Github user sameeragarwal commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14815
cc @hvanhovell @gatorsmile
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user Sherry302 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14659
Hi, @srowen Could you please review this PR? Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
GitHub user sameeragarwal opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14815
[SPARK-17244] Catalyst should not pushdown non-deterministic join conditions
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Given that non-deterministic expressions can be
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14637
**[Test build #64435 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64435/consoleFull)**
for PR 14637 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14814
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64434/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14814
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14814
**[Test build #64434 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64434/consoleFull)**
for PR 14814 at commit
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14814
/cc @rxin
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user mgummelt commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14637
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8880#discussion_r76318724
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/security/CryptoStreamUtils.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,106 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14637
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14637
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64430/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14637
**[Test build #64430 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64430/consoleFull)**
for PR 14637 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14814
**[Test build #64434 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64434/consoleFull)**
for PR 14814 at commit
GitHub user zsxwing opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14814
[SPARK-17242][Document]Update links of external dstream projects
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Updated links of external dstream projects.
## How was this
Github user mgummelt commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14813
thanks! LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14813
**[Test build #64433 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64433/consoleFull)**
for PR 14813 at commit
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14637
LGTM now.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14777#discussion_r76313519
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/literals.scala
---
@@ -251,8 +251,21 @@ case class Literal (value: Any,
GitHub user vanzin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14813
[SPARK-17240][core] Make SparkConf serializable again.
Make the config reader transient, and initialize it lazily so that
serialization works with both java and kryo (and hopefully any other
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14812
**[Test build #64432 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64432/consoleFull)**
for PR 14812 at commit
GitHub user maropu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14812
[SPARK-17237][SQL] Remove unnecessary backticks in a pivot result schema
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
A schema of pivot results has nested backticks (e.g.
Github user ooq commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14176
@davies I guess there is still benefit to make it public? If the user knows
that their workload would always run faster with single-level, e.g., many
distinct keys. I thought about
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14811
**[Test build #64431 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64431/consoleFull)**
for PR 14811 at commit
Github user mallman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14798
@zsxwing PR #14811 is a backport of this PR to `branch-2.0`.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
GitHub user mallman opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14811
[SPARK-17231][CORE] Avoid building debug or trace log messages unless
This is simply a backport of #14798 to `branch-2.0`. This backport omits
the change to `ExternalShuffleBlockHandler.java`. In
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14774
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14777#discussion_r76305691
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/literals.scala
---
@@ -251,8 +251,21 @@ case class Literal (value: Any,
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14537#discussion_r76305079
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveMetastoreCatalog.scala ---
@@ -237,21 +237,27 @@ private[hive] class
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14798
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user mallman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14798
Will do
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14798
@mallman It has some conflicts with 2.0. Could you submit another PR for
branch 2.0, please? Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14798
LGTM. I was just thinking to work on this yesterday! Thanks, merging to
master and 2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14637
**[Test build #64430 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64430/consoleFull)**
for PR 14637 at commit
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8880#discussion_r76298874
--- Diff:
yarn/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/security/IOEncryptionSuite.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,332 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8880#discussion_r76298505
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkContext.scala ---
@@ -413,6 +414,10 @@ class SparkContext(config: SparkConf) extends Logging
with
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14239
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64427/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14239
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14239
**[Test build #64427 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64427/consoleFull)**
for PR 14239 at commit
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13852#discussion_r76292731
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/collect.scala
---
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ abstract class Collect extends
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14710
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14710
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64429/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user mgummelt commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14637#discussion_r76292137
--- Diff: dev/create-release/release-build.sh ---
@@ -186,12 +186,13 @@ if [[ "$1" == "package" ]]; then
# We increment the Zinc port each time
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14710
**[Test build #64429 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64429/consoleFull)**
for PR 14710 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12004
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64428/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12004
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12004
**[Test build #64428 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64428/consoleFull)**
for PR 12004 at commit
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14637#discussion_r76291436
--- Diff: dev/create-release/release-build.sh ---
@@ -186,12 +186,13 @@ if [[ "$1" == "package" ]]; then
# We increment the Zinc port each time
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13852#discussion_r76291119
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/collect.scala
---
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ abstract class Collect extends
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14753
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14753
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64426/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14753
**[Test build #64426 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64426/consoleFull)**
for PR 14753 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14710
**[Test build #64429 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64429/consoleFull)**
for PR 14710 at commit
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14710
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8880#discussion_r76289131
--- Diff:
yarn/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/YarnIOEncryptionSuite.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,335 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14801
Sure, will revert it back and use the existing `AnalysisException`. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14809
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64425/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14809
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14809
**[Test build #64425 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64425/consoleFull)**
for PR 14809 at commit
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14777#discussion_r76284138
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/literals.scala
---
@@ -251,8 +251,21 @@ case class Literal (value: Any,
Github user ajbozarth closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14794
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user ajbozarth commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14794
Thanks @tgravescs
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14774
LGTM. Thanks @wangmiao1981
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user tgravescs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14794
+1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user mallman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14798
I focused mainly on trace and debug logging. I didn't do much with errors
or warnings, especially where exceptions are logged. I'm assuming these are
less frequent, and the cost of building those
Github user dbtsai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14785
Please also add test cases for matrices. Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14452
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64422/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14452
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14810
Looks like an error -- close this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14452
**[Test build #64422 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64422/consoleFull)**
for PR 14452 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14750
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14750
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64421/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14750
**[Test build #64421 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64421/consoleFull)**
for PR 14750 at commit
Github user mallman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14617
@jerryshao The UI changes look great. I have not had a chance to scrutinize
the source changes. Hopefully we can get someone else to help review.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user f7753 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14239
@tgravescs Thank you.
Currently, I'm not load all the data into memory, I use parameters
`spark.shuffle.prepare.open ` to switch this mechanism off/on and
`spark.shuffle.prepare.count` to
Github user davies commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14176
Can we make this `spark.sql.codegen.aggregate.map.twolevel.enable`
internal? otherwise we should have a better name.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14810
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user sujan121 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14810
Branch 1.6
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
(Please fill in changes proposed in this fix)
## How was this patch tested?
(Please explain how this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14785
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14785
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64424/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14785
**[Test build #64424 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64424/consoleFull)**
for PR 14785 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12004
**[Test build #64428 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64428/consoleFull)**
for PR 12004 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14452
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14452
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64420/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14452
**[Test build #64420 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64420/consoleFull)**
for PR 14452 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14239
**[Test build #64427 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64427/consoleFull)**
for PR 14239 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14809
**[Test build #64425 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64425/consoleFull)**
for PR 14809 at commit
Github user yhuai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14753
@hvanhovell This is supposed to work with window functions.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14753
**[Test build #64426 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64426/consoleFull)**
for PR 14753 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14809
cc @yhuai @gatorsmile @liancheng @clockfly
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user cloud-fan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14809
[SPARK-17238][SQL] simplify the logic for converting data source table into
hive compatible format
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Previously we have 2 conditions to
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14786
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14786
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64419/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14786
**[Test build #64419 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64419/consoleFull)**
for PR 14786 at commit
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14753#discussion_r76264528
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/TypedImperativeAggregateSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,300 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14753#discussion_r76263947
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/interfaces.scala
---
@@ -389,3 +389,144 @@ abstract class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14785
**[Test build #64424 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64424/consoleFull)**
for PR 14785 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14808
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14808
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64423/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14808
**[Test build #64423 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64423/consoleFull)**
for PR 14808 at commit
201 - 300 of 508 matches
Mail list logo
