Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7391#issuecomment-121148012
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7391#issuecomment-121148004
[Test build #37209 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37209/console)
for PR 7391 at commit
[`89dc797`](https://github.
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7392#discussion_r34541871
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/GenerateOrdering.scala
---
@@ -70,17 +70,27 @@ object GenerateOrdering e
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7392#issuecomment-121147857
[Test build #37213 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37213/consoleFull)
for PR 7392 at commit
[`fd45c7a`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7392#issuecomment-121147735
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7376#issuecomment-121147720
The prediction is already checked in the existing tests. I can add a check
for sum to 1 though, yes.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email an
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7392#issuecomment-121147754
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7384#discussion_r34541669
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/CoalescedRDD.scala ---
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ private[spark] case class CoalescedRDDPartition(
val pare
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7392#discussion_r34541628
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/CodeGenerator.scala
---
@@ -56,6 +56,14 @@ class CodeGenContext {
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7364#discussion_r34541643
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/master/Master.scala
---
@@ -727,40 +727,44 @@ private[master] class Master(
def removeApplic
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7392#discussion_r34541583
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/GenerateProjection.scala
---
@@ -151,85 +151,96 @@ object GenerateP
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7392#discussion_r34541509
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/expressions/MonotonicallyIncreasingID.scala
---
@@ -49,4 +55,17 @@ private[sql] case class Mono
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7392#discussion_r34541483
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/expressions/MonotonicallyIncreasingID.scala
---
@@ -49,4 +55,17 @@ private[sql] case class Mono
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7390#discussion_r34541474
--- Diff: unsafe/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/unsafe/types/Interval.java
---
@@ -43,12 +43,13 @@
* Finally is the unit name, ends with an optional "s
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6783#issuecomment-121147125
[Test build #9 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SlowSparkPullRequestBuilder/9/console)
for PR 6783 at commit
[`0493dc4`](https://github.com/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6783#issuecomment-121147149
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7241#issuecomment-121146721
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7241#issuecomment-121146662
[Test build #8 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SlowSparkPullRequestBuilder/8/console)
for PR 7241 at commit
[`2fc7291`](https://github.com/
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7348#discussion_r34541318
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/types/AbstractDataType.scala
---
@@ -96,6 +96,24 @@ private[sql] class TypeCollection(private val typ
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7392#issuecomment-121146644
[Test build #37212 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37212/consoleFull)
for PR 7392 at commit
[`12a9e12`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7392#issuecomment-121146453
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7375#discussion_r34541288
--- Diff: pom.xml ---
@@ -319,17 +306,6 @@
1.0.0
-
--- End diff --
Note that removing this from the depen
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7392#issuecomment-121146474
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
GitHub user cloud-fan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7392
[SPARK-9020][SQL] Support mutable state in code gen expressions
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/cloud-fan/spark mutable-state
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7392#issuecomment-121146269
cc @rxin
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
en
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7391#issuecomment-121146035
[Test build #37209 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37209/consoleFull)
for PR 7391 at commit
[`89dc797`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7348#issuecomment-121146059
[Test build #37210 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37210/consoleFull)
for PR 7348 at commit
[`4932d57`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7241#issuecomment-121145972
[Test build #37211 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37211/consoleFull)
for PR 7241 at commit
[`2fc7291`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7348#issuecomment-121145911
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7348#discussion_r34541015
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/types/AbstractDataType.scala
---
@@ -96,6 +96,24 @@ private[sql] class TypeCollection(private va
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7348#issuecomment-121145896
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7241#issuecomment-121145916
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7241#issuecomment-121145903
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7391#issuecomment-121145910
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7348#discussion_r34541019
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/types/AbstractDataType.scala
---
@@ -96,6 +96,24 @@ private[sql] class TypeCollection(private va
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7391#issuecomment-121145892
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7241#issuecomment-121145780
Master's tests might be in a bad state right now. If all else fails, I can
try manually running this tomorrow on my local machine to make sure that tests
pass, then c
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6783#issuecomment-121145758
[Test build #37208 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37208/consoleFull)
for PR 6783 at commit
[`0493dc4`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7390#issuecomment-121145726
[Test build #37207 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37207/consoleFull)
for PR 7390 at commit
[`57861f7`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7348#issuecomment-121145755
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7241#issuecomment-121145699
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7348#issuecomment-121145739
[Test build #37202 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37202/console)
for PR 7348 at commit
[`e4727cc`](https://github.
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7391#issuecomment-121145405
/cc @rxin
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
en
GitHub user JoshRosen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7391
[SPARK-9031] Merge BlockObjectWriter and DiskBlockObject writer to remove
abstract class
BlockObjectWriter has only one concrete non-test class,
DiskBlockObjectWriter. In order to simplify the co
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6783#issuecomment-121145024
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6783#issuecomment-121145035
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6783#issuecomment-121144971
[Test build #11 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SlowSparkPullRequestBuilder/11/consoleFull)
for PR 6783 at commit
[`0493dc4`](https://github
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7390#issuecomment-121145034
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7385#issuecomment-121145033
> @zsxwing will TaskContext.get() work for you? AFAIK we're trying to avoid
the introduction of new withContext methods when TaskContext.get() will suffice
(see some of
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7390#issuecomment-121145017
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7241#issuecomment-121144899
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6783#issuecomment-121144936
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6783#issuecomment-121144923
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7385#issuecomment-121144882
@zsxwing will `TaskContext.get()` work for you? AFAIK we're trying to
avoid the introduction of new `withContext` methods when `TaskContext.get()`
will suffice (see s
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7241#issuecomment-121144873
[Test build #37196 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37196/console)
for PR 7241 at commit
[`2fc7291`](https://github.
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7385#issuecomment-121144704
@JoshRosen thank you for fixing this. Actually, I have another requirement
for `submitJob`. Current `submitJob` signature is
```
def submitJob[T, U, R](
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5267#issuecomment-121144687
[Test build #37205 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37205/console)
for PR 5267 at commit
[`080274b`](https://github.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5267#issuecomment-121144688
Build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does n
GitHub user viirya opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7390
[Minor][SQL] Allow spaces in the beginning and ending of string for Interval
This is a minor fixing for #7355 to allow spaces in the beginning and
ending of string parsed to `Interval`.
You can merg
Github user zhichao-li commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6783#issuecomment-121144576
retest this please. [Fail by timeout after 1
minute](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37198/testReport/org.apache.spark.sql.hive.thri
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5267#issuecomment-121144033
[Test build #37205 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37205/consoleFull)
for PR 5267 at commit
[`080274b`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4960#issuecomment-121144099
[Test build #37206 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37206/consoleFull)
for PR 4960 at commit
[`32da933`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7382#issuecomment-121143886
[Test build #37203 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37203/consoleFull)
for PR 7382 at commit
[`1258bdf`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7279#issuecomment-121143509
[Test build #37204 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37204/consoleFull)
for PR 7279 at commit
[`db70dc2`](https://gith
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7348#discussion_r34540368
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/arithmetic.scala
---
@@ -48,6 +49,9 @@ case class UnaryMinus(child: Express
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4960#issuecomment-121143349
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5267#issuecomment-121143332
Build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have thi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5267#issuecomment-121143339
Build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this f
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7279#issuecomment-121143340
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7382#issuecomment-121143335
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4960#issuecomment-121143334
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7279#issuecomment-121143325
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7382#issuecomment-121143323
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user yu-iskw commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5267#issuecomment-121143278
@mengxr Sorry for the delay of my modification. I have just modified the
implementation as follows. Could you review it when you have time? I am
checking the performance
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7348#issuecomment-121143164
[Test build #37202 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37202/consoleFull)
for PR 7348 at commit
[`e4727cc`](https://gith
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4960#issuecomment-121142791
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7348#issuecomment-121142497
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7279#issuecomment-121142486
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7382#issuecomment-121142551
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7348#issuecomment-121142433
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7387#issuecomment-121141423
[Test build #37201 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37201/consoleFull)
for PR 7387 at commit
[`e8c2e09`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7387#issuecomment-121141229
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7387#issuecomment-121141206
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7387#issuecomment-121141117
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7387#issuecomment-121141101
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7387#issuecomment-121141144
[Test build #10 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SlowSparkPullRequestBuilder/10/consoleFull)
for PR 7387 at commit
[`e8c2e09`](https://github
Github user adrian-wang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7387#issuecomment-121141030
retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have thi
Github user acidghost closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6761
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is e
Github user acidghost commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7376#issuecomment-121140598
Looks good to me. There's no check that they sum to 1 or that the
prediction from probabilities is right, but I don't think is necessary
---
If your project is set up
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6783#issuecomment-121140048
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6783#issuecomment-121140029
[Test build #37198 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37198/console)
for PR 6783 at commit
[`0493dc4`](https://github.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7350#issuecomment-121139541
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7350#issuecomment-121139518
[Test build #37190 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37190/console)
for PR 7350 at commit
[`e3e96f7`](https://github.
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7385#issuecomment-121139415
[Test build #37200 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37200/consoleFull)
for PR 7385 at commit
[`1e2db7f`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7385#issuecomment-121139114
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7385#issuecomment-121139099
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7387#issuecomment-121139087
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7387#issuecomment-121139039
[Test build #37195 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37195/console)
for PR 7387 at commit
[`e8c2e09`](https://github.
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7280#issuecomment-121138135
[Test build #37199 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37199/consoleFull)
for PR 7280 at commit
[`dbf0c1b`](https://gith
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7280#issuecomment-121137898
@shivaram @davies I updated this to implicitly convert double to float
based on schema.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
r
1 - 100 of 1042 matches
Mail list logo
