Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13061
> Aren't we already doing that
No, you're throwing a generic exception that doesn't explain what's wrong.
None of the existing errors say "properties file not found", which is what a
null wo
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13499#discussion_r65764703
--- Diff:
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/YarnClientSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -64,7 +68,7 @@ private[spark] class YarnClientSchedu
Github user dhruve commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13061
Aren't we already doing that. The generic catch would display the error
message and also the exception that caused it. Having an extra check isn't
going to add more value here.
---
If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13499
**[Test build #59955 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59955/consoleFull)**
for PR 13499 at commit
[`d53ad55`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/d
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13115
**[Test build #3052 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3052/consoleFull)**
for PR 13115 at commit
[`e756a0a`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13476
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13476
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59952/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13476
**[Test build #59952 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59952/consoleFull)**
for PR 13476 at commit
[`d256621`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user subrotosanyal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13499#discussion_r65762991
--- Diff:
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/YarnClientSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -64,7 +68,7 @@ private[spark] class YarnClien
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13490
**[Test build #59954 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59954/consoleFull)**
for PR 13490 at commit
[`1e3fd2e`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/1
Github user andrewor14 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13490
Sounds good. I've updated the patch.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
ena
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13498
Seems to be related to the sequence in which tests are executed... Perhaps
`src` is changed during tests.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply ap
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13061
> Feel that it would be better to error out rather than running an unknown
version
I meant a null check so you could throw a proper exception instead of a
generic `NullPointerException`.
-
Github user MLnick commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13481
Yeah actually looking at it the Scala side is a bit ugly. We can make it
prettier there and then just call into it from PySpark, e.g.
```
scala> val formula = new RFormula().setFormula("c
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13498
**[Test build #3058 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3058/consoleFull)**
for PR 13498 at commit
[`06d5b92`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13498
**[Test build #3057 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3057/consoleFull)**
for PR 13498 at commit
[`06d5b92`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13498
**[Test build #59953 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59953/consoleFull)**
for PR 13498 at commit
[`06d5b92`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/0
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13498
**[Test build #3056 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3056/consoleFull)**
for PR 13498 at commit
[`06d5b92`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13498
**[Test build #3054 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3054/consoleFull)**
for PR 13498 at commit
[`06d5b92`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13498
**[Test build #3055 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3055/consoleFull)**
for PR 13498 at commit
[`06d5b92`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13498
**[Test build #3053 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3053/consoleFull)**
for PR 13498 at commit
[`06d5b92`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13418
thanks, merging to master and 2.0!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enable
Github user dhruve commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13061
Fixed the minor nits. Feel that it would be better to error out rather than
running an unknown version of the framework, so haven't included the null check
for ```resourceStream```.
---
If your pro
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13418
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13476
**[Test build #59952 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59952/consoleFull)**
for PR 13476 at commit
[`d256621`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/d
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12313#discussion_r65759591
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/InsertIntoHiveTableSuite.scala
---
@@ -284,8 +284,128 @@ class InsertIntoHiveTableSuite extend
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13446
can you also update your title to say that this PR only adds regression
test? thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as wel
Github user rdblue commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12313#discussion_r65758947
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/InsertIntoHiveTableSuite.scala
---
@@ -284,8 +284,128 @@ class InsertIntoHiveTableSuite extends Q
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13494
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13494
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59940/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12313#discussion_r65758393
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/InsertIntoHiveTableSuite.scala
---
@@ -284,8 +284,128 @@ class InsertIntoHiveTableSuite extend
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13494
**[Test build #59940 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59940/consoleFull)**
for PR 13494 at commit
[`153293e`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13498
**[Test build #3050 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3050/consoleFull)**
for PR 13498 at commit
[`2949d70`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13498
**[Test build #3051 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3051/consoleFull)**
for PR 13498 at commit
[`2949d70`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13476
**[Test build #59948 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59948/consoleFull)**
for PR 13476 at commit
[`b399878`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13476
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59948/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13476
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user huaxingao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13492
retest please. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishe
Github user ericl commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13484
LGTM too, probably this will be even more of a improvement once we get the
other bottlenecks fixed
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitH
Github user sameeragarwal commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13318
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user sameeragarwal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13318#discussion_r65757237
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/unsafe/map/BytesToBytesMap.java ---
@@ -221,7 +221,8 @@ public BytesToBytesMap(
SparkEnv.get()
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13490
I think this should also throw exception
```
CREATE TABLE students (age INT, name STRING) AS SELECT 1, 'hello'
```
A `SELECT` also defines both the name and data type of its ou
Github user rdblue commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12313#discussion_r65757163
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/InsertIntoHiveTableSuite.scala
---
@@ -284,8 +284,128 @@ class InsertIntoHiveTableSuite extends Q
Github user ericl commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13491
LGTM provided tests still pass
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13446
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59939/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13446
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13500
**[Test build #59951 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59951/consoleFull)**
for PR 13500 at commit
[`518bdd5`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/5
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13446
**[Test build #59939 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59939/consoleFull)**
for PR 13446 at commit
[`e892324`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13418
**[Test build #3045 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3045/consoleFull)**
for PR 13418 at commit
[`77166bc`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13070
**[Test build #59950 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59950/consoleFull)**
for PR 13070 at commit
[`0cc3268`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/0
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13070
@cloud-fan Thank you for your review! Just quickly added the space.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13318
**[Test build #59949 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59949/consoleFull)**
for PR 13318 at commit
[`a929a06`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/a
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13318#discussion_r65754375
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/unsafe/map/BytesToBytesMap.java ---
@@ -221,7 +221,8 @@ public BytesToBytesMap(
SparkEnv.get() != nul
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13269
yea, but may not happen before 2.0. It needs some more refactor to the
object operator execution model. For example, the serializer in `AppendColumns`
has no corresponding attribute, its input is
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13318#discussion_r65753944
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/unsafe/map/BytesToBytesMap.java ---
@@ -221,7 +221,8 @@ public BytesToBytesMap(
SparkEnv.get() != nul
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13318#discussion_r65753668
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/shuffle/sort/ShuffleInMemorySorter.java ---
@@ -70,9 +70,14 @@ public int compare(PackedRecordPointer left,
Pac
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13501
**[Test build #59947 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59947/consoleFull)**
for PR 13501 at commit
[`550e386`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/5
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13476
**[Test build #59948 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59948/consoleFull)**
for PR 13476 at commit
[`b399878`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/b
GitHub user davies opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13501
[SPARK-15759] [SQL] Fallback to non-codegen when fail to compile generated
code
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In case of any bugs in whole-stage codegen, the generated
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13484#discussion_r65752894
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/trees/TreeNode.scala
---
@@ -169,11 +170,24 @@ abstract class TreeNode[BaseType <:
Tr
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13484
**[Test build #59946 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59946/consoleFull)**
for PR 13484 at commit
[`b3e63bb`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/b
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13500
**[Test build #59945 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59945/consoleFull)**
for PR 13500 at commit
[`4550f41`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/4
GitHub user lianhuiwang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13500
[SPARK-15756] [SQL] Support create table stored as
orcfile/parquetfile/avrofile
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
in
https://github.com/apache/hive/blob/master/ql/src/jav
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13499#discussion_r65752573
--- Diff:
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/YarnClientSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -64,7 +68,7 @@ private[spark] class YarnClientSchedu
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13115
**[Test build #3052 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3052/consoleFull)**
for PR 13115 at commit
[`e756a0a`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13499#discussion_r65752132
--- Diff:
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/YarnClientSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -21,9 +21,13 @@ import scala.collection.mutable.Arra
Github user liancheng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13469
LGTM pending Jenkins.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13070
LGTM, I'm wondering if it's slightly better if we always put a space after
`:`(not a big deal)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitH
Github user liancheng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13269
So there will be a follow-up for replacing `BoundReference` in serializer
expressions with `GetColumnByOrdinal`, right?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13469#discussion_r65751003
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/objects/objects.scala
---
@@ -519,7 +519,7 @@ case class CreateExternalRow
Github user liancheng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13474
LGTM pending Jenkins.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13061#discussion_r65750838
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/package.scala ---
@@ -41,7 +41,53 @@ package org.apache
* level interfaces. These are subject to changes o
Github user dhruve commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13061#discussion_r65750639
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/package.scala ---
@@ -41,7 +41,53 @@ package org.apache
* level interfaces. These are subject to changes o
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13498
**[Test build #3046 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3046/consoleFull)**
for PR 13498 at commit
[`2949d70`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13483
I don't think it's a big problem. After users understand the semantic, they
can easily work around it, by not putting grouping columns in agg list, or
turning off the config.
Well, it looks be
Github user skonto commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8559
great thnx, it passes locally now. I will test my pr too.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13498
**[Test build #3048 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3048/consoleFull)**
for PR 13498 at commit
[`2949d70`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13498
**[Test build #3047 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3047/consoleFull)**
for PR 13498 at commit
[`2949d70`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13498
**[Test build #3044 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3044/consoleFull)**
for PR 13498 at commit
[`2949d70`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13498
**[Test build #3049 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3049/consoleFull)**
for PR 13498 at commit
[`2949d70`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13499
BTW the change looks fine, I just want to take a look at the rest of the
code (the parts you're not touching) and also run some tests internally with
kerberos enabled.
---
If your project is set up
Github user devaraj-kavali commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13326#discussion_r65748851
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/mesos/MesosClusterScheduler.scala
---
@@ -188,10 +188,10 @@ private[spark] class Mes
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12313#discussion_r65748370
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/InsertIntoHiveTableSuite.scala
---
@@ -284,8 +284,128 @@ class InsertIntoHiveTableSuite extend
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13061#discussion_r65748365
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/package.scala ---
@@ -41,7 +41,53 @@ package org.apache
* level interfaces. These are subject to changes o
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13498
**[Test build #3051 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3051/consoleFull)**
for PR 13498 at commit
[`2949d70`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13446
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13446
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59936/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13498
**[Test build #3050 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3050/consoleFull)**
for PR 13498 at commit
[`2949d70`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13446
**[Test build #59936 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59936/consoleFull)**
for PR 13446 at commit
[`3837825`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13061
Two nits that I missed before and this is good to go.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have thi
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13061#discussion_r65747950
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/package.scala ---
@@ -41,7 +41,53 @@ package org.apache
* level interfaces. These are subject to changes o
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13061#discussion_r65747983
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/package.scala ---
@@ -41,7 +41,53 @@ package org.apache
* level interfaces. These are subject to changes o
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13474
**[Test build #59943 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59943/consoleFull)**
for PR 13474 at commit
[`2e289c8`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/2
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13401
**[Test build #59944 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59944/consoleFull)**
for PR 13401 at commit
[`83fe3e0`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/8
Github user subrotosanyal commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13499
@vanzin
Updated the title.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabl
Github user JoshRosen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13491
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13498
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13491
**[Test build #59942 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59942/consoleFull)**
for PR 13491 at commit
[`50a6270`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/5
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13498
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59937/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13469
**[Test build #59941 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59941/consoleFull)**
for PR 13469 at commit
[`6b2641f`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/6
301 - 400 of 554 matches
Mail list logo
