Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17711
**[Test build #76030 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76030/testReport)**
for PR 17711 at commit
Github user juliuszsompolski commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17707#discussion_r112672271
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/DDLCommandSuite.scala
---
@@ -558,12 +558,12 @@ class DDLCommandSuite
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17509
Sure, thanks
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user kiszk closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17509
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17707
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76029/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17707
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17707
**[Test build #76029 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76029/testReport)**
for PR 17707 at commit
Github user maver1ck commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17694
OK. I did additional tests.
Fix is working only with Spark 2.1.
I tried to apply it on 2.0.2 and that was the reason of my problem.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17716
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76031/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17716
**[Test build #76031 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76031/testReport)**
for PR 17716 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17716
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17712
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17712
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76027/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17712
**[Test build #76027 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76027/testReport)**
for PR 17712 at commit
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17716
cc @cloud-fan @ueshin @rxin
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17716
**[Test build #76031 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76031/testReport)**
for PR 17716 at commit
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17716#discussion_r112662001
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -636,17 +636,16 @@ class Analyzer(
GitHub user hvanhovell opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17716
[SPARK-19952][SQL] Remove various analysis exceptions
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
We currently have quite a few analysis exception subclasses, the problem
with these
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17713
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17713
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76023/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17713
**[Test build #76023 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76023/testReport)**
for PR 17713 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17623
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17623
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76022/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17623
**[Test build #76022 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76022/testReport)**
for PR 17623 at commit
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17509
@kiszk Cloud you close this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17715
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17715
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76028/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17711#discussion_r112655646
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/antlr4/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/parser/SqlBase.g4 ---
@@ -547,6 +547,10 @@ valueExpression
|
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17715
**[Test build #76028 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76028/testReport)**
for PR 17715 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17711
**[Test build #76030 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76030/testReport)**
for PR 17711 at commit
Github user eatoncys commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17683
@srowen Yes, i have two lines more than 100 words, i have modified it,
thank you
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user eatoncys commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17683#discussion_r112652466
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/BlockManagerMasterEndpoint.scala
---
@@ -497,11 +497,18 @@ private[spark] class BlockManagerInfo(
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17711#discussion_r112652461
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/antlr4/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/parser/SqlBase.g4 ---
@@ -547,6 +547,10 @@ valueExpression
|
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17707
**[Test build #76029 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76029/testReport)**
for PR 17707 at commit
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17711#discussion_r112649684
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SparkSqlParser.scala ---
@@ -1483,4 +1483,16 @@ class SparkSqlAstBuilder(conf: SQLConf)
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17712#discussion_r112648834
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/expressions/UserDefinedFunction.scala
---
@@ -47,12 +47,20 @@ case class UserDefinedFunction
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17684
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76019/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17684
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17684
**[Test build #76019 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76019/testReport)**
for PR 17684 at commit
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17712#discussion_r112646366
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/expressions/UserDefinedFunction.scala
---
@@ -47,12 +47,20 @@ case class UserDefinedFunction
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17711
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76020/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17711
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17711
**[Test build #76020 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76020/testReport)**
for PR 17711 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17715
**[Test build #76028 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76028/testReport)**
for PR 17715 at commit
GitHub user yanboliang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17715
Spark 20047
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
MLlib ```LogisticRegression``` should support bound constrained
optimization. Users can add bound constraints to coefficients
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17712
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17712
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76026/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17712
**[Test build #76026 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76026/testReport)**
for PR 17712 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17712
**[Test build #76027 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76027/testReport)**
for PR 17712 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17714
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user guoxiaolongzte opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17714
[SPARK-20428][Core]REST interface about 'v1/submissions/ kill/', currently
only supports delete a single âdriverâ, now let spark support delete some
âdriversâ
## What changes were
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17712#discussion_r112643902
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/expressions/UserDefinedFunction.scala
---
@@ -47,12 +47,20 @@ case class UserDefinedFunction
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17712
**[Test build #76026 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76026/testReport)**
for PR 17712 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17706
**[Test build #76021 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76021/testReport)**
for PR 17706 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17706
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76021/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17706
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17712
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76025/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17712
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17712
**[Test build #76025 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76025/testReport)**
for PR 17712 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17712
**[Test build #76025 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76025/testReport)**
for PR 17712 at commit
Github user guoxiaolongzte commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17696
@HyukjinKwon
I will try to improve my ability to translate, sorry.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17712
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76024/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17712
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17712
**[Test build #76024 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76024/testReport)**
for PR 17712 at commit
Github user maver1ck commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17694
I checked pyspark.zip of running container and everything is on its place.
So I assume that there is more that one race condition in this code.
I'll try to prepare example of the
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17712#discussion_r112638782
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/expressions/UserDefinedFunction.scala
---
@@ -47,12 +47,20 @@ case class UserDefinedFunction
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17712
**[Test build #76024 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76024/testReport)**
for PR 17712 at commit
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17712#discussion_r112638493
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/expressions/UserDefinedFunction.scala
---
@@ -47,12 +47,20 @@ case class UserDefinedFunction
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17087
@marmbrus could you please take a look?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user guoxiaolongzte commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17696#discussion_r112636940
--- Diff: docs/configuration.md ---
@@ -213,6 +213,15 @@ of the most common options to set are:
and typically can have up to 50 characters.
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17713
**[Test build #76023 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76023/testReport)**
for PR 17713 at commit
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17623#discussion_r112636638
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/trees/TreeNode.scala
---
@@ -422,40 +422,62 @@ abstract class TreeNode[BaseType <:
GitHub user dilipbiswal opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17713
[SPARK-20417][SQL] Move subquery error handling to checkAnalysis from
Analyzer
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently we do a lot of validations for subquery in the
Github user sadhen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14638
Since this pr won't be accepted. My solution is:
``` sql
# create table using spark-csv
CREATE TABLE tmp.cars
USING com.databricks.spark.csv
OPTIONS (path "/tmp/cars.csv", header
Github user wzhfy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17649#discussion_r112635039
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/resources/sql-tests/inputs/describe-table-after-alter-table.sql
---
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+CREATE TABLE table_with_comment (a
Github user jaceklaskowski commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17712#discussion_r112634952
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/UDFSuite.scala ---
@@ -256,10 +256,12 @@ class UDFSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user wzhfy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17649#discussion_r112634259
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/resources/sql-tests/inputs/describe-table-after-alter-table.sql
---
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+CREATE TABLE table_with_comment (a
Github user jaceklaskowski commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17712#discussion_r112634044
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/expressions/UserDefinedFunction.scala
---
@@ -47,12 +47,20 @@ case class UserDefinedFunction
Github user jaceklaskowski commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17712#discussion_r112634273
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/UDFSuite.scala ---
@@ -256,10 +256,12 @@ class UDFSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user wzhfy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17649
@gatorsmile Should we care about case sensitivity of comment? Hive allows
both "comment" and "Comment" in table parameters, while we are extracting
comment as a field of `CatalogTable`.
---
If your
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17696#discussion_r112633568
--- Diff: docs/configuration.md ---
@@ -213,6 +213,15 @@ of the most common options to set are:
and typically can have up to 50 characters.
Github user 10110346 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17698
Jenkins, test this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17683
@eatoncys I think you have lines that are too long
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17623
**[Test build #76022 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76022/testReport)**
for PR 17623 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17683
**[Test build #3670 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3670/testReport)**
for PR 17683 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17696#discussion_r112632522
--- Diff: docs/configuration.md ---
@@ -213,6 +213,15 @@ of the most common options to set are:
and typically can have up to 50 characters.
Github user wzhfy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17649#discussion_r112632107
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/resources/sql-tests/inputs/describe-table-after-alter-table.sql
---
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+CREATE TABLE table_with_comment (a
Github user wzhfy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17649#discussion_r112630905
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/resources/sql-tests/results/describe-table-after-alter-table.sql.out
---
@@ -0,0 +1,162 @@
+-- Automatically generated by
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17623
@ericl I've added the unit test. Please take a look if you can. Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17683
**[Test build #3670 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3670/testReport)**
for PR 17683 at commit
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17683#discussion_r112631811
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/BlockManagerMasterEndpoint.scala
---
@@ -497,11 +497,18 @@ private[spark] class BlockManagerInfo(
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17696
@guoxiaolongzte, I just tested the backquotes on Windows 7 with Chrome as
below:
**
for PR 17709 at commit
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17711#discussion_r112628499
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/antlr4/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/parser/SqlBase.g4 ---
@@ -547,6 +547,10 @@ valueExpression
|
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17706
**[Test build #76021 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/76021/testReport)**
for PR 17706 at commit
Github user WeichenXu123 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17706
Jenkins test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
201 - 300 of 334 matches
Mail list logo
