Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9565#issuecomment-155805485
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9405#discussion_r44540898
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/interfaces.scala ---
@@ -434,10 +439,7 @@ abstract class HadoopFsRelation
private[sql](maybePar
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8880#issuecomment-155805171
**[Test build #45640 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45640/consoleFull)**
for PR 8880 at commit
[`d08af32`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9627#issuecomment-155804858
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/4
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9627#issuecomment-155804798
**[Test build #45638 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45638/consoleFull)**
for PR 9627 at commit
[`717d709`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8880#issuecomment-155804445
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8880#issuecomment-155804412
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user steveloughran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9608#discussion_r44539552
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala ---
@@ -810,7 +810,7 @@ private[spark] object Utils extends Logging {
* Get the l
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9570#issuecomment-155800179
[Test build #45639 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45639/consoleFull)
for PR 9570 at commit
[`3c0f368`](https://gith
Github user jbonofre commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9487#issuecomment-155799886
You are right: it's more related to tasks. And yes, it's valid for both
completed and active tasks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email a
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9490#discussion_r44538127
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/interfaces.scala ---
@@ -604,10 +609,33 @@ abstract class HadoopFsRelation
private[sql](mayb
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9487#issuecomment-155799204
Thanks, the picture helps me think about where this should go.
This seems most related to the "Tasks" section which also reports the
locality of each task. Is it
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9405#discussion_r44537925
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/interfaces.scala ---
@@ -434,10 +439,7 @@ abstract class HadoopFsRelation
private[sql](maybe
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9630#issuecomment-155798981
**[Test build #45637 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45637/consoleFull)**
for PR 9630 at commit
[`56422c0`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9627#issuecomment-155798865
**[Test build #45638 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45638/consoleFull)**
for PR 9627 at commit
[`717d709`](https://gith
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9623#issuecomment-155797926
With this patch, CliSuite takes ~2 minutes vs. 6-7 minutes normally.
Similarly, HiveSparkSubmitSuite took ~2 minutes vs. 5+ normally.
---
If your project is s
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9570#issuecomment-155797913
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9570#issuecomment-155797875
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9565#issuecomment-155797574
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9565#issuecomment-155797524
**[Test build #45628 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45628/consoleFull)**
for PR 9565 at commit
[`1234515`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9565#issuecomment-155797577
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/4
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9630#issuecomment-155796803
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9627#issuecomment-155796807
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9630#issuecomment-155796830
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user reggert commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9264#discussion_r44536897
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/FutureAction.scala ---
@@ -105,6 +108,7 @@ trait FutureAction[T] extends Future[T] {
* A [[FutureAction]]
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9627#issuecomment-155796829
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user jbonofre commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9165#issuecomment-155796772
Hi Sean. Yes, let me prepare some "dummy" data to test different ordering.
Thanks !
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
rep
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9624#issuecomment-155796802
Before this patch, VersionsSuite took ~5-7 minutes in Jenkins; it's 2-3
minutes after.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9627#issuecomment-155796418
retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9287#issuecomment-155795676
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/4
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9630#issuecomment-155795632
cc @marmbrus
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this featur
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9287#issuecomment-155795673
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
GitHub user cloud-fan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9630
[SPARK-11656][SQL] support typed aggregate in project list
insert `aEncoder` like we do in `agg`
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.co
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9287#issuecomment-155795557
**[Test build #45630 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45630/consoleFull)**
for PR 9287 at commit
[`9f6bb88`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9628#issuecomment-155795431
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/4
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9628#issuecomment-155795429
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9628#issuecomment-155795388
**[Test build #45634 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45634/consoleFull)**
for PR 9628 at commit
[`7504c67`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9567#issuecomment-155794862
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9567#issuecomment-155794864
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/4
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9567#issuecomment-155794701
**[Test build #45631 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45631/consoleFull)**
for PR 9567 at commit
[`9fc5456`](https://git
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9629#issuecomment-155792540
**[Test build #45636 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45636/consoleFull)**
for PR 9629 at commit
[`ceef8c6`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9627#issuecomment-155792245
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9627#issuecomment-155792249
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/4
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9627#issuecomment-155792147
**[Test build #45633 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45633/consoleFull)**
for PR 9627 at commit
[`717d709`](https://git
Github user zjffdu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9490#discussion_r44534648
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/interfaces.scala ---
@@ -604,10 +609,33 @@ abstract class HadoopFsRelation
private[sql](maybePa
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9264#discussion_r44534598
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/FutureAction.scala ---
@@ -105,6 +108,7 @@ trait FutureAction[T] extends Future[T] {
* A [[FutureAction]
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9264#discussion_r44534518
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/FutureAction.scala ---
@@ -105,6 +108,7 @@ trait FutureAction[T] extends Future[T] {
* A [[FutureAction]
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9629#issuecomment-155791212
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9629#issuecomment-155791237
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9347#issuecomment-155790639
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/4
Github user reggert commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9264#discussion_r44534066
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/FutureAction.scala ---
@@ -105,6 +108,7 @@ trait FutureAction[T] extends Future[T] {
* A [[FutureAction]]
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9629#issuecomment-155790513
cc @marmbrus
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this featur
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9347#issuecomment-155790565
**[Test build #45629 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45629/consoleFull)**
for PR 9347 at commit
[`1636f72`](https://git
GitHub user cloud-fan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9629
[SQL][minor] remove newLongEncoder in functions
it may shadows the one from implicits in some case.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9628#issuecomment-155790142
**[Test build #45634 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45634/consoleFull)**
for PR 9628 at commit
[`7504c67`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9591#issuecomment-155789749
**[Test build #45635 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45635/consoleFull)**
for PR 9591 at commit
[`3806107`](https://gith
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9165#issuecomment-155789526
I think I'm still curious about what ordering this defines and whether it
works with non-numeric IDs? I think this is close to done otherwise.
---
If your project is set
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9165#discussion_r44533456
--- Diff: core/src/main/resources/org/apache/spark/ui/static/sorttable.js
---
@@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ sorttable = {
for (var i=0; i
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9591#issuecomment-155789384
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9591#issuecomment-155789366
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9591#issuecomment-155789064
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this f
Github user radekg commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9608#discussion_r44533312
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala ---
@@ -810,7 +810,7 @@ private[spark] object Utils extends Logging {
* Get the local ma
Github user radekg commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9608#discussion_r44533187
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/HttpFileServer.scala ---
@@ -42,10 +42,11 @@ private[spark] class HttpFileServer(
fileDir.mkdir()
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9628#issuecomment-155788500
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9628#discussion_r44532990
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/GroupedDataset.scala
---
@@ -127,15 +125,26 @@ class GroupedDataset[K, T] private[sql](
*/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9628#issuecomment-155788482
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
GitHub user cloud-fan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9628
[SPARK-11654][SQL] add reduce to GroupedDataset
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/cloud-fan/spark reduce
Alternatively you can
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9591#issuecomment-155788135
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9591#issuecomment-155788137
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/4
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9591#issuecomment-155788077
**[Test build #45632 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45632/consoleFull)**
for PR 9591 at commit
[`3806107`](https://git
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9627#issuecomment-155783475
**[Test build #45633 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45633/consoleFull)**
for PR 9627 at commit
[`717d709`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9627#issuecomment-155782814
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9627#issuecomment-155782795
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user cloud-fan closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9436
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is e
Github user cloud-fan closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9415
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is e
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9627#issuecomment-155782171
cc @nongli @yhuai
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user cloud-fan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9627
[SPARK-10371] [SQL][follow-up] fix code style
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/cloud-fan/spark follow
Alternatively you can re
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9591#issuecomment-155765658
**[Test build #45632 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45632/consoleFull)**
for PR 9591 at commit
[`3806107`](https://gith
Github user jacek-lewandowski commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9287#issuecomment-155764855
Rebased and more reasonably split into commits.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9591#issuecomment-155764361
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9591#issuecomment-155764339
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9567#issuecomment-155763966
**[Test build #45631 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45631/consoleFull)**
for PR 9567 at commit
[`9fc5456`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9567#issuecomment-155763378
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9567#issuecomment-155763347
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9567#issuecomment-155762877
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this f
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9287#issuecomment-155761506
**[Test build #45630 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45630/consoleFull)**
for PR 9287 at commit
[`9f6bb88`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9287#issuecomment-155759823
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9287#issuecomment-155759750
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user steveloughran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9608#discussion_r44526124
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala ---
@@ -810,7 +810,7 @@ private[spark] object Utils extends Logging {
* Get the l
Github user steveloughran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9608#discussion_r44526017
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/HttpFileServer.scala ---
@@ -42,10 +42,11 @@ private[spark] class HttpFileServer(
fileDir.mkdir()
Github user suyanNone commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4887#issuecomment-155758546
@andrewor14 , I had not make my point clearly.
This issues created because of `memory_disk_level` block not released
`unrollMemory` after that block had been put i
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9610#issuecomment-155754860
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/4
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9610#issuecomment-155754853
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9610#issuecomment-155754469
**[Test build #45618 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45618/consoleFull)**
for PR 9610 at commit
[`6deccff`](https://git
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9060#issuecomment-155752417
**[Test build #45626 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45626/consoleFull)**
for PR 9060 at commit
[`2eee7e3`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9060#issuecomment-155753066
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9060#issuecomment-155753068
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/4
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9347#issuecomment-155747220
**[Test build #45629 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45629/consoleFull)**
for PR 9347 at commit
[`1636f72`](https://gith
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9405#discussion_r44523864
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/ParquetRelation.scala
---
@@ -208,7 +208,15 @@ private[sql] class Parquet
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9625#issuecomment-155745019
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
801 - 900 of 1044 matches
Mail list logo
