Github user holdenk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15659
@JoshRosen - yes since we ship the jars with them we want people to be able
to install the correct package for the hadoop distribution they are running
with/against.
---
If your project is set up
Github user holdenk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15881
Thanks for taking this on :) I did a quick skim and these all look pretty
reasonable (in some cases we are directly calling an old mllib algorithm which
would do the validation at training time and
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15740
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11122
**[Test build #3426 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3426/consoleFull)**
for PR 11122 at commit
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15887
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15740
Merging in master! Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14612#discussion_r87958491
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/rules.scala
---
@@ -89,6 +89,22 @@ case class
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14612#discussion_r87958997
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/rules.scala
---
@@ -89,6 +89,22 @@ case class
Github user WangTaoTheTonic commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15803
I'll post how UI works and what changes it did to be different before later
:)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11122
**[Test build #3426 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3426/consoleFull)**
for PR 11122 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15884
**[Test build #68655 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68655/consoleFull)**
for PR 15884 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15884
**[Test build #68654 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68654/consoleFull)**
for PR 15884 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15878
Sure, will do it. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15887
**[Test build #68653 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68653/consoleFull)**
for PR 15887 at commit
GitHub user ueshin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15887
[SPARK-18442][SQL] Fix nullability of WrapOption.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The nullability of `WrapOption` should be `false`.
## How was this patch
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15878
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15878
Can you submit a backport for branch-2.0?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15878
Merging in master/branch-2.1. Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15875
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15885#discussion_r87949452
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/streaming/FileStreamSinkSuite.scala
---
@@ -142,19 +145,80 @@ class FileStreamSinkSuite extends
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15885#discussion_r87949429
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/FileFormatWriter.scala
---
@@ -86,6 +86,7 @@ object FileFormatWriter extends
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15875
Thanks - merging in master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11122
retest this please.
LGTM. Let's run the test again. Will merge after test passes.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15880
+1 on the postgres approach
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15886
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user weiqingy opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15886
[MINOR][DOC] Fix typos in the 'configuration', 'monitoring' and
'sql-programming-guide' documentation
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Fix typos in the
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15843
I'd prefer option2 for safety since the model summaries should be an issue
for GC. And looks like Java model summaries don't have copy method.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15883
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68650/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15883
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15883
**[Test build #68650 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68650/consoleFull)**
for PR 15883 at commit
Github user weiqingy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15869
Hi, @srowen I have replied your comments and updated the PR. Could you
please review it again? Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user weiqingy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15869#discussion_r87945871
--- Diff: docs/running-on-yarn.md ---
@@ -495,6 +468,20 @@ To use a custom metrics.properties for the application
master and executors, upd
name
Github user weiqingy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15869#discussion_r87945875
--- Diff: docs/running-on-yarn.md ---
@@ -495,6 +468,20 @@ To use a custom metrics.properties for the application
master and executors, upd
name
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15875
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68652/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15875
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15875
**[Test build #68652 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68652/consoleFull)**
for PR 15875 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15835
I guess we should ping @liancheng as he was reviewing the previous one.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15849
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15849
**[Test build #68651 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68651/consoleFull)**
for PR 15849 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15849
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68651/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user weiqingy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15869#discussion_r87945049
--- Diff: docs/running-on-yarn.md ---
@@ -118,19 +118,6 @@ To use a custom metrics.properties for the application
master and executors, upd
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15868
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68647/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15868
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15868
**[Test build #68647 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68647/consoleFull)**
for PR 15868 at commit
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15875
@rxin I update this PR to notify in `Vertex and Edge RDDs` that not all
methods are listed and add link of `VertexRDD` and `EdgeRDD`.
BTW, use `VertexId` instead of `VertexID`
---
If
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15875
**[Test build #68652 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68652/consoleFull)**
for PR 15875 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15849
**[Test build #68651 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68651/consoleFull)**
for PR 15849 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15885
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15885
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68643/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15885
**[Test build #68643 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68643/consoleFull)**
for PR 15885 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15881
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68648/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15881
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15881
**[Test build #68648 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68648/consoleFull)**
for PR 15881 at commit
Github user uncleGen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15852
LGTM overall. If this is accepted, then i will close #15827
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user uncleGen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15852#discussion_r87941243
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/CompactibleFileStreamLog.scala
---
@@ -63,7 +63,60 @@ abstract class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15852
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68644/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15852
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15883
**[Test build #68650 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68650/consoleFull)**
for PR 15883 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15852
**[Test build #68644 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68644/consoleFull)**
for PR 15852 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15817
**[Test build #68649 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68649/consoleFull)**
for PR 15817 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15817
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15817
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68649/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user yanboliang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15883
Jenkins, test this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15880
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68645/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15880
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user pwoody commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15835
@rxin @HyukjinKwon ready for more review on my end.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15880
**[Test build #68645 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68645/consoleFull)**
for PR 15880 at commit
Github user zhengruifeng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15881#discussion_r87939529
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/tree/treeParams.scala ---
@@ -73,11 +73,13 @@ private[ml] trait DecisionTreeParams extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15817
**[Test build #68649 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68649/consoleFull)**
for PR 15817 at commit
Github user techaddict commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15817
@jkbradley done ð
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user zhengruifeng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15881#discussion_r87939306
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/tree/treeParams.scala ---
@@ -73,11 +73,13 @@ private[ml] trait DecisionTreeParams extends
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15884
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15884
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68642/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15884
**[Test build #68642 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68642/consoleFull)**
for PR 15884 at commit
Github user hhbyyh commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15881#discussion_r87939017
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/tree/treeParams.scala ---
@@ -73,11 +73,13 @@ private[ml] trait DecisionTreeParams extends
PredictorParams
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15881
**[Test build #68648 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68648/consoleFull)**
for PR 15881 at commit
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15881
Thanks for reviewing. I update the checking in LiR's `solver` : Array ->
Set, output supported options in err message.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15817
Can you please implement the Param directly in Bucketizer and
QuantileDiscretizer? Just like in Scala, HasHandleInvalid has built-in Param
doc which applies to existing use cases but not
Github user uncleGen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15852#discussion_r87936909
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/CompactibleFileStreamLog.scala
---
@@ -63,7 +63,60 @@ abstract class
Github user wzhfy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15877#discussion_r87936572
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/CountMinSketchAggSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,284 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15884#discussion_r87936113
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/json/JSONOptions.scala
---
@@ -34,35 +34,42 @@ private[sql] class JSONOptions(
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15884#discussion_r87936135
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/json/JSONOptions.scala
---
@@ -34,35 +34,42 @@ private[sql] class JSONOptions(
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15884#discussion_r87936058
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/json/JSONOptions.scala
---
@@ -34,35 +34,42 @@ private[sql] class JSONOptions(
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15865
For sure, I ran
```bash
$ ./dev/lint-java
Using `mvn` from path: .../mvn
Checkstyle checks passed.
```
It seems fine. It looks good to me for few minor comments
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15865#discussion_r87935757
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/examples/ml/JavaInteractionExample.java
---
@@ -48,8 +47,7 @@ public static void main(String[] args)
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15884#discussion_r87935620
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/json/JSONOptions.scala
---
@@ -34,35 +34,42 @@ private[sql] class JSONOptions(
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15865#discussion_r87935645
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/UnsafeArrayData.java
---
@@ -109,7 +109,8 @@ public void pointTo(Object
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15868
Thank you for retriggering, @gatorsmile .
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15880
+1 on the postgres approach
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15884#discussion_r87935015
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/json/JSONOptions.scala
---
@@ -34,35 +34,42 @@ private[sql] class JSONOptions(
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15857#discussion_r87934920
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/FoldablePropagationSuite.scala
---
@@ -118,14 +118,30 @@ class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15868
**[Test build #68647 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68647/consoleFull)**
for PR 15868 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15868
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user uncleGen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15849#discussion_r87934733
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/examples/sql/streaming/JavaStructuredKafkaWordCount.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,96 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed
Github user wzhfy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15877#discussion_r87934606
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/CountMinSketchAgg.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,131 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15704
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15704
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68640/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15704
**[Test build #68640 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68640/consoleFull)**
for PR 15704 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15868
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68641/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user zzcclp commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11122
It sounds good. @zsxwing could you take a look at this pr? does this pr
plan to be merged into branch-2.1?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
1 - 100 of 437 matches
Mail list logo
