Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11157#issuecomment-195631964
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11157#issuecomment-195631809
**[Test build #52983 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52983/consoleFull)**
for PR 11157 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11157#issuecomment-195631590
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11157#issuecomment-195631588
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11157#issuecomment-195631586
**[Test build #52982 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52982/consoleFull)**
for PR 11157 at commit
Github user skonto commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11157#issuecomment-195631531
updated the PR @tnachen @mgummelt, ready for review
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11610#issuecomment-195631468
**[Test build #52981 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52981/consoleFull)**
for PR 11610 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11157#issuecomment-195631462
**[Test build #52982 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52982/consoleFull)**
for PR 11157 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11667#issuecomment-195630704
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11514#issuecomment-195630759
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11514#issuecomment-195630758
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11667#issuecomment-195630707
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11514#issuecomment-195630625
**[Test build #52966 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52966/consoleFull)**
for PR 11514 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11667#issuecomment-195630551
**[Test build #52967 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52967/consoleFull)**
for PR 11667 at commit
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11647#discussion_r55912815
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/Canonicalize.scala
---
@@ -36,15 +36,16 @@ import
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11644#issuecomment-195628886
**[Test build #52980 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52980/consoleFull)**
for PR 11644 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11669#issuecomment-195626487
Hi, @JoshRosen .
Now, this PR includes SBT/MiMa updates for SPARK-13834.
Build and MiMa is tested on both JDK8 and JDK7.
I hope it will pass at this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11669#issuecomment-195626140
**[Test build #52979 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52979/consoleFull)**
for PR 11669 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11661#issuecomment-195625234
Oh, @JoshRosen . I'll merge both PR.
It passed now based on #11669 .
Sorry for making you confused.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11665#issuecomment-195625087
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11665#issuecomment-195625089
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11665#issuecomment-195624904
**[Test build #52963 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52963/consoleFull)**
for PR 11665 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11672#issuecomment-195624382
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11672#issuecomment-195624381
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11672#issuecomment-195624375
**[Test build #52978 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52978/consoleFull)**
for PR 11672 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11672#issuecomment-195624377
**[Test build #52978 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52978/consoleFull)**
for PR 11672 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11671#issuecomment-195624117
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11671#issuecomment-195624102
**[Test build #52977 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52977/consoleFull)**
for PR 11671 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11671#issuecomment-195624114
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
GitHub user zsxwing opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11672
[WIP]Remove streaming-flume, streaming-mqtt, streaming-zeromq,
streaming-akka, streaming-twitter to Spark packages
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Just test if can
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11644#discussion_r55911638
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala ---
@@ -2014,8 +2014,10 @@ private[spark] object Utils extends Logging {
} catch {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11613#issuecomment-195623518
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11671#issuecomment-195623496
**[Test build #52977 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52977/consoleFull)**
for PR 11671 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11613#issuecomment-195623515
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
GitHub user vanzin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11671
[minor][build][test-maven] Remove invocation of dependency plugin.
Removing the execution id prevents the goal from running unless
it's explicitly invoked from the command line.
You can merge
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11613#issuecomment-195623171
**[Test build #52956 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52956/consoleFull)**
for PR 11613 at commit
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11668#issuecomment-195622769
Could you close this PR please?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11644#issuecomment-195622365
**[Test build #52976 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52976/consoleFull)**
for PR 11644 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11666#issuecomment-195621424
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11666#issuecomment-195621420
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11666#issuecomment-195621127
**[Test build #52964 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52964/consoleFull)**
for PR 11666 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11644#issuecomment-195620583
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11644#issuecomment-195620580
**[Test build #52975 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52975/consoleFull)**
for PR 11644 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11644#issuecomment-195620582
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user sameeragarwal commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11665#issuecomment-195620519
cc @nongli @yhuai @gatorsmile
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11661#issuecomment-195620503
Hi, @JoshRosen .
I made a PR for MiMa first: #11669 .
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11669#issuecomment-195620416
**[Test build #52974 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52974/consoleFull)**
for PR 11669 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11670#issuecomment-195620412
**[Test build #52973 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52973/consoleFull)**
for PR 11670 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11644#issuecomment-195620424
**[Test build #52975 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52975/consoleFull)**
for PR 11644 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11668#issuecomment-195620383
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user sameeragarwal commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11670#issuecomment-195620188
cc @yhuai
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user sameeragarwal opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11670
[SPARK-][SQL] Remove redundant conditions while combining filters
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
**[I'll link it to the JIRA once ASF JIRA is back online]**
GitHub user dongjoon-hyun opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11669
[SPARK-XXX][BUILD] Update MiMa plugin to 0.1.9.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
NOTE: Apache JIRA is down now. I'll update the title as soon as possible.
GitHub user pradeepsavadi opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11668
Branch 1.6
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
(Please fill in changes proposed in this fix)
## How was this patch tested?
(Please explain how
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11613#issuecomment-195619862
**[Test build #52972 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52972/consoleFull)**
for PR 11613 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11660#issuecomment-195619420
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11660#issuecomment-195619419
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11660#issuecomment-195619285
**[Test build #52953 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52953/consoleFull)**
for PR 11660 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11661#issuecomment-195617712
Really, it's interesting issue.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11661#issuecomment-195617676
Thank you, @JoshRosen . I tried both together, too. But, it still has a
problem.
By the way, during that procedure, I found that new MiMa plugin reports
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11661#issuecomment-195616909
Hmm, interesting. Note that there's now an updated version of MiMa, so we
might also consider bumping that (and other SBT plugins) as well.
---
If your project is
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11610#discussion_r55909205
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/optim/WeightedLeastSquares.scala ---
@@ -108,6 +101,53 @@ private[ml] class WeightedLeastSquares(
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11613#issuecomment-195616282
I ended up having to roll back that size estimation improvement because it
broke some tests which relied on the old behavior. I'd still like to make that
change but
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11610#discussion_r55909088
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/optim/WeightedLeastSquares.scala ---
@@ -108,6 +101,53 @@ private[ml] class WeightedLeastSquares(
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11613#issuecomment-195615909
**[Test build #52971 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52971/consoleFull)**
for PR 11613 at commit
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11613#discussion_r55908919
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/memory/MemoryStore.scala ---
@@ -100,48 +92,136 @@ private[spark] class MemoryStore(
*/
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11649#issuecomment-195615310
I guess I would probably propagate them during planning (i.e. when you are
creating the physical `Filter` operator) since its not really an optimization
to add them
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11610#discussion_r55908792
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/optim/WeightedLeastSquares.scala ---
@@ -120,34 +160,47 @@ private[ml] class WeightedLeastSquares(
Github user jodersky commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11544#discussion_r55908688
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/jobs/JobProgressListener.scala ---
@@ -374,28 +374,30 @@ class JobProgressListener(conf: SparkConf)
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11649#issuecomment-195614379
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11649#issuecomment-195614380
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11649#issuecomment-195614281
**[Test build #52958 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52958/consoleFull)**
for PR 11649 at commit
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11644#discussion_r55908574
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala ---
@@ -2014,8 +2014,10 @@ private[spark] object Utils extends Logging {
} catch {
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11664#issuecomment-195614031
**[Test build #52962 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52962/consoleFull)**
for PR 11664 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11664#issuecomment-195614082
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11664#issuecomment-195614080
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11610#discussion_r55908431
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/optim/WeightedLeastSquares.scala ---
@@ -108,6 +101,53 @@ private[ml] class WeightedLeastSquares(
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11610#discussion_r55908419
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/optim/WeightedLeastSquares.scala ---
@@ -108,6 +101,53 @@ private[ml] class WeightedLeastSquares(
Github user bjornjon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11644#discussion_r55908378
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala ---
@@ -2014,8 +2014,10 @@ private[spark] object Utils extends Logging {
} catch
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11610#discussion_r55908346
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/optim/WeightedLeastSquares.scala ---
@@ -108,6 +101,53 @@ private[ml] class WeightedLeastSquares(
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11657#issuecomment-195613637
LGTM. The original idea was to import `c.g.c.b.Charsets.UTF_8` so that
later you could just change the import to
`java.nio.charset.StandardCharsets.UTF_8` without
Github user GayathriMurali commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11544#discussion_r55908239
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/jobs/JobProgressListener.scala ---
@@ -374,28 +374,30 @@ class JobProgressListener(conf: SparkConf)
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11610#discussion_r55908232
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/optim/WeightedLeastSquares.scala ---
@@ -108,6 +101,53 @@ private[ml] class WeightedLeastSquares(
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11612#issuecomment-195612369
LGTM.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11510#issuecomment-195612256
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11591#issuecomment-195612429
**[Test build #52970 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52970/consoleFull)**
for PR 11591 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11510#issuecomment-195612259
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11612#discussion_r55907969
--- Diff:
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/YarnAllocator.scala ---
@@ -265,25 +265,52 @@ private[yarn] class YarnAllocator(
// For
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11510#issuecomment-195612119
**[Test build #52951 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52951/consoleFull)**
for PR 11510 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11580#issuecomment-195611810
**[Test build #52968 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52968/consoleFull)**
for PR 11580 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11452#issuecomment-195611811
**[Test build #52969 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52969/consoleFull)**
for PR 11452 at commit
Github user sameeragarwal commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11649#issuecomment-195611317
@marmbrus the reason for adding these inferred filters in the logical plan
is because we currently only propagate constraints in the logical plan (and
they are
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11580#issuecomment-195611297
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11667#issuecomment-195611094
**[Test build #52967 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52967/consoleFull)**
for PR 11667 at commit
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11452#issuecomment-195611100
SQL test failure, I assume unrelated? retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11452#issuecomment-195610681
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11452#issuecomment-195610678
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11452#issuecomment-195610666
**[Test build #52959 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/52959/consoleFull)**
for PR 11452 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11661#issuecomment-195610240
Actually, it seems that MIMA test passes on JDK8 and fails on JDK7.
I didn't check that before PR. I'm investigating the reason now.
Although I closed
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11667#issuecomment-195609699
@yhuai
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
101 - 200 of 606 matches
Mail list logo
