Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16009
LGTM
Merging with master and branch-2.1
Thank you!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16009#discussion_r90330019
--- Diff: docs/ml-features.md ---
@@ -1188,7 +1188,9 @@ categorical features. The number of bins is set by
the `numBuckets` parameter. I
that the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15982
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16085
**[Test build #3447 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3447/consoleFull)**
for PR 16085 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16085
**[Test build #69429 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69429/consoleFull)**
for PR 16085 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15923
**[Test build #69422 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69422/consoleFull)**
for PR 15923 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15923
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69422/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16085
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16085
> Test build #69423 has started for PR 16085 at commit 33c253f.
This is hanging here but is not related to this change:
```
[info] ExternalAppendOnlyMapSuite:
[info] - single
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15923
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15982
**[Test build #69419 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69419/consoleFull)**
for PR 15982 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15982
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69419/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14079
**[Test build #69428 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69428/consoleFull)**
for PR 14079 at commit
Github user mccheah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16061#discussion_r90323622
--- Diff:
kubernetes/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/kubernetes/KubernetesClusterSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,222 @@
+/*
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15813
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15813
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69418/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15813
**[Test build #69418 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69418/consoleFull)**
for PR 15813 at commit
Github user mccheah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16061#discussion_r90321324
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkSubmit.scala ---
@@ -596,6 +599,26 @@ object SparkSubmit extends CommandLineUtils {
}
Github user mccheah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16061#discussion_r90321063
--- Diff: dev/deps/spark-deps-hadoop-2.4 ---
@@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ jersey-client-2.22.2.jar
jersey-common-2.22.2.jar
Github user mccheah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16061#discussion_r90320239
--- Diff:
kubernetes/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/kubernetes/KubernetesClusterSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,222 @@
+/*
Github user mccheah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16061#discussion_r90320078
--- Diff:
kubernetes/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/kubernetes/KubernetesClusterSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,222 @@
+/*
Github user wesm commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15821
Luckily we are on the home stretch for making the Java and C++ libraries
binary compatible -- e.g. I'm working on automated testing today:
https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/219
---
If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15910
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69413/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13147#discussion_r90317826
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/planning/QueryPlanner.scala
---
@@ -27,6 +27,14 @@ import
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15910
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15910
**[Test build #69413 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69413/consoleFull)**
for PR 15910 at commit
Github user liancheng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16030
@brkyvz @maropu Actually, we do allow users to create partitioned tables
that allow data schema to contains (part of) the partition columns, and there
are [test][1] [cases][2] for this use case.
Github user tdas commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16085
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15662
**[Test build #69427 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69427/consoleFull)**
for PR 15662 at commit
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15992
I think this PR has one issue. There are two places requiring ClassTag. The
first one is creating `Receiver`, the other one is calling `receiverStream`. If
they are inconsistent (e.g., writing some
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16073
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16080
We need a test case here.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16082
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16082
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69416/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user andrewor14 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16081
and 2.0
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16081
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16082
**[Test build #69416 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69416/consoleFull)**
for PR 16082 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16070
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69414/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16070
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user andrewor14 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16073
and 2.0
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16070
**[Test build #69414 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69414/consoleFull)**
for PR 16070 at commit
Github user andrewor14 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16073
LGTM merging into master 2.1.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user NathanHowell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16084
cc/ @HyukjinKwon
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user andrewor14 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16081
Ok, merging into master 2.1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15780
**[Test build #69426 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69426/consoleFull)**
for PR 15780 at commit
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15780#discussion_r90309952
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/objects/objects.scala
---
@@ -405,13 +407,12 @@ case class WrapOption(child:
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15780#discussion_r90309935
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/encoders/ExpressionEncoderSuite.scala
---
@@ -338,6 +338,18 @@ class
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15780#discussion_r90309905
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/objects/objects.scala
---
@@ -171,15 +171,17 @@ case class StaticInvoke(
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16086
**[Test build #69425 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69425/consoleFull)**
for PR 16086 at commit
Github user BryanCutler commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15821
Thanks @mariusvniekerk, as @holdenk said we are going to try to get
something basic working first and after we show some performance improvement,
we can follow up with more things
---
If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16086
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16086
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69424/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16086
**[Test build #69424 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69424/consoleFull)**
for PR 16086 at commit
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16052#discussion_r90306255
--- Diff:
streaming/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/StreamingContextSuite.scala
---
@@ -869,6 +891,31 @@ object TestReceiver {
val counter
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16086
**[Test build #69424 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69424/consoleFull)**
for PR 16086 at commit
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16085
cc @tdas
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16085
Another option is adding `@JsonIgnoreProperties` to these classes to ignore
unknown fields. However, there are two disadvantages:
- It's easy to ignore something that we don't want to
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16085
**[Test build #69423 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69423/consoleFull)**
for PR 16085 at commit
GitHub user zsxwing opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16085
[SPARK-18655][SS]Ignore Structured Streaming 2.0.2 logs in history server
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
As `queryStatus` in StreamingQueryListener events was removed
Github user mallman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16071
I can't vouch for how `Path` and `URI` work together to do the right thing,
however the test coverage looks good. LGTM overall.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user thomastechs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16083
This patch would be catching the exception happening while the
metadatacheck(due to getting corrupted) and continue with a warning log and
continue with the drop operation...
---
If your
Github user mallman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16071#discussion_r90303311
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/PartitionProviderCompatibilitySuite.scala
---
@@ -205,6 +205,58 @@ class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16084
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user NathanHowell opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16084
[SPARK-18654][SQL] Remove unreachable patterns in makeRootConverter
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`makeRootConverter` is only called with a `StructType` value.
Github user ericl commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16071#discussion_r90302152
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/PartitionProviderCompatibilitySuite.scala
---
@@ -205,6 +205,58 @@ class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16082
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69420/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16082
**[Test build #69420 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69420/consoleFull)**
for PR 16082 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16082
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user zhzhan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16068
retest it please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user mallman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16071#discussion_r90300900
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/PartitionProviderCompatibilitySuite.scala
---
@@ -205,6 +205,58 @@ class
Github user foxish commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16061
Cross posting link to [the
proposal](https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12840988/SPARK-18278%20-%20Spark%20on%20Kubernetes%20Design%20Proposal.pdf)
here.
---
If your project is set
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15923
**[Test build #69422 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69422/consoleFull)**
for PR 15923 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15662
LGTM except a minor comment
cc @cloud-fan
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user foxish commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16061#discussion_r90298908
--- Diff: dev/make-distribution.sh ---
@@ -154,7 +154,9 @@ export MAVEN_OPTS="${MAVEN_OPTS:--Xmx2g
-XX:MaxPermSize=512M -XX:ReservedCodeCac
# Store the
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15662#discussion_r90298317
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/jdbc/JDBCSuite.scala
---
@@ -855,6 +855,8 @@ class JDBCSuite extends SparkFunSuite
Github user vijoshi closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15991
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16083
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user jayadevanmurali opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16083
[SPARK-18097][SQL] Add exception catch to handle corrupted metadata
scenario while dropping the table
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add exception catch to handle
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15982
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16048
**[Test build #69421 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69421/consoleFull)**
for PR 16048 at commit
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16048
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15979
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15979
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69411/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15987
Hi, @hvanhovell , @gatorsmile , @rxin .
Should we remove *Expression* related stuff?
Originally, #15302 does not have this kind of expression issue. It's just
an extension of the
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15979
**[Test build #69411 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69411/consoleFull)**
for PR 15979 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15958
@jiangxb1987 Could you submit a follow-up PR to correct it? Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15958#discussion_r90293883
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/antlr4/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/parser/SqlBase.g4 ---
@@ -124,8 +124,8 @@ statement
(USING resource
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16082
**[Test build #69420 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69420/consoleFull)**
for PR 16082 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16082
**[Test build #69415 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69415/consoleFull)**
for PR 16082 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16082
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69415/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16082
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user wangmiao1981 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16064
cc @sethah @yanboliang @MLnick
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15982
**[Test build #69419 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69419/consoleFull)**
for PR 15982 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15813
**[Test build #69418 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69418/consoleFull)**
for PR 15813 at commit
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15910
LGTM. we need to get this in branch-2.1 because of the signature change
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16082
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16082
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69412/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14079
**[Test build #69417 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69417/consoleFull)**
for PR 14079 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16082
**[Test build #69412 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69412/consoleFull)**
for PR 16082 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16060
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
301 - 400 of 601 matches
Mail list logo
