Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10998#issuecomment-178870796
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10998#issuecomment-178870799
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10998#issuecomment-178870708
**[Test build #50598 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50598/consoleFull)**
for PR 10998 at commit
[`0c52897`](https://g
GitHub user zsxwing opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11034
Add FileStreamSource and a simple version of FileStreamSink
`FileStreamSource` is an implementation of
`org.apache.spark.sql.execution.streaming.Source`. It takes advantage of the
existing `Hadoop
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11030#discussion_r51649279
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/memory.scala
---
@@ -131,8 +139,13 @@ class MemorySink(schema: StructType) exten
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11034#issuecomment-178872016
@marmbrus @tdas Please take a look.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11019#issuecomment-178872055
**[Test build #2494 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2494/consoleFull)**
for PR 11019 at commit
[`2c2b007`](https://g
Github user mgummelt commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10993#discussion_r51649684
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/mesos/CoarseMesosSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -245,99 +239,182 @@ private[spark] class Co
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11032#discussion_r51649811
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/CodeFormatter.scala
---
@@ -33,8 +33,15 @@ private class CodeFormatter
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10844#issuecomment-178873146
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10844#issuecomment-178873147
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11030#discussion_r51650418
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataStreamWriter.scala ---
@@ -84,6 +84,17 @@ final class DataStreamWriter private[sql](df: DataFrame
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11032#discussion_r51650399
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/CodeFormatter.scala
---
@@ -33,8 +33,15 @@ private class CodeFormatte
Github user mgummelt commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10993#discussion_r51650484
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/mesos/CoarseMesosSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -245,99 +239,182 @@ private[spark] class Co
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10844#issuecomment-178873821
**[Test build #50603 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50603/consoleFull)**
for PR 10844 at commit
[`2bd2735`](https://gi
Github user mgummelt commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10993#discussion_r51650781
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/mesos/CoarseMesosSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -245,99 +239,182 @@ private[spark] class Co
Github user mgummelt commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10993#discussion_r51650895
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/mesos/CoarseMesosSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -245,99 +239,182 @@ private[spark] class Co
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11034#issuecomment-178875023
**[Test build #50604 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50604/consoleFull)**
for PR 11034 at commit
[`a2784ff`](https://gi
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11030#discussion_r51651322
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/memory.scala
---
@@ -46,6 +47,8 @@ case class MemoryStream[A : Encoder](id: Int,
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11031#issuecomment-178875431
**[Test build #50590 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50590/consoleFull)**
for PR 11031 at commit
[`224916f`](https://g
Github user mgummelt commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10993#discussion_r51651630
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/mesos/CoarseMesosSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -245,99 +239,182 @@ private[spark] class Co
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11031#issuecomment-178875628
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11031#issuecomment-178875627
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user mgummelt commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10993#discussion_r51651674
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/mesos/CoarseMesosSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -245,99 +239,182 @@ private[spark] class Co
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11031#issuecomment-178876202
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fe
Github user tedyu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11006#discussion_r51652148
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataStreamReader.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,127 @@
+/*
+* Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (
Github user mgummelt commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10993#discussion_r51652453
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/mesos/CoarseMesosSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -373,40 +451,25 @@ private[spark] class Coa
Github user mgummelt commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10993#discussion_r51652632
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/mesos/CoarseMesosSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -426,23 +489,23 @@ private[spark] class Coa
Github user mgummelt commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10993#discussion_r51652611
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/mesos/CoarseMesosSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -245,99 +239,182 @@ private[spark] class Co
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10319#issuecomment-178879167
**[Test build #50593 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50593/consoleFull)**
for PR 10319 at commit
[`75887c4`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10841#issuecomment-178879266
**[Test build #50607 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50607/consoleFull)**
for PR 10841 at commit
[`a507f74`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10319#issuecomment-178879307
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10319#issuecomment-178879309
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10841#issuecomment-178881873
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10841#issuecomment-178881868
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11031#issuecomment-178882145
**[Test build #50606 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50606/consoleFull)**
for PR 11031 at commit
[`224916f`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10841#issuecomment-178881831
**[Test build #50607 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50607/consoleFull)**
for PR 10841 at commit
[`a507f74`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10993#issuecomment-178882985
**[Test build #50608 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50608/consoleFull)**
for PR 10993 at commit
[`0a1181a`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11032#issuecomment-178882684
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11032#issuecomment-178882689
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10953#issuecomment-178884266
**[Test build #50609 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50609/consoleFull)**
for PR 10953 at commit
[`8fae471`](https://gi
Github user tedyu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11006#discussion_r51654597
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/StreamExecution.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,211 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user tedyu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11006#discussion_r51654640
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/StreamExecution.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,211 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11032#issuecomment-178885367
**[Test build #2495 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2495/consoleFull)**
for PR 11032 at commit
[`5849d9b`](https://g
GitHub user cloud-fan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11035
[SPARK-13101][SQL] nullability of array type element should not fail
analysis of encoder
nullability should only be considered as an optimization rather than part
of the type system, so instead
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11035#issuecomment-178886327
cc @marmbrus @liancheng
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10953#issuecomment-178886459
**[Test build #50609 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50609/consoleFull)**
for PR 10953 at commit
[`8fae471`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10953#issuecomment-178886470
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10953#issuecomment-178886469
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user markgrover commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10953#issuecomment-178887726
Jenkins, test this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11012#issuecomment-178887920
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11035#discussion_r51656127
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/encoders/EncoderResolutionSuite.scala
---
@@ -32,94 +34,49 @@ case class StringIntClas
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11035#issuecomment-178889598
**[Test build #50611 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50611/consoleFull)**
for PR 11035 at commit
[`aa07e56`](https://gi
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10922#discussion_r51656405
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/SparkListener.scala ---
@@ -296,6 +296,17 @@ class StatsReportListener extends SparkListener with
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10953#issuecomment-178891202
**[Test build #50613 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50613/consoleFull)**
for PR 10953 at commit
[`7dcb848`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10953#issuecomment-178891812
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10953#issuecomment-178892002
**[Test build #50610 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50610/consoleFull)**
for PR 10953 at commit
[`7dcb848`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10953#issuecomment-178891802
**[Test build #50613 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50613/consoleFull)**
for PR 10953 at commit
[`7dcb848`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10953#issuecomment-178891809
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11012#issuecomment-178892226
**[Test build #50612 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50612/consoleFull)**
for PR 11012 at commit
[`5207fb4`](https://gi
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10914#discussion_r51656765
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkContext.scala ---
@@ -531,13 +531,14 @@ class SparkContext(config: SparkConf) extends Logging
with Exe
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10914#discussion_r51656829
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkContext.scala ---
@@ -531,13 +531,14 @@ class SparkContext(config: SparkConf) extends Logging
with Exe
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10953#issuecomment-178892440
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10953#issuecomment-178892437
**[Test build #50610 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50610/consoleFull)**
for PR 10953 at commit
[`7dcb848`](https://g
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10914#discussion_r51656963
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala ---
@@ -2212,9 +2212,9 @@ private[spark] object Utils extends Logging {
* incompati
GitHub user mbautin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11036
[SPARK-12291] [SQL] Establish a link between SparkPlan and LogicalPlan nodes
This is a prerequisite for reusing RDDs corresponding to shared query
fragments between different Spark SQL queries,
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10914#issuecomment-178893105
@zjffdu the latest changes look more complicated than before. I think it
would be best to achieve the following:
- all checks involving the conf should be in
`Ut
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11036#issuecomment-178893385
**[Test build #50614 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50614/consoleFull)**
for PR 11036 at commit
[`b79fd07`](https://gi
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10319#issuecomment-178893454
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10319#discussion_r51657811
--- Diff: docs/running-on-mesos.md ---
@@ -387,6 +387,13 @@ See the [configuration page](configuration.html) for
information on Spark config
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11019#issuecomment-178895272
**[Test build #2494 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2494/consoleFull)**
for PR 11019 at commit
[`2c2b007`](https://
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10319#issuecomment-178897207
**[Test build #50616 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50616/consoleFull)**
for PR 10319 at commit
[`75887c4`](https://gi
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11036#issuecomment-178897362
Did you link to the corrected JIRA ticket? And what's your whole design?
This is a big change and we need to discuss if it worth.
---
If your project is set up for i
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10808#discussion_r51658411
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/mesos/MesosSchedulerUtils.scala
---
@@ -340,4 +347,24 @@ private[mesos] trait MesosSched
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11035#issuecomment-178898451
**[Test build #50611 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50611/consoleFull)**
for PR 11035 at commit
[`aa07e56`](https://g
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10808#discussion_r51658530
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/executor/MesosExecutorBackend.scala ---
@@ -81,6 +88,16 @@ private[spark] class MesosExecutorBackend
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11035#issuecomment-178898496
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11035#issuecomment-178898495
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10930#issuecomment-178900829
LGTM. Merging to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have thi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10953#issuecomment-178901409
**[Test build #50615 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50615/consoleFull)**
for PR 10953 at commit
[`edfca9f`](https://gi
Github user liancheng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11035#issuecomment-178901752
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10908#issuecomment-178901804
**[Test build #2493 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2493/consoleFull)**
for PR 10908 at commit
[`2ea2d54`](https://
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10989#issuecomment-178901909
**[Test build #2496 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2496/consoleFull)**
for PR 10989 at commit
[`4d75022`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10844#issuecomment-178902239
**[Test build #50603 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50603/consoleFull)**
for PR 10844 at commit
[`2bd2735`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11036#issuecomment-178902429
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11036#issuecomment-178902371
**[Test build #50614 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50614/consoleFull)**
for PR 11036 at commit
[`b79fd07`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11036#issuecomment-178902428
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10844#issuecomment-178902496
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10844#issuecomment-178902501
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11035#issuecomment-178902743
**[Test build #50617 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50617/consoleFull)**
for PR 11035 at commit
[`aa07e56`](https://gi
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11030#discussion_r51660015
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/ContinuousQueryManager.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,106 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Fo
Github user mbautin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11036#issuecomment-178902964
Sorry -- linked to the wrong JIRA ticket. Should be
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-12991.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this emai
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10678#discussion_r51660099
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -521,38 +522,96 @@ class Analyzer(
*/
ob
Github user mbautin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11036#issuecomment-178903997
@cloud-fan : the whole design for the feature this is needed for (query
fragment RDD reuse) is at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-11838,
but this seems to b
GitHub user davies opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11037
[SPARK-13150] [SQL] disable two flaky tests
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/davies/spark disable_flaky
Alternatively you can re
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11037#issuecomment-178903950
cc @liancheng
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11030#discussion_r51660259
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/QueryException.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11030#discussion_r51660396
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLContext.scala ---
@@ -845,6 +847,16 @@ class SQLContext private[sql](
}
/**
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11030#discussion_r51660427
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SinkStatus.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF)
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11030#discussion_r51660438
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/ContinuousQuery.scala ---
@@ -17,11 +17,45 @@
package org.apache.spark.sql
+impor
1 - 100 of 835 matches
Mail list logo
