Github user lianhuiwang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14036#discussion_r70660445
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/arithmetic.scala
---
@@ -207,20 +207,12 @@ case class Multiply(left: Exp
Github user lianhuiwang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14036#discussion_r70659855
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/parser/AstBuilder.scala
---
@@ -957,7 +957,7 @@ class AstBuilder extends SqlBaseBase
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14106
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14106
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62248/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14106
**[Test build #62248 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62248/consoleFull)**
for PR 14106 at commit
[`d337e8e`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14012
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user liancheng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14012
Thanks! Merged this to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled an
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14140
**[Test build #62252 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62252/consoleFull)**
for PR 14140 at commit
[`599a868`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/5
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14140
Jenkins test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14140
Jenkins add to whitelist
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user lianhuiwang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14036#discussion_r70656424
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/parser/AstBuilder.scala
---
@@ -957,7 +957,7 @@ class AstBuilder extends SqlBaseBase
Github user MasterDDT commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14092
cc @hvanhovell
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14148
@rxin @cloud-fan @yhuai Will do more investigation and submit a separate PR
for solution review. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply app
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12983
Yes, @zhengruifeng what's the difference here? could you update or close?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your proje
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14181
**[Test build #62251 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62251/consoleFull)**
for PR 14181 at commit
[`9a5f975`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/9
GitHub user maropu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14181
[SPARK-15382][SQL] Fix a rule to push down projects beneath Sample
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When `X` > 1.0 in `Dataset#sample`, `sample(true, X).withColumn("x",
monot
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13990
**[Test build #62250 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62250/consoleFull)**
for PR 13990 at commit
[`cbc8798`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/c
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13650#discussion_r70642695
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/RandomForestRegressorSuite.scala
---
@@ -105,6 +108,55 @@ class RandomForestRegressorSuite
Github user andreweduffy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14159
Yep, looks like the other one was closed by the committer. I saw Sean
commented that this might need to be tested against 2.2, is that going to be
necessary?
---
If your project is set up for
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14071
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62249/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14071
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14071
**[Test build #62249 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62249/consoleFull)**
for PR 14071 at commit
[`d18ac59`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14045
**[Test build #62244 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62244/consoleFull)**
for PR 14045 at commit
[`17f3b82`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14045
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62244/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14045
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user wesolowskim commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14137#discussion_r70643061
--- Diff:
graphx/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/graphx/lib/StronglyConnectedComponents.scala
---
@@ -44,6 +44,11 @@ object StronglyConnectedComponents
Github user yanboliang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13650
This PR looks good overall, I left some inline comments. Thanks for working
on this. @MechCoder
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on G
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14137
Is it now not necessary to cache the 'work graph' as well?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not hav
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13650#discussion_r70640862
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/RandomForestRegressor.scala
---
@@ -168,15 +173,37 @@ class RandomForestRegressionModel pri
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14137
I was thinking it should be perfectly possible to unpersist scWorkGraph
RDDs that are persisted along the way in the same way? it should be the same
pattern. It's possible to leave the final result p
Github user yanboliang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13650
@MechCoder It seems there is a typo in the PR's description:
```
The variance is calculated by summing up the mean of the variance of each
decision tree + mean of the prediction^2 of each
Github user wesolowskim commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14137
I don't know if I understand you correctly. Last work RDD is explicitly
materialized because iteration's depend on number of vertices left in graph.
My aim with latest solution was to leave
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14116
**[Test build #62243 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62243/consoleFull)**
for PR 14116 at commit
[`11031e4`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user techaddict commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14036#discussion_r70639783
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/FunctionRegistry.scala
---
@@ -234,6 +234,7 @@ object FunctionRegistry {
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13670#discussion_r70636564
--- Diff:
core/src/main/resources/org/apache/spark/ui/static/executorspage.js ---
@@ -0,0 +1,410 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundat
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14116
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14116
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62243/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14137
Ack right I mean does it need to be explicitly materialized? I suppose the
new code also has the effect of materializing the last work RDD, but then I
imagine we need to unpersist it too.
---
If yo
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13650#discussion_r70639350
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/RandomForestRegressorSuite.scala
---
@@ -105,6 +109,54 @@ class RandomForestRegressorSuite
Github user wesolowskim commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14137
'work graph' is already cached and it is indeed necessary.
To summarize - do you propose to replace sccGraph.triplets.take(1) with
sccGraph.vertices.count() and sccGraph.edges.count()?
Github user wesolowskim commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14137#discussion_r70637549
--- Diff:
graphx/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/graphx/lib/StronglyConnectedComponents.scala
---
@@ -64,11 +69,20 @@ object StronglyConnectedComponents
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14137#discussion_r70638869
--- Diff:
graphx/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/graphx/lib/StronglyConnectedComponents.scala
---
@@ -44,6 +44,11 @@ object StronglyConnectedComponents {
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13650#discussion_r70638775
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/RandomForestRegressorSuite.scala
---
@@ -105,6 +109,54 @@ class RandomForestRegressorSuite
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13650#discussion_r70638644
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/RandomForestRegressorSuite.scala
---
@@ -105,6 +109,54 @@ class RandomForestRegressorSuite
Github user wesolowskim commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14137#discussion_r70638560
--- Diff:
graphx/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/graphx/lib/StronglyConnectedComponents.scala
---
@@ -44,6 +44,11 @@ object StronglyConnectedComponents
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13650#discussion_r70637087
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/RandomForestRegressorSuite.scala
---
@@ -105,6 +109,54 @@ class RandomForestRegressorSuite
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13650#discussion_r70637181
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/RandomForestRegressorSuite.scala
---
@@ -105,6 +109,54 @@ class RandomForestRegressorSuite
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13650#discussion_r70638276
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/RandomForestRegressorSuite.scala
---
@@ -105,6 +109,54 @@ class RandomForestRegressorSuite
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13650#discussion_r70637680
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/RandomForestRegressorSuite.scala
---
@@ -105,6 +109,54 @@ class RandomForestRegressorSuite
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13650#discussion_r70637268
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/RandomForestRegressorSuite.scala
---
@@ -105,6 +109,54 @@ class RandomForestRegressorSuite
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13670#discussion_r70636570
--- Diff:
core/src/main/resources/org/apache/spark/ui/static/executorspage.js ---
@@ -0,0 +1,410 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundat
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14137#discussion_r70636044
--- Diff:
graphx/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/graphx/lib/StronglyConnectedComponents.scala
---
@@ -44,6 +44,11 @@ object StronglyConnectedComponents {
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14137#discussion_r70635683
--- Diff:
graphx/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/graphx/lib/StronglyConnectedComponents.scala
---
@@ -64,11 +69,20 @@ object StronglyConnectedComponents {
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14071
**[Test build #62249 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62249/consoleFull)**
for PR 14071 at commit
[`d18ac59`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/d
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14071
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14071
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62247/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14071
**[Test build #62247 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62247/consoleFull)**
for PR 14071 at commit
[`632d9a7`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14071#discussion_r70634823
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/interface.scala
---
@@ -42,38 +42,54 @@ case class CatalogFunction(
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14106
**[Test build #62248 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62248/consoleFull)**
for PR 14106 at commit
[`d337e8e`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/d
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14149
**[Test build #62246 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62246/consoleFull)**
for PR 14149 at commit
[`6dd2a86`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/6
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14071
**[Test build #62247 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62247/consoleFull)**
for PR 14071 at commit
[`632d9a7`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/6
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14116
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62242/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14116
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user wesolowskim commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14137
I added unpersists to additionally created caches and checked performance.
scc.run is slightly longer, but returned graph is cached (both vertices and
edges).
To fully optimize it and remov
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14036
last 2 comments. @liancheng @clockfly can you also take a look?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project doe
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14116
**[Test build #62242 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62242/consoleFull)**
for PR 14116 at commit
[`66fab70`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14036#discussion_r70631504
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/arithmetic.scala
---
@@ -285,6 +278,26 @@ case class Divide(left: Expressi
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14079
**[Test build #62245 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62245/consoleFull)**
for PR 14079 at commit
[`338db65`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/3
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14036#discussion_r70631462
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/arithmetic.scala
---
@@ -285,6 +278,26 @@ case class Divide(left: Expressi
Github user lianhuiwang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14036#discussion_r70628892
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/FunctionRegistry.scala
---
@@ -234,6 +234,7 @@ object FunctionRegistry {
Github user jerryshao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14149#discussion_r70628729
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala ---
@@ -2342,6 +2342,18 @@ private[spark] object Utils extends Logging {
* Return th
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14149#discussion_r70628081
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala ---
@@ -2342,6 +2342,18 @@ private[spark] object Utils extends Logging {
* Return th
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14068
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14180
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
Github user jerryshao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14149#discussion_r70625909
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala ---
@@ -2342,6 +2342,18 @@ private[spark] object Utils extends Logging {
* Return th
GitHub user Stibbons opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14180
Wheelhouse and VirtualEnv support
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Support virtualenv and wheel in PySpark, based on SPARK-13587.
Full description in
[SPARK-16367]
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14149#discussion_r70625165
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala ---
@@ -2342,6 +2342,18 @@ private[spark] object Utils extends Logging {
* Return th
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14149#discussion_r70625202
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala ---
@@ -2342,6 +2342,18 @@ private[spark] object Utils extends Logging {
* Return th
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14045
**[Test build #62244 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62244/consoleFull)**
for PR 14045 at commit
[`17f3b82`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/1
Github user ScrapCodes commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14151
I have a question, should we keep a column with filenames ? in current
approach we ignore key column.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13704
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13704
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62239/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13704
**[Test build #62239 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62239/consoleFull)**
for PR 13704 at commit
[`355f5a5`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14169
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14169
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62237/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14169
**[Test build #62237 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62237/consoleFull)**
for PR 14169 at commit
[`e4c7e02`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14116
**[Test build #62243 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62243/consoleFull)**
for PR 14116 at commit
[`11031e4`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/1
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14165
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62236/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14165
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14165
**[Test build #62236 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62236/consoleFull)**
for PR 14165 at commit
[`b4372f7`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14116
**[Test build #62242 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62242/consoleFull)**
for PR 14116 at commit
[`66fab70`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/6
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14116
Jenkins becomes unstable more and more: Fail -> MiMa -> RAT (with same
commit.)
I rebased and update the commit id to see the result.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply t
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14116
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14151
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62233/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14116
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62241/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14116
**[Test build #62241 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62241/consoleFull)**
for PR 14116 at commit
[`eb302c4`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14151
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14151
**[Test build #62233 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62233/consoleFull)**
for PR 14151 at commit
[`6e83f46`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14116
**[Test build #62241 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62241/consoleFull)**
for PR 14116 at commit
[`eb302c4`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/e
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14116
Retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishe
401 - 500 of 660 matches
Mail list logo
