Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12764#issuecomment-215618646
**[Test build #57304 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57304/consoleFull)**
for PR 12764 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12764#issuecomment-215618649
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12764#issuecomment-215618648
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12764#issuecomment-215618497
**[Test build #57304 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57304/consoleFull)**
for PR 12764 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12769#issuecomment-215618498
**[Test build #57303 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57303/consoleFull)**
for PR 12769 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12764#issuecomment-215618220
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12764#issuecomment-215618223
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12764#issuecomment-215618215
**[Test build #57302 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57302/consoleFull)**
for PR 12764 at commit
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12769#issuecomment-215618149
test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12764#issuecomment-215618028
**[Test build #57302 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57302/consoleFull)**
for PR 12764 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12769#issuecomment-215617795
**[Test build #2924 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2924/consoleFull)**
for PR 12769 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12752#issuecomment-215617596
**[Test build #57301 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57301/consoleFull)**
for PR 12752 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12755#issuecomment-215617450
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12755#issuecomment-215617449
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12755#issuecomment-215617401
**[Test build #57297 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57297/consoleFull)**
for PR 12755 at commit
Github user mwws commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12752#issuecomment-215617286
Jenkins, retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user mwws commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12752#issuecomment-215617172
The failed test is not related to my change (I think PR#12416 break spark
CI)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12773#issuecomment-215616890
**[Test build #2928 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2928/consoleFull)**
for PR 12773 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12409#issuecomment-215616915
**[Test build #2922 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2922/consoleFull)**
for PR 12409 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12719#issuecomment-215616875
Thank you for review, @cloud-fan !
Do you mean removing aliases by replacing the base expression(?) by using
`transformUp`?
Maybe, except the top most
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12773#issuecomment-215616903
**[Test build #2929 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2929/consoleFull)**
for PR 12773 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12773#issuecomment-215616837
**[Test build #2925 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2925/consoleFull)**
for PR 12773 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12773#issuecomment-215616866
**[Test build #2927 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2927/consoleFull)**
for PR 12773 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12773#issuecomment-215616838
**[Test build #57300 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57300/consoleFull)**
for PR 12773 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12773#issuecomment-215616855
**[Test build #2926 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2926/consoleFull)**
for PR 12773 at commit
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12773#issuecomment-215616619
test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12771#issuecomment-215616450
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12771#issuecomment-215616449
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12771#issuecomment-215616380
**[Test build #57295 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57295/consoleFull)**
for PR 12771 at commit
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12771#discussion_r61530661
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/TPCDSBenchmark.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,1225 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12416#issuecomment-215615904
I have reverted this commit.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11601#issuecomment-215615452
**[Test build #57298 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57298/consoleFull)**
for PR 11601 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11601#issuecomment-215615467
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11601#issuecomment-215615465
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12416#issuecomment-215615493
Sorry. I am going to revert it. I believe it breaks the build. Seems those
build changes are not related to adding Since tag.
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12416#issuecomment-215615096
Looks like this one breaks the pr builder?
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12769#issuecomment-215615011
**[Test build #2924 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2924/consoleFull)**
for PR 12769 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12719#issuecomment-215614987
instead of doing this, can we propagate foldable alias bottom up? So that
it's not only `Sort`, but all operators can benefit from it.
---
If your project is set up
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12640#discussion_r61529874
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/linalg/UDTSerializationBenchmark.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12773#issuecomment-215614070
**[Test build #57299 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57299/consoleFull)**
for PR 12773 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12773#issuecomment-215613977
cc @rxin @davies @yhuai
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
GitHub user cloud-fan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12773
[HOTFIX][CORE] fix a concurrence issue in NewAccumulator
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`AccumulatorContext` is not thread-safe, that's why all of its methods are
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12764#issuecomment-215613711
**[Test build #2921 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2921/consoleFull)**
for PR 12764 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11601#issuecomment-215613222
**[Test build #57298 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57298/consoleFull)**
for PR 11601 at commit
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12765#discussion_r61529274
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/catalog.py ---
@@ -0,0 +1,426 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+#
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12765#discussion_r61529260
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/session.py ---
@@ -121,6 +121,19 @@ def newSession(self):
"""
return self.__class__(self._sc,
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12409#issuecomment-215612403
**[Test build #2923 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2923/consoleFull)**
for PR 12409 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12755#issuecomment-215612379
**[Test build #57297 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57297/consoleFull)**
for PR 12755 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12752#issuecomment-215612058
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12752#issuecomment-215612059
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12752#issuecomment-215612048
**[Test build #57294 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57294/consoleFull)**
for PR 12752 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12772#issuecomment-215611950
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12409#issuecomment-215611801
**[Test build #2923 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2923/consoleFull)**
for PR 12409 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12409#issuecomment-215611786
**[Test build #2922 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2922/consoleFull)**
for PR 12409 at commit
GitHub user liyuance opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12772
[SPARK-14998][SQL]fix ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException in
when I use transformation in SparkSQL, may throw
java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException, as some output lines of the
transformation
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12493#issuecomment-215611550
**[Test build #57296 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57296/consoleFull)**
for PR 12493 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12771#issuecomment-215611065
**[Test build #57295 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57295/consoleFull)**
for PR 12771 at commit
Github user sameeragarwal commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12771#issuecomment-215610732
cc @davies
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user sameeragarwal opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12771
[SPARK-14996] Add TPCDS Benchmark Queries for SparkSQL
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR adds support for easily running and benchmarking a set of common
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12755#issuecomment-215610516
@rxin The PR was first created to fix errors in Dataset.scala doc. What
about updating this PR by remove changes in other files?
---
If your project is set up
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12764#issuecomment-215610395
**[Test build #2920 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2920/consoleFull)**
for PR 12764 at commit
Github user zhengruifeng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12718#discussion_r61527726
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/ChiSqSelector.scala ---
@@ -79,11 +79,12 @@ final class ChiSqSelector(override val uid:
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12752#issuecomment-215609668
**[Test build #57294 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57294/consoleFull)**
for PR 12752 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12765#issuecomment-215609430
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12765#issuecomment-215609428
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12765#issuecomment-215609352
**[Test build #57289 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57289/consoleFull)**
for PR 12765 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12765#issuecomment-215609337
**[Test build #2916 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2916/consoleFull)**
for PR 12765 at commit
Github user dding3 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12747#issuecomment-215609146
@srowen Thanks for your review. I have removed it in ANNGradient. Besides,
I checked all subclass of Gradient, looks like there is no duplicate
implementation now.
Github user felixcheung commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10094#issuecomment-215609110
I think someone also add a `window` function?
https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/a55fbe2a16aa0866ff8aca25bf9f772e6eb516a1/R/pkg/R/functions.R#L2154
---
If
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12765#issuecomment-215608783
**[Test build #2918 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2918/consoleFull)**
for PR 12765 at commit
Github user NathanHowell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12750#discussion_r61526935
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/json/InferSchema.scala
---
@@ -246,12 +263,39 @@ private[sql] object
Github user NathanHowell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12750#discussion_r61526900
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/json/InferSchema.scala
---
@@ -246,12 +263,39 @@ private[sql] object
Github user NathanHowell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12750#discussion_r61526786
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/json/InferSchema.scala
---
@@ -76,6 +78,15 @@ private[sql] object
Github user NathanHowell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12750#issuecomment-215607825
Alright, here's a few ideas that will at least reduce allocations by a bit.
Your version with the merge sort is likely better than the insertion sort here
but I
Github user sun-rui commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12493#discussion_r61526656
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Dataset.scala ---
@@ -1981,6 +1982,23 @@ class Dataset[T] private[sql](
}
/**
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12759#issuecomment-215607453
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12759#issuecomment-215607455
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12759#issuecomment-215607382
**[Test build #57292 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57292/consoleFull)**
for PR 12759 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12409#issuecomment-215607184
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12409#issuecomment-215607182
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12409#issuecomment-215607119
**[Test build #57293 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57293/consoleFull)**
for PR 12409 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12764#issuecomment-215605025
**[Test build #2912 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2912/consoleFull)**
for PR 12764 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12722#issuecomment-215604610
**[Test build #2914 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2914/consoleFull)**
for PR 12722 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12769#issuecomment-215603503
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12769#issuecomment-215603485
**[Test build #57291 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57291/consoleFull)**
for PR 12769 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12769#issuecomment-215603455
**[Test build #2919 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2919/consoleFull)**
for PR 12769 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12769#issuecomment-215603504
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12769#issuecomment-215602538
**[Test build #57288 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57288/consoleFull)**
for PR 12769 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12769#issuecomment-215602554
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12769#issuecomment-215602555
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12769#issuecomment-215602145
**[Test build #2915 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2915/consoleFull)**
for PR 12769 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12768#discussion_r61523748
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/util/TypeUtils.scala
---
@@ -42,13 +42,14 @@ object TypeUtils {
}
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12765#discussion_r61523711
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/catalog.py ---
@@ -0,0 +1,426 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+#
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12765#discussion_r61523686
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/catalog.py ---
@@ -0,0 +1,426 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+#
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12768#discussion_r61523655
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/util/TypeUtils.scala
---
@@ -42,13 +42,14 @@ object TypeUtils {
}
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12768#discussion_r61523626
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/util/TypeUtils.scala
---
@@ -42,13 +42,14 @@ object TypeUtils {
}
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12765#discussion_r61523630
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/session.py ---
@@ -121,6 +121,19 @@ def newSession(self):
"""
return self.__class__(self._sc,
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12765#discussion_r61523579
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/conf.py ---
@@ -0,0 +1,114 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+# contributor
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11812#issuecomment-215601512
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11812#issuecomment-215601488
**[Test build #57290 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57290/consoleFull)**
for PR 11812 at commit
101 - 200 of 866 matches
Mail list logo
