Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19893
**[Test build #85802 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85802/testReport)**
for PR 19893 at commit
[`87c4852`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/8
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19893
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19893
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85802/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user liufengdb commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20174#discussion_r160217718
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/aggregate/HashAggregateExec.scala
---
@@ -230,6 +236,7 @@ case class HashAggregateExec(
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20146
ok SGTM
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spar
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20187
**[Test build #85805 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85805/testReport)**
for PR 20187 at commit
[`bfaf466`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/b
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20187
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85805/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20187
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user foxish commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20187
cc/ @zihongz @bowei from K8s networking - can you guys confirm that using
`..svc` is strictly better than using the FQDN which
made an assumption of the dns zone (cluster.local)?
---
-
Github user bowei commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20187
Confirmed -- the FQDN is not going to work on clusters that have a custom
cluster suffix.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-un
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20013#discussion_r16052
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/status/LiveEntity.scala ---
@@ -119,118 +121,115 @@ private class LiveTask(
import LiveEntityHelpe
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20013
> I suggest running more tests(real workloads)
I've tested all of these PRs attached to SPARK-18085 with lots of real and
synthetic app logs.
---
--
Github user liyinan926 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20187
@foxish have you run the integration tests against this on both minikube
and GKE?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsub
Github user gerashegalov commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20098
Thank you for review and commit @vanzin !
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user foxish commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20187
@liyinan926 -- not yet, will be running them shortly.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For addit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20013
**[Test build #85806 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85806/testReport)**
for PR 20013 at commit
[`ed59b4d`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/ed
Github user icexelloss commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20171#discussion_r160229142
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/tests.py ---
@@ -3616,6 +3616,34 @@ def test_vectorized_udf_basic(self):
bool_f(col('bool')))
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19943#discussion_r160232913
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/orc/OrcColumnarBatchReader.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,509 @@
+/*
+ * Lic
Github user icexelloss commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19872
Ping @ueshin, do you think of the current state of the PR?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20019
**[Test build #85803 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85803/testReport)**
for PR 20019 at commit
[`d1e2454`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/d
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20019
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20019
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85803/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19943#discussion_r160236021
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/orc/OrcColumnarBatchReader.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,509 @@
+/*
+ * Lic
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19943#discussion_r160236163
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/orc/OrcColumnarBatchReader.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,509 @@
+/*
+ * Lic
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19943#discussion_r160236240
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/orc/OrcColumnarBatchReader.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,509 @@
+/*
+ * Lic
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20178#discussion_r160236611
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/StageInfo.scala ---
@@ -56,6 +56,8 @@ class StageInfo(
completionTime = Some(System.current
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19943
@henrify , @cloud-fan . For @henrify 's question, I got the answer. The
answer is negative like the official document. Even ORC reader side, the data
for a VectorizedRowBatch comes from more
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20187
Let me know how those tests go and then I'll merge this.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For ad
Github user henrify commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19943
@dongjoon-hyun Ok thanks. It is pity that the single buffer cannot be used,
would have reduced number of arraycopy() calls by 5 orders of magnitude.. Btw
have you tested the inlining behaviour or tr
GitHub user sethah opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20188
[SPARK-22993][ML] Clarify HasCheckpointInterval param doc
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add a note to the `HasCheckpointInterval` parameter doc that clarifies that
thi
Github user cbyn commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16209
Thanks @sureshthalamati. I thought the idea was to specify the destination
database type. E.g. writing spark sql strings as VARCHAR works but VARCHAR is
not a spark sql type. (I'm using the VARCHAR fea
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20188
**[Test build #85807 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85807/testReport)**
for PR 20188 at commit
[`752d0ba`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/75
Github user sethah commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20188
cc @srowen @holdenk The MLlib counterparts actually make mention of this,
but for some reason the note never got ported over to ML package.
The only caveat I can think of is that this doc is
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19943
**[Test build #85808 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85808/testReport)**
for PR 19943 at commit
[`ba03d20`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/ba
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19943#discussion_r160251456
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/orc/OrcColumnarBatchReader.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,509 @@
+/*
+ * Lic
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20097#discussion_r160251566
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/MicroBatchExecution.scala
---
@@ -392,6 +443,21 @@ class MicroBatchExecution(
Github user tdas commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20097
LGTM. Merging it to master.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: rev
Github user foxish commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20187
```
Discovery starting.
Discovery completed in 191 milliseconds.
Run starting. Expected test count is: 8
KubernetesSuite:
- Run SparkPi with no resources
- Run SparkPi with a ve
Github user Gauravshah commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16578
@mallman do you foresee any issues ? planning to backport it to spark 2.2
on personal fork. will probably make jitpack release
---
--
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20187
Merging to master / 2.3.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: revie
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20187
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user imatiach-msft commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20168#discussion_r160255634
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/image.py ---
@@ -201,8 +243,9 @@ def readImages(self, path, recursive=False,
numPartitions=-1,
.. versionadde
Github user imatiach-msft commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20168#discussion_r160255996
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/tests.py ---
@@ -1843,6 +1844,28 @@ def tearDown(self):
class ImageReaderTest(SparkSessionTestCase):
+
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20186
**[Test build #85804 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85804/testReport)**
for PR 20186 at commit
[`10b5518`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/1
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20186
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20186
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85804/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user imatiach-msft commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20168#discussion_r160257066
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/tests.py ---
@@ -1843,6 +1844,28 @@ def tearDown(self):
class ImageReaderTest(SparkSessionTestCase):
+
Github user sameeragarwal commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20013
@vanzin Thanks for the great work! Given this is a sizable change, I'll
like get this in before cutting RC1.
---
-
To unsu
Github user imatiach-msft commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20168#discussion_r160258674
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/image/ImageSchema.scala
---
@@ -37,20 +37,51 @@ import org.apache.spark.sql.types._
@Since("2.
Github user imatiach-msft commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20168#discussion_r160259006
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/image/ImageSchema.scala
---
@@ -143,12 +174,12 @@ object ImageSchema {
val height
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20097
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user imatiach-msft commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20168#discussion_r160260468
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/tests.py ---
@@ -1843,6 +1844,28 @@ def tearDown(self):
class ImageReaderTest(SparkSessionTestCase):
+
Github user imatiach-msft commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20168
@tomasatdatabricks nice PR! I've added a few comments.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20188
**[Test build #85807 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85807/testReport)**
for PR 20188 at commit
[`752d0ba`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/7
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20188
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85807/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20188
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user WeichenXu123 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20168#discussion_r160264829
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/image.py ---
@@ -71,9 +88,30 @@ def ocvTypes(self):
"""
if self._ocvTypes is None:
-
Github user WeichenXu123 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20168#discussion_r160265175
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/image.py ---
@@ -55,7 +72,7 @@ def imageSchema(self):
"""
if self._imageSchema is None:
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19943
Thanks. I checked the as-is inline behavior. As you told, ORC nextBatch is
not inlined so far while Parquet nextBatch does. I'll try to optimize that.
---
---
Github user WeichenXu123 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20168#discussion_r160264533
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/image.py ---
@@ -71,9 +88,30 @@ def ocvTypes(self):
"""
if self._ocvTypes is None:
-
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20186
Is it easy to add a unit test in `StagePageSuite`? Also this is the kind of
stuff the compiler should be complaining about...
---
---
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20168#discussion_r160271945
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/image.py ---
@@ -71,9 +88,30 @@ def ocvTypes(self):
"""
if self._ocvTypes is None:
-
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19943
**[Test build #85808 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85808/testReport)**
for PR 19943 at commit
[`ba03d20`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/b
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19943
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19943
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85808/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20151
@rxin or @joshrosen could you guys take a quick look and see if it makes
sense?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubs
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20013
**[Test build #85809 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85809/testReport)**
for PR 20013 at commit
[`44c9647`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/44
GitHub user mgaido91 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20189
[SPARK-22975] MetricsReporter should not throw exception when there was no
progress reported
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`MetricsReporter ` assumes that there has
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20189
**[Test build #85810 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85810/testReport)**
for PR 20189 at commit
[`1185a51`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/11
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20013
**[Test build #85806 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85806/testReport)**
for PR 20013 at commit
[`ed59b4d`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20013
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85806/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20013
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user henrify commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19943
@dongjoon-hyun Thanks. I don't think it matters if nextBatch() is inlined
or not. I think what matters is 1) how the putX() etc methods calls inside the
tight loops are inlined and 2) how complex th
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20174
**[Test build #85811 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85811/testReport)**
for PR 20174 at commit
[`6e164d5`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/6e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20096
**[Test build #85812 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85812/testReport)**
for PR 20096 at commit
[`d94461a`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/d9
Github user zjffdu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13599#discussion_r160285377
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/api/python/VirtualEnvFactory.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,151 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Found
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20176
@cloud-fan ping
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@s
Github user shaneknapp commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19290
i filed a bug about this on the spark jira:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-22996
as we're about to move all the spark builds to new ubuntu machines, w/much
more up2date p
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19943
After minimizing `nextBatch`, it becomes smaller than Parquet's
`nextBatch`. But, it's inlined only some cases, but mostly not. It's not
helpful. For the other technique, I'll try later.
`
GitHub user RussellSpitzer opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20190
[SPARK-22976][Core]: Cluster mode driver directories can be removed wâ¦
â¦hile running
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The clean up logic on
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20190
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
GitHub user JoshRosen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20191
[SPARK-22997] Add additional defenses against use of freed MemoryBlocks
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch modifies Spark's `MemoryAllocator` implementations s
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20191
**[Test build #85813 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85813/testReport)**
for PR 20191 at commit
[`a7f8c07`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/a7
Github user henrify commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19943
@dongjoon-hyun the nextBatch() is invoked 4096x less often than the main
copy loops, so it doesn't matter much..
---
-
To unsubs
GitHub user vanzin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20192
[SPARK-22994][k8s] Use a single image for all Spark containers.
This change allows a user to submit a Spark application on kubernetes
having to provide a single image, instead of one image for ea
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20192
**[Test build #85814 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85814/testReport)**
for PR 20192 at commit
[`bfad831`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/bf
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20096
**[Test build #85815 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85815/testReport)**
for PR 20096 at commit
[`94d5f50`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/94
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20191#discussion_r160295529
--- Diff:
common/unsafe/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/unsafe/memory/UnsafeMemoryAllocator.java
---
@@ -38,9 +38,20 @@ public MemoryBlock allocate(long size
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13599
**[Test build #85817 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85817/testReport)**
for PR 13599 at commit
[`fb59f9a`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/fb
GitHub user liyinan926 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20193
[SPARK-22998][K8S] Set missing value for SPARK_MOUNTED_CLASSPATH in the
executors
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The environment variable `SPARK_MOUNTED_CLASSPATH`
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20193
**[Test build #85816 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85816/testReport)**
for PR 20193 at commit
[`640e785`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/64
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20189
**[Test build #85810 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85810/testReport)**
for PR 20189 at commit
[`1185a51`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/1
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20189
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85810/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20191#discussion_r160296722
--- Diff:
common/unsafe/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/unsafe/memory/UnsafeMemoryAllocator.java
---
@@ -38,9 +38,20 @@ public MemoryBlock allocate(long s
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20189
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20191#discussion_r160296848
--- Diff:
common/unsafe/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/unsafe/memory/UnsafeMemoryAllocator.java
---
@@ -38,9 +38,20 @@ public MemoryBlock allocate(long size
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20191#discussion_r160297024
--- Diff:
common/unsafe/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/unsafe/memory/UnsafeMemoryAllocator.java
---
@@ -38,9 +38,20 @@ public MemoryBlock allocate(long s
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20193
**[Test build #85816 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85816/testReport)**
for PR 20193 at commit
[`640e785`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/6
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20193
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85816/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20193
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
201 - 300 of 522 matches
Mail list logo
