759929
The spurious failure message from AmplabJenkins is a side-effect of some
changes which skip the JVM tests for PRs that only touch certain PySpark
modules. Ignore the
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5423#discussion_r33485446
--- Diff:
yarn/history/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/yarn/YarnHistoryProvider.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,1015 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user sarutak commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7088#issuecomment-116760825
Ah, that is after patch applied. O.K, I'll merge once the test finish
successfully.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6796#discussion_r33486747
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/parquet/ParquetTypes.scala ---
@@ -43,16 +43,27 @@ private[parquet] object ParquetTypesConverter
Github user MechCoder commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7058#issuecomment-116763185
jenkins test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7077#issuecomment-116764561
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7077#issuecomment-116764517
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6796#discussion_r33487239
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/parquet/ParquetTableSupport.scala
---
@@ -369,9 +371,6 @@ private[parquet] class
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7085#issuecomment-116740435
The script's lint checks looked fine and I manually verified that the
message was logged properly, so I'm going to merge this into master. Thanks!
---
If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6830#issuecomment-116740302
[Test build #35997 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35997/console)
for PR 6830 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6830#issuecomment-116740290
[Test build #35997 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35997/consoleFull)
for PR 6830 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7029#issuecomment-116740148
[Test build #35996 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35996/console)
for PR 7029 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7020#issuecomment-116741869
[Test build #35998 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35998/consoleFull)
for PR 7020 at commit
Github user shivaram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6743#issuecomment-116748735
Thanks @sun-rui for the update. @davies can probably confirm but AFAIK the
PySpark location is picked up at [1] by looking at the JAR file path / Spark
home.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7088#issuecomment-116753571
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6830#issuecomment-116757341
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6830#issuecomment-116757293
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user sarutak commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7088#issuecomment-116758162
LGTM, but just in case, could you show a screen shot in the case of
`totalExecutionTime == 0` ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6338#discussion_r33484881
--- Diff: python/pyspark/rdd.py ---
@@ -121,15 +121,30 @@ def _parse_memory(s):
def _load_from_socket(port, serializer):
-sock =
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7058#issuecomment-116759031
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7088#issuecomment-116759370
could you show a screen shot in the case of totalExecutionTime == 0 ?
I have already put a screenshot in the PR description.
---
If your project is set up for
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7058#issuecomment-116759076
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user MechCoder commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7058#issuecomment-116760679
Thanks for the clarification!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5423#issuecomment-116761481
Splitting up the patch? Would that help?
Yes. Reviewing a 9k line patch is a lot of work, regardless of where the
code is. People still need to review test
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6796#discussion_r33486665
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/parquet/ParquetTypes.scala ---
@@ -43,16 +43,27 @@ private[parquet] object ParquetTypesConverter
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6796#discussion_r33486716
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/parquet/ParquetTypes.scala ---
@@ -43,16 +43,27 @@ private[parquet] object ParquetTypesConverter
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7077#issuecomment-116763438
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7026#discussion_r33487478
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/client/package.scala ---
@@ -32,13 +32,36 @@ package object client {
// Hive 0.14 depends
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7058#issuecomment-116765543
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7058#issuecomment-116766343
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7058#issuecomment-116766385
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user liancheng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6796#issuecomment-116766442
Hi @rtreffer,
- How is the compatibility mode intended to work? Settings are currently
private, but I'd like to store Decimal(19), so is lifting the 18 limit
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5423#discussion_r33488335
--- Diff:
yarn/history/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/yarn/YarnHistoryProvider.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,1015 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6968#issuecomment-116769050
@tdas can you review?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6968#issuecomment-116769034
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7058#issuecomment-116769868
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7058#issuecomment-116769791
[Test build #36005 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36005/console)
for PR 7058 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6968#issuecomment-116770263
[Test build #36006 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36006/consoleFull)
for PR 6968 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6830#issuecomment-116770973
[Test build #36008 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36008/consoleFull)
for PR 6830 at commit
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6827#issuecomment-116771070
@vanzin can you elaborate? Where is the offending line?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5563#discussion_r33490036
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/mesos/MesosSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -59,6 +59,9 @@ private[spark] class
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7060#issuecomment-116772124
[Test build #35993 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35993/console)
for PR 7060 at commit
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7058#issuecomment-116773193
Woohoo, looks like my hack worked :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AiHe commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6338#discussion_r33490643
--- Diff: python/pyspark/rdd.py ---
@@ -121,15 +121,30 @@ def _parse_memory(s):
def _load_from_socket(port, serializer):
-sock =
Github user AiHe commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6338#issuecomment-116774008
When I'm working on python networking problem, I usually follow that
example as a python standard usage. Then I just apply the underlying idea here.
I'm wondering if I
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7073#discussion_r33492734
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/columnar/ColumnAccessor.scala ---
@@ -71,44 +71,44 @@ private[sql] abstract class
Github user kdatta commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3234#issuecomment-116766214
Hi Josh, Ankur,
We have a dependence on this story for PyGraphX. We are close to completing
the PyGraphX work and would like this code to be reviewed and
Github user MechCoder commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7086#issuecomment-116768373
It seems that the 'JMap[String, JList[Float]]' is not serializable.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6830#issuecomment-116768318
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6830#issuecomment-116768277
[Test build #35992 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35992/console)
for PR 6830 at commit
Github user steveloughran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5423#discussion_r33488891
--- Diff:
yarn/history/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/yarn/YarnHistoryProvider.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,1015 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed
Github user rtreffer commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6796#issuecomment-116769197
Hi @liancheng, thank you for the thorough review, will push a reworked
version soon. Everything sounds reasonable :-)
With private Settings I meant that I
Github user ankurcha commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5563#issuecomment-116769444
Thanks @tnachen @dragos - I did add some debug statements to make things
explicit. Here is the output with
`spark.mesos.constraints=zone:us-east-1a`:
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7026#discussion_r33489768
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/client/package.scala ---
@@ -32,13 +32,36 @@ package object client {
// Hive 0.14 depends
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5563#discussion_r33490121
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/mesos/MesosSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -191,13 +194,29 @@ private[spark] class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7060#issuecomment-116772162
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6262#discussion_r33490447
--- Diff: python/pyspark/tests.py ---
@@ -874,6 +874,15 @@ def
test_sortByKey_uses_all_partitions_not_only_first_and_last(self):
for size in
Github user MechCoder commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7086#issuecomment-116771077
I pushed in a hack that works, but now the Scala version looks ugly.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6827#issuecomment-116774379
OK, I'm going to revert this patch. @vanzin would you mind submitting a fix?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user steveloughran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5423#discussion_r33491590
--- Diff:
yarn/history/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/yarn/YarnHistoryProvider.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,1015 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7088#discussion_r33491939
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/jobs/StagePage.scala ---
@@ -570,6 +570,35 @@ private[ui] class StagePage(parent: StagesTab) extends
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7088#discussion_r33492287
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/jobs/StagePage.scala ---
@@ -570,6 +570,35 @@ private[ui] class StagePage(parent: StagesTab) extends
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7058#issuecomment-116766793
I'm testing out a slightly silly hack to see if I can prevent the spurious
AmplabJenkins errors: at the bottom of our Jenkins execute shell command, I'm
adding an
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6796#discussion_r33487973
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/parquet/CatalystSchemaConverter.scala
---
@@ -383,20 +386,14 @@ private[parquet] class
Github user steveloughran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5423#discussion_r33488124
--- Diff:
yarn/history/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/yarn/YarnHistoryProvider.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,1015 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7058#issuecomment-116767185
[Test build #36005 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36005/consoleFull)
for PR 7058 at commit
Github user steveloughran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5423#discussion_r33488601
--- Diff:
yarn/history/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/yarn/YarnHistoryProvider.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,1015 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed
Github user steveloughran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5423#discussion_r33488512
--- Diff:
yarn/history/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/yarn/YarnHistoryProvider.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,1015 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7026#discussion_r33488555
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/client/package.scala ---
@@ -32,13 +32,36 @@ package object client {
// Hive 0.14 depends
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6968#issuecomment-116769664
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6968#issuecomment-116769691
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6830#issuecomment-116770692
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7086#issuecomment-116770659
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6830#issuecomment-116770668
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7086#issuecomment-116770691
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5563#discussion_r33490259
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/mesos/MesosSchedulerUtils.scala
---
@@ -86,10 +89,106 @@ private[mesos] trait
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5563#discussion_r33490252
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/mesos/MesosSchedulerUtils.scala
---
@@ -86,10 +89,106 @@ private[mesos] trait
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5563#discussion_r33490244
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/mesos/MesosSchedulerUtils.scala
---
@@ -86,10 +89,106 @@ private[mesos] trait
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5563#discussion_r33490235
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/mesos/MesosSchedulerUtils.scala
---
@@ -17,16 +17,19 @@
package
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7086#issuecomment-116771747
[Test build #36007 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36007/consoleFull)
for PR 7086 at commit
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6827#issuecomment-116772492
@andrewor14 It's not a particular line, it's the whole patch. The patch
ignores any application whose logs do not contain an application ID. No logs
generated by Spark
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7088#discussion_r33491885
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/jobs/StagePage.scala ---
@@ -570,6 +570,35 @@ private[ui] class StagePage(parent: StagesTab) extends
201 - 300 of 1332 matches
Mail list logo
