Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12402#discussion_r59833733
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/clustering.py ---
@@ -22,7 +22,151 @@
from pyspark.mllib.common import inherit_doc
__all__ = ['BisectingKMeans'
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12402#discussion_r59833895
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/clustering.py ---
@@ -22,7 +22,151 @@
from pyspark.mllib.common import inherit_doc
__all__ = ['BisectingKMeans'
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1#issuecomment-210317598
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1#issuecomment-210317168
**[Test build #55901 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55901/consoleFull)**
for PR 1 at commit
[`1171a90`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1#issuecomment-210317592
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12402#discussion_r59834165
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/clustering.py ---
@@ -22,7 +22,151 @@
from pyspark.mllib.common import inherit_doc
__all__ = ['BisectingKMeans'
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12402#discussion_r59834247
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/clustering.py ---
@@ -22,7 +22,151 @@
from pyspark.mllib.common import inherit_doc
__all__ = ['BisectingKMeans'
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12405#issuecomment-210319196
**[Test build #55903 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55903/consoleFull)**
for PR 12405 at commit
[`5539c1b`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12405#issuecomment-210319246
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12405#issuecomment-210319254
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user ScrapCodes closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user ScrapCodes commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5#issuecomment-210324204
@andrewor14 As far as I knew, it worked fine. There is a check in
Task.collectAccumulatorUpdates, you mean that check is not sufficient ? Ahh
looking at the jira, I
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12402#discussion_r59834954
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/clustering.py ---
@@ -22,7 +22,151 @@
from pyspark.mllib.common import inherit_doc
__all__ = ['BisectingKMeans'
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12402#discussion_r59834991
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/clustering.py ---
@@ -22,7 +22,151 @@
from pyspark.mllib.common import inherit_doc
__all__ = ['BisectingKMeans'
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12317#issuecomment-210328578
**[Test build #55902 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55902/consoleFull)**
for PR 12317 at commit
[`e626d1d`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12317#issuecomment-210328835
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12317#issuecomment-210328832
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12340#issuecomment-210337909
**[Test build #55907 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55907/consoleFull)**
for PR 12340 at commit
[`fa3e95a`](https://gi
GitHub user yhuai opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12410
[WIP] [SQL] Towards removing HiveContext
## This PR does not run thrift server tests because jenkins run those tests
first and will fail the build if there is any failure. I'd like to know how
many
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12410#issuecomment-210341447
**[Test build #55908 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55908/consoleFull)**
for PR 12410 at commit
[`69e778d`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12410#issuecomment-210341701
**[Test build #55908 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55908/consoleFull)**
for PR 12410 at commit
[`69e778d`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12410#issuecomment-210341706
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12410#issuecomment-210341704
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12340#discussion_r59837905
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/misc.scala
---
@@ -487,6 +487,50 @@ case class PrintToStderr(child: Expression)
Github user adrian-wang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12391#discussion_r59838034
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveExternalCatalogSuite.scala
---
@@ -17,20 +17,22 @@
package org.apache.spark.s
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12340#discussion_r59838031
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/misc.scala
---
@@ -487,6 +487,50 @@ case class PrintToStderr(child: Expression)
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12340#discussion_r59838077
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/misc.scala
---
@@ -487,6 +487,50 @@ case class PrintToStderr(child: Expression)
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12340#issuecomment-210342856
can you create a new jira ticket for assert_true, and put both in the title?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12257#issuecomment-210344607
**[Test build #55904 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55904/consoleFull)**
for PR 12257 at commit
[`e6c0c3b`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12257#issuecomment-210344727
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12257#issuecomment-210344729
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user sarutak commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12257#issuecomment-210345071
retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this f
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12257#issuecomment-210346298
**[Test build #55909 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55909/consoleFull)**
for PR 12257 at commit
[`e6c0c3b`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12385#issuecomment-210346378
**[Test build #55906 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55906/consoleFull)**
for PR 12385 at commit
[`8b204ca`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12385#issuecomment-210346501
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12340#issuecomment-210346484
Thank you for fast review. I'll update and create the JIRA.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12385#issuecomment-210346502
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1#issuecomment-210346717
**[Test build #55905 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55905/consoleFull)**
for PR 1 at commit
[`587263b`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1#issuecomment-210346924
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1#issuecomment-210346927
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12388#discussion_r59839605
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/jobs/JobProgressListener.scala ---
@@ -434,50 +434,50 @@ class JobProgressListener(conf: SparkConf) exten
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12410#issuecomment-210347156
**[Test build #55910 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55910/consoleFull)**
for PR 12410 at commit
[`496bea1`](https://gi
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12388#discussion_r59840023
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/jobs/JobProgressListener.scala ---
@@ -434,50 +434,50 @@ class JobProgressListener(conf: SparkConf) exten
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12340#discussion_r59840175
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/misc.scala
---
@@ -487,6 +487,50 @@ case class PrintToStderr(child: Ex
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12317#issuecomment-210353251
LGTM. Merged into master. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does no
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12317
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12410#issuecomment-210356553
`org.apache.spark.sql.hive.execution.SQLQuerySuite.sanity test for
SPARK-6618` will fail because we will not use executionHive to protect the call
of parseSql. So, `def h
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12382#issuecomment-210358749
@andrewor14 Hm.. I tried to add a rule but I realised (or I think) it
cannot find perfectly by a static way. One of the problems I met was below:
For exampl
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12382#issuecomment-210359106
@andrewor14 @srowen Do you mind If I open another PR for some more
corrections?
While trying to test regular expressions, I found some more things to
corre
Github user pravingadakh commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12176#discussion_r59844091
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/clustering/LDAOptimizer.scala ---
@@ -536,13 +532,16 @@ private[clustering] object OnlineLDAOptimi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11371#issuecomment-210367560
**[Test build #55911 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55911/consoleFull)**
for PR 11371 at commit
[`441d9a5`](https://gi
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12382#issuecomment-210369151
If there's a built-in scalastyle rule for this, let's enable it, but
otherwise not sure it's worth building custom code to enforce it. If you've
found ways to look for m
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12340#issuecomment-210373329
**[Test build #55907 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55907/consoleFull)**
for PR 12340 at commit
[`fa3e95a`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12340#issuecomment-210373810
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12340#issuecomment-210373814
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user dragos commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12403#issuecomment-210375089
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
GitHub user kiszk opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12411
[SPARK-14656][Core] Fix Benchmark.getPorcessorName() always return "Unknown
processor" on Linux
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR returns correct processor name in ```/p
GitHub user viirya opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12412
[SPARK-14609][SQL] Native support for LOAD DATA DDL command
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add the native support for LOAD DATA DDL command that loads data into Hive
ta
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12411#issuecomment-210375881
**[Test build #55912 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55912/consoleFull)**
for PR 12411 at commit
[`b6ea54e`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12410#issuecomment-210376394
**[Test build #55910 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55910/consoleFull)**
for PR 12410 at commit
[`496bea1`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12410#issuecomment-210376596
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12410#issuecomment-210376598
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12412#issuecomment-210377132
**[Test build #55913 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55913/consoleFull)**
for PR 12412 at commit
[`d8aaae6`](https://gi
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12176#discussion_r59848898
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/clustering/LDAOptimizer.scala ---
@@ -536,13 +532,16 @@ private[clustering] object OnlineLDAOptimizer {
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12413#issuecomment-210381977
cc @srowen
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this featu
GitHub user HyukjinKwon opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12413
[MINOR] Remove inappropriate type notation and extra anonymous closure
within functional transformations
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR removes
-
Github user peterableda commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12395#discussion_r59849405
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/memory/StaticMemoryManager.scala ---
@@ -104,6 +104,8 @@ private[spark] class StaticMemoryManager(
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12413#issuecomment-210383168
**[Test build #55914 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55914/consoleFull)**
for PR 12413 at commit
[`bd7dec4`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12340#issuecomment-210383165
**[Test build #55915 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55915/consoleFull)**
for PR 12340 at commit
[`bdcef78`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12004#issuecomment-210383201
**[Test build #55916 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55916/consoleFull)**
for PR 12004 at commit
[`105de0b`](https://gi
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12268#issuecomment-210383858
Could I please cc @falaki who I believe is the original author?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitH
Github user rajeshbalamohan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12105#issuecomment-210384204
Revised the patch addressing comments. Fixed eval() of UnixTime,
FromUnixTime. Haven't changed eval in DateFormatClass as i am not sure if
format can change in
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12412#issuecomment-210384544
**[Test build #55913 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55913/consoleFull)**
for PR 12412 at commit
[`d8aaae6`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12412#issuecomment-210384612
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12412#issuecomment-210384615
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12395#discussion_r59850951
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/memory/StaticMemoryManager.scala ---
@@ -104,6 +104,8 @@ private[spark] class StaticMemoryManager(
p
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12413#discussion_r59851195
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/TaskEndReason.scala ---
@@ -149,8 +149,8 @@ case class ExceptionFailure(
this(e, accumUpdates, preserve
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12413#discussion_r59851263
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/api/java/JavaRDDLike.scala
---
@@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ trait JavaRDDLike[T, This <: JavaRDDLike[T, This]]
extends
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12413#issuecomment-210393625
LGTM with a few questions
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have t
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12257#issuecomment-210396203
**[Test build #55909 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55909/consoleFull)**
for PR 12257 at commit
[`e6c0c3b`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12257#issuecomment-210396502
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12257#issuecomment-210396499
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user pravingadakh commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12176#discussion_r59852468
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/clustering/LDAOptimizer.scala ---
@@ -536,13 +532,16 @@ private[clustering] object OnlineLDAOptimi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12412#issuecomment-210396681
**[Test build #55917 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55917/consoleFull)**
for PR 12412 at commit
[`d15c7a3`](https://gi
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12413#discussion_r59852563
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/api/java/JavaRDDLike.scala
---
@@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ trait JavaRDDLike[T, This <: JavaRDDLike[T, This]]
ext
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12413#discussion_r59852942
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/TaskEndReason.scala ---
@@ -149,8 +149,8 @@ case class ExceptionFailure(
this(e, accumUpdates, pre
GitHub user yanboliang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12414
[SPARK-14657] [ML] RFormula w/o intercept, we should output reference
category when encoding string terms
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
(Please fill in changes pro
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11371#issuecomment-210402524
**[Test build #55911 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55911/consoleFull)**
for PR 11371 at commit
[`441d9a5`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11371#issuecomment-210402776
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11371#issuecomment-210402778
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12414#issuecomment-210403003
**[Test build #55918 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55918/consoleFull)**
for PR 12414 at commit
[`167beae`](https://gi
GitHub user shkdee opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12415
[BUG] LinearRegressionModel use default parameters if yStd is 0
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the (rare) case where yStd is 0 in LinearRegression, parameters are not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12259#issuecomment-210406323
**[Test build #55919 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55919/consoleFull)**
for PR 12259 at commit
[`ba9e910`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12415#issuecomment-210406159
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your p
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12259#issuecomment-210406956
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12259#issuecomment-210406958
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12259#issuecomment-210406941
**[Test build #55919 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/55919/consoleFull)**
for PR 12259 at commit
[`ba9e910`](https://g
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12412#discussion_r59855917
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/antlr4/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/parser/SqlBase.g4 ---
@@ -880,6 +882,8 @@ INDEXES: 'INDEXES';
LOCKS: 'LOCKS';
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12412#discussion_r59856683
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/commands.scala ---
@@ -255,3 +258,88 @@ case class CreateMetastoreDataSourceAsSelect
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12412#discussion_r59856710
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/commands.scala ---
@@ -255,3 +258,88 @@ case class CreateMetastoreDataSourceAsSelect
1 - 100 of 710 matches
Mail list logo
