Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15704#discussion_r87895663
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/ddl.scala ---
@@ -418,27 +419,58 @@ case class AlterTableRenamePartitionCommand(
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15704#discussion_r87896496
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/HiveDDLSuite.scala
---
@@ -225,6 +226,108 @@ class HiveDDLSuite
}
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15704#discussion_r87895874
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/ddl.scala ---
@@ -418,27 +419,58 @@ case class AlterTableRenamePartitionCommand(
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15704#discussion_r87896147
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/antlr4/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/parser/SqlBase.g4 ---
@@ -243,7 +243,7 @@ partitionSpec
;
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15878
**[Test build #68636 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68636/consoleFull)**
for PR 15878 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15840
**[Test build #68627 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68627/consoleFull)**
for PR 15840 at commit
Github user JoshRosen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15659
> I think we will want to keep the release-build tagging so that the
artifacts are correct for the different hadoop versions.
Ah, so the idea is that we'll make separate PyPi artifacts
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15840
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15840
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68627/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user dongjoon-hyun closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15302
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15302
I'm closing this PR in favor of #15704 .
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15881#discussion_r87887739
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/LinearRegression.scala ---
@@ -171,7 +171,10 @@ class LinearRegression @Since("1.3.0")
Github user dbtsai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15876
LGTM. Thanks. Merged into master and 2.1 branch.
@srowen Are you referring the MLOR PR which has many followup PRs? If so,
the changes in the main MLOR PR is very big, and many of the issues
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15882
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15882
**[Test build #68632 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68632/consoleFull)**
for PR 15882 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15882
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68632/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15682
**[Test build #68635 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68635/consoleFull)**
for PR 15682 at commit
Github user hhbyyh commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15881#discussion_r87883345
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/LinearRegression.scala ---
@@ -171,7 +171,10 @@ class LinearRegression @Since("1.3.0")
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14638
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14638
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68628/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14638
**[Test build #68628 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68628/consoleFull)**
for PR 14638 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15682
Retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15868
**[Test build #68634 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68634/consoleFull)**
for PR 15868 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15868
Then, @gatorsmile .
Could you review this PR, too?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15763
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15763
LGTM. Merging to master/2.1/2.0. Thanks!
@nsyca could you open a JIRA discuss a generic subquery operator.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15876
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14638
**[Test build #68633 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68633/consoleFull)**
for PR 14638 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14638#discussion_r87878854
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/TableReader.scala ---
@@ -122,10 +126,18 @@ class HadoopTableReader(
val
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15563#discussion_r87876783
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/internal/config/package.scala ---
@@ -207,6 +207,10 @@ package object config {
.booleanConf
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14638#discussion_r87876602
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/TableReader.scala ---
@@ -113,6 +113,10 @@ class HadoopTableReader(
val
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14638
Thank you for review, @srowen !
Yes. The issue was `the question here is whether the change belongs here or
elsewhere`, and I couldn't find better place.
---
If your project is set up
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15868#discussion_r87875679
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/jdbc/JdbcUtils.scala
---
@@ -667,7 +667,14 @@ object JdbcUtils extends Logging
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14638#discussion_r87874812
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/TableReader.scala ---
@@ -113,6 +113,10 @@ class HadoopTableReader(
val tablePath
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14638#discussion_r87874770
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/TableReader.scala ---
@@ -113,6 +113,10 @@ class HadoopTableReader(
val tablePath
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14638#discussion_r87875211
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/TableReader.scala ---
@@ -122,10 +126,18 @@ class HadoopTableReader(
val attrsWithIndex
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15882
**[Test build #68632 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68632/consoleFull)**
for PR 15882 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15880
Hi, @cloud-fan . What about just showing warning for that?
For Hive 1.2.1 and 2.1.0, it's `true` like the old Spark.
```sql
hive> SELECT 19157170390056973L = "19157170390056971";
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15843
I don't see a need to do deep copies of model summaries, but I agree I
don't like how JavaWrapper is ambiguous about whether it does shallow or deep
copies.
I'd say the confusion comes
Github user mgummelt commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15740
@rxin @srowen What will it take to merge this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user hhbyyh commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15881#discussion_r87873242
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/LinearRegression.scala ---
@@ -171,7 +171,10 @@ class LinearRegression @Since("1.3.0")
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15780
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68626/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15868#discussion_r87872317
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/jdbc/JdbcUtils.scala
---
@@ -667,7 +667,14 @@ object JdbcUtils extends
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15780
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15780
**[Test build #68626 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68626/consoleFull)**
for PR 15780 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15702
**[Test build #68631 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68631/consoleFull)**
for PR 15702 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15868
**[Test build #68630 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68630/consoleFull)**
for PR 15868 at commit
Github user jnadler commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15132
Huge thank you to Cody Koeninger for working on this change. Looking
forward to 2.1.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15868
Hi, @srowen .
I addressed the comment and added an image in the PR description.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15132
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15132
LGTM. Thanks! Merging to master and 2.1.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15840
**[Test build #68629 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68629/consoleFull)**
for PR 15840 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15874
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68625/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15874
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15874
**[Test build #68625 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68625/consoleFull)**
for PR 15874 at commit
Github user boneill42 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15882#discussion_r87868136
--- Diff:
external/kinesis-asl/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kinesis/KinesisRecordProcessor.scala
---
@@ -102,27 +101,29 @@ private[kinesis]
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15763
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68623/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15763
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15763
**[Test build #68623 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68623/consoleFull)**
for PR 15763 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15857#discussion_r87865899
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/expressions.scala
---
@@ -428,43 +428,47 @@ object FoldablePropagation
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15857#discussion_r87865485
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/FoldablePropagationSuite.scala
---
@@ -118,14 +118,30 @@ class
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15857#discussion_r87865434
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/expressions.scala
---
@@ -428,43 +428,47 @@ object FoldablePropagation
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15878
Sure, let me do it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15857#discussion_r87862736
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/FoldablePropagationSuite.scala
---
@@ -118,14 +118,30 @@ class
Github user nsyca commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15763
@hvanhovell could you please review the PR again? Hopefully this is the
last one.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14638
**[Test build #68628 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68628/consoleFull)**
for PR 14638 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14638
Retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15857#discussion_r87861276
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/expressions.scala
---
@@ -428,43 +428,47 @@ object FoldablePropagation
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14638
Thank you, @jamartinh . I hope so.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15763
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68621/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15859
LGTM. Merging to master, 2.1 and 2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15868#discussion_r87857574
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/jdbc/JdbcUtils.scala
---
@@ -667,9 +667,15 @@ object JdbcUtils extends
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15859
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15763
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15763
**[Test build #68621 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68621/consoleFull)**
for PR 15763 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15659
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68619/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15659
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15659
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68620/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15659
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15659
**[Test build #68619 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68619/consoleFull)**
for PR 15659 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15840
**[Test build #68627 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68627/consoleFull)**
for PR 15840 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15659
**[Test build #68620 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68620/consoleFull)**
for PR 15659 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15777
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15777
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68624/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15777
**[Test build #68624 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68624/consoleFull)**
for PR 15777 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15780
**[Test build #68626 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68626/consoleFull)**
for PR 15780 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15874
**[Test build #68625 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68625/consoleFull)**
for PR 15874 at commit
Github user Yunni commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15874
Thanks, @sethah. I have reverted "AND-amplification" related changes. PTAL.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15883
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15883
**[Test build #68622 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68622/consoleFull)**
for PR 15883 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15883
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68622/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15780
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15780
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68618/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15780
**[Test build #68618 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68618/consoleFull)**
for PR 15780 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15857
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68617/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15857
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15857
**[Test build #68617 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68617/consoleFull)**
for PR 15857 at commit
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15777#discussion_r87841411
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/clustering/BisectingKMeans.scala ---
@@ -132,7 +132,7 @@ class BisectingKMeansModel private[ml] (
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15777
**[Test build #68624 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68624/consoleFull)**
for PR 15777 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15865
**[Test build #3425 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3425/consoleFull)**
for PR 15865 at commit
201 - 300 of 437 matches
Mail list logo
