Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8806#discussion_r39891704
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/json/JsonSuite.scala
---
@@ -1159,4 +1159,104 @@ class JsonSuite extends Query
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8825#issuecomment-141543896
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8825#issuecomment-141543857
[Test build #42680 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/42680/console)
for PR 8825 at commit
[`a0e7fc6`](https://github.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8825#issuecomment-141543900
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/42
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8768
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8806#discussion_r39891131
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/json/JsonSuite.scala
---
@@ -1159,4 +1159,104 @@ class JsonSuite extends Query
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8768#issuecomment-141541623
Thanks! Merging.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8806#discussion_r39891065
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/json/JsonSuite.scala
---
@@ -1159,4 +1159,104 @@ class JsonSuite extends Query
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8768#issuecomment-141540489
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/42
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8806#discussion_r39890833
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/json/JsonSuite.scala
---
@@ -1159,4 +1159,104 @@ class JsonSuite extends Query
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8768#issuecomment-141540485
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8768#issuecomment-141539957
[Test build #42671 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/42671/console)
for PR 8768 at commit
[`5e3361a`](https://github.
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8806#discussion_r39890261
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/json/JsonSuite.scala
---
@@ -1159,4 +1159,104 @@ class JsonSuite extends Query
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8825#issuecomment-141537831
[Test build #42680 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/42680/consoleFull)
for PR 8825 at commit
[`a0e7fc6`](https://gith
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8806#discussion_r39889891
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/json/JsonSuite.scala
---
@@ -1159,4 +1159,104 @@ class JsonSuite extends Query
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8806#discussion_r39889832
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/json/JacksonGenerator.scala
---
@@ -73,6 +73,38 @@ private[sql] object JacksonGene
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8825#issuecomment-141536602
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8825#issuecomment-141536569
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
GitHub user JoshRosen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8825
[SPARK-10704] Consolidate HashShuffleReader and ShuffleReader; refactor
ShuffleManager.getReader()
The current shuffle code has an interface named ShuffleReader with only one
implementation, Hash
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8782#issuecomment-141536508
I don't have a strong opinion on it. It looks like there is this parallel
structure for everything except the random and random-vector methods, for some
reason. But yeah
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8800#issuecomment-141536165
[Test build #42679 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/42679/consoleFull)
for PR 8800 at commit
[`e0e1a4d`](https://gith
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8806#discussion_r39889195
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/json/JacksonParser.scala
---
@@ -62,10 +62,23 @@ private[sql] object JacksonPa
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8800#issuecomment-141535625
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8800#issuecomment-141535653
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6457#issuecomment-141535317
Hi @zsxwing,
There were a couple of things that were bothering me in the code but I
couldn't really put my finger on them. Instead of trying to point them out in
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8214#issuecomment-141535347
[Test build #42678 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/42678/consoleFull)
for PR 8214 at commit
[`eac380b`](https://gith
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8806#discussion_r3981
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/json/JacksonGenerator.scala
---
@@ -73,6 +73,38 @@ private[sql] object Jackson
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8806#discussion_r3965
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/json/JacksonGenerator.scala
---
@@ -73,6 +73,38 @@ private[sql] object Jackson
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8782#issuecomment-141534938
[Test build #42677 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/42677/consoleFull)
for PR 8782 at commit
[`dae7346`](https://gith
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8805#issuecomment-141534690
Actually @yhuai and I just found the real root cause of the original issue
SPARK-10474. I'm closing this PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to t
Github user andrewor14 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8805
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8214#issuecomment-141534546
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8214#issuecomment-141534572
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user holdenk commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8615#issuecomment-141534364
So I left this running on a machine just to see if it would ever complete,
and it did although:
Finished test(python): pyspark.streaming.tests (762976s)
Finished
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8631#issuecomment-141533658
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8631#issuecomment-141533663
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/42
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8782#issuecomment-141533488
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8631#issuecomment-141533529
[Test build #42670 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/42670/console)
for PR 8631 at commit
[`854d0bb`](https://github.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8782#issuecomment-141533463
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user holdenk commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8782#issuecomment-141532528
@srowen I figured providing a general method would be easier than playing
whack-a-mole with all of the other wrapper methods, but I can either add vector
to this one or
Github user holdenk commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8785#issuecomment-141532159
Looks like good improvements, less duplicated code, although there are
still some minor style issues. You might want to merge in the latest master
branch so that tests c
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8785#discussion_r39886832
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/jdbc/JDBCSuite.scala
---
@@ -450,4 +449,12 @@ class JDBCSuite extends SparkFunSuite with
BeforeAndAfte
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8785#discussion_r39886795
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/jdbc/JDBCRelation.scala
---
@@ -75,6 +76,19 @@ private[sql] object JDBCRelation
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8785#discussion_r39886861
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/jdbc/JDBCWriteSuite.scala ---
@@ -151,4 +150,13 @@ class JDBCWriteSuite extends SharedSQLContext with
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8824#issuecomment-141525792
[Test build #42676 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/42676/consoleFull)
for PR 8824 at commit
[`dc01065`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8823#issuecomment-141525663
[Test build #42675 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/42675/consoleFull)
for PR 8823 at commit
[`1f56d2e`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8812#issuecomment-141525608
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8812#issuecomment-141525611
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/42
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8812#issuecomment-141525459
[Test build #42669 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/42669/console)
for PR 8812 at commit
[`0ffbbeb`](https://github.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8824#issuecomment-141525293
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8800#issuecomment-141525340
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8800#issuecomment-141525341
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/42
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8824#issuecomment-141525275
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8805#discussion_r39885230
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/util/collection/unsafe/sort/UnsafeExternalSorter.java
---
@@ -254,22 +281,25 @@ public int getNumberOfAlloca
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8800#issuecomment-141525164
[Test build #42672 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/42672/console)
for PR 8800 at commit
[`e133bee`](https://github.
GitHub user yhuai opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8824
[SPARK-10672] [SQL] Do not fail when we cannot save the metadata of a data
source table in a hive compatible way
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-10672
You can merge this pull request into
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8823#issuecomment-141524234
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8823#issuecomment-141524170
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8823#issuecomment-141524014
The fix is good. I only added comments. Will merge it to both master and
branch 1.5 once it passes jenkins.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this em
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8742#issuecomment-141523674
@yjshen I added the comments and create a new PR
(https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8823). Can you close this one?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
GitHub user yhuai opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8823
[SPARK-10539][SQL]Project should not be pushed down through Intersect or
Except #8742
Intersect and Except are both set operators and they use the all the
columns to compare equality between rows. Wh
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8749#discussion_r39884511
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkContext.scala ---
@@ -264,6 +264,7 @@ class SparkContext(config: SparkConf) extends Logging
with ExecutorAllo
Github user moustaki commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5059#issuecomment-141522701
Perfect, thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8749#issuecomment-141522803
[Test build #42674 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/42674/consoleFull)
for PR 8749 at commit
[`eaf6169`](https://gith
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8800#issuecomment-141522666
Will split this PR to two PRs.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not hav
Github user tedyu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8749#discussion_r39883770
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkContext.scala ---
@@ -264,6 +264,7 @@ class SparkContext(config: SparkConf) extends Logging
with ExecutorAll
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5059#issuecomment-141521839
We turned this off by default in Spark 1.5 as it was causing problems
similar to what you saw.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and ha
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8749#issuecomment-141521108
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8749#issuecomment-141521071
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user tedyu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8822#discussion_r39883150
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkContext.scala ---
@@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ class SparkContext(config: SparkConf) extends Logging
with ExecutorAlloc
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8816#issuecomment-141521035
Docs are not built by Jenkins so there is no need to run Jenkins here.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitH
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8816#issuecomment-141521056
cc @tnachen
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enab
Github user tedyu closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8822
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabl
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8749#discussion_r39883147
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkContext.scala ---
@@ -264,6 +264,7 @@ class SparkContext(config: SparkConf) extends Logging
with ExecutorAllo
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8808#issuecomment-141520379
@navis can you give us the data type that caused this problem?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as wel
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8800#discussion_r39882820
--- Diff: sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/hiveUDFs.scala
---
@@ -59,19 +59,52 @@ private[hive] class HiveFunctionRegistry(underlying:
analysi
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8749#issuecomment-141520185
Yes I agree @kmadhugit can you add a java doc to explain the semantics?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear o
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8749#issuecomment-141520083
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8822#issuecomment-141520065
OK let's close this PR then.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8808#issuecomment-141519938
Yes - I cherry-picked it now. Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8822#issuecomment-141519890
This is a duplicate. Let's move convo to
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8749 Yes, definitely not OK to expose the
mutable object.
---
If your project is set up f
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8822#issuecomment-141519586
@rxin yes that was my comment, but do you think we should add a getter for
it?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8821#issuecomment-141519458
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/42
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8822#issuecomment-141519443
[Test build #42673 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/42673/consoleFull)
for PR 8822 at commit
[`007c6d6`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8821#issuecomment-141519457
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8821#issuecomment-141519322
[Test build #42668 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/42668/console)
for PR 8821 at commit
[`a4cc671`](https://github.
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8822#discussion_r39882168
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkContext.scala ---
@@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ class SparkContext(config: SparkConf) extends Logging
with Executor
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8822#issuecomment-141519199
@srowen @JoshRosen do you guys think this is a good idea?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as we
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8822#issuecomment-141519233
-1
I don't think we should just expose an atomic variable directly.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear o
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8781#issuecomment-141518821
@tdas this looks good. Once you address the comments I can merge this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8781#discussion_r39881884
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/ThreadUtils.scala ---
@@ -86,4 +87,62 @@ private[spark] object ThreadUtils {
val threadFactory
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8781#discussion_r39881817
--- Diff: core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/util/ThreadUtilsSuite.scala
---
@@ -66,4 +66,24 @@ class ThreadUtilsSuite extends SparkFunSuite {
v
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8822#issuecomment-141518002
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8822#issuecomment-141518019
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8781#discussion_r39881618
--- Diff:
streaming/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/StreamingContextSuite.scala
---
@@ -180,6 +180,38 @@ class StreamingContextSuite extends Spa
GitHub user tedyu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8822
Expose SparkContext#stopped flag with @DeveloperApi
See this thread: http://search-hadoop.com/m/q3RTtqvncy17sSTx1
We should expose this flag to developers
@andrewor14
You can merge
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8781#discussion_r39881407
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/StreamingContext.scala ---
@@ -588,12 +588,16 @@ class StreamingContext private[streaming] (
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8781#discussion_r39881201
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/StreamingContext.scala ---
@@ -588,12 +588,16 @@ class StreamingContext private[streaming] (
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8781#discussion_r39881028
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/StreamingContext.scala ---
@@ -588,12 +588,16 @@ class StreamingContext private[streaming] (
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8800#issuecomment-141516265
[Test build #42672 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/42672/consoleFull)
for PR 8800 at commit
[`e133bee`](https://gith
301 - 400 of 618 matches
Mail list logo
