Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16192
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16175
I checked the code base. We are having multiple potential overflow issues
in `sizeInBytes` of `Statistics`. We might need a fix for all the other places.
---
If your project is set up for it,
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16192
Thanks. Merging to master and 2.1.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16175#discussion_r91352281
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DatasetSuite.scala
---
@@ -1110,6 +1110,17 @@ class DatasetSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user aray closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16197
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16189
**[Test build #69803 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69803/consoleFull)**
for PR 16189 at commit
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16189#discussion_r91347493
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/executor/Executor.scala ---
@@ -432,6 +435,57 @@ private[spark] class Executor(
}
/**
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16179
I think I know what the problem is, this will require some test changes.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user huaxingao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16175#discussion_r91345742
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DatasetSuite.scala
---
@@ -1110,6 +1110,16 @@ class DatasetSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user mengxr commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16190
@sarutak Do you know why we needed this change to fix ssl-enabled history
server in #15611?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16119
**[Test build #69802 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69802/consoleFull)**
for PR 16119 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16119
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69802/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16119
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16119
**[Test build #69802 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69802/consoleFull)**
for PR 16119 at commit
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16197
Merging to 2.0. Thanks! Can you close?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user hhbyyh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16194
I haven't really checked about it, but is it possible to just provide the
default `toString` implementation in some upstream abstract class, like Model?
And we can do the similar thing for
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16119
**[Test build #69801 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69801/consoleFull)**
for PR 16119 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16119
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69801/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16119
Build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16197
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16197
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69798/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16119
**[Test build #69801 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69801/consoleFull)**
for PR 16119 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16197
**[Test build #69798 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69798/consoleFull)**
for PR 16197 at commit
Github user wangmiao1981 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16150#discussion_r91341471
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -661,7 +665,10 @@ setMethod("fitted", signature(object = "KMeansModel"),
# Get the summary of a k-means model
Github user brkyvz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16114
I will need to take a deeper look at this to remember the code. I'm not
sure but there may be some issues with the checkpointing happening to the
WriteAheadLog and DynamoDB. Going to come back to
Github user brkyvz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16114#discussion_r91339332
--- Diff:
external/kinesis-asl/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kinesis/KinesisRecordProcessor.scala
---
@@ -68,7 +68,16 @@ private[kinesis] class
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16000
The API should be one; it doesn't belong to core or streaming, it belongs
to Spark. Parts of it would be coming from core, parts of it would be coming
from streaming. Just like the UI.
And
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16189#discussion_r91337695
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/executor/Executor.scala ---
@@ -432,6 +435,57 @@ private[spark] class Executor(
}
/**
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16189#discussion_r91337585
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/executor/Executor.scala ---
@@ -432,6 +435,57 @@ private[spark] class Executor(
}
/**
Github user mridulm commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14638#discussion_r91332545
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/TableReader.scala ---
@@ -122,10 +125,22 @@ class HadoopTableReader(
val attrsWithIndex
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16169
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69800/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16169
**[Test build #69800 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69800/consoleFull)**
for PR 16169 at commit
Github user mridulm commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14638#discussion_r91331724
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/TableReader.scala ---
@@ -113,6 +113,9 @@ class HadoopTableReader(
val tablePath
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16175#discussion_r91329867
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DatasetSuite.scala
---
@@ -1110,6 +1110,16 @@ class DatasetSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16197
LGTM - pending jenkins.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16148
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69799/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16148
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16148
**[Test build #69799 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69799/consoleFull)**
for PR 16148 at commit
Github user yanboliang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16169
@felixcheung This is a good question. It's reasonable to call
```.setProbabilityCol(probabilityCol)``` on a model or a pipeline model, and
this should be handled at model transformation
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15987
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69797/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15987
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15987
**[Test build #69797 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69797/consoleFull)**
for PR 15987 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16169
**[Test build #69800 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69800/consoleFull)**
for PR 16169 at commit
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16148#discussion_r91314970
--- Diff: examples/src/main/r/ml/ml.R ---
@@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+#
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16148
**[Test build #69799 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69799/consoleFull)**
for PR 16148 at commit
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16148#discussion_r91313338
--- Diff: examples/src/main/r/ml/glm.R ---
@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+#
Github user mridulm commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16196#discussion_r91309679
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/SizeEstimator.scala ---
@@ -119,8 +126,6 @@ object SizeEstimator extends Logging {
}
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16148#discussion_r91310987
--- Diff: docs/sparkr.md ---
@@ -512,39 +512,33 @@ head(teenagers)
# Machine Learning
-SparkR supports the following machine learning
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14638
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69796/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14638
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14638
**[Test build #69796 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69796/consoleFull)**
for PR 14638 at commit
Github user a-roberts commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16196#discussion_r91309585
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/SizeEstimator.scala ---
@@ -89,7 +90,13 @@ object SizeEstimator extends Logging {
// A
Github user mridulm commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16196#discussion_r91309138
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/SizeEstimator.scala ---
@@ -89,7 +90,13 @@ object SizeEstimator extends Logging {
// A cache
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16197
**[Test build #69798 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69798/consoleFull)**
for PR 16197 at commit
GitHub user aray opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16197
[SPARK-17760][SQL][Backport] AnalysisException with dataframe pivot when
groupBy column is not attribute
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Backport of #16177 to branch-2.0
Github user a-roberts commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16196#discussion_r91305043
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/SizeEstimator.scala ---
@@ -243,47 +253,59 @@ object SizeEstimator extends Logging {
arrSize
Github user a-roberts commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16196#discussion_r91301705
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/SizeEstimator.scala ---
@@ -89,7 +90,13 @@ object SizeEstimator extends Logging {
// A
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14365
It seems to exist some cases like the following (on the current master).
On hive,
```sql
CREATE TABLE t1 (a string) PARTITIONED BY (b string) STORED AS ORC;
INSERT INTO
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14638
**[Test build #69796 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69796/consoleFull)**
for PR 14638 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15987
**[Test build #69797 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69797/consoleFull)**
for PR 15987 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16196
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16196
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69795/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15987
Retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14638
Retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15664#discussion_r91287287
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/jdbc/JdbcUtils.scala
---
@@ -112,7 +112,25 @@ object JdbcUtils extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16196
**[Test build #69795 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69795/consoleFull)**
for PR 16196 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16193#discussion_r91285472
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/python/ExtractPythonUDFs.scala
---
@@ -166,3 +174,40 @@ object ExtractPythonUDFs
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16177
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16177
@aray could you open a backport for branch 2.0 if you feel that we should
also fix it there?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16177
LGTM. Merging to master/2.1. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16193#discussion_r91284534
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/python/BatchEvalPythonExecSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,99 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15722
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user omuravskiy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16006
Tests added
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15722
LGTM. Merging to master/2.1. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16056
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69794/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15722
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69793/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15722
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15722
**[Test build #69793 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69793/consoleFull)**
for PR 15722 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16056
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16056
**[Test build #69794 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69794/consoleFull)**
for PR 16056 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16190
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16190
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69790/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16190
**[Test build #69790 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69790/consoleFull)**
for PR 16190 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16043
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16043
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69788/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16043
**[Test build #69788 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69788/consoleFull)**
for PR 16043 at commit
Github user mridulm commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16196#discussion_r91268810
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/SizeEstimator.scala ---
@@ -119,8 +126,6 @@ object SizeEstimator extends Logging {
}
Github user mridulm commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16196#discussion_r91268937
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/SizeEstimator.scala ---
@@ -89,7 +90,13 @@ object SizeEstimator extends Logging {
// A cache
Github user mridulm commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16196#discussion_r91270660
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/SizeEstimator.scala ---
@@ -243,47 +253,59 @@ object SizeEstimator extends Logging {
arrSize
Github user mridulm commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16196#discussion_r91271510
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/SizeEstimator.scala ---
@@ -316,62 +338,40 @@ object SizeEstimator extends Logging {
*/
Github user mridulm commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16196#discussion_r91270825
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/SizeEstimator.scala ---
@@ -243,47 +253,59 @@ object SizeEstimator extends Logging {
arrSize
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16192
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69785/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16192
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16109
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69786/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16109
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16192
**[Test build #69785 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69785/consoleFull)**
for PR 16192 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16122
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16109
**[Test build #69786 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69786/consoleFull)**
for PR 16109 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16122
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69792/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16122
**[Test build #69792 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69792/consoleFull)**
for PR 16122 at commit
401 - 500 of 590 matches
Mail list logo
