Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16464#discussion_r95951488
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib_clustering.R ---
@@ -404,11 +411,14 @@ setMethod("summary", signature(object = "LDAModel"),
vocabSize <- callJMet
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16555
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16555
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71299/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16464
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16464
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71302/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16568
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71297/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16464
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16500
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16464
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71303/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16566
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71298/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16500
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71296/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16464
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16557
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16557
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71291/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16500
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71295/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16566
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16464
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71301/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16568
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16500
Build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16567
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16567
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71293/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16512
**[Test build #71304 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71304/testReport)**
for PR 16512 at commit
[`73ffaca`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/73
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16565
@gatorsmile oh, I see. Is it okay to mix this pr with the fix of #15111?
Would it be better to backport #15111 first then, backport this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16464#discussion_r95954100
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib_clustering.R ---
@@ -404,11 +411,14 @@ setMethod("summary", signature(object = "LDAModel"),
vocabSize <- callJMeth
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16119
**[Test build #71305 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71305/testReport)**
for PR 16119 at commit
[`e5c822a`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/e5
GitHub user uncleGen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16569
[SPARK-19206][DOC][DStream]Fix outdated parameter descriptions
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Fix outdated parameter descriptions in kafka010
## How was this
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16512
**[Test build #71304 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71304/testReport)**
for PR 16512 at commit
[`73ffaca`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/7
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16512
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16512
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71304/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16569
**[Test build #71306 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71306/testReport)**
for PR 16569 at commit
[`acfc855`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/ac
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16119
**[Test build #71305 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71305/testReport)**
for PR 16119 at commit
[`e5c822a`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16119
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71305/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16119
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16569
**[Test build #71306 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71306/testReport)**
for PR 16569 at commit
[`acfc855`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/a
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16569
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71306/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16569
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
GitHub user oza opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16570
[SPARK-19207][SQL] LocalSparkSession should use Slf4JLoggerFactory.INSTANCE
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Using Slf4JLoggerFactory.INSTANCE instead of creating Slf4JLogger
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16570
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
Github user sardetushar commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5008
Hi, I manage to solve this issue. now i am able to recover all the data but
as discussed in this thread [Data Duplicate issue]
(https://www.mail-archive.com/user@spark.apache.org/msg52687.html)
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16228
**[Test build #71307 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71307/testReport)**
for PR 16228 at commit
[`ffb9eee`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/ff
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16410
**[Test build #71308 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71308/testReport)**
for PR 16410 at commit
[`1d92a8f`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/1d
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16410
Build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16410
**[Test build #71308 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71308/testReport)**
for PR 16410 at commit
[`1d92a8f`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/1
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16410
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71308/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16410
**[Test build #71309 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71309/testReport)**
for PR 16410 at commit
[`41d257e`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/41
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16410
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16410
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71309/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16571
**[Test build #71310 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71310/testReport)**
for PR 16571 at commit
[`dd0e0c3`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/dd
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16410
**[Test build #71311 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71311/testReport)**
for PR 16410 at commit
[`abdea3a`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/ab
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16410
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71311/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16410
**[Test build #71311 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71311/testReport)**
for PR 16410 at commit
[`abdea3a`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/a
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16410
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16410
**[Test build #71312 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71312/testReport)**
for PR 16410 at commit
[`4e09c0e`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/4e
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16500
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16119
thanks, merging to master/2.1/2.0!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enable
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16500
**[Test build #71313 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71313/testReport)**
for PR 16500 at commit
[`203e36c`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/20
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16119
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16550
backported to 2.1/2.0
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16571
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16571
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71310/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16571
**[Test build #71310 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71310/testReport)**
for PR 16571 at commit
[`dd0e0c3`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/d
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14971#discussion_r95975787
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/client/HiveClientImpl.scala
---
@@ -378,6 +380,50 @@ private[hive] class HiveClientImpl(
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14971#discussion_r95976667
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/client/HiveClientImpl.scala
---
@@ -378,6 +380,50 @@ private[hive] class HiveClientImpl(
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14971#discussion_r95977105
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/client/HiveClientImpl.scala
---
@@ -427,7 +473,14 @@ private[hive] class HiveClientImpl(
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14971#discussion_r95977972
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/client/HiveClientImpl.scala
---
@@ -427,7 +473,14 @@ private[hive] class HiveClientImpl(
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16564#discussion_r95979368
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DatasetSuite.scala
---
@@ -898,11 +899,15 @@ class DatasetSuite extends QueryTest with
SharedSQLCon
Github user windpiger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16549
For test case
```
test("intersect") {
checkSQL("SELECT * FROM t0 INTERSECT SELECT * FROM t0", "intersect")
}
```
https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/sq
Github user windpiger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16545
thanks! even though it is a no-partition file, it will also be deleted, so
I think this change will more clear
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
repl
GitHub user nsyca opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16572
[SPARK-18863][SQL] Output non-aggregate expressions without GROUP BY in a
subquery does not yield an error
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR will report proper error me
Github user windpiger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16255#discussion_r95981143
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -200,6 +200,8 @@ object RemoveAliasOnlyProject extend
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16528
**[Test build #71316 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71316/testReport)**
for PR 16528 at commit
[`d5b3b4f`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/d5
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16571
**[Test build #71315 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71315/testReport)**
for PR 16571 at commit
[`671e566`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/67
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16572
**[Test build #71314 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71314/testReport)**
for PR 16572 at commit
[`24397cf`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/24
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16549#discussion_r95981274
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameWriter.scala ---
@@ -383,14 +383,19 @@ final class DataFrameWriter[T] private[sql](ds:
Dat
GitHub user uncleGen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16573
[SPARK-19210][DStream] Add log level info into checkpoint file
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
If we set log level by using **SparkContext.setLogLevel()**, after resta
Github user nsyca commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16572#discussion_r95981409
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/CheckAnalysis.scala
---
@@ -117,66 +117,72 @@ trait CheckAnalysis extends Predica
Github user nsyca commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16572#discussion_r95982097
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLQueryTestSuite.scala ---
@@ -163,7 +163,12 @@ class SQLQueryTestSuite extends QueryTest with
SharedS
Github user WeichenXu123 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15730
cc @yanboliang Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wis
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16573
**[Test build #71317 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71317/testReport)**
for PR 16573 at commit
[`1fc5f93`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/1f
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16549
**[Test build #71319 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71319/testReport)**
for PR 16549 at commit
[`8901bae`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/89
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16571
**[Test build #71318 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71318/testReport)**
for PR 16571 at commit
[`5839ac2`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/58
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16228
**[Test build #71307 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71307/testReport)**
for PR 16228 at commit
[`ffb9eee`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/f
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16228
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16228
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71307/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16410
**[Test build #71312 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71312/testReport)**
for PR 16410 at commit
[`4e09c0e`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/4
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16410
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71312/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16410
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16545
Why would a file exist there? if it doesn't exist in any normal operation
then I don't see a good motive for changing this, as it works as designed
already.
---
If your project is set up for it, yo
GitHub user WeichenXu123 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16574
[SPARK-19189] Optimize CartesianRDD to avoid partition re-computation and
re-serialization
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Current CartesianRDD implementation, sup
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16574
**[Test build #71320 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71320/testReport)**
for PR 16574 at commit
[`14ba3b2`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/14
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16574
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16574
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71320/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16574
**[Test build #71320 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71320/testReport)**
for PR 16574 at commit
[`14ba3b2`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/1
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16574
**[Test build #71321 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71321/testReport)**
for PR 16574 at commit
[`e114eed`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/e1
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16574
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16574
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71321/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16574
**[Test build #71321 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71321/testReport)**
for PR 16574 at commit
[`e114eed`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16571
**[Test build #71315 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71315/testReport)**
for PR 16571 at commit
[`671e566`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/6
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16571
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16549#discussion_r95988185
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameWriter.scala ---
@@ -383,14 +383,20 @@ final class DataFrameWriter[T] private[sql](ds:
Dat
1 - 100 of 447 matches
Mail list logo
