Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7093#discussion_r33504060
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/Client.scala ---
@@ -125,10 +126,12 @@ private class ClientActor(driverArgs:
ClientArguments, conf:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6973#issuecomment-116814853
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7086#issuecomment-116815350
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user MechCoder commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6948#issuecomment-116815596
Any other comments? @hhbyyh
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7095#issuecomment-116823350
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7091#issuecomment-116828125
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6959#issuecomment-116828143
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6205#issuecomment-116833560
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user vanzin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7097
[SPARK-8372] Do not show applications that haven't recorded their app ID
yet.
Showing these applications may lead to weird behavior in the History
Server. For old logs, if
the app ID is
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6205#issuecomment-116833401
This never ran test. Jenkins, this is ok to test.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7097#issuecomment-116833772
I made some small changes on top of @carsonwang original patch, to account
for old Spark versions. Most of my added changes are in the test code.
---
If your project is
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7097#issuecomment-116836938
[Test build #36032 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36032/consoleFull)
for PR 7097 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7094#issuecomment-116841482
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7094#issuecomment-116841501
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6338#issuecomment-116841488
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6338#issuecomment-116841500
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6959#discussion_r33516110
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/UnsafeFixedWidthAggregationMap.java
---
@@ -70,67 +92,38 @@
private
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6921#issuecomment-116857231
[Test build #36026 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36026/console)
for PR 6921 at commit
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6959#discussion_r33517761
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/util/UniqueObjectPool.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6983#issuecomment-116863918
+1 to @squito 's suggestion, and I'll add that you can also force push if
you do a rebase instead of a merge. Eitherway, github only is going to look at
whatever the
Github user dragos commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5563#issuecomment-116874376
I still think this is a very useful feature and would love to have it in.
We could look at [Marathon
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7094#issuecomment-116874339
[Test build #36037 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36037/console)
for PR 7094 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7102#issuecomment-116874487
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7101#issuecomment-116874493
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7101#issuecomment-116874511
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7102#issuecomment-116874549
Merged.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7102#issuecomment-116874507
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6810#discussion_r33524575
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/AggregateSuite.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7070#issuecomment-116875664
[Test build #36048 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36048/consoleFull)
for PR 7070 at commit
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7101#issuecomment-116875730
LGTM. To make sure I understand, this still requires that the caller
passes in a new set of expression for each thread in order to be safe? (which I
think we get for
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6557#issuecomment-116875643
LGTM. We can document this later.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7095#issuecomment-116814806
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7093#issuecomment-116814818
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7038#issuecomment-116834206
[Test build #36030 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36030/console)
for PR 7038 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7077#issuecomment-116834302
[Test build #36028 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36028/consoleFull)
for PR 7077 at commit
Github user liancheng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6145#issuecomment-116834216
@scwf @cloud-fan Thanks! I'm merging this to branch-1.4.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7039#issuecomment-116834566
@yhuai
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7096#issuecomment-116834309
[Test build #36027 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36027/consoleFull)
for PR 7096 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7025#issuecomment-116838119
[Test build #36035 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36035/consoleFull)
for PR 7025 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7099#issuecomment-116837958
[Test build #36034 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36034/consoleFull)
for PR 7099 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5805#issuecomment-116841829
[Test build #36031 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36031/console)
for PR 5805 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6338#issuecomment-116841847
[Test build #36038 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36038/consoleFull)
for PR 6338 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7094#issuecomment-116841874
[Test build #36037 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36037/consoleFull)
for PR 7094 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5805#issuecomment-116842028
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6648#issuecomment-116844669
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6648#issuecomment-116844688
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4399#issuecomment-116846071
[Test build #36040 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36040/consoleFull)
for PR 4399 at commit
Github user aarondav commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5392#discussion_r33513145
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/Client.scala ---
@@ -36,20 +36,30 @@ import org.apache.spark.util.{ActorLogReceive,
AkkaUtils,
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6557#issuecomment-116846095
@davies @shivaram any updates on this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5233#issuecomment-116847131
Looks like YARN-3415 is resolved. Is there still a fix that's needed on the
Spark side @sryza? If not, shall we close this PR?
---
If your project is set up for it,
Github user aarondav commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5392#discussion_r33513862
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/Client.scala ---
@@ -82,29 +92,38 @@ private class ClientActor(driverArgs: ClientArguments,
conf:
Github user aarondav commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5392#discussion_r33513905
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/Client.scala ---
@@ -82,29 +92,38 @@ private class ClientActor(driverArgs: ClientArguments,
conf:
Github user holdenk commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7080#issuecomment-116850826
Looks good to me with a few minor notes :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user aarondav commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5392#discussion_r33515502
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/client/AppClient.scala ---
@@ -40,98 +37,139 @@ import org.apache.spark.util.{ActorLogReceive,
Github user ankurcha commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5563#issuecomment-116851005
@dragos That's a very good catch, I was going as per the
http://mesos.apache.org/documentation/attributes-resources/ documentation page
which says that the attribute
Github user sryza commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6994#discussion_r33515526
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/stat/test/KSTest.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,191 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6877#issuecomment-116855108
+ 1 for truncate, otherwise LGTM.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6338#issuecomment-116854700
Merged into master, 1.4 and 1.3 branch
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user tigerquoll closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5250
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6921#issuecomment-116861385
[Test build #36044 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36044/consoleFull)
for PR 6921 at commit
Github user ckadner commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6983#issuecomment-116861479
@marmbrus - Hi Michael, please let me know when you have time to review my
pull-request. This PR no longer merges, so I would close this and create a new
PR on top of
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6973#issuecomment-116863246
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6959
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user jonalter commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7093#discussion_r33524269
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/Client.scala ---
@@ -125,10 +126,12 @@ private class ClientActor(driverArgs:
ClientArguments, conf:
Github user liancheng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7070#issuecomment-116875110
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6968#issuecomment-116821437
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7094#issuecomment-116820942
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6917#discussion_r33507904
--- Diff: dev/run-tests.py ---
@@ -639,32 +651,47 @@ def detect_binary_inop_with_mima():
run_cmd([os.path.join(SPARK_HOME, dev, mima)])
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7091#issuecomment-116829532
[Test build #36024 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36024/console)
for PR 7091 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6606#issuecomment-116829717
Merging this. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user Rosstin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7096
Spark-8660
Converted JavaDoc style comments in
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/LogisticRegressionSuite.scala
to regular multiline comments, to make copy-pasting R commands
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7091#issuecomment-116829730
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7048#issuecomment-116833627
[Test build #36029 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36029/consoleFull)
for PR 7048 at commit
Github user Rosstin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7096#issuecomment-116834065
@rxin done, hope that's not too long
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7093#discussion_r33508854
--- Diff:
streaming/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/scheduler/JobGeneratorSuite.scala
---
@@ -76,7 +76,9 @@ class JobGeneratorSuite extends
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7008#discussion_r33510186
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/Checkpoint.scala ---
@@ -44,11 +44,19 @@ class Checkpoint(@transient ssc: StreamingContext,
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7099#issuecomment-116838806
[Test build #36034 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36034/console)
for PR 7099 at commit
Github user Rosstin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7096#issuecomment-116838453
@rxin Of course, my bad
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6969#issuecomment-116843259
@rekhajoshm can you address the comments? In particular, I think the
proposal is just to fix the documentation for now. I would recommend that we
close this PR and
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6686#issuecomment-116848080
Merging this in. Thanks @ilganeli!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user aarondav commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5392#discussion_r33514893
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/client/AppClient.scala ---
@@ -40,98 +37,139 @@ import org.apache.spark.util.{ActorLogReceive,
Github user shivaram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7025#issuecomment-116849288
The code change looks ok but I need to test it on a windows machine to see
what is going on. Will try to do this soon
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7096#issuecomment-116856496
Thanks - merging this in master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7096#issuecomment-116856432
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7077#issuecomment-116859209
[Test build #36028 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36028/consoleFull)
for PR 7077 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7051#issuecomment-116860066
[Test build #36018 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36018/console)
for PR 7051 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7092#issuecomment-116860321
[Test build #36019 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36019/consoleFull)
for PR 7092 at commit
Github user aarondav commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5392#discussion_r33519086
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/worker/Worker.scala
---
@@ -258,41 +299,65 @@ private[worker] class Worker(
}
}
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7051#issuecomment-116860168
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user jonalter commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7093#discussion_r33523678
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/RDD.scala ---
@@ -659,6 +660,7 @@ abstract class RDD[T: ClassTag](
* @param separateWorkingDir Use
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6810#discussion_r33523617
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SparkPlan.scala ---
@@ -153,13 +153,14 @@ abstract class SparkPlan extends
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7100#issuecomment-116875481
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6971#discussion_r33504350
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/misc.scala
---
@@ -47,4 +48,44 @@ case class Md5(child: Expression)
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7086#issuecomment-116815269
[Test build #36015 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36015/console)
for PR 7086 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7095#issuecomment-116816972
[Test build #36023 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36023/consoleFull)
for PR 7095 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7095#issuecomment-116820863
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6968#issuecomment-116821037
[Test build #36006 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36006/console)
for PR 6968 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7091#issuecomment-116828513
[Test build #36024 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36024/consoleFull)
for PR 7091 at commit
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7077#issuecomment-116832037
Wow, tests are really flaky today...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7077#issuecomment-116832055
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
501 - 600 of 1332 matches
Mail list logo
