Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8544#issuecomment-136799235
I ended up having to add some MiMa excludes. These only impact internal
classes but they are RPCs that are sent over the wire. Would be good to get
confirmation that
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8559#issuecomment-136808541
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user frodeso commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8545#issuecomment-136813226
@cloud-fan @yhuai I just did the same and came to the same conclusion. We
are not actually involved in the connector, just a user of it so no guarantees
though.
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8544#discussion_r38452084
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskInfo.scala ---
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ import org.apache.spark.annotation.DeveloperApi
class
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8504#issuecomment-136821267
@jerryshao doesn't YARN already come with a stable REST API [1] for
submitting applications? The main reason why we did it for standalone mode is
because the Master
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8557#issuecomment-136826504
[Test build #41872 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41872/console)
for PR 8557 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8557#issuecomment-136826631
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5636#issuecomment-136826444
I'll have a close look at this later today, but at a quick glance the high
level approach seems reasonable.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7976#issuecomment-136828857
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7403#discussion_r38458069
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/PairRDDFunctions.scala
---
@@ -565,12 +603,25 @@ class PairRDDFunctions[K, V](self: RDD[(K, V)])
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7976#issuecomment-136828901
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7403#discussion_r38458023
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/PairRDDFunctions.scala
---
@@ -103,13 +105,46 @@ class PairRDDFunctions[K, V](self: RDD[(K, V)])
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7976#issuecomment-136831122
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user 0x0FFF commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8556#discussion_r38460209
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/types.py ---
@@ -168,10 +168,12 @@ def needConversion(self):
return True
def toInternal(self, d):
Github user 0x0FFF commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8556#issuecomment-136836673
Added regression test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8506#issuecomment-136838302
@vanzin could you take a look?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8559#issuecomment-136800416
[Test build #41877 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41877/consoleFull)
for PR 8559 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8556#issuecomment-136806464
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8556#issuecomment-136806465
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8545#issuecomment-136813686
@frodeso This one has been merged. When we release 1.4.2, the name of that
strategy will be the same.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8358#issuecomment-136817295
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8555#issuecomment-136817048
@davies
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
GitHub user squito opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8560
[DO NOT MERGE] remove the messageScheduler since its not neeeded
just testing
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/squito/spark
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8557
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8556#discussion_r38460758
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/types.py ---
@@ -168,10 +168,12 @@ def needConversion(self):
return True
def toInternal(self, d):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8555#issuecomment-136834539
[Test build #41885 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41885/consoleFull)
for PR 8555 at commit
Github user ilganeli commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5636#issuecomment-136836260
Sure man - I'll do this shortly. Thanks.
Thank you,
Ilya Ganelin
-Original Message-
From: Imran Rashid
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8555#issuecomment-136801581
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8555#issuecomment-136801584
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user rotationsymmetry commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8552#discussion_r38449179
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/param/shared/sharedParams.scala ---
@@ -337,7 +337,7 @@ private[ml] trait HasStepSize extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8559#issuecomment-136810409
[Test build #41878 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41878/consoleFull)
for PR 8559 at commit
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8559#discussion_r38451269
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGScheduler.scala
---
@@ -1242,7 +1259,7 @@ class DAGScheduler(
Github user frodeso commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8545#issuecomment-136814280
@yhuai Thanks, much appreciated!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8358#issuecomment-136820689
[Test build #41879 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41879/consoleFull)
for PR 8358 at commit
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8543#issuecomment-136822521
@davies looks like the test needs to be modified.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8556#discussion_r38456406
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/types.py ---
@@ -168,10 +168,12 @@ def needConversion(self):
return True
def toInternal(self, d):
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7403#discussion_r38458893
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/PairRDDFunctions.scala
---
@@ -565,12 +603,25 @@ class PairRDDFunctions[K, V](self: RDD[(K, V)])
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7976#issuecomment-136840750
[Test build #41887 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41887/consoleFull)
for PR 7976 at commit
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8482#issuecomment-136840774
@romansew please submit this patch against the master branch instead. It
would be good to have a consistent fix in both newer and older branches.
---
If your
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8437#issuecomment-136842836
@JoshRosen should look at this
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user rotationsymmetry commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8552#discussion_r38443083
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/param/shared/sharedParams.scala ---
@@ -337,7 +337,7 @@ private[ml] trait HasStepSize extends
Github user feynmanliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8507#discussion_r38446219
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/clustering/GaussianMixtureModel.scala
---
@@ -159,19 +159,25 @@ object GaussianMixtureModel
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8532#discussion_r38448746
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/recommendation/ALS.scala
---
@@ -178,6 +178,7 @@ private[recommendation] trait ALSParams extends
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8545#issuecomment-136812635
@cloud-fan I did a quick of their repo. Looks like they have their own
SQLContext and refer to the `TakeOrdered` strategy at there. Looks like it is
fine that we do not
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8556#issuecomment-136825789
@0x0FFF Thanks for working on this, could you add a regression test for it?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7403#discussion_r38458197
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/PairRDDFunctions.scala
---
@@ -103,13 +105,46 @@ class PairRDDFunctions[K, V](self: RDD[(K, V)])
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8560#issuecomment-136829302
[Test build #41882 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41882/consoleFull)
for PR 8560 at commit
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7403#discussion_r38458330
--- Diff: core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/DependencySuite.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF)
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7403#discussion_r38458368
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/CoGroupedRDD.scala ---
@@ -75,7 +76,8 @@ private[spark] class CoGroupPartition(
* @param part
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7976#issuecomment-136831124
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8556#issuecomment-136798504
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8555#issuecomment-136798398
Jenkins, this is ok to test.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8545#issuecomment-136798868
I believe that we've also made other strategy renames in recent patches,
including a rename of the join selection strategy (it's no longer called
HashJoinStrategy).
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8545#issuecomment-136800201
Is that in branch 1.4? Looks like we still have `HashJoin` in 1.4 branch.
This PR changes the name of `TakeOrderedAndProject` back `TakeOrdered` for 1.4
branch. So, users
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8556#issuecomment-136800148
[Test build #41875 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41875/consoleFull)
for PR 8556 at commit
Github user squito commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8559#issuecomment-136806928
Jenkins, retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8528#discussion_r38449868
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/param/shared/SharedParamsCodeGen.scala
---
@@ -56,7 +56,8 @@ private[shared] object SharedParamsCodeGen {
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8556#issuecomment-136816836
@davies
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8513#discussion_r38454541
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/Word2Vec.scala
---
@@ -49,6 +49,17 @@ private[feature] trait Word2VecBase extends Params
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8555#issuecomment-136821873
[Test build #41880 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41880/consoleFull)
for PR 8555 at commit
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8555#discussion_r38456059
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/types.py ---
@@ -1290,8 +1290,9 @@ def can_convert(self, obj):
def convert(self, obj, gateway_client):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8514#issuecomment-136832067
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7976#issuecomment-136840867
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7976#issuecomment-136840864
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7976#issuecomment-136840860
[Test build #41887 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41887/console)
for PR 7976 at commit
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8559#discussion_r38451212
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGScheduler.scala
---
@@ -1123,8 +1133,15 @@ class DAGScheduler(
// TODO: Cancel
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8555#issuecomment-136820437
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8555#issuecomment-136820479
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8560#issuecomment-13682
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7976#issuecomment-136827809
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7976#issuecomment-136827786
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8560#issuecomment-136827811
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user eracah commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8514#issuecomment-136832080
@andrewor14 Fixed. Tested locally with
[scalastyle](http://www.scalastyle.org/)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7976#issuecomment-136832134
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7976#issuecomment-136832132
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8514#issuecomment-136832030
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8556#issuecomment-136837439
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8556#issuecomment-136837411
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8556#issuecomment-136837583
[Test build #41886 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41886/consoleFull)
for PR 8556 at commit
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8482#issuecomment-136841179
Also, I looked at the definition of `BlockStatus#isCached`. Looks like it
already takes into account external block store size? Is Tachyon somehow not
caching your
Github user massie commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7403#discussion_r38463750
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/Dependency.scala ---
@@ -76,6 +78,15 @@ class ShuffleDependency[K, V, C](
override def rdd:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8559#issuecomment-136808491
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8118
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4887#issuecomment-136819519
Sure, I'll have a look later today.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8514#issuecomment-136823930
@eracah can you fix the style errors?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8314#discussion_r38457605
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/util/random/XORShiftRandomSuite.scala ---
@@ -65,4 +65,19 @@ class XORShiftRandomSuite extends
Github user yhuai closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8545
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8555#issuecomment-136828311
[Test build #41880 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41880/console)
for PR 8555 at commit
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8314#discussion_r38457631
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/util/random/XORShiftRandomSuite.scala ---
@@ -65,4 +65,19 @@ class XORShiftRandomSuite extends
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8557#issuecomment-136829325
The failures must be spurious. One is a doc-only change; the other affects
a docker script that isn't involved in the tests here. (Actually I'm not sure
that download
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7403#discussion_r38458787
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/PairRDDFunctions.scala
---
@@ -565,12 +603,25 @@ class PairRDDFunctions[K, V](self: RDD[(K, V)])
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7403#discussion_r38458836
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/PairRDDFunctions.scala
---
@@ -103,13 +105,46 @@ class PairRDDFunctions[K, V](self: RDD[(K, V)])
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7403#discussion_r38458181
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/PairRDDFunctions.scala
---
@@ -565,12 +603,25 @@ class PairRDDFunctions[K, V](self: RDD[(K, V)])
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8514#issuecomment-136832825
[Test build #41884 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41884/consoleFull)
for PR 8514 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8555#issuecomment-136833119
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user 0x0FFF commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8555#discussion_r38461951
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/types.py ---
@@ -1290,8 +1290,9 @@ def can_convert(self, obj):
def convert(self, obj, gateway_client):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8556#issuecomment-136798468
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8556#issuecomment-136798336
Jenkins, this is ok to test.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8545#issuecomment-136800812
Ah, gotcha. They're still going to have to update for 1.5, though, and will
need to use reflection if they want to be compatible across 1.4.x and 1.5.x (or
ship
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8559#issuecomment-136806155
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
1 - 100 of 695 matches
Mail list logo
