Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12954#discussion_r62391407
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -1645,3 +1646,30 @@ object
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12907#issuecomment-217558682
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12907#issuecomment-217558684
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12907#issuecomment-217558642
**[Test build #58028 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58028/consoleFull)**
for PR 12907 at commit
Github user nchammas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11785#discussion_r62391024
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/types/StructField.scala ---
@@ -24,7 +24,9 @@ import org.json4s.JsonDSL._
* A field inside
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12964#issuecomment-217557772
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12964#issuecomment-217557775
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12964#issuecomment-217557696
**[Test build #58029 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58029/consoleFull)**
for PR 12964 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12843
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11871
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12843#issuecomment-217557000
Merged into master and branch-2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12309#issuecomment-217556199
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12309#issuecomment-217556200
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12309#issuecomment-217556001
**[Test build #58016 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58016/consoleFull)**
for PR 12309 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12964#issuecomment-217555660
**[Test build #58029 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58029/consoleFull)**
for PR 12964 at commit
Github user sureshthalamati commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12904#issuecomment-217555333
Thank you for the feedback , Reynold , HyukjinKwon. Update the PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
GitHub user holdenk opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12964
[SPARK-15189] Update ml.evaluation PyDoc
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Fix doctest issue, short param description, and tag items as Experimental
## How was
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11546#issuecomment-217555196
Thanks, I'm merging this into branch-1.6.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12954#discussion_r62388521
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -1645,3 +1646,30 @@ object
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12856#issuecomment-217552265
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12907#issuecomment-217552503
**[Test build #58028 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58028/consoleFull)**
for PR 12907 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12856#issuecomment-217552263
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12856#issuecomment-217551680
**[Test build #58017 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58017/consoleFull)**
for PR 12856 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12907#issuecomment-217551357
**[Test build #58025 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58025/consoleFull)**
for PR 12907 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12907#issuecomment-217551399
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12907#issuecomment-217551393
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12963#issuecomment-217551144
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12963#issuecomment-217551142
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12963#issuecomment-217551045
**[Test build #58026 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58026/consoleFull)**
for PR 12963 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12856#issuecomment-217549885
**[Test build #58027 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58027/consoleFull)**
for PR 12856 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11546#issuecomment-217549033
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11546#issuecomment-217549030
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12963#issuecomment-217548793
**[Test build #58026 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58026/consoleFull)**
for PR 12963 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11546#issuecomment-217548905
**[Test build #58014 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58014/consoleFull)**
for PR 11546 at commit
Github user ntietz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12955#issuecomment-217547803
I'll dig deeper into the documentation and will update!
I've got the bandwidth to work on this. I'll add a JIRA for it tonight and
work on it over the course of
GitHub user holdenk opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12963
[SPARK-15188] Add missing thresholds param to NaiveBayes in PySpark
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add missing thresholds param to NiaveBayes
## How was
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12832#discussion_r62384839
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/Accumulable.scala ---
@@ -49,6 +48,7 @@ import org.apache.spark.util.Utils
* @tparam R the full
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12962#issuecomment-217546783
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12962#issuecomment-217546781
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12962#issuecomment-217546573
**[Test build #58015 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58015/consoleFull)**
for PR 12962 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12889#issuecomment-217545042
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12889#issuecomment-217545040
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12889#issuecomment-217544938
**[Test build #58023 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58023/consoleFull)**
for PR 12889 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12907#issuecomment-217544590
**[Test build #58025 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58025/consoleFull)**
for PR 12907 at commit
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12856#issuecomment-217544431
LGTM! Those tests are awesome!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12907#issuecomment-217543760
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12907#issuecomment-217543724
**[Test build #58022 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58022/consoleFull)**
for PR 12907 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12907#issuecomment-217543757
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12856#discussion_r62382369
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/FileCatalogSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12856#discussion_r62382277
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/FileCatalogSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12954#discussion_r62382220
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -1645,3 +1646,30 @@ object
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12889#issuecomment-217542363
**[Test build #58023 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58023/consoleFull)**
for PR 12889 at commit
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12954#discussion_r62382186
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -1645,3 +1646,30 @@ object
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12618#issuecomment-217542372
**[Test build #58024 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58024/consoleFull)**
for PR 12618 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12959#issuecomment-217539998
**[Test build #58012 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58012/consoleFull)**
for PR 12959 at commit
Github user wangmiao1981 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12788#issuecomment-217541412
@sethah @zhengruifeng @yanboliang I made changes to address comments.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12889#discussion_r62381355
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/regression.py ---
@@ -708,7 +710,7 @@ def _create_model(self, java_model):
@inherit_doc
-class
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12907#issuecomment-217541256
**[Test build #58022 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58022/consoleFull)**
for PR 12907 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12959#issuecomment-217540229
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12959#issuecomment-217540231
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12790#discussion_r62380680
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/pipeline.py ---
@@ -89,9 +87,9 @@ def setParams(self, stages=None):
setParams(self, stages=None)
Sets
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12960#issuecomment-217539316
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12960#issuecomment-217539313
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12960#issuecomment-217539079
**[Test build #58011 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58011/consoleFull)**
for PR 12960 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12788#issuecomment-217537902
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12788#issuecomment-217537899
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12788#issuecomment-217537788
**[Test build #58020 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58020/consoleFull)**
for PR 12788 at commit
Github user steveloughran commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12004#issuecomment-217536672
For anyone trying to run these tests, they'll need a test xml file and
refer to it
```
mvn test -Phadoop-2.6
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12113#issuecomment-217535862
**[Test build #58021 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58021/consoleFull)**
for PR 12113 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12788#issuecomment-217535852
**[Test build #58020 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58020/consoleFull)**
for PR 12788 at commit
Github user wangmiao1981 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12788#issuecomment-217534939
retest it please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12788#issuecomment-217534341
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12788#issuecomment-217534345
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12954#discussion_r62377447
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -1645,3 +1646,30 @@ object
Github user BryanCutler commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12790#discussion_r62377335
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/pipeline.py ---
@@ -89,9 +87,9 @@ def setParams(self, stages=None):
setParams(self, stages=None)
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12113#issuecomment-217533566
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12113#issuecomment-217533562
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12113#issuecomment-217533559
**[Test build #58018 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58018/consoleFull)**
for PR 12113 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12113#issuecomment-217533280
**[Test build #58018 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58018/consoleFull)**
for PR 12113 at commit
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12954#issuecomment-217533079
@hvanhovell never mind, I made a mistake in the query
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12961#issuecomment-217532129
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12961#issuecomment-217532127
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12856#issuecomment-217532164
**[Test build #58017 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58017/consoleFull)**
for PR 12856 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12961#issuecomment-217532002
**[Test build #58013 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58013/consoleFull)**
for PR 12961 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12309#issuecomment-217530991
**[Test build #58016 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58016/consoleFull)**
for PR 12309 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12309#issuecomment-217530027
Jenkins retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12885#issuecomment-217528932
Thank you!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12955#issuecomment-217528845
Hm, then there are actually similar methods for key-value RDDs in
`PairRDDFunctions` and `JavaPairRDD` -- basically the non "distinct" ones.
I think we could
Github user mgummelt commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11157#issuecomment-217528595
I just learned that Mesos 0.29 will have network isolation support, which
will allow us to launch each container in its own network namespace. What do
you think
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12899#discussion_r62374320
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/Task.scala ---
@@ -155,7 +155,13 @@ private[spark] abstract class Task[T](
*/
def
Github user tgravescs commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12113#issuecomment-217528211
yeah I would mostly be worried about hitting the same issue with memory
bloat but it would need more investigation. I'll update for the getSizeAs
---
If your
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12954#issuecomment-217527040
I still can't run Q41 after this PR:
```
select distinct(i_product_name)
from item i1
where i_manufact_id between 738 and 738+40
and (select
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12962#issuecomment-217526996
**[Test build #58015 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58015/consoleFull)**
for PR 12962 at commit
GitHub user gatorsmile opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12962
[SPARK-15187] [SQL] Disallow Dropping Default Database
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In Hive Metastore, dropping default database is not allowed. However, in
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12885
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user kevinyu98 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10125#issuecomment-217526107
@srowen: sorry for the long delay. I will work on it now.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12885#issuecomment-217525623
LGTM. Merging to master and branch 2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12885#issuecomment-217525644
Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user tgravescs commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7739#issuecomment-217525101
I have seen cases where driver and executor needs different classpath,
mostly in client mode. gateways/launcher boxes can have different setup then
hadoop nodes. I
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12942#issuecomment-217524184
alright, for now the user will have to check the secret conf value.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
201 - 300 of 680 matches
Mail list logo
