Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17265
**[Test build #74455 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74455/testReport)**
for PR 17265 at commit
[`91bdb39`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/91
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17194
**[Test build #74450 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74450/testReport)**
for PR 17194 at commit
[`40b1267`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/40
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17277
**[Test build #74452 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74452/testReport)**
for PR 17277 at commit
[`7b85c51`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/7b
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17130
**[Test build #3599 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3599/testReport)**
for PR 17130 at commit
[`9ce0093`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/9
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17276
**[Test build #74448 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74448/testReport)**
for PR 17276 at commit
[`430ec95`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/43
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17274
**[Test build #7 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/7/testReport)**
for PR 17274 at commit
[`6cb40eb`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/6c
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17278
**[Test build #74453 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74453/testReport)**
for PR 17278 at commit
[`54cbad1`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/54
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16954#discussion_r105715265
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/TypeCoercion.scala
---
@@ -365,17 +368,73 @@ object TypeCoercion {
}
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16954#discussion_r105714984
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/TypeCoercion.scala
---
@@ -365,17 +385,66 @@ object TypeCoercion {
}
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16954#discussion_r105716052
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/TypeCoercion.scala
---
@@ -365,17 +368,73 @@ object TypeCoercion {
}
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17265
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16954#discussion_r105714546
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/TypeCoercion.scala
---
@@ -365,17 +368,73 @@ object TypeCoercion {
}
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17233
I'll take a look
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, o
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16954#discussion_r105712270
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/TypeCoercion.scala
---
@@ -109,6 +109,26 @@ object TypeCoercion {
}
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16954#discussion_r105711886
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/TypeCoercion.scala
---
@@ -109,6 +109,26 @@ object TypeCoercion {
}
Github user erenavsarogullari commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15604
Jenkins, retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabl
Github user erenavsarogullari commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15604
The following unit tests look failed due to timeout and _irrelevant_ so
triggered again.
**1-**
org.apache.spark.storage.BlockManagerProactiveReplicationSuite.proactive block
rep
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17241#discussion_r105709959
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -555,6 +555,17 @@ object SQLConf {
.booleanConf
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17241#discussion_r105709767
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -555,6 +555,17 @@ object SQLConf {
.booleanConf
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17241#discussion_r105709364
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -595,6 +594,11 @@ class Analyzer(
case vie
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17241#discussion_r105709239
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -595,6 +594,11 @@ class Analyzer(
case vie
Github user zero323 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17218
@jkbradley Thanks for the comment. I thought about `PrefixSpan` in the
future so I wanted to avoid embedding this in `FPGrowth`. I'll put it in the
`fpm`.
---
If your project is set up for it, yo
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17238
@mridulm you know the yarn bits involved better than I do. It sounds like
you are saying this is the wrong change, and instead its just a
misconfiguration in yarn -- I'll buy that argument. Essenti
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17278
cc @wzhfy
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17271
Retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
GitHub user hvanhovell opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17278
[SPARK-19933][SQL] Do not change output of a subquery
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The `RemoveRedundantAlias` rule can change the output attributes (the
expression id'
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17278
cc @cloud-fan @ueshin
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishe
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17130
The updated transform looks good; thanks for pinging!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17130#discussion_r105702725
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/fpm/FPGrowth.scala ---
@@ -56,8 +56,8 @@ private[fpm] trait FPGrowthParams extends Params with
HasFeatu
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17218
Thanks for the PR! I'll wait until this isn't "WIP" to review it
thoroughly, but I'll make two comments now:
* The params should not be added to shared.py since they are not shared by
any oth
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17277
cc @eric @mallman @liancheng
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
GitHub user cloud-fan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17277
[SPARK-19887][SQL] null is a valid partition value
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When partition value is null, we will write the data to a directory like
`a=__HIVE_
Github user CodingCat closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17126
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user CodingCat commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17126
thanks
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the f
Github user CodingCat commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17126
OK, close this one
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16373
@gatorsmile Added the positive test cases.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16373#discussion_r105687000
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/tables.scala ---
@@ -642,18 +644,34 @@ case class ShowTablesCommand(
/
Github user nsyca commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17191
@maropu: I have made a few comments in the code and test cases. IMO, we
should go back to define what we want to fix before jumping into the code.
I am sorry if my previous statement gave you
Github user nsyca commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17191#discussion_r105659975
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLQuerySuite.scala
---
@@ -2586,4 +2586,15 @@ class SQLQuerySuite extends QueryTest with
SharedSQLCon
Github user nsyca commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17191#discussion_r105679116
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -775,11 +775,21 @@ class Analyzer(
case q
Github user tgravescs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15009
@kishorvpatil please resolve the conflicts.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fea
Github user sergey-rubtsov commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16735
Couldn't run tests in CSVSuite locally on my Windows OS, apologize for the
possible test fails
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16735
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
GitHub user sergey-rubtsov reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16735
[SPARK-19228][SQL] Introduce tryParseDate method to process csv date â¦
â¦column with custom format as date
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patc
Github user sergey-rubtsov closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16735
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the featur
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17267#discussion_r105664922
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/utils.py ---
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ def __init__(self, desc, stackTrace):
self.stackTrace = stackTrace
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17267#discussion_r105663697
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/utils.py ---
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ def __init__(self, desc, stackTrace):
self.stackTrace = stackTrace
def
GitHub user jinxing64 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17276
[WIP][SPARK-19937] Collect metrics of block sizes when shuffle.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Metrics of blocks sizes(when shuffle) should be collected for later
an
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17267#discussion_r105659050
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/utils.py ---
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ def __init__(self, desc, stackTrace):
self.stackTrace = stackTrace
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17267#discussion_r105657313
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/utils.py ---
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ def __init__(self, desc, stackTrace):
self.stackTrace = stackTrace
def
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17267#discussion_r105657204
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/utils.py ---
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ def __init__(self, desc, stackTrace):
self.stackTrace = stackTrace
def
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17275
Sure you can update this branch too. Force push if you need to.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does no
Github user nafshartous commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17275
Should I submit a new PR or is it acceptable to resolve by adding more
commits on this one ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on Gi
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17267#discussion_r105654542
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/utils.py ---
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ def __init__(self, desc, stackTrace):
self.stackTrace = stackTrace
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17267#discussion_r105654236
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/utils.py ---
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ def __init__(self, desc, stackTrace):
self.stackTrace = stackTrace
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17267#discussion_r105653661
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/utils.py ---
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ def __init__(self, desc, stackTrace):
self.stackTrace = stackTrace
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17275
It looks like the change got mangled, maybe due to line-ending differences?
the diff shows the entire file as a change. Check the CRLF settings in git and
try again?
---
If your project is set up f
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17275
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
GitHub user nafshartous opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17275
SPARK-19767 Add not about missing API doc for Kafka 0.10 integration.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Adding not about missing API docs for Kafka 0.10
## H
Github user yanboliang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17274
Jenkins, test this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and w
Github user windpiger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17272
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
GitHub user yanboliang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17274
[SPARK-19925][SPARKR] Fix SparkR spark.getSparkFiles fails when it was
called on executors.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
SparkR ```spark.getSparkFiles``` fails when it
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17178
How about `as.struct`?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wish
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17087
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17087
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74442/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17087
**[Test build #74442 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74442/testReport)**
for PR 17087 at commit
[`530f84f`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/5
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17178
> array might be a bit vague - does that require the column value to be a
JSON array, or just multiple JSON object spanning multiple line?
Yup, it requires that input is a JSON array (mu
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17178#discussion_r105626282
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/functions.R ---
@@ -2452,11 +2453,18 @@ setMethod("date_format", signature(y = "Column", x
= "character"),
#'}
#' @note from
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17192
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74439/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17192
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17192
**[Test build #74439 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74439/testReport)**
for PR 17192 at commit
[`e8cd20a`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17273
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74440/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17273
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17273
**[Test build #74440 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74440/testReport)**
for PR 17273 at commit
[`97a426d`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/9
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17175
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17175
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74438/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17175
**[Test build #74438 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74438/testReport)**
for PR 17175 at commit
[`454515d`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/4
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17273
Thank you for review, @srowen .
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabl
Github user lw-lin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17268
@marmbrus @zsxwing would you take a look at this, thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17272
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74441/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17272
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17272
**[Test build #74441 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74441/testReport)**
for PR 17272 at commit
[`0e753cc`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/0
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17251
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74433/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17251
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17256
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17256
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74432/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17251
**[Test build #74433 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74433/testReport)**
for PR 17251 at commit
[`3bfa978`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/3
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17256
**[Test build #74432 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74432/testReport)**
for PR 17256 at commit
[`87d3fc8`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/8
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17273
Maybe @tdas or @ericl can comment on whether that's a valid shortcut, but
otherwise it does seem safer to just fix the logInfo
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17255
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17255
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74434/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17255
**[Test build #74434 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74434/testReport)**
for PR 17255 at commit
[`76dceb2`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/7
Github user uncleGen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17267
IMHO, yes. And @viirya is the original author.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fea
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17087
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74435/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17087
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17087
**[Test build #74442 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74442/testReport)**
for PR 17087 at commit
[`530f84f`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/53
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17087
**[Test build #74435 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74435/testReport)**
for PR 17087 at commit
[`11f56d1`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/1
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17087#discussion_r105612049
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/predicates.scala
---
@@ -20,20 +20,22 @@ package org.apache.spark.sql.catalys
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17272
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17272
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74437/
Test FAILed.
---
401 - 500 of 549 matches
Mail list logo
