Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18375
**[Test build #78528 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78528/testReport)**
for PR 18375 at commit
[`0f449df`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/0f
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18375
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wis
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18375
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18375
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78524/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18375
**[Test build #78524 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78524/testReport)**
for PR 18375 at commit
[`eba52f3`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/e
Github user dosoft commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16924
@cloud-fan spark thriftserver as long-running application?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not hav
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18384
**[Test build #3811 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3811/testReport)**
for PR 18384 at commit
[`371933d`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/3
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18403
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18403
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78527/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18403
**[Test build #78527 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78527/testReport)**
for PR 18403 at commit
[`e04fb89`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/e
Github user jinxing64 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18327
@cloud-fan
Thanks for merging :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
ena
Github user SharpRay closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18404
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is e
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16924
what's the use case of this patch? I think it makes sense to show the
history entry after the app is finished, I'm not sure why we want the history
server to detect it earlier.
---
If your proje
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18391
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18398
**[Test build #3809 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3809/testReport)**
for PR 18398 at commit
[`6c6df33`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18391
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78521/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18391
**[Test build #78521 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78521/testReport)**
for PR 18391 at commit
[`cd9f424`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/c
Github user SharpRay commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18404
OK, I will make this PR to master, Thank you.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18384
**[Test build #3810 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3810/testReport)**
for PR 18384 at commit
[`371933d`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18322
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18322
LGTM, merging to master!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wish
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18403
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the featur
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18403
**[Test build #78527 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78527/testReport)**
for PR 18403 at commit
[`e04fb89`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/e0
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18402
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18402
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78520/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18403
Thank you @srowen, @viirya and @cloud-fan.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18402
**[Test build #78520 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78520/testReport)**
for PR 18402 at commit
[`0255e5d`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/0
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18386
thanks, merging to 2.2!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishe
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18327
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18404
Hi, I think you need to make pr to not `branch-2.1` but `master`.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18327
thanks, merging to master!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wi
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18403#discussion_r123738175
--- Diff: python/setup.py ---
@@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ def _supports_symlinks():
extras_require={
'ml': ['numpy>=1.7'],
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18403#discussion_r123737717
--- Diff: python/setup.py ---
@@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ def _supports_symlinks():
extras_require={
'ml': ['numpy>=1.7'],
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18266
**[Test build #78526 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78526/testReport)**
for PR 18266 at commit
[`a984f3b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/a9
Github user wangyum commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18266#discussion_r123736535
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/jdbc/JDBCRDD.scala
---
@@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ object JDBCRDD extends Logging {
Github user wangyum commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18266#discussion_r123734456
--- Diff:
external/docker-integration-tests/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/jdbc/OracleIntegrationSuite.scala
---
@@ -198,4 +205,37 @@ class OracleInte
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18375
@gatorsmile Manually checked:
```
scala> Seq((1, 2, 3)).toDF("a", "b", "c").write.save(s"$path/a=0")
scala> spark.read.load(path).show
17/06/23 21:04:44 WARN SchemaUtils: Found duplicat
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18375
**[Test build #78525 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78525/testReport)**
for PR 18375 at commit
[`0f449df`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/0f
Github user wangyum commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18266#discussion_r123733947
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/jdbc/JDBCSuite.scala
---
@@ -907,7 +907,7 @@ class JDBCSuite extends SparkFunSuite
assert(ne
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18404
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
GitHub user SharpRay opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18404
[SPARK-18004][SQL] Make sure the date or timestamp related predicate can be
pushed down to Oracle correctly
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
1. Override beforeFetch met
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18375
**[Test build #78524 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78524/testReport)**
for PR 18375 at commit
[`eba52f3`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/eb
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18320
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78523/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18320
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18320
**[Test build #78523 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78523/testReport)**
for PR 18320 at commit
[`c5fe347`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/c
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18403#discussion_r123727387
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/dataframe.py ---
@@ -1746,7 +1746,7 @@ def toPandas(self):
pdf = pd.DataFrame.from_records(self.collect(),
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18403#discussion_r123726773
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/dataframe.py ---
@@ -1746,7 +1746,7 @@ def toPandas(self):
pdf = pd.DataFrame.from_records(self.collect(),
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18301
ping @cloud-fan
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or i
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18403
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78522/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18403
**[Test build #78522 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78522/testReport)**
for PR 18403 at commit
[`4ddc54b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/4
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18403
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18320
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the featur
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18403#discussion_r123726189
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/dataframe.py ---
@@ -1746,7 +1746,7 @@ def toPandas(self):
pdf = pd.DataFrame.from_records(self.collect(),
colu
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18403#discussion_r123725824
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/dataframe.py ---
@@ -1746,7 +1746,7 @@ def toPandas(self):
pdf = pd.DataFrame.from_records(self.collect(),
colu
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18235
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78516/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18235
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18235
**[Test build #78516 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78516/testReport)**
for PR 18235 at commit
[`9ae5bf2`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/9
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18320
**[Test build #78523 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78523/testReport)**
for PR 18320 at commit
[`c5fe347`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/c5
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18320#discussion_r123722811
--- Diff: R/pkg/inst/worker/daemon.R ---
@@ -30,8 +30,55 @@ port <- as.integer(Sys.getenv("SPARKR_WORKER_PORT"))
inputCon <- socketConnection(
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18384
**[Test build #3810 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3810/testReport)**
for PR 18384 at commit
[`371933d`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/3
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18398
**[Test build #3809 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3809/testReport)**
for PR 18398 at commit
[`6c6df33`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/6
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18403#discussion_r123722199
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/dataframe.py ---
@@ -1746,7 +1746,7 @@ def toPandas(self):
pdf = pd.DataFrame.from_records(self.collect(),
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18403
**[Test build #78522 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78522/testReport)**
for PR 18403 at commit
[`4ddc54b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/4d
GitHub user HyukjinKwon opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18403
[SPARK-21193][PYTHON] Specify Pandas version in setup.py
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
It looks we missed specifying the Pandas version. This PR proposes to fix
i
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18288#discussion_r123721406
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/source/libsvm/LibSVMRelation.scala ---
@@ -91,12 +91,10 @@ private[libsvm] class LibSVMFileFormat extends
Github user steveloughran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17747
Mima test failure was about a new method in hist server
```
[info] spark-mllib: found 0 potential binary incompatibilities while
checking against org.apache.spark:spark-mllib_2.11:2.0.0
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18391
**[Test build #78521 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78521/testReport)**
for PR 18391 at commit
[`cd9f424`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/cd
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18320#discussion_r123719067
--- Diff: R/pkg/inst/worker/daemon.R ---
@@ -30,8 +30,55 @@ port <- as.integer(Sys.getenv("SPARKR_WORKER_PORT"))
inputCon <- socketConnection(
p
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18320#discussion_r123718675
--- Diff: R/pkg/inst/worker/daemon.R ---
@@ -30,8 +30,55 @@ port <- as.integer(Sys.getenv("SPARKR_WORKER_PORT"))
inputCon <- socketConnection(
p
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18402
**[Test build #78520 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78520/testReport)**
for PR 18402 at commit
[`0255e5d`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/02
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18401
No, this is a behavior change. It is maybe not a good idea in many cases
but it's allowed. Please see JIRA
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appea
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18288#discussion_r123718043
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/source/libsvm/LibSVMRelation.scala ---
@@ -91,12 +91,10 @@ private[libsvm] class LibSVMFileFormat exte
GitHub user tdas opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18402
[SPARK-21192][SS] Preserve State Store provider class configuration across
restarts
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
If the SQL conf for StateStore provider class is change
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18320#discussion_r123717458
--- Diff: R/pkg/inst/worker/daemon.R ---
@@ -30,8 +30,55 @@ port <- as.integer(Sys.getenv("SPARKR_WORKER_PORT"))
inputCon <- socketConnection(
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18320#discussion_r123717120
--- Diff: R/pkg/inst/worker/daemon.R ---
@@ -30,8 +30,55 @@ port <- as.integer(Sys.getenv("SPARKR_WORKER_PORT"))
inputCon <- socketConnection(
p
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18384
**[Test build #3808 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3808/testReport)**
for PR 18384 at commit
[`371933d`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18401
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18323
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18323
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78515/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17455
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
GitHub user darionyaphet opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18401
[SPARK-21191] DataFrame Row StructType check duplicate name
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
to Avoid dataframe to have duplicated name when create dataframe using
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18323
**[Test build #78515 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78515/testReport)**
for PR 18323 at commit
[`5c3ecee`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/5
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18320#discussion_r123716354
--- Diff: R/pkg/inst/worker/daemon.R ---
@@ -30,8 +30,55 @@ port <- as.integer(Sys.getenv("SPARKR_WORKER_PORT"))
inputCon <- socketConnection(
p
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18320#discussion_r123715868
--- Diff: R/pkg/inst/worker/daemon.R ---
@@ -30,8 +30,55 @@ port <- as.integer(Sys.getenv("SPARKR_WORKER_PORT"))
inputCon <- socketConnection(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18320
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18320
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78519/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18320
**[Test build #78519 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78519/testReport)**
for PR 18320 at commit
[`7d61153`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/7
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18399
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78509/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18399
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18399
**[Test build #78509 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78509/testReport)**
for PR 18399 at commit
[`cbf3517`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/c
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18320#discussion_r123714768
--- Diff: R/pkg/inst/worker/daemon.R ---
@@ -30,8 +30,55 @@ port <- as.integer(Sys.getenv("SPARKR_WORKER_PORT"))
inputCon <- socketConnection(
p
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17714
One general question: what do we expect to gain from this improvement?
Seems it's just looping the drivers and send kill requests?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this em
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17714
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18327
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18327
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78514/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18327
**[Test build #78514 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78514/testReport)**
for PR 18327 at commit
[`ed210fb`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17713
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78512/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17713
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17922#discussion_r123707614
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/param/__init__.py ---
@@ -170,6 +170,15 @@ def toVector(value):
raise TypeError("Could not convert %s to vector"
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17922#discussion_r123711301
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/tests.py ---
@@ -832,6 +860,96 @@ def test_logistic_regression(self):
except OSError:
pass
301 - 400 of 518 matches
Mail list logo
