Github user MLnick commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12207#discussion_r59160367
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/dataframe.py ---
@@ -1181,18 +1181,26 @@ def approxQuantile(self, col, probabilities,
relativeError):
Space-efficien
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12267#issuecomment-208187631
**[Test build #55511 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55511/consoleFull)**
for PR 12267 at commit
[`4e9096d`](https://gi
Github user holdenk commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12286#issuecomment-208187383
We could maybe make this a more complete test and actually check that their
are no checkpoint files generated? Although that might be over kill.
---
If your project is
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12267#issuecomment-208183704
`BinaryComparisonSimplification` LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12083#issuecomment-208183683
@liyezhang556520 Could you send a patch for 1.6 branch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. I
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12038#issuecomment-208183606
cherry-picked into 1.6 branch
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not ha
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12292#issuecomment-208183377
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12292#issuecomment-208183380
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12292#issuecomment-208183259
**[Test build #55504 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55504/consoleFull)**
for PR 12292 at commit
[`961f117`](https://g
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12081#discussion_r59158513
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveSessionCatalog.scala ---
@@ -74,9 +74,9 @@ private[sql] class HiveSessionCatalog(
/
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12267#issuecomment-208181978
@cloud-fan . Thank you so much for improving this PR.
Overall, this PR starts to include one Non-Null case (`EqualNullSafe`) now.
May I change the classname
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12081#issuecomment-208182022
**[Test build #55510 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55510/consoleFull)**
for PR 12081 at commit
[`9cf48e1`](https://gi
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12267#discussion_r59158077
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -787,6 +788,28 @@ object BooleanSimplification ex
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12259#issuecomment-208181263
This is a good idea, but in 2.0 we are going to hide UserDefinedFunction
for now and re-design this API in 2.1. We should revisit it together.
---
If your project i
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12138#issuecomment-208179970
@cloud-fan yea. this solution looks complicated due to that I need to fit
it into current usage of `Expand`... I will try your proposal and see if it
works. Thanks!
--
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12138#issuecomment-208179409
I just get noticed that this PR can also solve another JIRA ticket:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-14495.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can rep
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12067#issuecomment-208178674
**[Test build #55509 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55509/consoleFull)**
for PR 12067 at commit
[`4ee5ac1`](https://gi
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12267#discussion_r59157332
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/NonNullableBinaryComparisonSimplificationSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,95 @@
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12259#issuecomment-208176286
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12267#discussion_r59157076
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/NonNullableBinaryComparisonSimplificationSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,95 @@
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12259#issuecomment-208176285
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12293#issuecomment-208176244
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your p
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12259#issuecomment-208176150
**[Test build #55503 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55503/consoleFull)**
for PR 12259 at commit
[`eafdd58`](https://g
GitHub user rajeshbalamohan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12293
SPARK-14387. [SQL] Exceptions thrown when querying ORC tables stored â¦
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Physical files stored in Hive as ORC would have internal colu
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12267#discussion_r59156961
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -787,6 +788,28 @@ object BooleanSimplification extend
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12067#issuecomment-208175823
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12067#issuecomment-208175822
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12067#issuecomment-208175816
**[Test build #55508 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55508/consoleFull)**
for PR 12067 at commit
[`050e942`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12067#issuecomment-208175668
**[Test build #55508 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55508/consoleFull)**
for PR 12067 at commit
[`050e942`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12267#issuecomment-208173217
**[Test build #55507 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55507/consoleFull)**
for PR 12267 at commit
[`86380de`](https://gi
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12267#discussion_r59156009
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/NonNullableBinaryComparisonSimplificationSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,99 @
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12267#discussion_r59155908
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/NonNullableBinaryComparisonSimplificationSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,99 @
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12067#issuecomment-208171753
**[Test build #55506 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55506/consoleFull)**
for PR 12067 at commit
[`9e9be45`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12067#issuecomment-208171754
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12067#issuecomment-208171756
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12067#issuecomment-208171517
**[Test build #55506 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55506/consoleFull)**
for PR 12067 at commit
[`9e9be45`](https://gi
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12267#discussion_r59155788
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -787,6 +788,28 @@ object BooleanSimplification ex
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12267#issuecomment-208170041
Thank you for *deep review*, @cloud-fan . :)
I changed PR according to the one comment first.
For the others, I asked some questions to understand more corr
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12267#discussion_r59155584
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/NonNullableBinaryComparisonSimplificationSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,99 @@
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12267#issuecomment-208169438
**[Test build #55505 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55505/consoleFull)**
for PR 12267 at commit
[`7ea4e29`](https://gi
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12267#discussion_r59155488
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -787,6 +788,28 @@ object BooleanSimplification extend
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12138#issuecomment-208168423
Yea, and in this PR we use `NamedExpression` to avoid re-using child's
output, which should work. My proposal is that, we can use placeholders(maybe
`BoundReference`)
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12267#discussion_r59155308
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/NonNullableBinaryComparisonSimplificationSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,99 @
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12267#discussion_r59154875
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -787,6 +788,28 @@ object BooleanSimplification ex
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12292#issuecomment-208165851
**[Test build #55504 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55504/consoleFull)**
for PR 12292 at commit
[`961f117`](https://gi
GitHub user viirya opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12292
[SPARK-14520][SQL] Use correct return type in VectorizedParquetInputFormat
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-14520
`Ve
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12292#issuecomment-208164442
cc @nongli
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
en
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12267#discussion_r59154150
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/NonNullableBinaryComparisonSimplificationSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,99 @
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12267#discussion_r59154120
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -787,6 +788,28 @@ object BooleanSimplification ex
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12259#issuecomment-208160483
**[Test build #55503 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55503/consoleFull)**
for PR 12259 at commit
[`eafdd58`](https://gi
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12259#issuecomment-208159753
cc @marmbrus @yhuai @rxin
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12138#issuecomment-208158392
@cloud-fan Thanks for comment.
The problem is we re-use child's output as `Expand`s output. We will
create new attributes in `Expand` because `Expand` actually
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12081#issuecomment-208152087
I can reproduce it now. : )
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9565#issuecomment-208151820
hmm. We can't remove non code-generated version of ScalaUDF as any
InterpretedProjection with udf will fail...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to thi
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12081#issuecomment-208151740
Thank you for your investigation! Sorry, just came back. Will follow your
idea to fix the issue.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user tedyu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12279#discussion_r59152083
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/VectorizedColumnReader.java
---
@@ -200,8 +150,26 @@ void readBatch(int to
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12260#issuecomment-208151177
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12260#issuecomment-208151178
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12260#issuecomment-208151080
**[Test build #55498 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55498/consoleFull)**
for PR 12260 at commit
[`856ad74`](https://g
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12081#issuecomment-208150854
For now, we can avoid of dropping `current_database` in
`SessionCatalog.reset`.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply app
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12284
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12284#issuecomment-208148952
Thanks. Merging to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have t
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12081#issuecomment-208148091
You can reproduce it by calling `test-only *HiveDDLSuite *HiveQuerySuite`.
Yea, it is indeed the problem of reset.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12081#issuecomment-208147970
`current_database` is special because it is registered in HiveContext. So,
it is not tracked FunctionRegistry.builtIn. I think `HiveDDLSuite` drops this
function by calli
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9565#issuecomment-208147682
**[Test build #55502 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55502/consoleFull)**
for PR 9565 at commit
[`30a867e`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9565#issuecomment-208147724
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/5
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9565#issuecomment-208147721
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11301#issuecomment-208147504
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11301#issuecomment-208147505
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11301#issuecomment-208147395
**[Test build #55497 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55497/consoleFull)**
for PR 11301 at commit
[`02d75c7`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9565#issuecomment-208147148
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/5
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9565#issuecomment-208147147
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9565#issuecomment-208147121
**[Test build #55501 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55501/consoleFull)**
for PR 9565 at commit
[`884a176`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11550#issuecomment-208145793
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11550#issuecomment-208145794
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11550#issuecomment-208145667
**[Test build #55496 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55496/consoleFull)**
for PR 11550 at commit
[`c197d52`](https://g
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12207#issuecomment-208142363
ping @jkbradley @MLnick
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have th
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9565#issuecomment-208138899
**[Test build #55502 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55502/consoleFull)**
for PR 9565 at commit
[`30a867e`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9565#issuecomment-208136271
**[Test build #55501 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55501/consoleFull)**
for PR 9565 at commit
[`884a176`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12284#issuecomment-208131830
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12284#issuecomment-208131833
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12067#issuecomment-208131549
**[Test build #55499 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55499/consoleFull)**
for PR 12067 at commit
[`045a9be`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12284#issuecomment-208131432
**[Test build #55495 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55495/consoleFull)**
for PR 12284 at commit
[`9271a03`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12067#issuecomment-208131587
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12067#issuecomment-208131584
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user oliverpierson commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11553#issuecomment-208130852
scalastyle check is failing because the `@see` link on [line
54](https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11553/commits/c365da039f239e03f21fa927f8fa1ccaa9ca9ba8#diff-b
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11553#issuecomment-208130405
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11553#issuecomment-208130400
**[Test build #55500 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55500/consoleFull)**
for PR 11553 at commit
[`c365da0`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11553#issuecomment-208130403
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11553#issuecomment-208129954
**[Test build #55500 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55500/consoleFull)**
for PR 11553 at commit
[`c365da0`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12067#issuecomment-208129959
**[Test build #55499 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55499/consoleFull)**
for PR 12067 at commit
[`045a9be`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12260#issuecomment-208122361
**[Test build #55498 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55498/consoleFull)**
for PR 12260 at commit
[`856ad74`](https://gi
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12268#discussion_r59148216
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/csv/CSVParserSuite.scala
---
@@ -1,125 +0,0 @@
-/*
- * Licensed to th
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12267#discussion_r59147914
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/NonNullableBinaryComparisonSimplificationSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,99 @@
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11301#issuecomment-208119382
**[Test build #55497 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55497/consoleFull)**
for PR 11301 at commit
[`02d75c7`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11550#issuecomment-208119378
**[Test build #55496 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55496/consoleFull)**
for PR 11550 at commit
[`c197d52`](https://gi
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12081#issuecomment-208119322
Unable to find it. : (
Still unable to reproduce it in my local environment. Will upload a code
change to print out a message when we adding Hive UDF `curren
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11868#issuecomment-208118258
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12081#issuecomment-208118294
Is there any chance that the original current_database is not in the
function registry when we call current_database?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11868#issuecomment-208118250
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
1 - 100 of 279 matches
Mail list logo
