Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11856#issuecomment-201486208
**[Test build #54209 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54209/consoleFull)**
for PR 11856 at commit
[`9fe40fe`](https://gi
Github user zsxwing closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11922
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is en
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11963#issuecomment-201483944
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabl
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11895#issuecomment-201483546
**[Test build #54208 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54208/consoleFull)**
for PR 11895 at commit
[`f5d5976`](https://gi
Github user zsxwing closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11162
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is en
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11895#issuecomment-201482647
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fe
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11940
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11940#issuecomment-201480383
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11940#issuecomment-201480105
Merging to master
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fea
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11940#issuecomment-201480375
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11948#issuecomment-201480224
Thanks for the PR! It will be great if we can make it clear what command is
not supported. From the current error message, we only know there are features
that we do not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11940#issuecomment-201479663
**[Test build #54203 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54203/consoleFull)**
for PR 11940 at commit
[`45f1452`](https://g
Github user yinxusen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11952#issuecomment-201477882
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11964#issuecomment-201475663
**[Test build #54207 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54207/consoleFull)**
for PR 11964 at commit
[`8cd2d85`](https://gi
GitHub user dongjoon-hyun opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11964
[SPARK-14164] Improve input layer validation to
MultilayerPerceptronClassifier
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This issue improves an input layer validation and r
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11911#issuecomment-201471915
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11911#issuecomment-201471906
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11911#issuecomment-201470871
**[Test build #54195 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54195/consoleFull)**
for PR 11911 at commit
[`f59c85f`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11940#issuecomment-201471322
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11940#issuecomment-201471316
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11940#issuecomment-201469930
**[Test build #54198 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54198/consoleFull)**
for PR 11940 at commit
[`d8dcd04`](https://g
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11948#issuecomment-201468856
updated
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
en
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11953
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11953#issuecomment-201461105
Merging this into master
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have th
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11940#issuecomment-201461192
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11940#issuecomment-201461196
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11910#issuecomment-201460911
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11910#issuecomment-201460905
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11940#issuecomment-201460511
**[Test build #54200 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54200/consoleFull)**
for PR 11940 at commit
[`9809acf`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11910#issuecomment-201460251
**[Test build #54193 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54193/consoleFull)**
for PR 11910 at commit
[`631c44c`](https://g
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11885#issuecomment-201455646
LGTM, just need to fix the env variable thing one way or another.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11885#discussion_r57482682
--- Diff: yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/Client.scala ---
@@ -549,6 +549,21 @@ private[spark] class Client(
appMasterOnly = true)
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11940#issuecomment-201451635
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11940#issuecomment-201451629
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11940#issuecomment-201450909
**[Test build #54197 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54197/consoleFull)**
for PR 11940 at commit
[`37343ca`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11623#issuecomment-201450575
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11623#issuecomment-201450580
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11623#issuecomment-201449787
**[Test build #54192 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54192/consoleFull)**
for PR 11623 at commit
[`c0e73cd`](https://g
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11963#issuecomment-201449332
CC @gatorsmile
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this featur
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11856#issuecomment-201449446
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11856#issuecomment-201449335
**[Test build #54205 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54205/consoleFull)**
for PR 11856 at commit
[`5eeacc9`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11856#issuecomment-201449451
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11953#issuecomment-201448647
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11953#issuecomment-201448643
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11953#issuecomment-201447516
**[Test build #54191 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54191/consoleFull)**
for PR 11953 at commit
[`2f43d41`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11963#issuecomment-201446477
**[Test build #54206 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54206/consoleFull)**
for PR 11963 at commit
[`758a8a8`](https://gi
GitHub user dongjoon-hyun opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11963
[MINOR][SQL] Fix substr/substring testcases.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR fixes the following two testcases in order to test the correct
usages.
``
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11856#issuecomment-201440520
**[Test build #54205 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54205/consoleFull)**
for PR 11856 at commit
[`5eeacc9`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11925#issuecomment-201439988
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11925#issuecomment-201439993
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11925#issuecomment-201439602
**[Test build #54194 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54194/consoleFull)**
for PR 11925 at commit
[`5eb63b6`](https://g
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11603#issuecomment-201437129
Mostly good, just a few comments.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does no
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11942#issuecomment-201436077
**[Test build #54204 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54204/consoleFull)**
for PR 11942 at commit
[`c3d0f61`](https://gi
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11942#issuecomment-201435769
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11603#discussion_r57479046
--- Diff: yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/Client.scala ---
@@ -1264,7 +1266,7 @@ object Client extends Logging {
val secondar
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10399
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10399#issuecomment-201433854
Thanks, merging to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not hav
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11603#discussion_r57478478
--- Diff: yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/Client.scala ---
@@ -510,10 +516,12 @@ private[spark] class Client(
* (3) whether to add
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11924
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11924#issuecomment-201431779
Let's merge it now as it fails several times per day. Merging to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11796#issuecomment-201431676
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11796#issuecomment-201431670
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11796#issuecomment-201430662
**[Test build #54185 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54185/consoleFull)**
for PR 11796 at commit
[`976ce2c`](https://g
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11603#discussion_r57477923
--- Diff: yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/Client.scala ---
@@ -480,25 +495,16 @@ private[spark] class Client(
}
/**
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11956#issuecomment-201426171
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11956#issuecomment-201426182
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11956#issuecomment-201425493
**[Test build #54178 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54178/consoleFull)**
for PR 11956 at commit
[`c26cead`](https://g
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11603#discussion_r57477150
--- Diff:
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/ApplicationMasterArguments.scala
---
@@ -101,12 +91,8 @@ class ApplicationMasterArguments(val args
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11603#discussion_r57476945
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/internal/config/package.scala ---
@@ -33,6 +34,10 @@ package object config {
private[spark] val DRIVER_U
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11950
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11942#issuecomment-201418364
**[Test build #54201 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54201/consoleFull)**
for PR 11942 at commit
[`c3d0f61`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11942#issuecomment-201418469
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11942#issuecomment-201418463
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11940#issuecomment-201417804
**[Test build #54203 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54203/consoleFull)**
for PR 11940 at commit
[`45f1452`](https://gi
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11940#issuecomment-201415819
I'm going to merge this one after tests pass to unblock other PRs. Will
address further comments in another PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11940#issuecomment-201414609
> I see; so how about simplifying things a bit. Can I suggest that you
change the name of the variable to shouldInterruptThread or something that more
explicitly says t
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11942#issuecomment-201408099
**[Test build #54201 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54201/consoleFull)**
for PR 11942 at commit
[`c3d0f61`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11326#issuecomment-201408109
**[Test build #54202 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54202/consoleFull)**
for PR 11326 at commit
[`c20035c`](https://gi
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11940#issuecomment-201407257
> Since L157 calls microBatchThread.interrupt(), it's safe
I see; so how about simplifying things a bit. Can I suggest that you change
the name of the variable t
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11962#issuecomment-201405643
**[Test build #54199 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54199/consoleFull)**
for PR 11962 at commit
[`8f20e5a`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11940#issuecomment-201405645
**[Test build #54200 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54200/consoleFull)**
for PR 11940 at commit
[`9809acf`](https://gi
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11962#issuecomment-201405785
cc @yhuai @hvanhovell @viirya Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
GitHub user gatorsmile opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11962
[SPARK-14161] [SQL] Native Parsing for DDL Comand Drop Database
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Based on the Hive DDL document
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/displ
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11940#issuecomment-201404121
> Is that because there are multiple calls to
runUninterruptiblyInMicroBatchThread, and you want to keep the interrupted
status across those calls? If that's the case,
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11940#discussion_r57473579
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/StreamExecution.scala
---
@@ -101,6 +102,65 @@ class StreamExecution(
private
Github user ajbozarth commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11326#discussion_r57473060
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/HistoryServerSuite.scala ---
@@ -157,12 +157,14 @@ class HistoryServerSuite extends SparkFunS
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11940#issuecomment-201401173
**[Test build #54198 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54198/consoleFull)**
for PR 11940 at commit
[`d8dcd04`](https://gi
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11940#issuecomment-201401202
> It should not change interrupted to false if Thread.interrupted() returns
false
Is that because there are multiple calls to
`runUninterruptiblyInMicroBatchThr
Github user tdas commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11940#issuecomment-201400855
This logic is a little complex. Could you add some unit tests to make sure
this is correct?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have yo
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11895#issuecomment-201398249
LGTM once we fix the maven test issues. Thanks for taking care of this!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on G
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11940#discussion_r57472410
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/StreamExecution.scala
---
@@ -228,13 +288,17 @@ class StreamExecution(
comm
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11942#issuecomment-201399544
**[Test build #54196 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54196/consoleFull)**
for PR 11942 at commit
[`61d220b`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11942#issuecomment-201399555
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11942#issuecomment-201399560
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11940#issuecomment-201399466
@vanzin Oh, no... `interrupted = Thread.interrupted()` is wrong. It should
not change `interrupted` to `false` if `Thread.interrupted()` returns false.
Reverting it.
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11326#discussion_r57471934
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/HistoryServerSuite.scala ---
@@ -157,12 +157,14 @@ class HistoryServerSuite extends SparkFunSuit
Github user ajbozarth commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11326#discussion_r57471730
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/HistoryServerSuite.scala ---
@@ -157,12 +157,14 @@ class HistoryServerSuite extends SparkFunS
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11942#issuecomment-201397074
**[Test build #54196 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54196/consoleFull)**
for PR 11942 at commit
[`61d220b`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11940#issuecomment-201397068
**[Test build #54197 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54197/consoleFull)**
for PR 11940 at commit
[`37343ca`](https://gi
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11940#issuecomment-201393496
LGTM; looking at the code after my comment I think the shorter code is
safe, but that's a super minor thing anyway.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
301 - 400 of 657 matches
Mail list logo
