Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787
**[Test build #72674 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72674/testReport)**
for PR 16787 at commit
Github user uncleGen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16827
@srowen Could you please take a second review?
cc @rxin also
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user uncleGen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16818
cc @gatorsmile also
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user kunalkhamar commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16826#discussion_r100463301
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SparkSession.scala
---
@@ -213,6 +218,24 @@ class SparkSession private(
new
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16826
**[Test build #72679 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72679/testReport)**
for PR 16826 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16826
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72679/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16826
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16826
**[Test build #72679 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72679/testReport)**
for PR 16826 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16699
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72672/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16699
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16699
**[Test build #72672 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72672/testReport)**
for PR 16699 at commit
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16844#discussion_r100461137
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/unsafe/map/BytesToBytesMap.java ---
@@ -695,11 +690,16 @@ public boolean append(Object kbase, long koff, int
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16715
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72668/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16715
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16715
**[Test build #72668 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72668/testReport)**
for PR 16715 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16876
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72662/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16876
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16876
**[Test build #72662 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72662/testReport)**
for PR 16876 at commit
Github user jinxing64 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16831
@kayousterhout Thanks a lot. Sorry for this and I'll be careful in the
future.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16803
**[Test build #72678 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72678/testReport)**
for PR 16803 at commit
Github user windpiger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16803
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16674
**[Test build #72677 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72677/testReport)**
for PR 16674 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16776
**[Test build #72676 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72676/testReport)**
for PR 16776 at commit
Github user deswal-ajit commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15297
hi
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user uncleGen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16857
I think it is best to add a new unit test for this issue?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16776
Jenkins, retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user zuotingbing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16614
Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16879
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user lvdongr opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16879
[SPARK-19541][SQL] High Availability support for ThriftServer
JIRA Issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-19541
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787
**[Test build #72675 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72675/testReport)**
for PR 16787 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16857
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16857
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72666/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16857
**[Test build #72666 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72666/testReport)**
for PR 16857 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787
**[Test build #72674 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72674/testReport)**
for PR 16787 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16813
**[Test build #72673 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72673/testReport)**
for PR 16813 at commit
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16865
My colleagues recently have a case that their codes throw an exception like
this:
12:45:10at
Github user kayousterhout commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16813
Thanks Shane!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user actuaryzhang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16699
@sethah @imatiach-msft
Please review the new commit. Main changes:
- Fix issue in null deviance calculation in the presence of offset. Except
for special cases (Gaussian with
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16878
**[Test build #72670 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72670/testReport)**
for PR 16878 at commit
Github user kayousterhout commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16813
Jenkins, this is ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16865
**[Test build #72671 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72671/testReport)**
for PR 16865 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16699
**[Test build #72672 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72672/testReport)**
for PR 16699 at commit
Github user shaneknapp commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16813
sorted. @kayousterhout try to trigger another build. the daemon checks
every 5 mins for status, so be patient. :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16865
retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user xwu0226 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16878
@gatorsmile @cloud-fan Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16674#discussion_r100455122
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/HiveSQLViewSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,190 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
GitHub user xwu0226 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16878
[SPARK-19539][SQL] Block duplicate temp table during creation
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Current `CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE ... ` is deprecated and recommend users to
use
Github user kayousterhout commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16813
Ok I asked Shane about this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16870
**[Test build #72669 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72669/testReport)**
for PR 16870 at commit
Github user kayousterhout commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16813
Jenkins, test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16862
**[Test build #72667 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72667/testReport)**
for PR 16862 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16715
**[Test build #72668 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72668/testReport)**
for PR 16715 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16715
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72664/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16715
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16715
**[Test build #72664 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72664/testReport)**
for PR 16715 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16859
**[Test build #72665 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72665/testReport)**
for PR 16859 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16857
**[Test build #72666 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72666/testReport)**
for PR 16857 at commit
Github user uncleGen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16857
retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user jinxing64 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16876
It's great to have pendingPartitions in ShuffleMapStage.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user uncleGen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16818
cc @cloud-fan @hvanhovell
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user stanzhai closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16874
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user ouyangxiaochen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16868#discussion_r100450487
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/HiveDDLSuite.scala
---
@@ -926,38 +1006,63 @@ class HiveDDLSuite
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16847
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16847
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72661/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16847
**[Test build #72661 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72661/testReport)**
for PR 16847 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16715
**[Test build #72664 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72664/testReport)**
for PR 16715 at commit
Github user erenavsarogullari commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16813
I think problem still continues. We can get techops support to trigger
jenkins.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16831
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user kayousterhout commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16831
I merged this but just realized the current JIRA number is wrong. I won't
do a revert / recommit because this is such a small PR, but in the future, each
PR should have its own JIRA (so this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16877
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16877
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72663/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16877
**[Test build #72663 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72663/testReport)**
for PR 16877 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16859
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72660/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16862
Looks good.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16859
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16877
**[Test build #72663 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72663/testReport)**
for PR 16877 at commit
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16862#discussion_r100443723
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/BlockManager.scala
---
@@ -758,9 +761,33 @@ private[spark] class BlockManager(
blockId:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16859
**[Test build #72660 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72660/testReport)**
for PR 16859 at commit
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16862#discussion_r100443690
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/rdd/WriteAheadLogBackedBlockRDD.scala
---
@@ -158,13 +158,16 @@ class
GitHub user kayousterhout opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16877
[WIP] [SPARK-19538] Explicitly tell the DAGScheduler when a TaskSet is
complete
This is not intended to be merged! (see note at bottom) Posting to
facilitate discussion around #16620.
Github user markhamstra commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16876
You're welcome -- but do be aware that I'm going to be extremely busy with
non-Spark stuff for at least the next week, so for awhile my Spark code reviews
are likely to be more cursory than
Github user kayousterhout commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16876
Thanks for the quick look @markhamstra !
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user markhamstra commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16876
Makes good sense to me.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16876
**[Test build #72662 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72662/testReport)**
for PR 16876 at commit
GitHub user kayousterhout opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16876
[SPARK-19537] Move pendingPartitions to ShuffleMapStage.
The pendingPartitions instance variable should be moved to ShuffleMapStage,
because it is only used by ShuffleMapStages. This
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16862#discussion_r100441004
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/rdd/WriteAheadLogBackedBlockRDD.scala
---
@@ -158,13 +158,16 @@ class
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16777
cc @cloud-fan, WDYT?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16862#discussion_r100439834
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/rdd/WriteAheadLogBackedBlockRDD.scala
---
@@ -158,13 +158,16 @@ class
Github user kayousterhout commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16813
Jenkins test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user budde commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
@brkyvz Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16847
**[Test build #72661 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72661/testReport)**
for PR 16847 at commit
Github user sureshthalamati commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16847
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16865#discussion_r100431612
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/CodeGenerator.scala
---
@@ -1004,7 +1016,8 @@ object
Github user kayousterhout commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16813
Jenkins, this is OK to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user erenavsarogullari commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16813
Thanks @kayousterhout.
I think jenkins needs to be triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user davies commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16865
I understand the motivation here, could you show the benefit of this change
for a real use case?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user sethah commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16715
BTW I pointed out some typos or mistakes in certain places, but if it's in
one place it generally was everywhere. I didn't point out each individual one.
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16865#discussion_r100428764
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/CodeGenerator.scala
---
@@ -1004,7 +1016,8 @@ object CodeGenerator
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16715#discussion_r100426821
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/examples/ml/JavaMinHashLSHExample.java
---
@@ -44,25 +45,67 @@ public static void main(String[] args) {
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16715#discussion_r100424220
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/python/ml/bucketed_random_projection_lsh_example.py ---
@@ -0,0 +1,86 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software
101 - 200 of 562 matches
Mail list logo
