Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11590#issuecomment-194059196
Thanks, merging to master!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not hav
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11543#discussion_r55460514
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/dataframe.py ---
@@ -974,6 +974,35 @@ def dropDuplicates(self, subset=None):
jdf = self._jdf.dropDuplicates(sel
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11455#issuecomment-194058366
ping @andrewor14
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fea
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11476
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11486#issuecomment-194058243
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11486#issuecomment-194058224
**[Test build #52713 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52713/consoleFull)**
for PR 11486 at commit
[`1a685e1`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11486#issuecomment-194058244
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11476#issuecomment-194057856
Merging with master
Thanks for the fix!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pr
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11593#issuecomment-194057218
LGTM, pending tests. Thanks for tracking this down!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11486#issuecomment-194055694
**[Test build #52713 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52713/consoleFull)**
for PR 11486 at commit
[`1a685e1`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11538#issuecomment-194055695
**[Test build #52712 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52712/consoleFull)**
for PR 11538 at commit
[`7ed8ef7`](https://gi
Github user yinxusen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11486#issuecomment-194054855
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this f
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11403#issuecomment-194053846
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11403#issuecomment-194053848
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11403#issuecomment-194053532
**[Test build #52703 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52703/consoleFull)**
for PR 11403 at commit
[`7df43ca`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11590#issuecomment-194051634
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11590#issuecomment-194051635
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11590#issuecomment-194051370
**[Test build #52701 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52701/consoleFull)**
for PR 11590 at commit
[`87c1f0a`](https://g
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11443#issuecomment-194051032
@marmbrus the reason is, `DataFrame.collect` will return an object for
java, as java don't have generic type array. For long term we should relace all
`DataFrame.coll
Github user jodersky commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11588#issuecomment-194050736
@rxin Looks like finally everything passed :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your p
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9#issuecomment-194050123
**[Test build #52711 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52711/consoleFull)**
for PR 9 at commit
[`08afa4c`](https://gi
Github user viirya closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11235
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11235#issuecomment-194049145
@davies yea, looks like it is doing the same. Let me close this now. Thanks
for reviewing this anyway!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11235#discussion_r55457081
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -146,6 +147,56 @@ object EliminateSerialization extends
Github user yinxusen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9#issuecomment-194047596
test it please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this featu
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11589#issuecomment-194047399
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11589#issuecomment-194047409
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user yzhou2001 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11184#issuecomment-194047202
I'm not sure whether the visitor pattern is a good choice here. First
introduction of a visitor just for this fix would see no less code changes;
Second Scala pattern
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11578#issuecomment-194046907
**[Test build #52710 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52710/consoleFull)**
for PR 11578 at commit
[`992a356`](https://gi
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11444#issuecomment-194044560
follow up JIRA created: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-13757
@davies I'm not quite understand "We still does not support a schema string
with onl
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11589#issuecomment-194045013
**[Test build #52695 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52695/consoleFull)**
for PR 11589 at commit
[`4e891bf`](https://g
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11235#issuecomment-194041946
I did not realized that we had merged
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11372/files, do we still need this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to th
Github user sameeragarwal commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11585#issuecomment-194042020
Also @davies, if you prefer your current approach, we then need to
propagate the constraints in the physical plan as well (currently they are only
propagated in t
Github user sameeragarwal commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11585#issuecomment-194041168
@nongli @davies I think part of the rationale for having
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11511 was to avoid having the extract the
operator's (and its child'
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11588#issuecomment-194041116
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11588#issuecomment-194041115
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11588#issuecomment-194040643
**[Test build #52694 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52694/consoleFull)**
for PR 11588 at commit
[`8d1f435`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11403#issuecomment-194039988
**[Test build #52709 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52709/consoleFull)**
for PR 11403 at commit
[`7cd6844`](https://gi
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11403#discussion_r55455063
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/QueryPlan.scala
---
@@ -237,4 +237,65 @@ abstract class QueryPlan[PlanType <:
Tree
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11591#issuecomment-194037786
if you have a fix for it, great. I'm trying to reproduce this locally but
so far no luck.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have you
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11403#discussion_r55454531
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/ui/SparkPlanGraph.scala
---
@@ -101,12 +104,15 @@ private[sql] object SparkPlanGraph {
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11591#issuecomment-194037384
Ugh, looks like you're running into the similar issues that I saw with
MiMa, so maybe my assembly-free MiMa patch will have to go in first?
---
If your project is se
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11593#issuecomment-194037164
**[Test build #52708 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52708/consoleFull)**
for PR 11593 at commit
[`12f8e55`](https://gi
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11587
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11593#issuecomment-194036038
this this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11593#issuecomment-194035552
cc @marmbrus
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fea
GitHub user HyukjinKwon opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11593
[SPARK-13728][SQL] Fix ORC PPD test so that pushed filters can be checked.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11509 makes the outpu
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11587#issuecomment-194035302
Merging into master and 1.6
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11403#discussion_r55453649
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameSuite.scala
---
@@ -1318,6 +1318,34 @@ class DataFrameSuite extends QueryTest with
SharedS
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11403#discussion_r55453570
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/ui/SparkPlanGraph.scala
---
@@ -101,12 +104,15 @@ private[sql] object SparkPlanGraph {
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11585#issuecomment-194034668
@nongli It seems that once we have this, we don't need #11511 anymore,
right?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appe
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11403#discussion_r55453451
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/exchange/Exchange.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,91 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Softw
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11403#discussion_r55453277
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/QueryPlan.scala
---
@@ -237,4 +237,65 @@ abstract class QueryPlan[PlanType <:
T
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11403#discussion_r55453264
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/QueryPlan.scala
---
@@ -237,4 +237,65 @@ abstract class QueryPlan[PlanType <:
T
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11403#discussion_r55453192
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/QueryPlan.scala
---
@@ -237,4 +237,65 @@ abstract class QueryPlan[PlanType <:
T
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11534#issuecomment-194033595
**[Test build #52707 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52707/consoleFull)**
for PR 11534 at commit
[`66796b5`](https://gi
Github user NarineK commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10806#issuecomment-194033385
Hi everyone,
@yanboliang, thanks for optimizing Kmeans.
I have a question. Is it possible to add Within Cluster Sum Square (in
total and for individual cluster)
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11534#issuecomment-194033260
I went ahead and split up `doPut()`, which greatly simplified the return
types.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11592#issuecomment-194032877
cc @joehalliwell
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this featu
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11592#issuecomment-194032743
**[Test build #52706 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52706/consoleFull)**
for PR 11592 at commit
[`aace0a3`](https://gi
GitHub user davies opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11592
[SPARK-13242] [SQL] codegen fallback in case-when if there many branches
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
If there are many branches in a CaseWhen expression, the generate
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11534#issuecomment-194031761
**[Test build #52705 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52705/consoleFull)**
for PR 11534 at commit
[`a16276e`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11534#issuecomment-194030709
**[Test build #52704 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52704/consoleFull)**
for PR 11534 at commit
[`7a08a17`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-194029785
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-194029789
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/5
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524#issuecomment-194029555
**[Test build #52691 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52691/consoleFull)**
for PR 9524 at commit
[`6e484bb`](https://git
Github user joehalliwell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11243#issuecomment-194029424
Not at all, please do!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not hav
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11243#issuecomment-194029011
@joehalliwell Do you mind me to take over this one? so we can merge this
quickly.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11243#discussion_r55449966
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/conditionalExpressions.scala
---
@@ -182,11 +183,16 @@ case class CaseWhen(br
Github user tedyu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11444#discussion_r55449167
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/types.py ---
@@ -681,6 +681,129 @@ def __eq__(self, other):
for v in [ArrayType, MapType, StructType
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11511
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user joehalliwell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11243#issuecomment-194026765
@davies Hi, I guess this missed the window for 1.6.1? Codegen errors of
this sort on complex expressions represent a regression with respect to 1.5.2
which are pre
Github user yinxusen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11128#issuecomment-194026546
@keypointt Examples in the PR are all small ones. I am not sure whether we
merge them or not. Either we use this PR
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9430 to rewrit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11591#issuecomment-194026418
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11591#issuecomment-194026376
**[Test build #52700 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52700/consoleFull)**
for PR 11591 at commit
[`79e1bf5`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11591#issuecomment-194026417
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11511#issuecomment-194026381
LGTM. Merging to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have thi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11403#issuecomment-194025753
**[Test build #52703 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52703/consoleFull)**
for PR 11403 at commit
[`7df43ca`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11534#issuecomment-194025752
**[Test build #52702 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52702/consoleFull)**
for PR 11534 at commit
[`92c5125`](https://gi
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11105#discussion_r55448680
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/ResultTask.scala
---
@@ -66,7 +67,10 @@ private[spark] class ResultTask[T, U](
_executorDes
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11403#discussion_r55448590
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameSuite.scala
---
@@ -1318,6 +1318,34 @@ class DataFrameSuite extends QueryTest with
SharedSQLC
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11588#issuecomment-194025026
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11590#issuecomment-194024849
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11588#issuecomment-194025025
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11588#issuecomment-194024814
**[Test build #52693 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52693/consoleFull)**
for PR 11588 at commit
[`8d1f435`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11590#issuecomment-194018846
**[Test build #52701 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52701/consoleFull)**
for PR 11590 at commit
[`87c1f0a`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11591#issuecomment-194018844
**[Test build #52700 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52700/consoleFull)**
for PR 11591 at commit
[`79e1bf5`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11238#issuecomment-194018400
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11238#issuecomment-194018404
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
GitHub user vanzin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11591
[SPARK-13578] [core] Modify launch scripts to not use assemblies.
Instead of looking for a specially-named assembly, the scripts now will
blindly add all jars under the libs directory to the clas
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11238#issuecomment-194017885
**[Test build #52698 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52698/consoleFull)**
for PR 11238 at commit
[`0d1069b`](https://g
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11590#issuecomment-194017241
cc @marmbrus
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
GitHub user davies opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11590
[SPARK-13750] [SQL] fix sizeInBytes of HadoopFsRelation
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR fix the sizeInBytes of HadoopFsRelation.
## How was this pat
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11511#issuecomment-194015933
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11511#issuecomment-194015941
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11541#issuecomment-194015437
**[Test build #52699 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52699/consoleFull)**
for PR 11541 at commit
[`2e20843`](https://gi
Github user wangmiao1981 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11582#issuecomment-194014892
@srowen I added the title in the pull request. Sorry for causing the
confusion here. I only made changes in one python file. All other changes are
merged from mast
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11511#issuecomment-194014876
**[Test build #52692 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52692/consoleFull)**
for PR 11511 at commit
[`21d8897`](https://g
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11572
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11541#issuecomment-194014737
Hi, @mengxr .
I removed the change on build related files. Now this PR contains pure
`Java` and `md` files.
Also, the description of PR/JIRA issue is upda
201 - 300 of 777 matches
Mail list logo
