Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18975#discussion_r136259136
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/InsertIntoDataSourceDirCommand.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
+/*
+ * Licen
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19092
**[Test build #81275 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81275/testReport)**
for PR 19092 at commit
[`3dad127`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/3
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19092
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81275/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19092
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18975#discussion_r136261767
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/InsertIntoDataSourceDirCommand.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
+/*
+ * Licen
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18975#discussion_r136261943
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/InsertSuite.scala ---
@@ -534,4 +534,83 @@ class InsertIntoHiveTableSuite extends QueryTest w
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18975#discussion_r136262362
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/InsertSuite.scala ---
@@ -534,4 +534,83 @@ class InsertIntoHiveTableSuite extends QueryTest w
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19092
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19092
**[Test build #81276 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81276/testReport)**
for PR 19092 at commit
[`3dad127`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/3d
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19086
**[Test build #81277 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81277/testReport)**
for PR 19086 at commit
[`7e0954c`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/7e
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19083#discussion_r136266187
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/CodeGenerator.scala
---
@@ -1001,6 +1001,16 @@ abstract class CodeGe
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18732
there's actually a number of key people participating in the discussion in
JIRA/SPIP, so I think we are good
I think perhaps SPARK-20396 should be a subtask instead for tracking the
ove
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16774#discussion_r136274847
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/tuning/CrossValidatorSuite.scala ---
@@ -120,6 +120,33 @@ class CrossValidatorSuite
}
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19093#discussion_r136275068
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/ui/AllExecutionsPage.scala
---
@@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ private[ui] class RunningExecutionTable(
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19093
CC @zsxwing
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if th
Github user Geek-He commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19093#discussion_r136279963
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/ui/AllExecutionsPage.scala
---
@@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ private[ui] class RunningExecutionTable
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18865
I think it makes sense to issue an error with good helpful message when
users only select `_corrupt_record` without other columns.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email a
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19092
**[Test build #81276 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81276/testReport)**
for PR 19092 at commit
[`3dad127`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/3
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19092
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19092
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81276/
Test PASSed.
---
GitHub user dongjoon-hyun opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19094
[SPARK-21884][SQL] Fix StackOverflowError on MetadataOnlyQuery
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR aims to fix StackOverflowError in `branch-2.2`. This happens
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19086
**[Test build #81277 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81277/testReport)**
for PR 19086 at commit
[`7e0954c`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/7
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19086
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19094
**[Test build #81278 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81278/testReport)**
for PR 19094 at commit
[`07126f7`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/07
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19086
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81277/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19078
**[Test build #81279 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81279/testReport)**
for PR 19078 at commit
[`17d7aed`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/17
GitHub user jaceklaskowski opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19095
[SPARK-21886][SQL] Use SparkSession.internalCreateDataFrame to createâ¦
⦠Dataset with LogicalRDD logical operator
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Reu
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19095
**[Test build #81280 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81280/testReport)**
for PR 19095 at commit
[`fff4b61`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/ff
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18538#discussion_r136305238
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/evaluation/ClusteringEvaluator.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,379 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Sof
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18538#discussion_r136305819
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/evaluation/ClusteringEvaluator.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,379 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Sof
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18538#discussion_r136306135
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/evaluation/ClusteringEvaluator.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,379 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Sof
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18538#discussion_r136304803
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/evaluation/ClusteringEvaluator.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,379 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Sof
Github user mgaido91 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18538#discussion_r136311477
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/evaluation/ClusteringEvaluator.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,379 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Softw
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19078
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19078
**[Test build #81279 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81279/testReport)**
for PR 19078 at commit
[`17d7aed`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/1
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19078
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81279/
Test FAILed.
---
GitHub user ScrapCodes opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19096
[SPARK-21869][SS] A cached Kafka producer should not be closed if any task
is using it.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
By updating the access time for the producer
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19096
**[Test build #81281 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81281/testReport)**
for PR 19096 at commit
[`f21bf16`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/f2
Github user dm-tran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18865#discussion_r136315990
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/json/JsonFileFormat.scala
---
@@ -114,7 +114,16 @@ class JsonFileFormat extend
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19096
**[Test build #81282 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81282/testReport)**
for PR 19096 at commit
[`0afb48c`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/0a
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19096
**[Test build #81281 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81281/testReport)**
for PR 19096 at commit
[`f21bf16`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/f
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19096
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19096
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81281/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19096
**[Test build #81282 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81282/testReport)**
for PR 19096 at commit
[`0afb48c`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/0
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19096
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81282/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19096
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19094
**[Test build #81278 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81278/testReport)**
for PR 19094 at commit
[`07126f7`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/0
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19094
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81278/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19094
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19095
**[Test build #81280 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81280/testReport)**
for PR 19095 at commit
[`fff4b61`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/f
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19095
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81280/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19095
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18538#discussion_r136332399
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/evaluation/ClusteringEvaluator.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,379 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Sof
Github user jerryshao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19077#discussion_r136332974
--- Diff:
common/unsafe/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/unsafe/memory/HeapMemoryAllocator.java
---
@@ -47,23 +47,29 @@ private boolean shouldPool(long siz
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18538#discussion_r136333104
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/evaluation/ClusteringEvaluator.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,379 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Sof
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18935
@squito can you please review again? Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19077
This PR generally looks fine to me, my concern is that will this change
bring in subtle impact on the code which leverage it.
CC @JoshRosen to take a review.
---
If your project is set u
Github user WeichenXu123 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17014
I think about this double-cache issue for a few days. One big problem is
that, we are hard get precise storage level info. For example, we may add `map`
transform on cached dataset and then pas
Github user hhbyyh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18610
Thanks for the reply. Since there's already an agreement, I will hold my
suggestion on initialModel data type.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user hhbyyh commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17461#discussion_r135430463
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/clustering/LDA.scala ---
@@ -32,10 +34,7 @@ import org.apache.spark.ml.param._
import org.apache.spark
Github user hhbyyh commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17461#discussion_r135430545
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/clustering/LDA.scala ---
@@ -180,6 +179,29 @@ private[clustering] trait LDAParams extends Params
with HasF
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19072
**[Test build #81283 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81283/testReport)**
for PR 19072 at commit
[`e185d37`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/e1
Github user aray commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18818
ping @viirya @gatorsmile
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user aray commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18306
ping @zsxwing
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19094
Hi, @lianhuiwang and @hvanhovell .
Could you review this PR? When this was introduced at 2.1.0, there was no
problem.
When the underlying classes of `fsRelation.location.listFiles` chan
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18697
**[Test build #81284 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81284/testReport)**
for PR 18697 at commit
[`70a7268`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/70
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18697
**[Test build #81284 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81284/testReport)**
for PR 18697 at commit
[`70a7268`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/7
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18697
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81284/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18697
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19078
**[Test build #81285 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81285/testReport)**
for PR 19078 at commit
[`3304092`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/33
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18697
**[Test build #81286 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81286/testReport)**
for PR 18697 at commit
[`0f21237`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/0f
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18538
**[Test build #81287 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81287/testReport)**
for PR 18538 at commit
[`45d1380`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/45
Github user mgaido91 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18731
AppVeyor build failed because of a timeout. I don't know how to retest it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pr
Github user mgaido91 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18538#discussion_r136373078
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/evaluation/ClusteringEvaluator.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,379 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Softw
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19092
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the fea
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18697#discussion_r136378843
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/physical/partitioning.scala
---
@@ -171,6 +171,16 @@ sealed trait Partitioning
Github user BryanCutler commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18787
Thanks @ueshin!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user cenyuhai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18270
I can't see any comment at 77d4f7c?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enable
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19065
**[Test build #81288 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81288/testReport)**
for PR 19065 at commit
[`f13cd73`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/f1
Github user rvesse commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18519
@ArtRand Any plans to add delegation token renewal under Mesos in the
future?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19092
Thanks! Merging to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and w
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19092
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18270
That commit is the code changes I suggested.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fe
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18270
**[Test build #81289 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81289/testReport)**
for PR 18270 at commit
[`2c6ed67`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/2c
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19078
**[Test build #81285 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81285/testReport)**
for PR 19078 at commit
[`3304092`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/3
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19078
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19078
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81285/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19095
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the fe
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19095
Thanks! Merging to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and w
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19095
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18538
**[Test build #81287 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81287/testReport)**
for PR 18538 at commit
[`45d1380`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/4
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18538
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81287/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19089
**[Test build #81290 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81290/testReport)**
for PR 19089 at commit
[`31d6c77`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/31
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18538
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18975
**[Test build #81291 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81291/testReport)**
for PR 18975 at commit
[`b2068ce`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/b2
Github user jaceklaskowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19095
That was really quick! Thanks a lot @gatorsmile
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19065
**[Test build #81288 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81288/testReport)**
for PR 19065 at commit
[`f13cd73`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/f
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19065
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19095
@jaceklaskowski Maybe you can fix the PR title next time. Thanks for your
work!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19065
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81288/
Test PASSed.
---
1 - 100 of 299 matches
Mail list logo
