Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13563
@rxin what do you think about adding an encoding parameter to `PipedRDD`?
I'm inclined to it since it will resolve this issue essentially.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user liancheng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13496
LGTM, merging to master and branch-2.0. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13604
**[Test build #60303 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60303/consoleFull)**
for PR 13604 at commit
GitHub user cloud-fan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13604
[SPARK-15856][SQL] Revert API breaking changes made in DataFrameReader.text
and SQLContext.range
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In Spark 2.0, after unifying
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13597
LGTM. @marmbrus what do you think?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user liancheng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12836
@NarineK @shivaram Sorry for the late reply. Overriding `stringArgs` is the
correct solution for this issue.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user sadikovi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13563
Can you give an example where it would not work? I was actually thinking
about adding codec for stderr with malformed rule of CodingErrorAction.REPLACE
to make it safer.
---
If your project is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13549
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user sameeragarwal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13161#discussion_r66653864
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/util/collection/unsafe/sort/RadixSortSuite.scala
---
@@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ class RadixSortSuite extends
Github user sameeragarwal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13161#discussion_r66653788
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/util/collection/unsafe/sort/RadixSortSuite.scala
---
@@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ class RadixSortSuite extends
Github user sameeragarwal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13161#discussion_r66653192
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/SortOrder.scala
---
@@ -64,49 +64,57 @@ case class SortOrder(child:
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13563#discussion_r66653094
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/PipedRDD.scala ---
@@ -129,7 +130,7 @@ private[spark] class PipedRDD[T: ClassTag](
override def
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13589
**[Test build #60302 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60302/consoleFull)**
for PR 13589 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13601
**[Test build #60301 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60301/consoleFull)**
for PR 13601 at commit
Github user JoshRosen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13602
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user sameeragarwal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13161#discussion_r66650922
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/util/collection/unsafe/sort/UnsafeInMemorySorter.java
---
@@ -301,6 +323,19 @@ public SortedIterator
Github user JoshRosen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13601
Jenkins, this is ok to test.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user sameeragarwal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13161#discussion_r66650450
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/util/collection/unsafe/sort/UnsafeInMemorySorter.java
---
@@ -206,14 +216,27 @@ public void
Github user sameeragarwal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13161#discussion_r66649155
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/util/collection/unsafe/sort/UnsafeInMemorySorter.java
---
@@ -93,6 +94,14 @@ public int
Github user sameeragarwal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13161#discussion_r66648811
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/util/collection/unsafe/sort/RadixSort.java
---
@@ -205,13 +210,14 @@ public static int
Github user sameeragarwal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13161#discussion_r66648782
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/util/collection/unsafe/sort/RadixSort.java
---
@@ -205,13 +210,14 @@ public static int
Github user yanboliang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13481
I was trying to merge this, but looks like the merge script is not happy.
Please feel free to merge this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user MLnick commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13481
@yanboliang do you want to go ahead and merge this one?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13603#discussion_r66647379
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/BlacklistIntegrationSuite.scala
---
@@ -93,6 +94,30 @@ class BlacklistIntegrationSuite extends
Github user bomeng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13543#discussion_r66647339
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/master/MasterArguments.scala ---
@@ -20,18 +20,24 @@ package org.apache.spark.deploy.master
import
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13603#discussion_r66646791
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSetManager.scala ---
@@ -404,6 +404,25 @@ private[spark] class TaskSetManager(
}
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13603
**[Test build #60300 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60300/consoleFull)**
for PR 13603 at commit
Github user yanboliang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13481
LGTM2
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
GitHub user squito opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13603
[SPARK-15865][CORE] Blacklist should not result in job hanging with less
than 4 executors
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Before this change, when you turn on
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13155
**[Test build #3074 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3074/consoleFull)**
for PR 13155 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13562
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60298/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13562
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13562
**[Test build #60298 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60298/consoleFull)**
for PR 13562 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13594
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13594#discussion_r66644139
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/AccumulatorV2.scala ---
@@ -415,15 +415,20 @@ class DoubleAccumulator extends
AccumulatorV2[jl.Double,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13602
**[Test build #60299 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60299/consoleFull)**
for PR 13602 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13597#discussion_r66643644
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameWriter.scala ---
@@ -572,8 +573,13 @@ final class DataFrameWriter[T] private[sql](ds:
GitHub user squito opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13602
[SPARK-15878][CORE][TEST] fix cleanup in EventLoggingListenerSuite and
ReplayListenerSuite
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
These tests weren't properly using
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13563
Why would stderr be different from stdout?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user tejasapatil commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13563
@sadikovi : That will not work in all cases. See :
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13563#discussion_r66318006
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13562#discussion_r66641656
--- Diff: dev/make-distribution.sh ---
@@ -150,7 +156,13 @@ export MAVEN_OPTS="${MAVEN_OPTS:--Xmx2g
-XX:MaxPermSize=512M -XX:ReservedCodeCac
# Store the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13562
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60297/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13562
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13562
**[Test build #60297 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60297/consoleFull)**
for PR 13562 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9571
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9571
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60296/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9571
**[Test build #60296 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60296/consoleFull)**
for PR 9571 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13486
Hi, @marmbrus .
Could you review this PR again?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13436
Thank you, @rxin .
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user frreiss commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13155
Tests ran successfully on my machine.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user yangw1234 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13601#discussion_r66630258
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -1656,7 +1656,7 @@ class Analyzer(
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13562
**[Test build #60298 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60298/consoleFull)**
for PR 13562 at commit
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13562#discussion_r66625100
--- Diff: dev/make-distribution.sh ---
@@ -42,6 +42,8 @@ function exit_with_usage {
echo "usage:"
cl_options="[--name] [--tgz] [--mvn ]"
Github user a-roberts commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13562#discussion_r66624671
--- Diff: dev/make-distribution.sh ---
@@ -42,6 +42,8 @@ function exit_with_usage {
echo "usage:"
cl_options="[--name] [--tgz] [--mvn ]"
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13601#discussion_r66624159
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -1656,7 +1656,7 @@ class Analyzer(
//
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13601
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user yangw1234 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13601
[SPARK-15875] Try to use Seq.isEmpty and Seq.nonEmpty instead of Seq.length
== 0 and Seq.length > 0
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In scala, immutable.List.length
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13524
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60295/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13524
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13524
**[Test build #60295 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60295/consoleFull)**
for PR 13524 at commit
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13562#discussion_r66621977
--- Diff: dev/make-distribution.sh ---
@@ -42,6 +42,8 @@ function exit_with_usage {
echo "usage:"
cl_options="[--name] [--tgz] [--mvn ]"
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13562
**[Test build #60297 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60297/consoleFull)**
for PR 13562 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13593
cc @rxin @hvanhovell @liancheng This is another issue related to `Cache`
and `Uncache`. Actually, I am not sure if we should provide a SQL interface
`UNCACHE TABLE IF EXISTS`.
Thanks!
Github user steveloughran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9571
Updated patch. Addresses indentation, found and eliminated one more call to
{{initialize()}} outside of constructor.
Adds a whole new counter, `event.replay.count`, which counts the
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9571
**[Test build #60296 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60296/consoleFull)**
for PR 9571 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13599
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13599
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13599
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60294/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13599
**[Test build #60294 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60294/consoleFull)**
for PR 13599 at commit
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13589#discussion_r66615434
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/CodeGenerator.scala
---
@@ -490,6 +490,7 @@ class CodegenContext
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13599
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60293/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13599
**[Test build #60293 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60293/consoleFull)**
for PR 13599 at commit
Github user steveloughran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9571#discussion_r66614402
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/FsHistoryProvider.scala ---
@@ -667,6 +700,90 @@ private[history] class
Github user steveloughran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9571#discussion_r66613829
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/FsHistoryProvider.scala ---
@@ -278,6 +303,9 @@ private[history] class
Github user steveloughran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9571#discussion_r66612954
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/HistoryServer.scala ---
@@ -114,28 +123,45 @@ class HistoryServer(
* this UI with
Github user a-roberts commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13562#discussion_r66610434
--- Diff: dev/make-distribution.sh ---
@@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ function exit_with_usage {
echo "usage:"
cl_options="[--name] [--tgz] [--mvn ]"
Github user lw-lin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13597
@marmbrus @cloud-fan @zsxwing , would you mind taking a look? Thanks! :-)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user weicheng113 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13600
In the original JdbcRDD, it only supports Long bound type and does not
leave room for extension. In the pull request, the implementation support the
original Long type plus String type, which
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13597
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60292/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13597
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13597
**[Test build #60292 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60292/consoleFull)**
for PR 13597 at commit
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13562#discussion_r66606804
--- Diff: dev/make-distribution.sh ---
@@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ function exit_with_usage {
echo "usage:"
cl_options="[--name] [--tgz] [--mvn ]"
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13562#discussion_r66606535
--- Diff: dev/make-distribution.sh ---
@@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ function exit_with_usage {
echo "usage:"
cl_options="[--name] [--tgz] [--mvn ]"
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13524
**[Test build #60295 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60295/consoleFull)**
for PR 13524 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13596
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60291/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13596
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13596
**[Test build #60291 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60291/consoleFull)**
for PR 13596 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13600
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user lw-lin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13595
@tdas @zsxwing , would you mind taking a look? Thanks! :-)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
GitHub user weicheng113 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13600
JdbcRDD - generalize lower bound type support, not just long type.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
JdbcRDD - generalize lower bound type support, not just long
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13599
**[Test build #60294 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60294/consoleFull)**
for PR 13599 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13595
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13595
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60290/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13599
**[Test build #60293 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60293/consoleFull)**
for PR 13599 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13595
**[Test build #60290 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60290/consoleFull)**
for PR 13595 at commit
GitHub user zjffdu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13599
[SPARK-13587] [PYSPARK] Support virtualenv in pyspark
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Support virtualenv in pyspark as described in SPARK-13587
## How was this patch
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13562
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60288/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13562
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13562
**[Test build #60288 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60288/consoleFull)**
for PR 13562 at commit
Github user zjffdu closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13598
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
401 - 500 of 618 matches
Mail list logo
