Github user s-urbaniak closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10880
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user s-urbaniak commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10880#issuecomment-173949395
@srowen I apologize for the quick initiative then ;-) I'll peek through the
contributing guidelines and close this PR then.
---
If your project is set up for it,
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10851#discussion_r50589211
--- Diff: project/SparkBuild.scala ---
@@ -34,13 +34,24 @@ object BuildCommons {
private val buildLocation =
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10851#issuecomment-174052098
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10851#issuecomment-174052095
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user BryanCutler commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10598#issuecomment-174037525
@vijaykiran , I missed one line that is a bit too long, could you please
fix that, otherwise LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10851#issuecomment-174047131
**[Test build #49923 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49923/consoleFull)**
for PR 10851 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10851#issuecomment-174052043
**[Test build #49923 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49923/consoleFull)**
for PR 10851 at commit
Github user BryanCutler commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10598#discussion_r50586569
--- Diff: python/pyspark/mllib/classification.py ---
@@ -91,19 +91,21 @@ def predict(self, test):
class
Github user lresende commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9893#issuecomment-174039005
@JoshRosen For this PR to work, there is a need to manually deploy the JDBC
driver as described on the pom. This is similar to the requirement that in
order to run
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9893#issuecomment-174041948
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9893#issuecomment-174041949
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10854#issuecomment-174043438
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10854#issuecomment-174043437
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10854#issuecomment-174043284
**[Test build #49921 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49921/consoleFull)**
for PR 10854 at commit
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10868#issuecomment-174038405
Merging to master
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user gliptak commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9532#issuecomment-174032690
Two failed tests
org.apache.spark.sql.hive.ParquetMetastoreSuite.Caching converted data
source Parquet Relations0.25 sec5
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10868
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10865#issuecomment-173995099
**[Test build #2441 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2441/consoleFull)**
for PR 10865 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10868#issuecomment-174004266
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10580
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10868#issuecomment-174004263
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10868#issuecomment-174013374
LGTM.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user BryanCutler commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10601#issuecomment-174027082
Thanks @vijaykiran , this is looking much better! I made a few comments
for correction, and could you also update the PR title and description to
indicate that
Github user BryanCutler commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10602#issuecomment-174011424
Hi @somideshmukh , it looks like your changes still have a couple of
indentation problems. Maybe try changing the indent to not use the tab
character. If using
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8734#discussion_r50576539
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/tree/DecisionTreeSuite.scala ---
@@ -294,8 +295,12 @@ class DecisionTreeSuite extends SparkFunSuite with
Github user redsanket commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10838#discussion_r50576595
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/ShuffleBlockFetcherIterator.scala
---
@@ -258,6 +268,9 @@ final class ShuffleBlockFetcherIterator(
Github user BryanCutler commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10601#discussion_r50581260
--- Diff: python/pyspark/mllib/tree.py ---
@@ -305,30 +324,39 @@ def trainClassifier(cls, data, numClasses,
categoricalFeaturesInfo, numTrees,
Github user BryanCutler commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10600#issuecomment-174027903
Thanks @vijaykiran , just a couple minor corrections and would you mind
changing the PR title to indicate this is for regression.py?
---
If your project is set up
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8734#discussion_r50572835
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/tree/impl/RandomForest.scala ---
@@ -740,7 +740,11 @@ private[ml] object RandomForest extends Logging {
Github user BryanCutler commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10600#discussion_r50575904
--- Diff: python/pyspark/mllib/regression.py ---
@@ -393,27 +401,35 @@ def train(cls, data, iterations=100, step=1.0,
regParam=0.01,
set of
Github user BryanCutler commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10601#discussion_r50582414
--- Diff: python/pyspark/mllib/tree.py ---
@@ -545,28 +587,35 @@ def trainRegressor(cls, data, categoricalFeaturesInfo,
"""
Github user BryanCutler commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10601#discussion_r50582397
--- Diff: python/pyspark/mllib/tree.py ---
@@ -483,28 +517,36 @@ def trainClassifier(cls, data,
categoricalFeaturesInfo,
Method to train a
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10865#issuecomment-173995327
**[Test build #2442 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2442/consoleFull)**
for PR 10865 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9532#issuecomment-174008158
**[Test build #2443 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2443/consoleFull)**
for PR 9532 at commit
Github user shivaram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10580#issuecomment-174003522
Merging this to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user BenFradet commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10411#issuecomment-174000491
pinging @thunterdb and @jkbradley
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10868#issuecomment-174003947
**[Test build #49920 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49920/consoleFull)**
for PR 10868 at commit
Github user BryanCutler commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10598#issuecomment-174005748
I viewed in pydoc with a window size of 80 and LGTM, cc @jkbradley to take
a look. Thanks @vijaykiran!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user BryanCutler commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10610#issuecomment-174006651
ping @jkbradley , I updated to 74 character width and viewed through pydoc
to verify, it is ready for review.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user BryanCutler commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10600#discussion_r50575606
--- Diff: python/pyspark/mllib/regression.py ---
@@ -37,10 +37,11 @@ class LabeledPoint(object):
"""
Class that represents the features
Github user BryanCutler commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10600#discussion_r50575636
--- Diff: python/pyspark/mllib/regression.py ---
@@ -66,8 +67,10 @@ class LinearModel(object):
"""
A linear model that has a vector of
Github user BryanCutler commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10601#discussion_r50582231
--- Diff: python/pyspark/mllib/tree.py ---
@@ -154,21 +155,31 @@ def trainClassifier(cls, data, numClasses,
categoricalFeaturesInfo,
"""
Github user BryanCutler commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10601#discussion_r50582271
--- Diff: python/pyspark/mllib/tree.py ---
@@ -213,20 +224,28 @@ def trainRegressor(cls, data, categoricalFeaturesInfo,
"""
Github user BryanCutler commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10601#discussion_r50582335
--- Diff: python/pyspark/mllib/tree.py ---
@@ -305,30 +324,39 @@ def trainClassifier(cls, data, numClasses,
categoricalFeaturesInfo, numTrees,
Github user BryanCutler commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10601#discussion_r50582361
--- Diff: python/pyspark/mllib/tree.py ---
@@ -385,29 +413,35 @@ def trainRegressor(cls, data,
categoricalFeaturesInfo, numTrees, featureSubsetSt
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10868#issuecomment-173859325
**[Test build #2438 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2438/consoleFull)**
for PR 10868 at commit
Github user maropu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10631#issuecomment-173866941
@rxin Okay and I'll wait for that.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10878#issuecomment-173876771
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10870#issuecomment-173839201
**[Test build #49907 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49907/consoleFull)**
for PR 10870 at commit
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10845#issuecomment-173840961
retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10563#issuecomment-173840864
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10723#issuecomment-173840905
retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10563#issuecomment-173840865
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10563#issuecomment-173840651
**[Test build #49910 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49910/consoleFull)**
for PR 10563 at commit
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10870#issuecomment-173842673
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10828#issuecomment-173842603
**[Test build #2434 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2434/consoleFull)**
for PR 10828 at commit
Github user sarutak commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10873#issuecomment-173855467
LGTM but could you paste a **before** screen shot just in case.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10845#issuecomment-173855055
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user dragos commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10370#issuecomment-173875166
@jayv do you have time to work on this, or should I?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
GitHub user jaceklaskowski opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10878
[STREAMING][MINOR] Scaladoc + logs
Found while doing code review
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/jaceklaskowski/spark
GitHub user curriedegg opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10879
Branch 1.6
Will try to Improve parquet performance on s3 with DirectOutputCommiter and
Append Mode
Current State
Driver copies objects from staging then deletes
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10877#issuecomment-173859650
**[Test build #49917 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49917/consoleFull)**
for PR 10877 at commit
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10845#issuecomment-173861317
@rxin Sure.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10845#issuecomment-173870840
**[Test build #49918 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49918/consoleFull)**
for PR 10845 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10723#issuecomment-173876983
**[Test build #49916 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49916/consoleFull)**
for PR 10723 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10723#issuecomment-173877197
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10723#issuecomment-173877198
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10639#discussion_r50517513
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/optim/IterativelyReweightedLeastSquaresSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,219 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10865#issuecomment-173872289
**[Test build #2436 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2436/consoleFull)**
for PR 10865 at commit
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10723#issuecomment-173877661
@hvanhovell the tests are passed. Can you help review this? Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10879#issuecomment-173877589
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
GitHub user nishkamravi2 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10881
[SPARK-12967][Netty] Avoid NettyRpc error message during sparkContext
shutdown
If the there's an RPC issue while sparkContext is alive but stopped (which
would happen only when executing
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10881#issuecomment-174081009
**[Test build #49924 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49924/consoleFull)**
for PR 10881 at commit
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8734#discussion_r50601582
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/tree/DecisionTreeSuite.scala ---
@@ -331,12 +336,62 @@ class DecisionTreeSuite extends SparkFunSuite
Github user lresende commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9893#issuecomment-174070205
Jenkins, this is ok to test.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10870#issuecomment-173839382
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10870#issuecomment-173839624
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10870#issuecomment-173839383
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10845#discussion_r50514078
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/HiveTypeCoercion.scala
---
@@ -406,6 +406,105 @@ object HiveTypeCoercion {
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10845#issuecomment-173853848
@viirya rather than me pointing out all the problem in each iteration, can
you try figuring out all the corner cases yourself and then submit this for
review? Thanks.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10723#issuecomment-173839876
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10723#issuecomment-173839873
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10723#issuecomment-173839756
**[Test build #49905 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49905/consoleFull)**
for PR 10723 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10868#issuecomment-173848963
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10868#issuecomment-173848966
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10868#issuecomment-173848916
**[Test build #49912 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49912/consoleFull)**
for PR 10868 at commit
GitHub user viirya opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10877
[SPARK-12950][SQL] Cache newly accessed hashtable entry in BytesToBytesMap
JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-12950
As described in JIRA, it is observed that when aggregate
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10865#issuecomment-173854771
**[Test build #2436 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2436/consoleFull)**
for PR 10865 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10854#issuecomment-173854809
**[Test build #2437 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2437/consoleFull)**
for PR 10854 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10563#issuecomment-173838406
Build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10563#issuecomment-173838407
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10829#issuecomment-173838255
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10829#issuecomment-173838158
**[Test build #49913 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49913/consoleFull)**
for PR 10829 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10563#issuecomment-173838190
**[Test build #49903 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49903/consoleFull)**
for PR 10563 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8872#issuecomment-173841919
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8872#issuecomment-173841915
**[Test build #49914 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49914/consoleFull)**
for PR 8872 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8872#issuecomment-173841921
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8872#issuecomment-173841613
**[Test build #49914 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49914/consoleFull)**
for PR 8872 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10854#issuecomment-173841716
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
1 - 100 of 224 matches
Mail list logo
