Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10960#issuecomment-176068656
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10739#issuecomment-176069009
Read
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SPARK/Contributing+to+Spark first.
You may want to search for duplicate JIRAs too. There are several on this topic
and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10968#issuecomment-176080459
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10968#issuecomment-176080460
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10723#issuecomment-176049783
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10723#issuecomment-176049782
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user jerryshao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10959#discussion_r51092784
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/master/MasterSource.scala ---
@@ -42,6 +42,6 @@ private[spark] class MasterSource(val master:
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10469#issuecomment-176057088
**[Test build #50267 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50267/consoleFull)**
for PR 10469 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10922#issuecomment-176157120
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10922#issuecomment-176157117
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9532#issuecomment-176154928
**[Test build #50273 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50273/consoleFull)**
for PR 9532 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10922#issuecomment-176156921
**[Test build #50275 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50275/consoleFull)**
for PR 10922 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9532#issuecomment-176186278
I'm sort of surprised that it was not necessary to update the file listing
all of the project dependencies?
The change is looking fairly good, except that the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9532#issuecomment-176155359
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9532#issuecomment-176155365
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user levin-royl commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10739#issuecomment-176178297
Hi, there are indeed some similar issues I found, e.g.:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-4039
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-1212
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9532#issuecomment-176113342
**[Test build #50273 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50273/consoleFull)**
for PR 9532 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10890#issuecomment-176115457
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10890#issuecomment-176115460
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10890#issuecomment-176115335
**[Test build #50271 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50271/consoleFull)**
for PR 10890 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10966#issuecomment-176123187
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10966#issuecomment-176123063
**[Test build #50269 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50269/consoleFull)**
for PR 10966 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10922#issuecomment-176112499
**[Test build #50270 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50270/consoleFull)**
for PR 10922 at commit
Github user jaceklaskowski commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10946#issuecomment-176115262
I'd appreciate having it merged since the current master is broken without
the fix - checked early morning today.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10890
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10890#issuecomment-176121885
Merged to master
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10762#issuecomment-176123877
**[Test build #50274 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50274/consoleFull)**
for PR 10762 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10874#issuecomment-176142187
**[Test build #50272 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50272/consoleFull)**
for PR 10874 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10890#issuecomment-176104639
Jenkins, retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10874#issuecomment-176105036
Jenkins, retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10922#issuecomment-176104800
Jenkins, retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10966#issuecomment-17614
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10966#issuecomment-176110426
**[Test build #50268 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50268/consoleFull)**
for PR 10966 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10966#issuecomment-17622
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10922#issuecomment-176114766
**[Test build #50270 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50270/consoleFull)**
for PR 10922 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10922#issuecomment-176114773
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10922#issuecomment-176114772
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user adrian-wang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10762#discussion_r51106564
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -919,6 +919,7 @@ object PushPredicateThroughJoin
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10966#issuecomment-176123185
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9532#issuecomment-176103990
Jenkins, retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10723#discussion_r51105544
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/antlr3/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/parser/SparkSqlLexer.g
---
@@ -465,7 +467,7 @@ Identifier
fragment
Github user tejasapatil commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10849#issuecomment-176122957
@marmbrus : Updated the title and description.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10922#issuecomment-176124334
**[Test build #50275 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50275/consoleFull)**
for PR 10922 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10874#issuecomment-176107969
**[Test build #50272 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50272/consoleFull)**
for PR 10874 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10890#issuecomment-176109173
**[Test build #50271 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50271/consoleFull)**
for PR 10890 at commit
Github user ScrapCodes commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10892#discussion_r51106802
--- Diff:
external/akka/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/akka/ActorReceiver.scala
---
@@ -90,6 +90,48 @@ object ActorReceiver {
Github user ScrapCodes commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10892#issuecomment-176122545
@CodingCat and @zsxwing Thanks for the PR and letting me take a look, I am
a bit unsure about having these as API methods. I want to know what others
opinion is on
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10723#discussion_r51107309
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/antlr3/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/parser/SparkSqlLexer.g
---
@@ -465,7 +467,7 @@ Identifier
fragment
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10762#issuecomment-176127037
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10762#issuecomment-176127014
**[Test build #50274 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50274/consoleFull)**
for PR 10762 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10762#issuecomment-176127032
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10874#issuecomment-176142622
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10874#issuecomment-176142614
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user tgravescs commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10648#issuecomment-176299122
mostly looks good a few more minor things.
- can you highlight the page you are on
- file a jira to have attemptid always show up in rest api so spark
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10841#issuecomment-176299436
**[Test build #50278 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50278/consoleFull)**
for PR 10841 at commit
Github user cowtowncoder commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10256#issuecomment-176300804
I know this issue is closed, but one suggestion I have would be to specify
the latest Jackson 2.5 version, 2.5.5 instead of 2.5.3. While I understand
caution in
Github user zhuoliu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10648#issuecomment-176303757
JIRA file here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-13064
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user cowtowncoder commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10256#issuecomment-176310354
@srowen Ah. Yes, just wanted to mention it; I don't have enough context so
there may be specific reasons for picking up particular versions. Glad to see
version
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10762#issuecomment-176310229
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10968#issuecomment-176314290
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user holdenk commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10962#issuecomment-176323543
Looking at params.scala shouldOwn uses a require which we should probably
stay consistent with (not saying we _shouldn't_ change it per-se just if we do
we should
Github user sethah commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10962#issuecomment-176325696
Good point about mirroring Scala. In that case, it is probably best not to
change it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10762#discussion_r51159429
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/CheckAnalysis.scala
---
@@ -104,6 +105,9 @@ trait CheckAnalysis {
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10968#issuecomment-176305245
**[Test build #2468 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2468/consoleFull)**
for PR 10968 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10762#issuecomment-176311144
**[Test build #50282 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50282/consoleFull)**
for PR 10762 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10968#issuecomment-176314296
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10968#issuecomment-176314889
**[Test build #50283 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50283/consoleFull)**
for PR 10968 at commit
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10960#issuecomment-176315428
@davies Did you get a chance to test whole-stage codegen with higher-order
statistics like skewness? If it works, the cleanest solution would be changing
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10966#issuecomment-176318629
I remember @tdas was considering the scalability of this approach.
Replaying event logs for a long running Streaming application is terrible.
Ideally, there should be
Github user sethah commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10962#issuecomment-176319087
I wonder if there is support for also changing `_shouldOwn` to return
True/False instead of True/ValueError? The only placed it is currently used is
in `_resolveParam`,
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10630#discussion_r51163511
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -388,57 +445,18 @@ class Analyzer(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10841#issuecomment-176325012
Build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10841#issuecomment-176325002
**[Test build #50284 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50284/consoleFull)**
for PR 10841 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10841#issuecomment-176325014
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user nongli commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10944#discussion_r51166249
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/WholeStageCodegen.scala
---
@@ -162,37 +206,48 @@ case class InputAdapter(child: SparkPlan)
Github user maropu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10928#issuecomment-176517539
I'm not sure how to fix though, there is the idea I have; we just throw an
unsupported exception when this type passed. This is because an array type
actually is unique
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10963#issuecomment-176522869
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user maropu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10901#issuecomment-176522896
@marmbrus This is a trivial fix, so could you check this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10963#issuecomment-176522874
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9893#issuecomment-176523842
**[Test build #50319 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50319/consoleFull)**
for PR 9893 at commit
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10972#discussion_r51217905
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/ParquetRelation.scala
---
@@ -799,9 +799,31 @@ private[sql] object
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10757#issuecomment-176524236
**[Test build #2471 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2471/consoleFull)**
for PR 10757 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9893#issuecomment-176524163
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9893#issuecomment-176524164
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10950#issuecomment-176526553
**[Test build #50329 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50329/consoleFull)**
for PR 10950 at commit
Github user tnachen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10057#issuecomment-176526642
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10954#issuecomment-176528787
spark-test-tags is declared with a test dependency in the root pom, and the
scope is inherited. You can check these things with `mvn dependency:tree`.
---
If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10972#issuecomment-176532399
**[Test build #50331 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50331/consoleFull)**
for PR 10972 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10924#issuecomment-176544434
**[Test build #50334 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50334/consoleFull)**
for PR 10924 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10973#issuecomment-176545687
**[Test build #50335 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50335/consoleFull)**
for PR 10973 at commit
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10916#discussion_r51221439
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/client/ClientInterface.scala
---
@@ -109,6 +109,9 @@ private[hive] trait ClientInterface {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10972#issuecomment-176550457
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10972#issuecomment-176550456
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10608#issuecomment-176552575
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10608#issuecomment-176552578
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10904#issuecomment-176555212
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9657#discussion_r51222766
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/InsertIntoHadoopFsRelation.scala
---
@@ -57,7 +57,8 @@ import
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9657#discussion_r51222742
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/DataSourceStrategy.scala
---
@@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ private[sql] object
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10904#issuecomment-176555211
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10904#issuecomment-176562480
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
401 - 500 of 627 matches
Mail list logo
