Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12926#issuecomment-217363557
I think a simpler and better approach is just removing this alias only
project in next batch.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and h
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12889#discussion_r62294700
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/classification.py ---
@@ -1118,7 +1142,8 @@ def getBlockSize(self):
return self.getOrDefault(self.blockSize)
Github user MLnick commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12918#discussion_r62294736
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/classification.py ---
@@ -454,7 +454,8 @@ class TreeClassifierParams(object):
impurity = Param(Params._dummy(), "impurity"
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12889#discussion_r62294714
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/regression.py ---
@@ -708,7 +710,7 @@ def _create_model(self, java_model):
@inherit_doc
-class DecisionTre
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12889#discussion_r62294597
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/classification.py ---
@@ -581,8 +602,11 @@ def _create_model(self, java_model):
@inherit_doc
-class Decisi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12927#issuecomment-217361848
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12927#issuecomment-217361850
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12927#issuecomment-217361802
**[Test build #57968 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57968/consoleFull)**
for PR 12927 at commit
[`2270148`](https://g
Github user holdenk commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12937#issuecomment-217361023
cc @yanboliang
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this featu
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12927#issuecomment-217360439
**[Test build #57968 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57968/consoleFull)**
for PR 12927 at commit
[`2270148`](https://gi
Github user JustinPihony commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12601#issuecomment-217359217
I can finish this next Monday(fix the conflicts that now exist), and will
actually do that given the above comments. I'd still like to get an opinion on
whether I
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12871#issuecomment-217358886
**[Test build #57967 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57967/consoleFull)**
for PR 12871 at commit
[`e975047`](https://gi
Github user holdenk commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12944#issuecomment-217358557
So a very minor style thing; it seems like the rest of the configuration
values are exposed through accessor methods on TransportConf rather than
directly exposing getI
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12949#issuecomment-217358270
**[Test build #57966 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57966/consoleFull)**
for PR 12949 at commit
[`d831109`](https://gi
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12926#issuecomment-217357870
cc @cloud-fan @yhuai @rxin
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12898#issuecomment-217357829
cc @cloud-fan @yhuai @rxin
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12949#issuecomment-217357762
cc @yhuai
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
GitHub user cloud-fan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12949
[SPARK-15173][SQL] DataFrameWriter.insertInto should work with datasource
table stored in hive
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When we read a datasource table stored
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12385#issuecomment-217357392
**[Test build #57965 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57965/consoleFull)**
for PR 12385 at commit
[`4031b02`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12947#issuecomment-217357135
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12947#issuecomment-217357132
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12947#issuecomment-217357024
**[Test build #57962 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57962/consoleFull)**
for PR 12947 at commit
[`b1d01c8`](https://g
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12385#discussion_r62292867
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/AlreadyExistException.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12948#issuecomment-217356782
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your p
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12946#issuecomment-217356644
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
GitHub user dding3 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12948
[SPARK-15172][ML] Improve LogisticRegression warning message
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Explicitly tell user initial coefficients is ignored if its size doesn't
match ex
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12946#issuecomment-217356648
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user jerryshao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11863#discussion_r62292704
--- Diff:
external/kafka-beta/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kafka/DirectKafkaInputDStream.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,344 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12946#issuecomment-217356541
**[Test build #57960 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57960/consoleFull)**
for PR 12946 at commit
[`bc837b4`](https://g
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12947#issuecomment-217355660
@clockfly Can we show table name instead of `HadoopFiles` or together? If
there is no table name, we could use the rightest part of path.
---
If your project is set up
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12945#issuecomment-217353911
**[Test build #57964 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57964/consoleFull)**
for PR 12945 at commit
[`e17bd6d`](https://gi
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12801#issuecomment-217353785
@yhuai Agree! Actually, I initially tried to do it in a batch mode. That is
the following API we need to use
```
public List dropPartitions(String dbName, Str
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12899#issuecomment-217352598
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12899#issuecomment-217352599
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12899#issuecomment-217352525
**[Test build #57959 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57959/consoleFull)**
for PR 12899 at commit
[`cb21034`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12918#issuecomment-217351727
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12918#issuecomment-217351726
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12918#issuecomment-217351688
**[Test build #57963 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57963/consoleFull)**
for PR 12918 at commit
[`bb18b9a`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12918#issuecomment-217349774
**[Test build #57963 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57963/consoleFull)**
for PR 12918 at commit
[`bb18b9a`](https://gi
Github user mwws closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11101
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabl
Github user mwws closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11249
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabl
Github user mwws commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12752#issuecomment-217349115
@srowen @zsxwing could you help merge itï¼
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12947#issuecomment-217348849
**[Test build #57962 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57962/consoleFull)**
for PR 12947 at commit
[`b1d01c8`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12914#issuecomment-217348813
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12914#issuecomment-217348812
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12914#issuecomment-217348761
**[Test build #57961 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57961/consoleFull)**
for PR 12914 at commit
[`602c5ca`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12871#issuecomment-217348613
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12871#issuecomment-217348611
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12871#issuecomment-217348567
**[Test build #57957 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57957/consoleFull)**
for PR 12871 at commit
[`8ff5d9c`](https://g
GitHub user clockfly opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12947
[SPARK-14476][SQL] Improves the output of dataset.explain by adding source
table names and file paths.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Improve the physical plan visualizati
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12945#issuecomment-217348014
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12914#issuecomment-217348026
**[Test build #57961 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57961/consoleFull)**
for PR 12914 at commit
[`602c5ca`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12945#issuecomment-217348013
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12945#issuecomment-217347997
**[Test build #57956 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57956/consoleFull)**
for PR 12945 at commit
[`029ce73`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12926#issuecomment-217347901
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12926#issuecomment-217347900
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12926#issuecomment-217347818
**[Test build #57955 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57955/consoleFull)**
for PR 12926 at commit
[`3d0554d`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12898#issuecomment-217347602
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12898#issuecomment-217347601
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12898#issuecomment-217347534
**[Test build #57954 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57954/consoleFull)**
for PR 12898 at commit
[`08c614a`](https://g
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12920#issuecomment-217347142
@MLnick Args-Parsing was removed in those examples
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12918#discussion_r62287954
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/classification.py ---
@@ -353,7 +353,7 @@ def roc(self):
Returns the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve
Github user holdenk commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12918#issuecomment-217346608
Happy to, I was going to leave those files for the people working in them
during QA but I can update them as well.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user yanboliang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12918#issuecomment-217346237
I like it! @holdenk Could you make change for all links in spark.ml docs? I
found there are links in ```regression.py```, ```recommendation.py``` and
```feature.py``
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12946#issuecomment-217345558
**[Test build #57960 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57960/consoleFull)**
for PR 12946 at commit
[`bc837b4`](https://gi
GitHub user koeninger opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12946
[SPARK-15085][Streaming][Kafka] Rename streaming-kafka artifact to inâ¦
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Renaming the streaming-kafka artifact to include kafka version, in
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12914#issuecomment-217344576
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12914#issuecomment-217344567
**[Test build #57958 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57958/consoleFull)**
for PR 12914 at commit
[`4fffa65`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12914#issuecomment-217344578
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12899#issuecomment-217344297
**[Test build #57959 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57959/consoleFull)**
for PR 12899 at commit
[`cb21034`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12914#issuecomment-217343853
**[Test build #57958 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57958/consoleFull)**
for PR 12914 at commit
[`4fffa65`](https://gi
Github user hellertime commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12933#issuecomment-217343655
I'm updating the title of the PR to reflect the change in approach. I think
the boolean property will be sufficient.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can r
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12856#issuecomment-217343071
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12856#issuecomment-217343068
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12871#issuecomment-217343030
**[Test build #57957 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57957/consoleFull)**
for PR 12871 at commit
[`8ff5d9c`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12856#issuecomment-217342999
**[Test build #57951 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57951/consoleFull)**
for PR 12856 at commit
[`8c06d4e`](https://g
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12943#discussion_r62286319
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/MultilayerPerceptronClassifier.scala
---
@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ private[ml] trait MultilayerPer
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12943#discussion_r62286255
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/MultilayerPerceptronClassifier.scala
---
@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ private[ml] trait MultilayerPer
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12945#issuecomment-217341678
**[Test build #57956 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57956/consoleFull)**
for PR 12945 at commit
[`029ce73`](https://gi
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12914#discussion_r62286043
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/param/_shared_params_code_gen.py ---
@@ -58,6 +61,9 @@ def __init__(self):
if defaultValueStr is not None:
t
Github user hellertime commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12933#issuecomment-217341428
True. So really the desired behavior is always just to ignore `*`
resources. A boolean property would suffice here. What about
`spark.mesos.ignoreDefaultResourceRole
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12914#discussion_r62285930
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/param/_shared_params_code_gen.py ---
@@ -58,6 +61,9 @@ def __init__(self):
if defaultValueStr is not None:
Github user tnachen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12933#issuecomment-217341006
Yes I am aware of multi roles, but not sure in what situation you would
want to register with multiple roles but only use one role's resources?
---
If your project is
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12914#discussion_r62285684
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/param/__init__.py ---
@@ -280,7 +281,9 @@ def explainParam(self, param):
else:
values.append("undefi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12899#issuecomment-217340511
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12899#issuecomment-217340512
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12914#discussion_r62285526
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/param/__init__.py ---
@@ -280,7 +281,9 @@ def explainParam(self, param):
else:
values.append("und
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12899#issuecomment-217340426
**[Test build #57946 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57946/consoleFull)**
for PR 12899 at commit
[`b48dda8`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12926#issuecomment-217339830
**[Test build #57955 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57955/consoleFull)**
for PR 12926 at commit
[`3d0554d`](https://gi
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12914#discussion_r62285048
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/param/__init__.py ---
@@ -280,7 +281,9 @@ def explainParam(self, param):
else:
values.append("und
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12898#issuecomment-217339397
**[Test build #57954 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57954/consoleFull)**
for PR 12898 at commit
[`08c614a`](https://gi
Github user hellertime commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12933#issuecomment-217339163
I see that as a potential solution, however at some future point mesos will
support frameworks which can hold multiple roles (MESOS-1763 ð) so perhaps
leaving it
Github user koeninger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11863#discussion_r62284776
--- Diff:
external/kafka-beta/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kafka/KafkaRDD.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,259 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user shivaram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12836#issuecomment-217338855
Lets create a wrapper - I think its better for R users.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user bomeng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12916#issuecomment-217338702
The test failure was caused by timeout for HiveThriftHttpServerSuite and
SingleSessionSuite... have not figure out the cause, any suggestion will be
welcome.
---
If y
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12945#issuecomment-217338674
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12945#issuecomment-217338672
**[Test build #57953 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57953/consoleFull)**
for PR 12945 at commit
[`0bcbe8c`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12945#issuecomment-217338675
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12945#issuecomment-217338558
**[Test build #57953 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57953/consoleFull)**
for PR 12945 at commit
[`0bcbe8c`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12920#issuecomment-217338464
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
1 - 100 of 844 matches
Mail list logo
