Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10951#issuecomment-182980180
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8#issuecomment-182980532
**[Test build #51117 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/51117/consoleFull)**
for PR 8 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8#issuecomment-182980915
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8#issuecomment-182980939
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9893#issuecomment-182981619
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9893#issuecomment-182981415
**[Test build #51107 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/51107/consoleFull)**
for PR 9893 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9893#issuecomment-182981622
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10949#issuecomment-182981995
**[Test build #51113 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/51113/consoleFull)**
for PR 10949 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10949#issuecomment-182982311
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10949#issuecomment-182982308
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11166#issuecomment-182982724
LGTM. Merging to master
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11166
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11157#issuecomment-182985985
**[Test build #51108 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/51108/consoleFull)**
for PR 11157 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11157#issuecomment-182986275
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11086#issuecomment-182986048
There is already `checkAggregatesWithTol` defined in that class, is that
sufficient?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11157#issuecomment-182986270
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11169#issuecomment-182793278
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11169#issuecomment-182792816
**[Test build #51091 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/51091/consoleFull)**
for PR 11169 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11169#issuecomment-182793280
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user steveloughran commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11033#issuecomment-182809024
This is to handle the launch situation
* secure cluster
* Oozie acquires tokens, sets to env var {{HADOOP_TOKEN_FILE_LOCATION}}
* launches client.
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11171#issuecomment-182820588
**[Test build #51093 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/51093/consoleFull)**
for PR 11171 at commit
Github user yinxusen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11124#discussion_r52635341
--- Diff: R/pkg/inst/tests/testthat/test_mllib.R ---
@@ -113,3 +113,18 @@ test_that("summary works on base GLM models", {
baseSummary <-
Github user yinxusen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11124#discussion_r52635130
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -126,3 +126,27 @@ setMethod("summary", signature(object =
"PipelineModel"),
return(list(coefficients =
Github user shaneknapp commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11051#issuecomment-182966961
jenkins test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user shaneknapp commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11051#issuecomment-182967337
im not totally sure... jenkins is picking up other PRB builds. i'll poke
around the (horrific) jenkins logs and see if i can't find out.
---
If your project is
Github user shaneknapp commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11051#issuecomment-182968845
it's building now:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/51120/
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10567#issuecomment-182970289
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10567#issuecomment-182970279
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user hvanhovell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11051#issuecomment-182965414
@shaneknapp any idea why Jenkins is not picking this up?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user holdenk commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11109#issuecomment-182966518
Great, thanks :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10567#issuecomment-182969820
**[Test build #51115 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/51115/consoleFull)**
for PR 10567 at commit
Github user yinxusen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11124#discussion_r52637690
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -126,3 +126,27 @@ setMethod("summary", signature(object =
"PipelineModel"),
return(list(coefficients =
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8880#issuecomment-182972800
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11051#issuecomment-182975000
**[Test build #51120 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/51120/consoleFull)**
for PR 11051 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10838#issuecomment-182993003
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10838#issuecomment-182992993
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11162#issuecomment-182994760
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10838#issuecomment-182991688
**[Test build #51118 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/51118/consoleFull)**
for PR 10838 at commit
Github user markgrover commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11143#issuecomment-182996634
Thanks Mario. Do let us know what you think @tdas
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10598#discussion_r52644739
--- Diff: python/pyspark/mllib/classification.py ---
@@ -272,37 +275,42 @@ def train(cls, data, iterations=100, step=1.0,
miniBatchFraction=1.0,
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11048#discussion_r52644696
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SparkQl.scala ---
@@ -62,6 +66,458 @@ private[sql] class SparkQl(conf: ParserConf =
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11153#discussion_r52645515
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/AnalysisSuite.scala
---
@@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ class AnalysisSuite extends
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11164#discussion_r52645513
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/mesos/CoarseMesosSchedulerBackendSuite.scala
---
@@ -195,19 +195,6 @@ class
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8#issuecomment-183001005
**[Test build #2536 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2536/consoleFull)**
for PR 8 at commit
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11164#issuecomment-183001176
This test was added recently in #10993 so this is just reverting the test
instead of reverting the whole patch. I do think we should use `ignore` since
that's what
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10876#discussion_r52645800
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/functions.py ---
@@ -254,15 +254,44 @@ def corr(col1, col2):
>>> a = [x * x - 2 * x + 3.5 for x in range(20)]
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11164#issuecomment-183001260
Also @mgummelt can you either file a JIRA or add the same JIRA to the title
of this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11153#discussion_r52646199
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -572,98 +572,64 @@ class Analyzer(
// Skip
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11162#issuecomment-183002962
**[Test build #51122 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/51122/consoleFull)**
for PR 11162 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8#issuecomment-183004244
**[Test build #51119 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/51119/consoleFull)**
for PR 8 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8#issuecomment-183005153
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8#issuecomment-183005159
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user sitalkedia commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11167#issuecomment-183006784
As you can see from the jstack of the driver http://pastebin.com/m8CP6VMv.
The dag-scheduler-event-loop thread has taken a lock and is spending a lot of
time in
Github user skonto commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11157#issuecomment-183007371
Jenkins, test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11170#issuecomment-183007352
@rxin Aggregation and joins have the same numOutputRows as without codegen,
only datasize and spillsize are not included in this PR, because I think they
are not
601 - 655 of 655 matches
Mail list logo
