Github user sun-rui commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14175#discussion_r72176972
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/mesos/MesosCoarseGrainedSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -552,7 +552,12 @@ private[spark] clas
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14132#discussion_r72176938
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -1774,6 +1775,49 @@ class Analyzer(
}
Github user jerryshao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14340#discussion_r72176261
--- Diff:
external/kafka-0-10/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kafka010/KafkaUtils.scala
---
@@ -177,3 +182,172 @@ object KafkaUtils extends Logg
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14327
**[Test build #62856 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62856/consoleFull)**
for PR 14327 at commit
[`3e134f1`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/3
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14357
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14357
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62852/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14357
**[Test build #62852 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62852/consoleFull)**
for PR 14357 at commit
[`f7d02ce`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14327#discussion_r72175886
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/ColumnPruningSuite.scala
---
@@ -346,5 +346,33 @@ class ColumnPruningSuite exte
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14357
I think this is related to
https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/142df4834bc33dc7b84b626c6ee3508ab1abe015
cc @dongjoon-hyun
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14296#discussion_r72175501
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -1207,6 +1207,17 @@ class Analyzer(
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14314
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user jerryshao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14340#discussion_r72175444
--- Diff: examples/src/main/python/streaming/direct_kafka010_wordcount.py
---
@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (AS
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14356
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14314
thanks, merging to master!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wi
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14357
@junyangq Any idea how the tests were passing on Jenkins before this fix ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pr
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13824
**[Test build #62855 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62855/consoleFull)**
for PR 13824 at commit
[`cb41e9e`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/c
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14354
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14327#discussion_r72174917
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/ColumnPruningSuite.scala
---
@@ -346,5 +346,33 @@ class ColumnPruningSuite e
Github user tdas commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14354
Merging to master and 2.0
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes s
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14284
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the fea
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14335
**[Test build #62853 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62853/consoleFull)**
for PR 14335 at commit
[`3d8c60d`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/3
Github user yhuai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14284
yea. that's a good point.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14284
**[Test build #62854 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62854/consoleFull)**
for PR 14284 at commit
[`ff3029e`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/f
Github user WeichenXu123 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14335
@srowen
`stats.unpersist(false)` ==> `stats.unpersist()` updated.
is there anything else need to update ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have you
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14357
**[Test build #62852 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62852/consoleFull)**
for PR 14357 at commit
[`f7d02ce`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/f
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14284
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14284
should we also update the doc for `OffsetWindowFunction.default`?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project do
GitHub user junyangq opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14357
[SPARK-16727][SparkR] Fix expected test output of describe and summary
functions
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Fix expected test output of describe and summary funct
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14356
**[Test build #62851 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62851/consoleFull)**
for PR 14356 at commit
[`e5dad1b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/e
Github user marmbrus commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14356
/cc @rxin
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if th
Github user nblintao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13620
Great! Thanks, @andrewor14 @ajbozarth @yhuai @zsxwing.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
GitHub user marmbrus opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14356
[SPARK-16724] Expose DefinedByConstructorParams
We don't generally make things in catalyst/execution private. Instead they
are just undocumented due to their lack of stability guarantees.
You ca
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14353
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62848/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14353
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14353
**[Test build #62848 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62848/consoleFull)**
for PR 14353 at commit
[`d3dd7fb`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14343
Several annotations is `kafka.py` are still `Experimental`, we should also
remove them.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as w
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14355
@dongjoon-hyun Do you mind if I ask a question please?
It seems it works in MySQL supports `UNION ALL` for the compatible types,
for example, numeric compatible types. If my understandin
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14354
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62849/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14354
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14354
**[Test build #62849 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62849/consoleFull)**
for PR 14354 at commit
[`5226a5e`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user yhuai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14284
this this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13620
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14241
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14241
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62847/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14241
**[Test build #62847 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62847/consoleFull)**
for PR 14241 at commit
[`ddb202e`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13620
Merging to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, o
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13620
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62846/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13620
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13620
**[Test build #62846 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62846/consoleFull)**
for PR 13620 at commit
[`649bb19`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user databricks-jenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/36
**[Test build #66 has
finished](https://jenkins.test.databricks.com/job/spark-pull-request-builder/66/consoleFull)**
for PR 36 at commit
[`8b764f3`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/8
Github user databricks-jenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/36
**[Test build #66 has
started](https://jenkins.test.databricks.com/job/spark-pull-request-builder/66/consoleFull)**
for PR 36 at commit
[`8b764f3`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/8b
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14355
**[Test build #62850 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62850/consoleFull)**
for PR 14355 at commit
[`98682a5`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/9
Github user holdenk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13571
Now that 2.0 is in the final RC would maybe @davies have a chance to take a
look and see if this is something that would be interesting?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
GitHub user dongjoon-hyun opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14355
[SPARK-16726][SQL] Improve error message for `Union` queries for
incompatible types
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, `UNION` queries on incompatible typ
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13571
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13571
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62843/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13571
**[Test build #62843 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62843/consoleFull)**
for PR 13571 at commit
[`06f753e`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user zasdfgbnm commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14231#discussion_r72167441
--- Diff: bin/spark-class ---
@@ -65,24 +65,25 @@ fi
# characters that would be otherwise interpreted by the shell. Read that
in a while loop, populat
Github user zasdfgbnm commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14231#discussion_r72167136
--- Diff: bin/spark-class ---
@@ -65,24 +65,25 @@ fi
# characters that would be otherwise interpreted by the shell. Read that
in a while loop, populat
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13920
Thanks a lot @JoshRosen .
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wis
Github user tdas commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14354
LGTM.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14354
This is an example of this leak:
http://spark-tests.appspot.com/builds/spark-master-test-sbt-hadoop-2.2/1429
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply ap
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14354
**[Test build #62849 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62849/consoleFull)**
for PR 14354 at commit
[`5226a5e`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/5
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14354#discussion_r72163631
--- Diff:
streaming/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/StreamingContextSuite.scala
---
@@ -819,10 +819,13 @@ class StreamingContextSuite extends Spar
GitHub user zsxwing opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14354
[SPARK-16722][Tests]Fix a StreamingContext leak in StreamingContextSuite
when eventually fails
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR moves `ssc.stop()` into `finally`
Github user sameeragarwal commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14349
LGTM (from https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14174)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14269
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62842/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14269
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14269
**[Test build #62842 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62842/consoleFull)**
for PR 14269 at commit
[`82feec4`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14292
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14350
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user tdas commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14292
Tests have passed. Merging this to master and 2.0. Thanks for reviewing
@zsxwing @jaceklaskowski
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14350
Merging to master and 2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wish
Github user yhuai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14350
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14079#discussion_r72160752
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/BlacklistTracker.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,216 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software F
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14353
**[Test build #62848 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62848/consoleFull)**
for PR 14353 at commit
[`d3dd7fb`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/d
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14350
/cc @yhuai
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if th
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14079#discussion_r72160650
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/internal/config/package.scala ---
@@ -97,6 +97,49 @@ package object config {
.toSequence
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14079#discussion_r72160497
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/TaskEndReason.scala ---
@@ -204,6 +213,7 @@ case object TaskResultLost extends TaskFailedReason {
@D
GitHub user dongjoon-hyun opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14353
[SPARK-16714][SQL] `array` should create a decimal array from decimals with
different precisions and scales
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In Spark 2.0, we will
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14292
**[Test build #3190 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3190/consoleFull)**
for PR 14292 at commit
[`26138b2`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14350
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62838/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14350
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14350
**[Test build #62838 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62838/consoleFull)**
for PR 14350 at commit
[`4c6dfbc`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14241
**[Test build #62847 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62847/consoleFull)**
for PR 14241 at commit
[`ddb202e`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/d
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14349
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62839/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14349
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14349
**[Test build #62839 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62839/consoleFull)**
for PR 14349 at commit
[`33978cb`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user WeichenXu123 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14333
@srowen
The sparkContext, by default, will running a cleaner to release not
referenced RDD/broadcasts on background. But, I think, we'd better to release
them by ourselves because the Spar
Github user yhuai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13585
@chenghao-intel Will you have time to update this PR?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14352
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
GitHub user nwbvt opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14352
Fix description of spark.speculation.quantile
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Minor doc fix regarding the spark.speculation.quantile configuration
parameter. It incorrec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14351
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14351
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62844/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14241
**[Test build #62845 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62845/consoleFull)**
for PR 14241 at commit
[`780fec5`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14241
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62845/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14351
**[Test build #62844 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62844/consoleFull)**
for PR 14351 at commit
[`4bff124`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14241
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13920
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13620
**[Test build #62846 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62846/consoleFull)**
for PR 13620 at commit
[`649bb19`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/6
201 - 300 of 689 matches
Mail list logo
