Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7158#issuecomment-117757054
**[Test build #36266 timed
out](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36266/console)**
for PR 7158 at commit
[`be0df01`](https://github
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7158#issuecomment-117757082
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6648#discussion_r33700867
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/shuffle/FileShuffleBlockResolver.scala ---
@@ -23,6 +23,8 @@ import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicInteger
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7132#issuecomment-117754366
[Test build #36282 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36282/consoleFull)
for PR 7132 at commit
[`26cc177`](https://gith
Github user tarekauel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6762#discussion_r33700547
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/stringOperations.scala
---
@@ -220,6 +222,404 @@ case class EndsWith(left:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7132#issuecomment-117753471
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7132#issuecomment-117753400
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user tarekauel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6762#discussion_r33700254
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/stringOperations.scala
---
@@ -220,6 +222,404 @@ case class EndsWith(left:
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6743#discussion_r33700035
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/api/r/RUtils.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) unde
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6743#discussion_r33699978
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/api/r/RUtils.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) unde
Github user tarekauel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6762#discussion_r33699927
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/stringOperations.scala
---
@@ -220,6 +222,404 @@ case class EndsWith(left:
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6648#discussion_r33699473
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/MapStatus.scala ---
@@ -132,6 +140,7 @@ private[spark] class CompressedMapStatus(
*/
private
Github user tarekauel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6762#discussion_r33698802
--- Diff:
unsafe/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/unsafe/types/UTF8String.java ---
@@ -159,6 +162,77 @@ public UTF8String toLowerCase() {
return UTF8
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7152
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7159#issuecomment-117747047
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user shivaram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7152#issuecomment-117746861
LGTM. Thanks @sun-rui for this change !
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7132#issuecomment-117746932
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user tarekauel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6762#discussion_r33698505
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/StringFunctionsSuite.scala
---
@@ -226,5 +226,128 @@ class StringFunctionsS
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7159#issuecomment-117746738
[Test build #36264 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36264/console)
for PR 7159 at commit
[`ff034d0`](https://github.
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7132#issuecomment-117746811
[Test build #36268 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36268/console)
for PR 7132 at commit
[`e5db35d`](https://github.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7086#issuecomment-117745925
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7086#issuecomment-117745684
[Test build #36279 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36279/console)
for PR 7086 at commit
[`3334d31`](https://github.
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7130#issuecomment-117744398
[Test build #36281 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36281/consoleFull)
for PR 7130 at commit
[`907366b`](https://gith
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6648#discussion_r33698111
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/shuffle/unsafe/UnsafeShuffleWriter.java ---
@@ -307,7 +313,7 @@ void forceSorterToSpill() throws IOException {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7130#issuecomment-117744187
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7130#issuecomment-117744164
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7161
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7161#issuecomment-117741960
LGTM, merging this into master, thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project do
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7161#discussion_r33697259
--- Diff: python/run-tests.py ---
@@ -31,6 +31,23 @@
import Queue
else:
import queue as Queue
+if sys.version_info >= (2, 7):
+
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7161#issuecomment-117740169
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7161#issuecomment-117739896
[Test build #36280 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36280/console)
for PR 7161 at commit
[`cf4f901`](https://github.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7057#issuecomment-117739502
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7057#issuecomment-117739311
[Test build #36267 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36267/console)
for PR 7057 at commit
[`34f63f8`](https://github.
Github user BryanCutler commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6205#issuecomment-117738429
No problem, I'll try to resolve these today
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your p
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7159#issuecomment-117737815
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7159#issuecomment-117737501
[Test build #36265 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36265/console)
for PR 7159 at commit
[`ecec410`](https://github.
Github user MechCoder commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6904#issuecomment-117731123
Thanks for the comment but Vector is a sealed trait as well but that seems
to work fine.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have yo
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7161#issuecomment-117730185
[Test build #36280 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36280/consoleFull)
for PR 7161 at commit
[`cf4f901`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7086#issuecomment-117729828
[Test build #36279 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36279/consoleFull)
for PR 7086 at commit
[`3334d31`](https://gith
Github user cocoatomo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6967#issuecomment-117729148
I created the pull request for this:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7161.
Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7161#issuecomment-117728352
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7086#issuecomment-117728317
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6904#issuecomment-117728223
[Test build #36278 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36278/console)
for PR 6904 at commit
[`e2390f5`](https://github.
GitHub user cocoatomo opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7161
[SPARK-8763][PySpark] executing run-tests.py with Python 2.6 fails with
absence of subprocess.check_output function
Running run-tests.py with Python 2.6 cause following error:
```
Run
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7161#issuecomment-117728308
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6904#issuecomment-117728246
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7086#issuecomment-117728350
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7160#issuecomment-117727391
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7160#issuecomment-117727171
[Test build #36273 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36273/console)
for PR 7160 at commit
[`d976187`](https://github.
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7159#issuecomment-117725169
This is the last PR for SPARK-6602
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does n
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7086#issuecomment-117725100
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7086#issuecomment-117725034
[Test build #36274 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36274/console)
for PR 7086 at commit
[`2715b25`](https://github.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6588#issuecomment-117724789
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6588#issuecomment-117724559
[Test build #36271 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36271/console)
for PR 6588 at commit
[`d7f42c2`](https://github.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6904#issuecomment-117724269
Build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does n
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6904#issuecomment-117723426
[Test build #36278 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36278/consoleFull)
for PR 6904 at commit
[`e2390f5`](https://gith
Github user squito commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6205#issuecomment-117722520
Hi @BryanCutler sorry for the delay on my mind. Thanks for updating.
Unfortunately looks like there are more conflicts with master, looks like you
need to merge again.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6904#issuecomment-117721952
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5668#issuecomment-117720033
[Test build #36276 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36276/consoleFull)
for PR 5668 at commit
[`dd630e7`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6904#issuecomment-117721876
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6904#issuecomment-117721053
[Test build #36277 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36277/console)
for PR 6904 at commit
[`71b951d`](https://github.
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7107#discussion_r33692135
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/CoarseGrainedSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -394,6 +394,27 @@ class CoarseGrainedSchedulerBack
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6904#issuecomment-117721058
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6904#issuecomment-117720519
[Test build #36277 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36277/consoleFull)
for PR 6904 at commit
[`71b951d`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6904#issuecomment-117720397
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6904#issuecomment-117720432
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6205#discussion_r33691317
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/RpcUtils.scala ---
@@ -47,14 +47,22 @@ object RpcUtils {
}
/** Returns the default Spark
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6205#discussion_r33691322
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/RpcUtils.scala ---
@@ -47,14 +47,22 @@ object RpcUtils {
}
/** Returns the default Spark
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6205#discussion_r33691332
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/RpcUtils.scala ---
@@ -47,14 +47,22 @@ object RpcUtils {
}
/** Returns the default Spark
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6205#discussion_r33691249
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/RpcUtils.scala ---
@@ -47,14 +47,22 @@ object RpcUtils {
}
/** Returns the default Spark
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5668#issuecomment-117718869
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5668#issuecomment-117718900
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6904#issuecomment-117718899
Build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this f
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6904#issuecomment-117718862
Build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have thi
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7113#discussion_r33689791
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/math.scala
---
@@ -354,6 +354,67 @@ case class Pow(left: Expression, right: Ex
Github user MechCoder commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7086#issuecomment-117714359
@mengxr
I just checked that HashingTF inherits from Has NumFeatures so there is no
really nothing to do for the first point.
I've just added the meth
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7086#issuecomment-117714275
[Test build #36274 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36274/consoleFull)
for PR 7086 at commit
[`2715b25`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7086#issuecomment-117714049
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7086#issuecomment-117714079
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7113#discussion_r33689483
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/math.scala
---
@@ -354,6 +354,67 @@ case class Pow(left: Expression, right: Ex
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6262#discussion_r33688599
--- Diff: python/pyspark/rdd.py ---
@@ -687,13 +687,25 @@ def groupBy(self, f, numPartitions=None):
return self.map(lambda x: (f(x), x)).groupByKey
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7113#discussion_r33689223
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/math.scala
---
@@ -354,6 +354,67 @@ case class Pow(left: Expression, right: Ex
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7160#issuecomment-117713158
[Test build #36273 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36273/consoleFull)
for PR 7160 at commit
[`d976187`](https://gith
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6262#issuecomment-117713153
Could we only have two mode? Fail on non-zero code or not, then it will be
easier to understand. We can call it `checkCode`, which is False by default,
grep could work wi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7160#issuecomment-117712904
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7160#issuecomment-117712925
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7143#issuecomment-117711886
The hard part is that BinaryType could be used in ArrayType and MapType, we
need to also fix them.
As @marmbrus suggested, it's better to create a wrapper for Bin
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7160#issuecomment-117711399
[Test build #36272 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36272/console)
for PR 7160 at commit
[`381dc42`](https://github.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7160#issuecomment-117711407
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6205#issuecomment-117710841
[Test build #992 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/992/consoleFull)
for PR 6205 at commit
[`4e89c75`](https://githu
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7160#issuecomment-117710404
[Test build #36272 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36272/consoleFull)
for PR 7160 at commit
[`381dc42`](https://gith
Github user squito commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7014#issuecomment-117710355
@pwendell are you OK with the change to `ExceptionFailure`? If you're ok
w/ it, this lgtm
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have yo
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7130#issuecomment-117709756
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7130#issuecomment-117709747
[Test build #36270 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36270/console)
for PR 7130 at commit
[`f4737bb`](https://github.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7160#issuecomment-117709446
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7160#issuecomment-117709485
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7160#issuecomment-117709470
[Test build #36269 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/36269/console)
for PR 7160 at commit
[`f31f0c1`](https://github.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7160#issuecomment-117709407
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
GitHub user ilganeli opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7160
[SPARK-8733][MLLIB] ML RDD.unpersist calls should use blocking = false
Updated all usages within the ML Lib module to use blocking = false.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7013#issuecomment-117709023
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
801 - 900 of 1142 matches
Mail list logo
