Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15438
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66762/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11336
I know why tests fail - please see my comment.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15438
**[Test build #66762 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66762/consoleFull)**
for PR 15438 at commit
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11336#discussion_r82908836
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/functions.R ---
@@ -3026,7 +3048,11 @@ setMethod("translate",
setMethod("unix_timestamp", signature(x = "missing", format =
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11336#discussion_r82908811
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/functions.R ---
@@ -2865,7 +2882,11 @@ setMethod("rand", signature(seed = "numeric"),
setMethod("randn", signature(seed =
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11336#discussion_r82908799
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/functions.R ---
@@ -2847,7 +2860,11 @@ setMethod("rand", signature(seed = "missing"),
setMethod("rand", signature(seed =
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11336#discussion_r82908825
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/functions.R ---
@@ -2876,7 +2897,8 @@ setMethod("randn", signature(seed = "missing"),
setMethod("randn", signature(seed =
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11336#discussion_r82908731
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/functions.R ---
@@ -2836,7 +2845,11 @@ setMethod("lpad", signature(x = "Column", len =
"numeric", pad = "character"),
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11336
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66767/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11336
**[Test build #66767 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66767/consoleFull)**
for PR 11336 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11336
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11336#discussion_r82908439
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/column.R ---
@@ -32,35 +34,65 @@ setOldClass("jobj")
#' @export
#' @note Column since 1.4.0
setClass("Column",
-
Github user ericl commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14690
Btw I also made https://github.com/VideoAmp/spark-public/pull/2/files, to
fix inputFiles.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11336#discussion_r82907977
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R ---
@@ -1168,12 +1179,14 @@ setMethod("take",
#' Head
#'
-#' Return the first \code{num} rows of a
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11336#discussion_r82907897
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R ---
@@ -1182,10 +1195,18 @@ setMethod("take",
#' @export
#' @examples
#'\dontrun{
-#' sparkR.session()
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11336#discussion_r82907729
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R ---
@@ -1035,10 +1035,16 @@ setMethod("dim",
c(count(x), ncol(x))
})
-#' Collects
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15389#discussion_r82907726
--- Diff: python/pyspark/rdd.py ---
@@ -2029,7 +2028,15 @@ def coalesce(self, numPartitions, shuffle=False):
>>> sc.parallelize([1, 2, 3, 4,
Github user wangmiao1981 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15421
I suspect that it could be related to my R installation:
localhost:~ mwang$ R
R version 3.3.0 (2016-05-03) -- "Supposedly Educational"
Copyright (C) 2016 The R Foundation
Github user wangmiao1981 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15421
That's interesting. I patched your change to a clean checkout and simply
tested against the example on the JIRA. It throws the above exception.
val obj = (sqlSerDe._1)(dis,
GitHub user HyukjinKwon reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15432
[SPARK-17854][SQL] rand/randn allows null as input seed
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes `rand`/`randn` accept `null` as input. In this case, it
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15338
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66759/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15338
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15432
@rxin yes, I just wanted to avoid changing a lot. Will try to fix it in
that way (at least) to show how it actually look like.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15432
@rxin yes, I just wanted to avoid changing a lot. Will try to fix it in
that way (at least) to show how it actually look like.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user HyukjinKwon closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15432
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15338
**[Test build #66759 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66759/consoleFull)**
for PR 15338 at commit
Github user falaki commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15421
@wangmiao1981 I don't get the exception that you reported on Mac. Also note
that the unit test is passing on Linux. I am not sure why returning null is an
issue.
---
If your project is set up for
Github user falaki commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15375
@felixcheung does it look OK now?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15408#discussion_r82897143
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/io/NioBufferedFileInputStream.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,132 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed under the Apache License,
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15408#discussion_r82903865
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/io/NioBufferedFileInputStream.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,132 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed under the Apache License,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11336
**[Test build #66767 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66767/consoleFull)**
for PR 11336 at commit
Github user mallman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14690#discussion_r82902172
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/DataSourceScanExec.scala
---
@@ -225,13 +225,16 @@ case class FileSourceScanExec(
}
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15408
**[Test build #66765 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66765/consoleFull)**
for PR 15408 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13440
**[Test build #66766 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66766/consoleFull)**
for PR 13440 at commit
Github user sitalkedia commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15408
jenkins retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user erikerlandson commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13440
test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user mallman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14690#discussion_r82900810
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/DataSourceScanExec.scala
---
@@ -225,13 +225,16 @@ case class FileSourceScanExec(
}
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14690
**[Test build #66764 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66764/consoleFull)**
for PR 14690 at commit
Github user wangmiao1981 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15421
I did test on Mac, not on Windows. I don't have windows setup either. The
very first issue that I saw is the negative index issue.
In addition, returning `null` when exception is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15307
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66763/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15307
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15307
**[Test build #66763 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66763/consoleFull)**
for PR 15307 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15307
**[Test build #3325 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3325/consoleFull)**
for PR 15307 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15307
**[Test build #66763 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66763/consoleFull)**
for PR 15307 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15307
**[Test build #3325 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3325/consoleFull)**
for PR 15307 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14959
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user falaki commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15421
My guess is that on windows R serialization behaves differently and
serializes `NA` as `null`. Unfortunately, I don't have a windows machine to
verify. Would you please test that?
---
If your
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14959
LGTM, merging to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user olarayej commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11336
@falaki Yeah but those warnings are making the build fail (see below). Is
that okay? Now I see a new"Checks" section. I may be outdated with the
protocols as it's been a while I didn't commit :-).
Github user falaki commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11336
I think some of the old tests still rely on `sparkRSQL.init()`. I believe
the warning is OK.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user mridulm commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15422
@srowen Since this is happening 'below' the user code (in the hadoop rdd),
is there a way around how to handle this ?
I agree that for a lot of usecases where it is critical to work off the
Github user mridulm commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15422
@zsxwing The map task is run by
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15421
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15421
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66755/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15421
**[Test build #66755 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66755/consoleFull)**
for PR 15421 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15389
@felixcheung merged it I believe.
@felixcheung please make sure you leave a msg saying it's merged (along
with the branch) when you merge prs.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user markhamstra commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15249#discussion_r82891721
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSetManager.scala ---
@@ -98,6 +84,14 @@ private[spark] class TaskSetManager(
var
Github user brkyvz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15307#discussion_r82890911
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/StreamMetrics.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,244 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user davies commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15389
Did not release that we already merged this, should we left a message here
or in the JIRA so we can know who merge this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user brkyvz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15307#discussion_r82890581
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/StreamExecution.scala
---
@@ -516,12 +563,127 @@ class StreamExecution(
Github user brkyvz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15307#discussion_r82890465
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/StreamExecution.scala
---
@@ -105,11 +105,21 @@ class StreamExecution(
var
Github user olarayej commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11336
@falaki Thanks for your comments. Yeah, before removing collect/show, I
just wanted to rebase to current upstream master. I'm getting a build error
which is actually a warning, not even an R
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15389#discussion_r82890280
--- Diff: python/pyspark/rdd.py ---
@@ -2029,7 +2028,15 @@ def coalesce(self, numPartitions, shuffle=False):
>>> sc.parallelize([1, 2, 3, 4, 5],
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15438
**[Test build #66762 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66762/consoleFull)**
for PR 15438 at commit
Github user brkyvz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15307#discussion_r82890127
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/streaming.py ---
@@ -189,6 +189,282 @@ def resetTerminated(self):
self._jsqm.resetTerminated()
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15307#discussion_r82890125
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/StreamExecution.scala
---
@@ -176,7 +184,9 @@ class StreamExecution(
//
Github user falaki commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11336#discussion_r82888215
--- Diff: R/pkg/inst/tests/testthat/test_sparkSQL.R ---
@@ -2252,6 +2252,31 @@ test_that("Method str()", {
Github user falaki commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11336#discussion_r82887849
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/column.R ---
@@ -32,35 +34,65 @@ setOldClass("jobj")
#' @export
#' @note Column since 1.4.0
setClass("Column",
-
Github user falaki commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11336#discussion_r82888061
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/column.R ---
@@ -32,35 +34,65 @@ setOldClass("jobj")
#' @export
#' @note Column since 1.4.0
setClass("Column",
-
Github user falaki commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11336#discussion_r82887445
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R ---
@@ -1035,10 +1035,17 @@ setMethod("dim",
c(count(x), ncol(x))
})
-#' Collects all
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13440
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13440
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66756/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13440
**[Test build #66756 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66756/consoleFull)**
for PR 13440 at commit
Github user brkyvz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15437
cc @tdas @zsxwing Would one of you want to look at this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14959
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14959
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66758/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14959
**[Test build #66758 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66758/consoleFull)**
for PR 14959 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15438
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66761/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15438
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15438
**[Test build #66761 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66761/consoleFull)**
for PR 15438 at commit
Github user neggert commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12576
Not sure what's going on regarding the multiple PRs for this issue, but I
cherry-picked this PR on top of 1.6.2 and it fixed the problem for me.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15438
**[Test build #66760 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66760/consoleFull)**
for PR 15438 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15438
**[Test build #66761 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66761/consoleFull)**
for PR 15438 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15437
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66754/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15437
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15437
**[Test build #66754 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66754/consoleFull)**
for PR 15437 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15438
**[Test build #66760 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66760/consoleFull)**
for PR 15438 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15438
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66760/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15438
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15438
cc @thunterdb, @hvanhovell, @davies
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
GitHub user rxin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15438
[SPARK-17845][SQL] More self-evident window function frame boundary API
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch improves the window function frame boundary API to make
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15436
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66752/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15436
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15436
**[Test build #66752 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66752/consoleFull)**
for PR 15436 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15190
Added them to your test cases. : )
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15338
**[Test build #66759 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66759/consoleFull)**
for PR 15338 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15338
Jenkins add to whitelist
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user seyfe closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15425
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user seyfe commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15425
Closing it since it's merged into 2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15382#discussion_r82878712
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -757,7 +758,10 @@ private[sql] class SQLConf extends Serializable with
201 - 300 of 661 matches
Mail list logo
