Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8#issuecomment-182980915
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8#issuecomment-182980939
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9893#issuecomment-182981619
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9893#issuecomment-182981415
**[Test build #51107 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/51107/consoleFull)**
for PR 9893 at commit
[`a03da4a`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9893#issuecomment-182981622
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/5
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10949#issuecomment-182981995
**[Test build #51113 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/51113/consoleFull)**
for PR 10949 at commit
[`6c934bd`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10949#issuecomment-182982311
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10949#issuecomment-182982308
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11166#issuecomment-182982724
LGTM. Merging to master
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have th
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11166
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11086#issuecomment-182986048
There is already `checkAggregatesWithTol` defined in that class, is that
sufficient?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
r
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11157#issuecomment-182985985
**[Test build #51108 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/51108/consoleFull)**
for PR 11157 at commit
[`a4e575d`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11157#issuecomment-182986275
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11157#issuecomment-182986270
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10838#issuecomment-182993003
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10838#issuecomment-182992993
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11162#issuecomment-182994760
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fe
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10838#issuecomment-182991688
**[Test build #51118 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/51118/consoleFull)**
for PR 10838 at commit
[`f0778af`](https://g
Github user markgrover commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11143#issuecomment-182996634
Thanks Mario. Do let us know what you think @tdas
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10598#discussion_r52644739
--- Diff: python/pyspark/mllib/classification.py ---
@@ -272,37 +275,42 @@ def train(cls, data, iterations=100, step=1.0,
miniBatchFraction=1.0,
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11048#discussion_r52644696
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SparkQl.scala ---
@@ -62,6 +66,458 @@ private[sql] class SparkQl(conf: ParserConf =
Simp
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11153#discussion_r52645515
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/AnalysisSuite.scala
---
@@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ class AnalysisSuite extends AnalysisTe
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11164#discussion_r52645513
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/mesos/CoarseMesosSchedulerBackendSuite.scala
---
@@ -195,19 +195,6 @@ class CoarseMesosS
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8#issuecomment-183001005
**[Test build #2536 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2536/consoleFull)**
for PR 8 at commit
[`04f5385`](https://
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11164#issuecomment-183001176
This test was added recently in #10993 so this is just reverting the test
instead of reverting the whole patch. I do think we should use `ignore` since
that's what w
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10876#discussion_r52645800
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/functions.py ---
@@ -254,15 +254,44 @@ def corr(col1, col2):
>>> a = [x * x - 2 * x + 3.5 for x in range(20)]
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11164#issuecomment-183001260
Also @mgummelt can you either file a JIRA or add the same JIRA to the title
of this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and hav
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11153#discussion_r52646199
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -572,98 +572,64 @@ class Analyzer(
// Skip sort
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11162#issuecomment-183002962
**[Test build #51122 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/51122/consoleFull)**
for PR 11162 at commit
[`26e9ad1`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8#issuecomment-183004244
**[Test build #51119 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/51119/consoleFull)**
for PR 8 at commit
[`04f5385`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8#issuecomment-183005153
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8#issuecomment-183005159
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user sitalkedia commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11167#issuecomment-183006784
As you can see from the jstack of the driver http://pastebin.com/m8CP6VMv.
The dag-scheduler-event-loop thread has taken a lock and is spending a lot of
time in the
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11170#issuecomment-183007352
@rxin Aggregation and joins have the same numOutputRows as without codegen,
only datasize and spillsize are not included in this PR, because I think they
are not impleme
Github user skonto commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11157#issuecomment-183007371
Jenkins, test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have t
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11153#discussion_r52648798
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -572,98 +572,64 @@ class Analyzer(
// Skip sort
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11167#issuecomment-183010519
OK, but the JIRA describes a deadlock, or at least that's how it reads.
@kayousterhout does that sound right? it sounds OK.
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user sitalkedia commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11167#issuecomment-183011444
Sorry, I did not make it clear. Its not a deadlock, the lock is held for a
very long time.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and ha
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11157#issuecomment-183012282
**[Test build #51123 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/51123/consoleFull)**
for PR 11157 at commit
[`a4e575d`](https://gi
Github user hvanhovell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11048#issuecomment-183012248
@viirya I have made an initial pass. This PR is large enough as it is, lets
not more commands to it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this ema
Github user hvanhovell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11051#issuecomment-183012725
@shaneknapp thanks for your help! Any idea what caused this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub a
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11051#issuecomment-183013147
**[Test build #51120 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/51120/consoleFull)**
for PR 11051 at commit
[`f3c7bbb`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11153#issuecomment-183013099
**[Test build #51124 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/51124/consoleFull)**
for PR 11153 at commit
[`dce3857`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11051#issuecomment-183013527
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11051#issuecomment-183013525
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10706#issuecomment-183013945
@hvanhovell Can you help to look at this one? I'd like to split this out as
small PRs, hopefully we can merge part of them into 2.0.
---
If your project is set up for i
Github user shaneknapp commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11051#issuecomment-183017267
the GHPRB plugin is finicky, obtuse and opaque in it's operations. i have
no idea why it decided to not trigger, and the logs don't show anything.
sorry...
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8880#discussion_r52651983
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/crypto/CryptoStreamUtils.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,98 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10953#issuecomment-183021465
**[Test build #51125 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/51125/consoleFull)**
for PR 10953 at commit
[`9983e7d`](https://gi
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11167#discussion_r52653078
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSetManager.scala ---
@@ -177,13 +177,15 @@ private[spark] class TaskSetManager(
Github user shaneknapp commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9893#issuecomment-183021435
jenkins, test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not hav
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10838#discussion_r52653425
--- Diff: docs/configuration.md ---
@@ -392,6 +392,16 @@ Apart from these, the following properties are also
available, and may be useful
Github user kayousterhout commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11167#issuecomment-183022065
Thanks for fixing this! You're right that the change you linked to is
broken; when I removed the readding parameter, I should have killed the
if-statement. I upda
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10838#discussion_r52654346
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/ShuffleBlockFetcherIterator.scala
---
@@ -153,9 +158,11 @@ final class ShuffleBlockFetcherIterator(
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10838#issuecomment-183027600
@redsanket most of my comments are minor. Otherwise LGTM.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10838#discussion_r52653512
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/ShuffleBlockFetcherIterator.scala
---
@@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ import org.apache.spark.util.Utils
*
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10838#discussion_r52653442
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/ShuffleBlockFetcherIterator.scala
---
@@ -169,7 +176,10 @@ final class ShuffleBlockFetcherIterator(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10953#issuecomment-183032502
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10953#issuecomment-183032500
Build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10953#issuecomment-183032489
**[Test build #51125 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/51125/consoleFull)**
for PR 10953 at commit
[`9983e7d`](https://g
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8880#discussion_r52656157
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/crypto/ShuffleEncryptionSuite.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,107 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Founda
Github user hvanhovell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10706#issuecomment-183033654
@davies sure, no problem.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not ha
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9893#issuecomment-183033927
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/5
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9893#issuecomment-183033924
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8880#discussion_r52656379
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/crypto/ShuffleEncryptionSuite.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,107 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Founda
Github user sitalkedia commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11167#issuecomment-183034458
Thanks @kayousterhout. I updated the comment accordingly.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as w
Github user shaneknapp commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9893#issuecomment-183034983
argh git timeout. jenkins, test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your p
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8880#issuecomment-183039809
**[Test build #51121 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/51121/consoleFull)**
for PR 8880 at commit
[`e92bb20`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8880#issuecomment-183040354
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8880#issuecomment-183040357
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/5
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9893#issuecomment-183043137
**[Test build #51127 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/51127/consoleFull)**
for PR 9893 at commit
[`a03da4a`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11162#issuecomment-183044250
**[Test build #51122 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/51122/consoleFull)**
for PR 11162 at commit
[`26e9ad1`](https://g
GitHub user spektom opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11173
Added missing utility method
Without this method it's impossible to create Kafka direct stream without
offsets but with custom message handler function.
You can merge this pull request into a Git
Github user hvanhovell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11168#issuecomment-183044450
Merging to master. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11162#issuecomment-183044617
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11162#issuecomment-183044614
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11168
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11173#issuecomment-183044967
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your p
Github user hvanhovell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11173#issuecomment-183046223
@spektom the title is not really informative. Could you improve the title,
and prepend it with the relevant JIRA ticket (please create one if you haven't
done that y
Github user hvanhovell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11051#issuecomment-183047397
@shaneknapp Thanks for checking... The GHPRB just works in mysterious
ways...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user hvanhovell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11051#issuecomment-183047747
Merging to master. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user BryanCutler commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10598#discussion_r52660909
--- Diff: python/pyspark/mllib/classification.py ---
@@ -272,37 +275,42 @@ def train(cls, data, iterations=100, step=1.0,
miniBatchFraction=1.0,
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11051
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11157#issuecomment-183056161
**[Test build #51123 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/51123/consoleFull)**
for PR 11157 at commit
[`a4e575d`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11157#issuecomment-183056362
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11100#discussion_r52665152
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -216,14 +216,36 @@ class Analyzer(
GroupingSe
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11157#issuecomment-183056361
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11153#issuecomment-183057571
**[Test build #51124 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/51124/consoleFull)**
for PR 11153 at commit
[`dce3857`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11153#issuecomment-183058007
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11153#issuecomment-183058010
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10705#issuecomment-183058138
**[Test build #51128 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/51128/consoleFull)**
for PR 10705 at commit
[`77939c2`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10705#issuecomment-183058638
**[Test build #51128 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/51128/consoleFull)**
for PR 10705 at commit
[`77939c2`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10705#issuecomment-183058644
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10705#issuecomment-183058649
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user skonto commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11157#issuecomment-183061297
There are flaky tests also due to the merge those public classes should
not be shown anyway... i only changed 5 files...
---
If your project is set up for it, you c
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11168#issuecomment-183061509
Can we add a unit test for this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user redsanket commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10838#issuecomment-183063914
@zsxwing addressed
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10838#issuecomment-183065836
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fe
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10838#issuecomment-183065989
LGTM. will merge this one once the tests pass.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your p
Github user kayousterhout commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11167#issuecomment-183066243
Jenkins, test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
201 - 300 of 655 matches
Mail list logo
