Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6851#issuecomment-120874888
[Test build #37132 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37132/consoleFull)
for PR 6851 at commit
Github user adrian-wang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6851#issuecomment-120885669
oh, it seems this pr has been merged but stay unclosed...
@davies @rxin
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6851#issuecomment-120887767
@adrian-wang probably a sync problem. It was evidently merged into master.
You can just close it too.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6851#issuecomment-120889834
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6851#issuecomment-120889798
[Test build #37132 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37132/console)
for PR 6851 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7369#issuecomment-120907599
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7361#discussion_r34448213
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/evaluation/RegressionMetrics.scala
---
@@ -53,14 +53,21 @@ class
GitHub user zsxwing opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7369
[SPARK-9012][WebUI]Escape Accumulators in the task table
If running the following codes, the task table will be broken because
accumulators aren't escaped.
```
val a = sc.accumulator(1,
Github user petz2000 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7370
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
GitHub user petz2000 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7371
[SPARK-8915] [Documentation, MLlib] Added @since tags to
mllib.classification
Created since tags for methods in mllib.classification
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7368#issuecomment-120854002
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7216#issuecomment-120882986
[Test build #37133 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37133/consoleFull)
for PR 7216 at commit
Github user sun-rui commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6743#issuecomment-120893058
@shivaram , tests done. Also tested with YARN cluster, yarn-client,
standalone, createDataFrame() in YARN client mode.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user nssalian commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7362#discussion_r34455972
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/StreamingContext.scala ---
@@ -192,11 +192,8 @@ class StreamingContext private[streaming] (
GitHub user stanzhai opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7368
[SPARK-9010][Documentation]Improve the Spark Configuration document about
`spark.kryoserializer.buffer`
The meaning of spark.kryoserializer.buffer should be Initial size of
Kryo's serialization
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7354#discussion_r34452323
--- Diff:
launcher/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/launcher/package-info.java ---
@@ -17,10 +17,10 @@
/**
* Library for launching Spark
Github user darabos commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7285#issuecomment-120898722
Ah, I think this may have to be a check higher up, on the argument to
`repartition`? this looks too low level. An RDD with 0 partitions is OK, just
not repartitioning
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7285#issuecomment-120903229
It might be able to be a little lower down than `repartition`, yes, it's
that `HashPartitioner` should accept 0 partitions. Looks good for a re-test.
---
If your
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7159#issuecomment-120908482
ping @andrewor14
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7371#issuecomment-120915513
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6981#issuecomment-120853421
[Test build #1056 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/1056/console)
for PR 6981 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7353#issuecomment-120858846
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7353#issuecomment-120858820
[Test build #37129 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37129/console)
for PR 7353 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7208#issuecomment-120864936
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7208#issuecomment-120864759
[Test build #37128 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37128/console)
for PR 7208 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6851#issuecomment-120874377
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6939#issuecomment-120882412
Since https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6830 is merged and this passes,
anyone object to merging?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7285#issuecomment-120890836
@darabos are you going to update this one? I think it can be an easy fix.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7369#issuecomment-120907620
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7362#discussion_r34447480
--- Diff:
streaming/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/StreamingContextSuite.scala
---
@@ -33,8 +33,12 @@ import org.apache.spark.storage.StorageLevel
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7362#discussion_r34447432
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/StreamingContext.scala ---
@@ -192,11 +192,8 @@ class StreamingContext private[streaming] (
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7216#issuecomment-120881812
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7216#issuecomment-120881767
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7361#discussion_r34448778
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/evaluation/RegressionMetrics.scala
---
@@ -53,14 +53,21 @@ class
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7369#issuecomment-120908093
[Test build #37134 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37134/consoleFull)
for PR 7369 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6796#issuecomment-120858057
[Test build #1055 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/1055/console)
for PR 6796 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6783#issuecomment-120864255
[Test build #1057 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/1057/console)
for PR 6783 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7368#issuecomment-120864274
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7367#issuecomment-120870680
Why is this needed though?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7364#discussion_r34446919
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/master/Master.scala
---
@@ -727,40 +727,44 @@ private[master] class Master(
def
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6743#issuecomment-120874020
[Test build #37127 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37127/console)
for PR 6743 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6743#issuecomment-120874138
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7361#discussion_r34448082
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/evaluation/RegressionMetrics.scala
---
@@ -53,14 +53,21 @@ class
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7361#discussion_r34448096
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/evaluation/RegressionMetrics.scala
---
@@ -53,14 +53,21 @@ class
Github user nssalian commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7362#discussion_r34456310
--- Diff:
streaming/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/StreamingContextSuite.scala
---
@@ -33,8 +33,12 @@ import
GitHub user petz2000 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7370
[SPARK-7751] [Documentation, MLlib] Added @since tags to
mllib.classification
Created since tags for methods in mllib.classification
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by
Github user xuchenCN commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7110#issuecomment-120891504
Hi @darkcrawler01 I see the log and this patch looks good to you
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7216#issuecomment-120899796
[Test build #37133 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37133/console)
for PR 7216 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7216#issuecomment-120899858
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7285#issuecomment-120903423
[Test build #1058 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/1058/consoleFull)
for PR 7285 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7385#issuecomment-121116531
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7384#issuecomment-121116448
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
GitHub user adrian-wang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7387
[SPARK-6851] [SQL] function least/greatest follow up
This is a follow up of remaining comments from #6851
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7387#issuecomment-121121295
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7387#issuecomment-121121276
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7216#issuecomment-121124002
@piaozhexiu can you close this pr since github is not closing it
automatically? Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7372#issuecomment-121127839
[Test build #37176 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37176/console)
for PR 7372 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7241#issuecomment-121131177
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user MechCoder commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7241#issuecomment-121131134
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7241#issuecomment-121131189
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7241#issuecomment-121131202
[Test build #8 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SlowSparkPullRequestBuilder/8/consoleFull)
for PR 7241 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7241#issuecomment-121131399
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7385#discussion_r34538350
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/FutureAction.scala ---
@@ -116,57 +121,32 @@ class SimpleFutureAction[T] private[spark](jobWaiter:
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7280#issuecomment-121138135
[Test build #37199 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37199/consoleFull)
for PR 7280 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7383#issuecomment-121116147
Build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7384#issuecomment-121116136
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7383#issuecomment-121116235
[Test build #37178 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37178/consoleFull)
for PR 7383 at commit
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7385#issuecomment-121116261
@zsxwing, TD and I think that this patch's fix may eliminate the need to
introduce a new submitAsyncJob API. I'm going to push another commit in a few
minutes to add
GitHub user JoshRosen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7385
[SPARK-9026] Refactor SimpleFutureAction.onComplete to not launch separate
thread for every callback
This commit refactors SimpleFutureAction so that registering a callback
with `onComplete`
GitHub user yaoxin226 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7384
Simplfy localFraction in CoalescedRDDPartition
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/yaoxin226/spark simplfy
Alternatively you can
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7385#discussion_r34533502
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/JobWaiter.scala ---
@@ -28,12 +31,18 @@ private[spark] class JobWaiter[T](
resultHandler:
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7386#issuecomment-121116395
@piaozhexiu PTAL. Github sync is lagging so you can just look at
21d671a4b6754a6bd4c67a40db5ea8f0d09dc5c2
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7383#issuecomment-121116140
Build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user zhichao-li commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6783#discussion_r34533961
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/arithmetic.scala
---
@@ -387,3 +387,96 @@ case class MinOf(left:
Github user tarekauel commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7353#issuecomment-121118086
@davies How should we deal with this? I don't know the value of `'value`,
but it seems to be something that the parser can parse can be parsed to
`1.1.1970`.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6783#issuecomment-121117987
Build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6783#issuecomment-121117993
Build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user piaozhexiu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7216#issuecomment-121126231
Sure. Thank you for merging it!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7382#issuecomment-121126151
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user piaozhexiu closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7216
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7279#issuecomment-121126260
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7382#issuecomment-121126135
[Test build #37173 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37173/console)
for PR 7382 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6737#issuecomment-121133118
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6737#issuecomment-121133131
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user ScrapCodes commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7375#discussion_r34537727
--- Diff: pom.xml ---
@@ -1423,34 +1452,12 @@
/goals
configuration
includeScopetest/includeScope
-
Github user zhichao-li commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6783#issuecomment-121135354
retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7385#issuecomment-121139114
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6783#issuecomment-121123435
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6783#issuecomment-121123396
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7385#issuecomment-121123390
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7385#issuecomment-121123436
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7389#issuecomment-121127461
[Test build #37191 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37191/consoleFull)
for PR 7389 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7379#issuecomment-121130008
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7379#issuecomment-121130017
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7387#issuecomment-121130781
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7387#issuecomment-121130983
[Test build #37195 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37195/consoleFull)
for PR 7387 at commit
Github user yijieshen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7365#issuecomment-121135059
@davies , thanks for the tip, it's just what I need to check any
unconscious situations. :)
@davies @rxin, the pr is almost done for the current implementation, I
Github user yijieshen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7365#discussion_r34538299
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/Cast.scala
---
@@ -421,48 +421,515 @@ case class Cast(child: Expression,
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6783#issuecomment-121136231
[Test build #37198 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/37198/consoleFull)
for PR 6783 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7280#issuecomment-121137830
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
1 - 100 of 968 matches
Mail list logo
