Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14546
Hi, @yhuai .
Could you review this PR?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14539
@hvanhovell , I may miss something, why do we create this new `InlineTable`
instead of using `Union`? I think we can create a special `OneRowRelation`(e.g.
`UnfoldableOneRowRelarion`) in test
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14528
Thank you, @srowen .
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14539#discussion_r74066649
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/basicLogicalOperators.scala
---
@@ -769,3 +769,41 @@ case object
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14539#discussion_r74066511
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/basicLogicalOperators.scala
---
@@ -769,3 +769,41 @@ case object
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14539#discussion_r74064642
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/parser/AstBuilder.scala
---
@@ -656,40 +656,37 @@ class AstBuilder extends
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13680#discussion_r74065336
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/util/UnsafeArraySuite.scala
---
@@ -18,27 +18,131 @@
package
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14539
**[Test build #63442 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63442/consoleFull)**
for PR 14539 at commit
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14539#discussion_r74062505
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -1563,17 +1563,21 @@ object DecimalAggregates
Github user tgravescs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12990
Sorry I haven't had time to look at this in great detail but have some
concerns.
So the way I read this, it will only ever show 1000 tasks on the task table
(by default at least)? I
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14562#discussion_r74055718
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/interfaces.scala
---
@@ -219,111 +219,118 @@ sealed abstract
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14562
@hvanhovell I'm not sure about the performance, will benchmark it later,
hopefully they can be inlined by JVM successfully.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14562#discussion_r74052366
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/interfaces.scala
---
@@ -219,111 +219,118 @@ sealed abstract
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14562#discussion_r74051693
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/slicedRows.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,108 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14562
Does this have performance implications? We are adding a layer of
indirection to a hot code path.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14537
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63441/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14565
Hi @uzadude, actually, there is a contribution guide here,
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SPARK/Contributing+to+Spark. It
would be even nicer if this contribution follows the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14537
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14537
**[Test build #63441 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63441/consoleFull)**
for PR 14537 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14563
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63439/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14563
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14563
**[Test build #63439 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63439/consoleFull)**
for PR 14563 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14102#discussion_r74047137
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/json/JacksonParser.scala
---
@@ -35,184 +34,337 @@ import
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14559
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14559
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63437/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14559
**[Test build #63437 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63437/consoleFull)**
for PR 14559 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14562
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14562
**[Test build #63438 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63438/consoleFull)**
for PR 14562 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14562
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63438/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14565
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user sun-rui commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14175
ok, will submit another PR for 2.0 branch
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14557
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14102#discussion_r74041085
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/json/JacksonParser.scala
---
@@ -35,184 +34,337 @@ import
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14102#discussion_r74041126
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/json/JacksonParser.scala
---
@@ -35,184 +34,337 @@ import
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14557
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63434/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user uzadude commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14565
I also opened a Jira feature request [[SPARK-16976]]
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14557
**[Test build #63434 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63434/consoleFull)**
for PR 14557 at commit
GitHub user uzadude opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14565
KCore algorithm
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Added [KCore]
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Degeneracy_(graph_theory)#k-Cores) algorithm
implementation
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14564
**[Test build #63440 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63440/consoleFull)**
for PR 14564 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14564
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63440/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14564
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14537
**[Test build #63441 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63441/consoleFull)**
for PR 14537 at commit
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13680#discussion_r74038625
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/util/UnsafeArraySuite.scala
---
@@ -18,27 +18,131 @@
package
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14560
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14560
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63432/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14564
OK, seems reasonable.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14560
**[Test build #63432 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63432/consoleFull)**
for PR 14560 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14564
**[Test build #63440 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63440/consoleFull)**
for PR 14564 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14564#discussion_r74036579
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/examples/sql/streaming/JavaStructuredNetworkWordCountWindowed.java
---
@@ -75,28 +75,30 @@ public
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14560
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14560
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63431/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14564
Hi @srowen , Could you please take a look?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user HyukjinKwon opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14564
[SPARK-16886][EXAMPLES][DOCS] Fix some examples to be consistent and
woring, and indentation in documentation
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Originally this PR
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14560
**[Test build #63431 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63431/consoleFull)**
for PR 14560 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14563
Alright, pretty trivial but a typo nonetheless. If you have time to
spell-check at least the same file, we might batch together more changes and
avoid piecemeal review of tiny PRs
---
If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14563
**[Test build #63439 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63439/consoleFull)**
for PR 14563 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13868
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63430/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13868
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13868
**[Test build #63430 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63430/consoleFull)**
for PR 13868 at commit
GitHub user ash211 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14563
Typo: Fow -> For
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/ash211/spark patch-8
Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14519
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14525
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14525
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63429/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user yanboliang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14519
I tested this locally and verified the serialization reduction. I posted
the shuffle size comparison diagram in the PR description. I will merge this
into master. Thanks for your review! @dbtsai
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14102#discussion_r74034675
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/json/JacksonParser.scala
---
@@ -35,184 +34,337 @@ import
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14525
**[Test build #63429 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63429/consoleFull)**
for PR 14525 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14102#discussion_r74034073
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/json/JacksonParser.scala
---
@@ -35,184 +34,337 @@ import
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14554
LGTM, merging to master!
this conflicts with 2.0, so I didn't backport
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14554
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14562
**[Test build #63438 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63438/consoleFull)**
for PR 14562 at commit
GitHub user cloud-fan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14562
[SPARK-16973][SQL] remove the buffer offsets in ImperativeAggregate
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
the `mutableAggBufferOffset` and `inputAggBufferOffset` in
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14562
cc @yhuai @liancheng @clockfly
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user lshmouse commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14561
Jenkins test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user lshmouse commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14561
Jenkins test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14559
**[Test build #63437 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63437/consoleFull)**
for PR 14559 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14559
**[Test build #63436 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63436/consoleFull)**
for PR 14559 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14559
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14559
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63436/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14559
**[Test build #63436 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63436/consoleFull)**
for PR 14559 at commit
Github user liancheng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14477
@srowen Sorry for the late reply, this LGTM.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14414
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14414
Merged to master
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14534#discussion_r74029654
--- Diff:
sql/hive-thriftserver/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/thriftserver/server/SparkSQLOperationManager.scala
---
@@ -39,15 +38,19 @@
Github user GraceH commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14559#discussion_r74029250
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameWriter.scala ---
@@ -447,7 +447,16 @@ final class DataFrameWriter[T] private[sql](ds:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14547
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SaintBacchus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14534#discussion_r74028969
--- Diff:
sql/hive-thriftserver/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/thriftserver/server/SparkSQLOperationManager.scala
---
@@ -39,15 +38,19 @@
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14547
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63428/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14547
**[Test build #63428 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63428/consoleFull)**
for PR 14547 at commit
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14559#discussion_r74028772
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameWriter.scala ---
@@ -447,7 +447,16 @@ final class DataFrameWriter[T] private[sql](ds:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14559
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14559
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63427/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user GraceH commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14559#discussion_r74028584
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameWriter.scala ---
@@ -447,7 +447,16 @@ final class DataFrameWriter[T] private[sql](ds:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14559
**[Test build #63427 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63427/consoleFull)**
for PR 14559 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14534
**[Test build #63433 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63433/consoleFull)**
for PR 14534 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14534
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14534
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63433/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14559#discussion_r74027679
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameWriter.scala ---
@@ -447,7 +447,16 @@ final class DataFrameWriter[T] private[sql](ds:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14561
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63435/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14561
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14561
**[Test build #63435 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63435/consoleFull)**
for PR 14561 at commit
501 - 600 of 741 matches
Mail list logo
