Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17059
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17059
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73693/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17059
**[Test build #73693 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73693/testReport)**
for PR 17059 at commit
[`a1e32aa`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/a
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17093
Thanks! Merging to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and w
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9571
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
en
Github user steveloughran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17120
-1, non binding
I understand the rationale for this, to aid migration from s3/s3n to s3a,
but given the need is schema independence, you should be using the full path
name from `Path.
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17093
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user steveloughran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9571
Style police. FWIW I think the lines that failed were already >100 chars,
it was just they got indented slightly more.
```
Scalastyle checks failed at following occurrences:
[error]
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9571
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73695/
Test FAILed.
---
I
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9571
**[Test build #73695 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73695/testReport)**
for PR 9571 at commit
[`d8ae876`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/d8a
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15505
**[Test build #73694 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73694/testReport)**
for PR 15505 at commit
[`335b7b9`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/33
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17116
**[Test build #73692 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73692/testReport)**
for PR 17116 at commit
[`1c26e8c`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/1c
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9571
**[Test build #73695 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73695/testReport)**
for PR 9571 at commit
[`d8ae876`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/d8ae
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17059
**[Test build #73693 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73693/testReport)**
for PR 17059 at commit
[`a1e32aa`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/a1
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17120
**[Test build #73691 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73691/testReport)**
for PR 17120 at commit
[`aeb10d1`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/ae
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17122
**[Test build #73689 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73689/testReport)**
for PR 17122 at commit
[`47f405c`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/47
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17119
**[Test build #73690 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73690/testReport)**
for PR 17119 at commit
[`dccac9a`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/dc
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17123
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17121
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17093
Thanks! Merging to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and w
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17099
@stanzhai Could you submit another PR to backport it to Spark 2.0?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17099
Thanks! Merging to master/2.1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled an
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17099
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17123
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
GitHub user crackcell opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17123
[SPARK-19781][ML] Handle NULLs as well as NaNs in Bucketizer when
handleInvalid is on
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The original Bucketizer can put NaNs into a spec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17116
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73684/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17117
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73686/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17117
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17116
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17116
**[Test build #73684 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73684/testReport)**
for PR 17116 at commit
[`f33b077`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/f
Github user tgravescs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17113
can you clarify the situations you are seeing issues? What happened to the
NM in this case. If you have work preserving restart I would think this would
actually cause you more problems. The NM
GitHub user kiszk opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17122
[SPARK-19786][SQL] Facilitate loop optimizations in a JIT compiler
regarding range()
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR improves performance of operations with `rang
Github user MLnick commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17090
It could also be I'm overthinking things - and we can mould the
`RankingEvaluator` to accept both types of input - the array version:
`(Array(predictions), Array(labels))` or the "exploded" version:
Github user MLnick commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17090
Isn't deciding on the output schema for these methods essentially the same
as deciding on transform semantics in #12574 (apart from the issue of how, or
if, to have transform generate the "ground tru
Github user yanboliang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17117
cc @dbtsai
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17117
**[Test build #73686 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73686/testReport)**
for PR 17117 at commit
[`2824d85`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/2
Github user MLnick commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17121
I'm not sure if this will break MiMa - let's see
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fea
Github user MLnick commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17121
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
GitHub user datumbox opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17121
[SPARK-19787][ML] Changing the default parameter of regParam.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the ALS method the default values of regParam do not match within the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17096
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73688/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17096
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user robbinspg commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17039
@hvanhovell So I backed out the changes in this PR, implemented your change
to SQLQueryTestSuite.getNormalizedResult, regenerated the golden results files
and the tests all pass on my x86 and big
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17096
**[Test build #73688 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73688/testReport)**
for PR 17096 at commit
[`9ac773c`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/9
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17112
Put `[WIP]` in the title for clarit
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
GitHub user lw-lin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17120
[SPARK-19715][Structured Streaming] Option to Strip Paths in FileSource
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Today, we compare the whole path when deciding if a file is new in
Github user datumbox commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17059
@MLnick I accepted all proposed changes. Please retest. :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17096
**[Test build #73688 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73688/testReport)**
for PR 17096 at commit
[`9ac773c`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/9a
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17096
Thank you @viirya. I think it is ready now.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fea
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17116
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73681/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17116
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17116
**[Test build #73681 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73681/testReport)**
for PR 17116 at commit
[`b67bdaf`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/b
Github user MLnick commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17059
@imatiach-msft thanks for reviewing and requesting the test case, I was
going to ask for one :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user MLnick commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17059
@datumbox left a few minor comments to clean up. Overall looks good. I
think it is fine for 2.2.
For the regParam even though it is a minor thing it would be best to just
create a new JIRA &
Github user MLnick commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17059
The discussion around numeric types was at
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12762#r61539327. The checked cast was
introduced because it was previously implicitly cast to `Int` anyway, and would
Github user MLnick commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17059#discussion_r103676000
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/recommendation/ALSSuite.scala ---
@@ -205,6 +206,69 @@ class ALSSuite
assert(decompressed.toSet =
Github user MLnick commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17059#discussion_r103674659
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/recommendation/ALSSuite.scala ---
@@ -205,6 +206,69 @@ class ALSSuite
assert(decompressed.toSet =
Github user MLnick commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17059#discussion_r103675924
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/recommendation/ALS.scala
---
@@ -451,8 +461,8 @@ class ALS(@Since("1.4.0") override val uid: String)
exte
Github user MLnick commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17059#discussion_r103677123
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/recommendation/ALSSuite.scala ---
@@ -513,31 +577,31 @@ class ALSSuite
withClue("fit should fail
Github user MLnick commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17059#discussion_r103675400
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/recommendation/ALS.scala
---
@@ -82,12 +82,22 @@ private[recommendation] trait ALSModelParams extends
Par
Github user MLnick commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17059#discussion_r103674813
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/recommendation/ALSSuite.scala ---
@@ -205,6 +206,69 @@ class ALSSuite
assert(decompressed.toSet =
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17117#discussion_r103675288
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/clustering/KMeans.scala
---
@@ -337,15 +366,61 @@ class KMeans @Since("1.5.0") (
@Since("
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15666
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73687/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15666
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15666
**[Test build #73687 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73687/testReport)**
for PR 15666 at commit
[`25b84a6`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/2
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15666
**[Test build #73687 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73687/testReport)**
for PR 15666 at commit
[`25b84a6`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/25
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17119
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73683/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17119
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17117
**[Test build #73686 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73686/testReport)**
for PR 17117 at commit
[`2824d85`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/28
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17119
**[Test build #73683 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73683/testReport)**
for PR 17119 at commit
[`9050349`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/9
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14299
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73685/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14299
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14299
**[Test build #73685 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73685/testReport)**
for PR 14299 at commit
[`9a0675f`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/9
Github user rberenguel commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17100
@holdenk added! And I suspect I have some issue locally with coursier when
running the tests... They supposedly work (as in, no outputted
errors/failures?) 1/3 times, the other 2 cause coursier c
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14299
**[Test build #73685 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73685/testReport)**
for PR 14299 at commit
[`9a0675f`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/9a
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17116
**[Test build #73684 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73684/testReport)**
for PR 17116 at commit
[`f33b077`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/f3
Github user AnthonyTruchet commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14299#discussion_r103657660
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/feature/Word2Vec.scala ---
@@ -314,6 +315,21 @@ class Word2Vec extends Serializable with Loggin
Github user AnthonyTruchet commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14299#discussion_r103656554
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/feature/Word2Vec.scala ---
@@ -314,6 +315,21 @@ class Word2Vec extends Serializable with Loggin
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16938
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73680/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16938
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16938
**[Test build #73680 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73680/testReport)**
for PR 16938 at commit
[`d78b7d5`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/d
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17119
**[Test build #73683 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73683/testReport)**
for PR 17119 at commit
[`9050349`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/90
GitHub user windpiger opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17119
[SPARK-19784][SQL]refresh table after alter the location
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
currently if we alter the location of a datasource table, then we select
from it,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15505
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73678/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15505
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15505
**[Test build #73678 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73678/testReport)**
for PR 15505 at commit
[`68607f7`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/6
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16971
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73676/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16971
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16971
**[Test build #73676 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73676/testReport)**
for PR 16971 at commit
[`402deb0`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/4
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16971
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73674/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16971
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16971
**[Test build #73674 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73674/testReport)**
for PR 16971 at commit
[`8d5941b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/8
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17114
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73675/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17114
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17114
**[Test build #73675 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73675/testReport)**
for PR 17114 at commit
[`cc6ee95`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/c
Github user huang1900z closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17118
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17093
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73673/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17093
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
GitHub user huang1900z opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17118
Hlj2.1.0
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
(Please fill in changes proposed in this fix)
## How was this patch tested?
(Please explain how this patch
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17093
**[Test build #73673 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73673/testReport)**
for PR 17093 at commit
[`3c079ff`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/3
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16910
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/73677/
Test PASSed.
---
401 - 500 of 562 matches
Mail list logo
