Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16739
**[Test build #72147 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72147/testReport)**
for PR 16739 at commit
[`50ab563`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/50
GitHub user felixcheung opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16739
[SPARK-19399][SPARKR] Add R coalesce API for DataFrame and Column
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add coalesce on DataFrame for down partitioning without shuffle and
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15274
Actually, to specify the schema in SQL language, maybe we can use a JSON
string. A little bit odd. Let us see whether users need it in SQL
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16736
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72146/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16736
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16736
Sorry, I might not explain it clearly. When the the cache size is set to
zero, -1, and 1, what happened to our metadata cache system in each case? Does
it work well? Will we get an error message
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16736
**[Test build #72146 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72146/testReport)**
for PR 16736 at commit
[`9486b90`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/9
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16737
cc @cloud-fan @yhuai @dongjoon-hyun
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
ena
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16735
The initial data type is NullType when we infer the schema. Let me know if
you still hit an issue.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear o
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16735
I checked your JIRA description. Your test case does not cover the scenario
you mentioned. You can add an end-to-end test case by following the existing
test case [`Load date types via custom dat
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16735#discussion_r98386122
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/csv/CSVInferSchema.scala
---
@@ -140,12 +137,21 @@ private[csv] object CSVIn
Github user jinxing64 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16738
Should `successful` and `tasksSuccessful` renamed to be `completed` and
`tasksCompleted`?which I think make more sense.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and hav
Github user wangmiao1981 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16723#discussion_r98385544
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/LinearSVC.scala ---
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ private[classification] trait LinearSVCParams ex
Github user wangmiao1981 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16723
@jkbradley Sorry for replying late! I was out for Chinese new year this
weekend. I will check the issue mentioned by HyukjinKwon otherwise, it looks
good to me.
---
If your project is set up
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16738
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
GitHub user jinxing64 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16738
[SPARK-19398] remove one misleading log in TaskSetManager.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Log below is misleading:
```
if (successful(index)) {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16737
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16737
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72143/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16737
**[Test build #72143 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72143/testReport)**
for PR 16737 at commit
[`297f87a`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/2
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16735
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72142/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16735
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16735
**[Test build #72142 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72142/testReport)**
for PR 16735 at commit
[`8f78e11`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/8
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16736
**[Test build #72146 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72146/testReport)**
for PR 16736 at commit
[`9486b90`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/94
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16734
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72140/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16734
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16734
**[Test build #72140 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72140/testReport)**
for PR 16734 at commit
[`1474e97`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/1
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16736
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16736
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72139/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16736
**[Test build #72139 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72139/testReport)**
for PR 16736 at commit
[`ffb56d1`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/f
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16736
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16736
**[Test build #72145 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72145/testReport)**
for PR 16736 at commit
[`44276c8`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/4
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16736
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72145/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16736
**[Test build #72145 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72145/testReport)**
for PR 16736 at commit
[`44276c8`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/44
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16729
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72144/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16729
**[Test build #72144 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72144/testReport)**
for PR 16729 at commit
[`295711d`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/2
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16729
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16697
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72138/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16697
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16697
**[Test build #72138 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72138/testReport)**
for PR 16697 at commit
[`7ff45e9`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/7
Github user lw-lin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16736#discussion_r98375909
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -464,6 +464,12 @@ object SQLConf {
.intConf
.createWith
Github user lw-lin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16736#discussion_r98375736
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/CatalystConf.scala ---
@@ -69,6 +71,7 @@ case class SimpleCatalystConf(
optimizer
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16736#discussion_r98375256
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/CatalystConf.scala ---
@@ -69,6 +71,7 @@ case class SimpleCatalystConf(
optim
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16729
**[Test build #72144 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72144/testReport)**
for PR 16729 at commit
[`295711d`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/29
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16734
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72141/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16734
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16734
**[Test build #72141 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72141/testReport)**
for PR 16734 at commit
[`33022e3`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/3
Github user lw-lin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16736#discussion_r98374466
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/CatalystConf.scala ---
@@ -69,6 +71,7 @@ case class SimpleCatalystConf(
optimizer
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16737
**[Test build #72143 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72143/testReport)**
for PR 16737 at commit
[`297f87a`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/29
GitHub user gatorsmile opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16737
[SPARK-19397] [SQL] Make option names of LIBSVM and TEXT case insensitive
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Prior to Spark 2.1, the option names are case sensitive for all
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16735
**[Test build #72142 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72142/testReport)**
for PR 16735 at commit
[`8f78e11`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/8f
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16735
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16734
**[Test build #72141 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72141/testReport)**
for PR 16734 at commit
[`33022e3`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/33
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16736
Also need to handle the illegal cases and add the test cases to verify it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16736#discussion_r98373692
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -464,6 +464,12 @@ object SQLConf {
.intConf
.create
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16736#discussion_r98373650
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -464,6 +464,12 @@ object SQLConf {
.intConf
.create
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16736#discussion_r98373609
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/CatalystConf.scala ---
@@ -69,6 +71,7 @@ case class SimpleCatalystConf(
optim
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16734
**[Test build #72140 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72140/testReport)**
for PR 16734 at commit
[`1474e97`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/14
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16736
**[Test build #72139 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72139/testReport)**
for PR 16736 at commit
[`ffb56d1`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/ff
GitHub user lw-lin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16736
[WIP][SPARK][SQL][Follow-up] Configurable `tableRelationCache` maximum size
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
(Please fill in changes proposed in this fix)
## How
Github user sarutak commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16625
I'll take a look at this during this week.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16697
**[Test build #72138 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72138/testReport)**
for PR 16697 at commit
[`7ff45e9`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/7f
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16729
**[Test build #72137 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72137/testReport)**
for PR 16729 at commit
[`4c24158`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/4
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16729
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72137/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16729
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16729
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16729
**[Test build #72136 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72136/testReport)**
for PR 16729 at commit
[`d11fc4b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/d
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16729
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72136/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16734#discussion_r98368350
--- Diff: docs/sql-programming-guide.md ---
@@ -1135,7 +1135,7 @@ Tables from the remote database can be loaded as a
DataFrame or Spark SQL tempor
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16697
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16697
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72135/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16697
**[Test build #72135 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72135/testReport)**
for PR 16697 at commit
[`2846458`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/2
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16733
@gatorsmile okay, I'll do
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16697
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16697
**[Test build #72134 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72134/testReport)**
for PR 16697 at commit
[`c47c5af`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/c
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16697
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72134/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16729
**[Test build #72137 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72137/testReport)**
for PR 16729 at commit
[`4c24158`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/4c
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16697
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72133/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16697
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16697
**[Test build #72133 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72133/testReport)**
for PR 16697 at commit
[`ccc71c6`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/c
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16729
**[Test build #72136 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72136/testReport)**
for PR 16729 at commit
[`d11fc4b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/d1
Github user dilipbiswal commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16710
Thank you very much @gatorsmile
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enable
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16729
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16729
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72132/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16729
**[Test build #72132 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72132/testReport)**
for PR 16729 at commit
[`0d722fd`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/0
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16697
**[Test build #72135 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72135/testReport)**
for PR 16697 at commit
[`2846458`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/28
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16733
Could you add a test case to `OracleIntegrationSuite`?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not hav
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16697
**[Test build #72134 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72134/testReport)**
for PR 16697 at commit
[`c47c5af`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/c4
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16697
**[Test build #72133 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72133/testReport)**
for PR 16697 at commit
[`ccc71c6`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/cc
Github user actuaryzhang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16729#discussion_r98363560
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/r/GeneralizedLinearRegressionWrapper.scala
---
@@ -143,7 +150,12 @@ private[r] object GeneralizedLin
Github user actuaryzhang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16729#discussion_r98363550
--- Diff: R/pkg/inst/tests/testthat/test_mllib_regression.R ---
@@ -77,6 +77,18 @@ test_that("spark.glm and predict", {
out <- capture.output(prin
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16729
**[Test build #72132 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72132/testReport)**
for PR 16729 at commit
[`0d722fd`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/0d
Github user actuaryzhang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16729
@felixcheung Thanks so much for your quick and detailed review. I have made
a new commit that removed dependency on `statmod` and fixed the issues you
pointed out. The major change is to add `v
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16735
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16734
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16734
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72130/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16734
**[Test build #72130 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72130/testReport)**
for PR 16734 at commit
[`33022e3`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/3
GitHub user sergey-rubtsov opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16735
[SPARK-19228][SQL] Introduce tryParseDate method to process csv date â¦
â¦column with custom format as date
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
(Please fil
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16719
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16729
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16729
**[Test build #72131 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72131/testReport)**
for PR 16729 at commit
[`fb66ce0`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/f
1 - 100 of 159 matches
Mail list logo
