Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8610#issuecomment-160001167
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/4
GitHub user viirya opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10009
[SPARK-12018][SQL] Refactor common subexpression elimination code
JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-12018
The code of common subexpression elimination can be factored and
si
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10008#issuecomment-16899
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your p
Github user viirya closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9993
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
GitHub user muxator opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10008
doc typo: "classificaion" -> "classification"
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/muxator/spark patch-1
Alternatively you can revi
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9993#issuecomment-16806
@marmbrus.Agreed. Thanks. I've not noticed there is introduced common
subexpression elimination in codegen recently. Close this now.
---
If your project is set up for it
Github user radekg commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9608#issuecomment-16247
Regarding the `TorrentBroadcast`. I think there is to be some magic done
around `blockManager.port`.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email an
Github user steveloughran commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9571#issuecomment-16264
(Note that the POMs changed to pull in some more of the codahale servlets,
though only the health checks & thread dump are being registered. Hooking up
those servl
Github user radekg commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9608#issuecomment-16205
I've added the code for 1.6. It works (tasks are successfully finishing).
However, I am not 100% sure what is the impact of this change. Would be great
if somebody accus
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9979#issuecomment-16105
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9979#issuecomment-16106
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/4
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9979#issuecomment-16056
**[Test build #46778 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46778/consoleFull)**
for PR 9979 at commit
[`1f4605e`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10001#issuecomment-15341
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10001#issuecomment-15342
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10001#issuecomment-15278
**[Test build #46777 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46777/consoleFull)**
for PR 10001 at commit
[`af508de`](https://g
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1#issuecomment-159998606
Now I gotta think hard about what I should submit using this branch when I
reopen the pull request.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1#issuecomment-159998570
:)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9571#issuecomment-159998497
**[Test build #46782 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46782/consoleFull)**
for PR 9571 at commit
[`25e77bd`](https://gith
Github user steveloughran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9991#discussion_r46008320
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/ui/SQLListenerSuite.scala
---
@@ -343,6 +343,8 @@ class SQLListenerMemoryLeakSuite ext
Github user dilipbiswal commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10001#issuecomment-159998104
@yhuai Hi Yin, in the discoverPartitions method, we are trying to create
the partition spec and are trying to cast a partition value to the
corresponding user speci
Github user markhamstra commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1#issuecomment-159997959
Reynold is just claiming all the good numbers for himself.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9571#issuecomment-159997461
**[Test build #46781 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46781/consoleFull)**
for PR 9571 at commit
[`1dcbb5f`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9571#issuecomment-159997153
**[Test build #46780 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46780/consoleFull)**
for PR 9571 at commit
[`1dcbb5f`](https://gith
Github user steveloughran commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9571#issuecomment-159996648
jenkins, test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user steveloughran commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9571#issuecomment-159996634
Added reworked design
* all metrics go through the `MetricsSystem`; the providers return an
optional `Source` from the `start()` call.
* `FsHistoryProv
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9571#issuecomment-159996343
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/4
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9571#issuecomment-159996339
**[Test build #46779 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46779/consoleFull)**
for PR 9571 at commit
[`f6bf558`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9571#issuecomment-159996342
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9990#discussion_r46007594
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLContext.scala ---
@@ -401,7 +402,7 @@ class SQLContext private[sql](
*/
@Experimental
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9571#issuecomment-159996173
**[Test build #46779 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46779/consoleFull)**
for PR 9571 at commit
[`f6bf558`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9995#issuecomment-159995282
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/4
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9995#issuecomment-159995281
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9995#issuecomment-159995211
**[Test build #46775 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46775/consoleFull)**
for PR 9995 at commit
[`95b2e0d`](https://git
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9979#issuecomment-159991328
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46778/consoleFull
is for hadoop 2.0 test.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9979#issuecomment-159991288
**[Test build #46778 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46778/consoleFull)**
for PR 9979 at commit
[`1f4605e`](https://gith
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9979#discussion_r46005696
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/client/IsolatedClientLoader.scala
---
@@ -34,23 +34,54 @@ import org.apache.spark.sql.hive.HiveCont
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10003#discussion_r46005296
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/jdbc/ProgressCassandraDialect.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10001#issuecomment-159988308
@dilipbiswal Do you know why it is broken?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10001#issuecomment-159987537
**[Test build #46777 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46777/consoleFull)**
for PR 10001 at commit
[`af508de`](https://gi
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10001#issuecomment-159986618
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enab
Github user CK50 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10003#discussion_r46004220
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/jdbc/ProgressCassandraDialect.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9961
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9976#issuecomment-159982559
**[Test build #46776 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46776/consoleFull)**
for PR 9976 at commit
[`d626bfc`](https://gith
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9990#issuecomment-159982550
> @zsxwing The one in SQLContext have a clearActive APIs, so I think don't
need WeakRef there.
Sorry. I meant the compilation failed.
---
If your project is se
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9976#issuecomment-159979553
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fea
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10003#issuecomment-159978454
@CK50 this needs some style cleanup - you can run dev/lint-scala to check
styles locally.
Can you please also attach the generated query before / after this change
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9995#issuecomment-159978503
**[Test build #46775 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46775/consoleFull)**
for PR 9995 at commit
[`95b2e0d`](https://gith
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10003#discussion_r46002799
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/jdbc/ProgressCassandraDialect.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9961#issuecomment-159977873
Thanks, I'm going to merge this to master and 1.6.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If yo
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10004#issuecomment-159977685
I wouldn't have the top level name be "PhysicalRDD" - that term just makes
no sense to users.
I'd consider just putting "Orc" there. If it is a Hive table, just sa
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9840#discussion_r46002594
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/encoders/ExpressionEncoder.scala
---
@@ -235,12 +236,13 @@ case class ExpressionEncoder[
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9858#discussion_r46002572
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/Exchange.scala ---
@@ -488,6 +488,12 @@ private[sql] case class EnsureRequirements(sqlContex
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9840#discussion_r46002504
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/encoders/ExpressionEncoder.scala
---
@@ -235,12 +236,13 @@ case class ExpressionEncoder[T](
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9995#discussion_r46002446
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -675,34 +675,34 @@ object PushPredicateThroughGenerate exte
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10001#issuecomment-159976397
@dilipbiswal , yours is the first PR after PR #1 !
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9840#discussion_r46002027
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/encoders/ExpressionEncoder.scala
---
@@ -235,12 +236,13 @@ case class ExpressionEncoder[
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1#issuecomment-159975380
wow, What an amazing achievement!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project doe
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9840#discussion_r46001855
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/encoders/EncoderResolutionSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,179 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9937#discussion_r46001738
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/encoders/ExpressionEncoder.scala
---
@@ -215,7 +215,7 @@ case class ExpressionEncoder[T]
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9937#discussion_r46001641
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/objects.scala
---
@@ -617,3 +617,31 @@ case class DecodeUsingSerializer[T](c
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8610#issuecomment-159973804
**[Test build #46774 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46774/consoleFull)**
for PR 8610 at commit
[`8232a80`](https://gith
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9937#issuecomment-159973463
Thanks for working on this. I'm not sure that this is the right tactic
though. I don't think that we want to make java bean the default fall back in
our scala reflect
Github user CodingCat commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8610#issuecomment-159972730
Jenkins, retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not ha
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8610#issuecomment-159972613
**[Test build #46768 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46768/consoleFull)**
for PR 8610 at commit
[`8232a80`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8610#issuecomment-159972642
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/4
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8610#issuecomment-159972641
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9889#discussion_r46000945
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Dataset.scala ---
@@ -579,11 +580,50 @@ class Dataset[T] private[sql](
*/
def takeAsList
Github user karlhigley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9843#discussion_r46000917
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/feature/IDF.scala ---
@@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ private object IDFModel {
newValues(k) = valu
Github user jleaniz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9849#issuecomment-159971670
Can these functions be called from PySpark somehow?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If yo
Github user steveloughran commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6935#issuecomment-159970929
The test failing is the web UI one; after hitting the web UI there's a
check on the cache metrics. The fact that `lookup.count == 1` means the 2nd GET
didn't trigg
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9859#issuecomment-159970309
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/4
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9859#issuecomment-159970290
**[Test build #46766 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46766/consoleFull)**
for PR 9859 at commit
[`449cbbb`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9859#issuecomment-159970308
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9889#issuecomment-159969380
@marmbrus Not sure if the latest code changes resolve all your concerns.
Please let me know if you have any suggestion. Thank you!
Have a good Thanksgiving D
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9993#issuecomment-159968877
I agree with @hvanhovell, this is already taken care of by common
subexpression elimination in codegen (i.e. even though the udf appears twice we
reuse the answer when
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9990#issuecomment-159967811
@zsxwing The one in SQLContext have a `clearActive` APIs, so I think don't
need WeakRef there.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9990#discussion_r45999453
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLContext.scala ---
@@ -45,9 +45,10 @@ import org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources._
import o
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9939#issuecomment-159966824
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/4
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9939#issuecomment-159966822
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9939#issuecomment-159966602
**[Test build #46773 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46773/consoleFull)**
for PR 9939 at commit
[`3fb1cda`](https://git
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10003#issuecomment-159965856
**[Test build #2119 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2119/consoleFull)**
for PR 10003 at commit
[`f2bf6ee`](https://
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10003#issuecomment-159965340
**[Test build #2119 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2119/consoleFull)**
for PR 10003 at commit
[`f2bf6ee`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9939#issuecomment-159959748
**[Test build #46773 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46773/consoleFull)**
for PR 9939 at commit
[`3fb1cda`](https://gith
Github user hhbyyh commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9939#issuecomment-159958910
This should be all for visibility review.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user hhbyyh commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9939#discussion_r45995982
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/clustering/BisectingKMeans.scala ---
@@ -407,7 +407,7 @@ private object BisectingKMeans extends Serializa
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10007#issuecomment-159952604
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10007#issuecomment-159952607
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10007#issuecomment-159952571
**[Test build #46772 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46772/consoleFull)**
for PR 10007 at commit
[`05f3edd`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10007#issuecomment-159950237
**[Test build #46772 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46772/consoleFull)**
for PR 10007 at commit
[`05f3edd`](https://gi
GitHub user yinxusen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10007
[SPARK-11987] Python API update for ChiSqSelector and QuantileDiscretizer
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-11987
For `QuantileDiscretizer`, I add a `QuantileDiscretizerModel` in
Github user mnd999 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2633#issuecomment-159947391
Did this ever make it to spark-packages.org? If not, it's a shame, but
would not be entirely surprising given how this PR was handled.
---
If your project is set up for
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10006#issuecomment-159942623
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10006#issuecomment-159942628
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10006#issuecomment-159942288
**[Test build #46771 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46771/consoleFull)**
for PR 10006 at commit
[`4c4049d`](https://g
Github user hhbyyh commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9939#discussion_r45989271
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/PCA.scala ---
@@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ object PCA extends DefaultParamsReadable[PCA] {
@Experimental
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10006#issuecomment-159936534
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10006#issuecomment-159936530
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10006#issuecomment-159936394
**[Test build #46770 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46770/consoleFull)**
for PR 10006 at commit
[`4c4049d`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10006#issuecomment-159931962
**[Test build #46771 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46771/consoleFull)**
for PR 10006 at commit
[`4c4049d`](https://gi
Github user yanboliang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10006#issuecomment-159929474
Jenkins, test this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
201 - 300 of 438 matches
Mail list logo
