Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15475
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15539#discussion_r84222074
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/FileStatusCache.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,82 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15475
Merging in master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15172
**[Test build #67245 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67245/consoleFull)**
for PR 15172 at commit
[`8d7532f`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/8
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15563
Can't this just be a normal sparkconf? Why do we need to specialize the
spark-submit arguments for this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear o
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15562
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the fea
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15550
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15562
**[Test build #67244 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67244/consoleFull)**
for PR 15562 at commit
[`34b3cb1`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/3
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15563
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15550
Merging in master / branch-2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and w
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15544
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67235/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15544
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
GitHub user weiqingy opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15563
[SPARK-16759][CORE] Add a configuration property to pass in caller contexts
of upstream applications into Spark
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Many applications take Spark
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15544
**[Test build #67235 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67235/consoleFull)**
for PR 15544 at commit
[`90a17f6`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15562#discussion_r84220232
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/ParquetOutputWriter.scala
---
@@ -122,47 +122,29 @@ private[parquet]
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15562
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67241/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15562
**[Test build #67241 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67241/consoleFull)**
for PR 15562 at commit
[`6b79d88`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15562
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15505
**[Test build #67242 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67242/consoleFull)**
for PR 15505 at commit
[`07b0581`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/0
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15297
**[Test build #67243 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67243/consoleFull)**
for PR 15297 at commit
[`6c943d1`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/6
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15562
**[Test build #67241 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67241/consoleFull)**
for PR 15562 at commit
[`6b79d88`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/6
Github user rxin closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15561
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabl
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15561
Actually this is subsumed by https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15562
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15562
cc @liancheng @cloud-fan @tejasapatil
also @marmbrus -- you have always wanted this to happen.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
GitHub user rxin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15562
Spark 18021
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently each data source OutputWriter is responsible for specifying the
entire file name for each file output. This, however, does
Github user WeichenXu123 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15516#discussion_r84218510
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/utils.R ---
@@ -385,6 +385,41 @@ getStorageLevel <- function(newLevel = c("DISK_ONLY",
"OFF_HEAP" = callJ
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15554
Merged in.
Can you close this? Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15558
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15558
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67234/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15558
**[Test build #67234 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67234/consoleFull)**
for PR 15558 at commit
[`5343947`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15560
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15560
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67238/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15560
**[Test build #67238 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67238/consoleFull)**
for PR 15560 at commit
[`b25b277`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15559
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67236/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15559
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15559
**[Test build #67236 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67236/consoleFull)**
for PR 15559 at commit
[`c43d169`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15551
cc @tejasapatil fyi on the change
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15561
**[Test build #67240 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67240/consoleFull)**
for PR 15561 at commit
[`426ed1f`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/4
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15428
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67233/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15428
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
GitHub user rxin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15561
[SPARK-18012][SQL] Simplify WriterContainer follow-up
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch is a follow-up to https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15551 and
did a few cosm
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15428
**[Test build #67233 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67233/consoleFull)**
for PR 15428 at commit
[`d1dd840`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15551
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user liancheng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15551
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the fea
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15377
**[Test build #67239 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67239/consoleFull)**
for PR 15377 at commit
[`9cffcf3`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/9
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15560
**[Test build #67238 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67238/consoleFull)**
for PR 15560 at commit
[`b25b277`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/b
GitHub user felixcheung opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15560
[SPARKR] fix warnings
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Fix for a bunch of test warnings that were added recently.
We need to investigate why warnings are not turn
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15423
**[Test build #67237 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67237/consoleFull)**
for PR 15423 at commit
[`15c568f`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/1
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15559
**[Test build #67236 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67236/consoleFull)**
for PR 15559 at commit
[`c43d169`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/c
GitHub user felixcheung opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15559
[SPARK-18013][SPARKR] add crossJoin API
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add crossJoin and do not default to cross join if joinExpr is left out
## How was th
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15544
**[Test build #67235 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67235/consoleFull)**
for PR 15544 at commit
[`90a17f6`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/9
Github user jerryshao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15377#discussion_r84212380
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala ---
@@ -2432,6 +2432,26 @@ private[spark] object Utils extends Logging {
}
}
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15550
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67228/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15550
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15550
**[Test build #67228 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67228/consoleFull)**
for PR 15550 at commit
[`b83a606`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15523
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15523
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67229/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15523
**[Test build #67229 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67229/consoleFull)**
for PR 15523 at commit
[`52cb8fb`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15552#discussion_r84210373
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/r/MultilayerPerceptronClassifierWrapper.scala
---
@@ -73,6 +75,8 @@ private[r] object MultilayerPerce
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15428
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67232/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15428
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15428
**[Test build #67232 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67232/consoleFull)**
for PR 15428 at commit
[`0fb8d38`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15515
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15515
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67230/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15515
**[Test build #67230 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67230/consoleFull)**
for PR 15515 at commit
[`4d93f48`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15551
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67227/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15558
**[Test build #67234 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67234/consoleFull)**
for PR 15558 at commit
[`5343947`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/5
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15551
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15551
**[Test build #67227 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67227/consoleFull)**
for PR 15551 at commit
[`0ca0c81`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
GitHub user viirya opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15558
[SPARK-17357][SPARK-6624][SQL] Convert filter predicate to CNF in Optimizer
for pushdown
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR is proposed to solve the problem #14912
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15421
@falaki I mean for the case the exception is raised, but it sounds it is
the same test just on different R version
LGTM.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email a
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15428
**[Test build #67233 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67233/consoleFull)**
for PR 15428 at commit
[`d1dd840`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/d
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15009
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67225/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15009
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15009
**[Test build #67225 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67225/consoleFull)**
for PR 15009 at commit
[`92e4445`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15546#discussion_r84205834
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/SQLBuilder.scala ---
@@ -138,6 +138,9 @@ class SQLBuilder private (
case g: Ge
Github user VinceShieh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15428
Thanks for your valuable suggestions. @jkbradley @srowen
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user VinceShieh commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15428#discussion_r84205458
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/QuantileDiscretizer.scala ---
@@ -66,11 +67,13 @@ private[feature] trait QuantileDiscretizerBas
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15428
**[Test build #67232 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67232/consoleFull)**
for PR 15428 at commit
[`0fb8d38`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/0
Github user VinceShieh commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15428#discussion_r84205467
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/feature.py ---
@@ -1157,9 +1157,11 @@ class QuantileDiscretizer(JavaEstimator,
HasInputCol, HasOutputCol, JavaMLReadab
Github user VinceShieh commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15428#discussion_r84205414
--- Diff: docs/ml-features.md ---
@@ -1104,9 +1104,11 @@ for more details on the API.
`QuantileDiscretizer` takes a column with continuous features an
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15428
**[Test build #67231 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67231/consoleFull)**
for PR 15428 at commit
[`c350e9f`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15428
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67231/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15428
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15551
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67226/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15551
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15428
**[Test build #67231 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67231/consoleFull)**
for PR 15428 at commit
[`c350e9f`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/c
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15551
**[Test build #67226 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67226/consoleFull)**
for PR 15551 at commit
[`cfba7bb`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1#discussion_r84204673
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/clustering/KMeans.scala
---
@@ -354,21 +354,41 @@ object KMeans extends DefaultParamsReadable[KMeans] {
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15532
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15423
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the fea
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15423#discussion_r84204534
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/DDLSuite.scala
---
@@ -1713,4 +1713,21 @@ class DDLSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15546#discussion_r84204517
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/SQLBuilder.scala ---
@@ -138,6 +138,9 @@ class SQLBuilder private (
case g: Generate =>
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15532
Thanks - merging in master/branch-2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enable
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15493
Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the featu
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15550
Cool - LGTM! (I will merge once Jenkins comes back positive)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not hav
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15493
I will take that and add my note.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15539#discussion_r84203885
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveTablePerfStatsSuite.scala
---
@@ -103,11 +92,103 @@ class HiveDataFrameSuite extends Query
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15539#discussion_r84203441
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveMetastoreCatalog.scala ---
@@ -231,11 +231,16 @@ private[hive] class
HiveMetastoreCatalog(
Github user WeichenXu123 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15550
@tejasapatil check other reference to scala's `zipWithIndex` and fix
similar case in `RDD.zipWithUniqueId`, thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have y
1 - 100 of 568 matches
Mail list logo
