[GitHub] [spark] SparkQA commented on issue #26412: [SPARK-29774][SQL] Date and Timestamp type +/- null should be null as Postgres

SparkQA commented on issue #26412: [SPARK-29774][SQL] Date and Timestamp type +/- null should be null as Postgres URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26412#issuecomment-561203267 **[Test build #114780 has

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins commented on issue #26412: [SPARK-29774][SQL] Date and Timestamp type +/- null should be null as Postgres

AmplabJenkins commented on issue #26412: [SPARK-29774][SQL] Date and Timestamp type +/- null should be null as Postgres URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26412#issuecomment-561203453 Merged build finished. Test FAILed.

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins commented on issue #26412: [SPARK-29774][SQL] Date and Timestamp type +/- null should be null as Postgres

AmplabJenkins commented on issue #26412: [SPARK-29774][SQL] Date and Timestamp type +/- null should be null as Postgres URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26412#issuecomment-561203458 Test FAILed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):

[GitHub] [spark] SparkQA commented on issue #26712: [SPARK-29883][SQL] Improve error messages when function name is an alias

SparkQA commented on issue #26712: [SPARK-29883][SQL] Improve error messages when function name is an alias URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26712#issuecomment-561203006 **[Test build #114787 has

[GitHub] [spark] SparkQA commented on issue #26412: [SPARK-29774][SQL] Date and Timestamp type +/- null should be null as Postgres

SparkQA commented on issue #26412: [SPARK-29774][SQL] Date and Timestamp type +/- null should be null as Postgres URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26412#issuecomment-561203012 **[Test build #114788 has

[GitHub] [spark] yaooqinn commented on issue #26716: [SPARK-30083][SQL] visitArithmeticUnary should wrap PLUS case with UnaryPositive for type checking

yaooqinn commented on issue #26716: [SPARK-30083][SQL] visitArithmeticUnary should wrap PLUS case with UnaryPositive for type checking URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26716#issuecomment-561202741 retest this please

[GitHub] [spark] yaooqinn commented on a change in pull request #26412: [SPARK-29774][SQL] Date and Timestamp type +/- null should be null as Postgres

yaooqinn commented on a change in pull request #26412: [SPARK-29774][SQL] Date and Timestamp type +/- null should be null as Postgres URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26412#discussion_r353222500 ## File path:

[GitHub] [spark] yaooqinn commented on a change in pull request #26412: [SPARK-29774][SQL] Date and Timestamp type +/- null should be null as Postgres

yaooqinn commented on a change in pull request #26412: [SPARK-29774][SQL] Date and Timestamp type +/- null should be null as Postgres URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26412#discussion_r353221948 ## File path:

[GitHub] [spark] srowen commented on issue #26713: [SPARK-30079][TESTS] set locale en_US in pom.xml for tests

srowen commented on issue #26713: [SPARK-30079][TESTS] set locale en_US in pom.xml for tests URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26713#issuecomment-561201227 @iamatwork what were the test failures though? It sounds like some tests might be too specific to particular error message

[GitHub] [spark] srowen closed pull request #26713: [SPARK-30079][TESTS] set locale en_US in pom.xml for tests

srowen closed pull request #26713: [SPARK-30079][TESTS] set locale en_US in pom.xml for tests URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26713 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the

[GitHub] [spark] cloud-fan commented on a change in pull request #26412: [SPARK-29774][SQL] Date and Timestamp type +/- null should be null as Postgres

cloud-fan commented on a change in pull request #26412: [SPARK-29774][SQL] Date and Timestamp type +/- null should be null as Postgres URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26412#discussion_r353221092 ## File path:

[GitHub] [spark] cloud-fan commented on a change in pull request #26412: [SPARK-29774][SQL] Date and Timestamp type +/- null should be null as Postgres

cloud-fan commented on a change in pull request #26412: [SPARK-29774][SQL] Date and Timestamp type +/- null should be null as Postgres URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26412#discussion_r353219424 ## File path:

[GitHub] [spark] cloud-fan commented on a change in pull request #26412: [SPARK-29774][SQL] Date and Timestamp type +/- null should be null as Postgres

cloud-fan commented on a change in pull request #26412: [SPARK-29774][SQL] Date and Timestamp type +/- null should be null as Postgres URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26412#discussion_r353218003 ## File path:

[GitHub] [spark] amanomer commented on a change in pull request #26712: [SPARK-29883][SQL] Improve error messages when function name is an alias

amanomer commented on a change in pull request #26712: [SPARK-29883][SQL] Improve error messages when function name is an alias URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26712#discussion_r353218007 ## File path:

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #26716: [SPARK-30083][SQL] visitArithmeticUnary should wrap PLUS case with UnaryPositive for type checking

AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #26716: [SPARK-30083][SQL] visitArithmeticUnary should wrap PLUS case with UnaryPositive for type checking URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26716#issuecomment-561197137 Test FAILed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to

[GitHub] [spark] srowen commented on issue #26747: [SPARK-29188][PySpark] toPandas gets wrong dtypes when applied on empty DF

srowen commented on issue #26747: [SPARK-29188][PySpark] toPandas gets wrong dtypes when applied on empty DF URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26747#issuecomment-561197720 Out of curiosity, what was the previous behavior? was it just missing Long / Double mappings?

[GitHub] [spark] SparkQA removed a comment on issue #26716: [SPARK-30083][SQL] visitArithmeticUnary should wrap PLUS case with UnaryPositive for type checking

SparkQA removed a comment on issue #26716: [SPARK-30083][SQL] visitArithmeticUnary should wrap PLUS case with UnaryPositive for type checking URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26716#issuecomment-561143977 **[Test build #114773 has

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #26716: [SPARK-30083][SQL] visitArithmeticUnary should wrap PLUS case with UnaryPositive for type checking

AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #26716: [SPARK-30083][SQL] visitArithmeticUnary should wrap PLUS case with UnaryPositive for type checking URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26716#issuecomment-561197121 Merged build finished. Test FAILed.

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins commented on issue #26716: [SPARK-30083][SQL] visitArithmeticUnary should wrap PLUS case with UnaryPositive for type checking

AmplabJenkins commented on issue #26716: [SPARK-30083][SQL] visitArithmeticUnary should wrap PLUS case with UnaryPositive for type checking URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26716#issuecomment-561197121 Merged build finished. Test FAILed.

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins commented on issue #26716: [SPARK-30083][SQL] visitArithmeticUnary should wrap PLUS case with UnaryPositive for type checking

AmplabJenkins commented on issue #26716: [SPARK-30083][SQL] visitArithmeticUnary should wrap PLUS case with UnaryPositive for type checking URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26716#issuecomment-561197137 Test FAILed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI

[GitHub] [spark] SparkQA commented on issue #26716: [SPARK-30083][SQL] visitArithmeticUnary should wrap PLUS case with UnaryPositive for type checking

SparkQA commented on issue #26716: [SPARK-30083][SQL] visitArithmeticUnary should wrap PLUS case with UnaryPositive for type checking URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26716#issuecomment-561196905 **[Test build #114773 has

[GitHub] [spark] tgravescs commented on issue #26614: [SPARK-29976][CORE] Trigger speculation for stages with too few tasks

tgravescs commented on issue #26614: [SPARK-29976][CORE] Trigger speculation for stages with too few tasks URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26614#issuecomment-561195206 Right, I get that it still uses regular speculation logic if enough have finished, my concerns are confusion to

[GitHub] [spark] cloud-fan commented on a change in pull request #26736: [SPARK-30098][SQL] Use default datasource as provider for CREATE TABLE syntax

cloud-fan commented on a change in pull request #26736: [SPARK-30098][SQL] Use default datasource as provider for CREATE TABLE syntax URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26736#discussion_r353213626 ## File path:

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #26080: [SPARK-29425][SQL] The ownership of a database should be respected

AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #26080: [SPARK-29425][SQL] The ownership of a database should be respected URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26080#issuecomment-561194023 Test FAILed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #26080: [SPARK-29425][SQL] The ownership of a database should be respected

AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #26080: [SPARK-29425][SQL] The ownership of a database should be respected URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26080#issuecomment-561194014 Merged build finished. Test FAILed.

[GitHub] [spark] SparkQA removed a comment on issue #26080: [SPARK-29425][SQL] The ownership of a database should be respected

SparkQA removed a comment on issue #26080: [SPARK-29425][SQL] The ownership of a database should be respected URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26080#issuecomment-561158295 **[Test build #114778 has

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins commented on issue #26080: [SPARK-29425][SQL] The ownership of a database should be respected

AmplabJenkins commented on issue #26080: [SPARK-29425][SQL] The ownership of a database should be respected URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26080#issuecomment-561194014 Merged build finished. Test FAILed. This is

[GitHub] [spark] SparkQA commented on issue #26080: [SPARK-29425][SQL] The ownership of a database should be respected

SparkQA commented on issue #26080: [SPARK-29425][SQL] The ownership of a database should be respected URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26080#issuecomment-561193841 **[Test build #114778 has

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins commented on issue #26080: [SPARK-29425][SQL] The ownership of a database should be respected

AmplabJenkins commented on issue #26080: [SPARK-29425][SQL] The ownership of a database should be respected URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26080#issuecomment-561194023 Test FAILed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #26712: [SPARK-29883][SQL] Improve error messages when function name is an alias

AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #26712: [SPARK-29883][SQL] Improve error messages when function name is an alias URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26712#issuecomment-561192781 Merged build finished. Test PASSed.

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #26712: [SPARK-29883][SQL] Improve error messages when function name is an alias

AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #26712: [SPARK-29883][SQL] Improve error messages when function name is an alias URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26712#issuecomment-561192793 Test PASSed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins commented on issue #26712: [SPARK-29883][SQL] Improve error messages when function name is an alias

AmplabJenkins commented on issue #26712: [SPARK-29883][SQL] Improve error messages when function name is an alias URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26712#issuecomment-561192781 Merged build finished. Test PASSed.

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins commented on issue #26712: [SPARK-29883][SQL] Improve error messages when function name is an alias

AmplabJenkins commented on issue #26712: [SPARK-29883][SQL] Improve error messages when function name is an alias URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26712#issuecomment-561192793 Test PASSed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):

[GitHub] [spark] SparkQA commented on issue #26712: [SPARK-29883][SQL] Improve error messages when function name is an alias

SparkQA commented on issue #26712: [SPARK-29883][SQL] Improve error messages when function name is an alias URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26712#issuecomment-561192193 **[Test build #114786 has

[GitHub] [spark] SparkQA commented on issue #26641: [SPARK-29453][WEBUI] Improve tooltips information for SQL tab.

SparkQA commented on issue #26641: [SPARK-29453][WEBUI] Improve tooltips information for SQL tab. URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26641#issuecomment-561190048 **[Test build #4959 has

[GitHub] [spark] SparkQA commented on issue #26467: [SPARK-29477]Improve tooltip for Streaming tab

SparkQA commented on issue #26467: [SPARK-29477]Improve tooltip for Streaming tab URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26467#issuecomment-561189875 **[Test build #4958 has started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/4958/testReport)** for PR 26467

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #26728: [SPARK-30012][CORE][SQL] Change classes extending scala collection classes to work with 2.13

AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #26728: [SPARK-30012][CORE][SQL] Change classes extending scala collection classes to work with 2.13 URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26728#issuecomment-561189302 Test PASSed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins commented on issue #26728: [SPARK-30012][CORE][SQL] Change classes extending scala collection classes to work with 2.13

AmplabJenkins commented on issue #26728: [SPARK-30012][CORE][SQL] Change classes extending scala collection classes to work with 2.13 URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26728#issuecomment-561189302 Test PASSed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #26728: [SPARK-30012][CORE][SQL] Change classes extending scala collection classes to work with 2.13

AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #26728: [SPARK-30012][CORE][SQL] Change classes extending scala collection classes to work with 2.13 URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26728#issuecomment-561189295 Merged build finished. Test PASSed.

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins commented on issue #26728: [SPARK-30012][CORE][SQL] Change classes extending scala collection classes to work with 2.13

AmplabJenkins commented on issue #26728: [SPARK-30012][CORE][SQL] Change classes extending scala collection classes to work with 2.13 URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26728#issuecomment-561189295 Merged build finished. Test PASSed.

[GitHub] [spark] SparkQA commented on issue #26728: [SPARK-30012][CORE][SQL] Change classes extending scala collection classes to work with 2.13

SparkQA commented on issue #26728: [SPARK-30012][CORE][SQL] Change classes extending scala collection classes to work with 2.13 URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26728#issuecomment-561188714 **[Test build #114785 has

[GitHub] [spark] amanomer commented on issue #26731: [SPARK-30093][SQL] Improve error message for creating view

amanomer commented on issue #26731: [SPARK-30093][SQL] Improve error message for creating view URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26731#issuecomment-561184732 cc @srowen @cloud-fan This is an automated message from

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #26644: [SPARK-30004][SQL] Allow merge UserDefinedType into a native DataType

AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #26644: [SPARK-30004][SQL] Allow merge UserDefinedType into a native DataType URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26644#issuecomment-561182766 Merged build finished. Test PASSed.

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #26644: [SPARK-30004][SQL] Allow merge UserDefinedType into a native DataType

AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #26644: [SPARK-30004][SQL] Allow merge UserDefinedType into a native DataType URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26644#issuecomment-561182777 Test PASSed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins commented on issue #26644: [SPARK-30004][SQL] Allow merge UserDefinedType into a native DataType

AmplabJenkins commented on issue #26644: [SPARK-30004][SQL] Allow merge UserDefinedType into a native DataType URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26644#issuecomment-561182777 Test PASSed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #26748: [SPARK-29392][CORE][SQL][FOLLOWUP] Avoid deprecated (in 2.13) Symbol syntax 'foo in favor of simpler expression, where it generated de

AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #26748: [SPARK-29392][CORE][SQL][FOLLOWUP] Avoid deprecated (in 2.13) Symbol syntax 'foo in favor of simpler expression, where it generated deprecation warnings URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26748#issuecomment-561182679 Test PASSed.

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins commented on issue #26748: [SPARK-29392][CORE][SQL][FOLLOWUP] Avoid deprecated (in 2.13) Symbol syntax 'foo in favor of simpler expression, where it generated deprecatio

AmplabJenkins commented on issue #26748: [SPARK-29392][CORE][SQL][FOLLOWUP] Avoid deprecated (in 2.13) Symbol syntax 'foo in favor of simpler expression, where it generated deprecation warnings URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26748#issuecomment-561182679 Test PASSed. Refer to

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins commented on issue #26748: [SPARK-29392][CORE][SQL][FOLLOWUP] Avoid deprecated (in 2.13) Symbol syntax 'foo in favor of simpler expression, where it generated deprecatio

AmplabJenkins commented on issue #26748: [SPARK-29392][CORE][SQL][FOLLOWUP] Avoid deprecated (in 2.13) Symbol syntax 'foo in favor of simpler expression, where it generated deprecation warnings URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26748#issuecomment-561182668 Merged build finished.

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #26748: [SPARK-29392][CORE][SQL][FOLLOWUP] Avoid deprecated (in 2.13) Symbol syntax 'foo in favor of simpler expression, where it generated de

AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #26748: [SPARK-29392][CORE][SQL][FOLLOWUP] Avoid deprecated (in 2.13) Symbol syntax 'foo in favor of simpler expression, where it generated deprecation warnings URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26748#issuecomment-561182668 Merged build

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins commented on issue #26644: [SPARK-30004][SQL] Allow merge UserDefinedType into a native DataType

AmplabJenkins commented on issue #26644: [SPARK-30004][SQL] Allow merge UserDefinedType into a native DataType URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26644#issuecomment-561182766 Merged build finished. Test PASSed. This

[GitHub] [spark] SparkQA commented on issue #26644: [SPARK-30004][SQL] Allow merge UserDefinedType into a native DataType

SparkQA commented on issue #26644: [SPARK-30004][SQL] Allow merge UserDefinedType into a native DataType URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26644#issuecomment-561182093 **[Test build #114784 has

[GitHub] [spark] SparkQA commented on issue #26748: [SPARK-29392][CORE][SQL][FOLLOWUP] Avoid deprecated (in 2.13) Symbol syntax 'foo in favor of simpler expression, where it generated deprecation warn

SparkQA commented on issue #26748: [SPARK-29392][CORE][SQL][FOLLOWUP] Avoid deprecated (in 2.13) Symbol syntax 'foo in favor of simpler expression, where it generated deprecation warnings URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26748#issuecomment-561182082 **[Test build #114783 has

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins commented on issue #26080: [SPARK-29425][SQL] The ownership of a database should be respected

AmplabJenkins commented on issue #26080: [SPARK-29425][SQL] The ownership of a database should be respected URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26080#issuecomment-561179529 Test PASSed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):

[GitHub] [spark] Ngone51 commented on a change in pull request #26736: [SPARK-30098][SQL] Use default datasource as provider for CREATE TABLE syntax

Ngone51 commented on a change in pull request #26736: [SPARK-30098][SQL] Use default datasource as provider for CREATE TABLE syntax URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26736#discussion_r353192969 ## File path:

[GitHub] [spark] cloud-fan commented on a change in pull request #26656: [SPARK-27986][SQL] Support ANSI SQL filter clause for aggregate expression

cloud-fan commented on a change in pull request #26656: [SPARK-27986][SQL] Support ANSI SQL filter clause for aggregate expression URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26656#discussion_r353192794 ## File path:

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #26738: [SPARK-30082][SQL] Do not replace Zeros when replacing NaNs

AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #26738: [SPARK-30082][SQL] Do not replace Zeros when replacing NaNs URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26738#issuecomment-561179450 Test PASSed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins commented on issue #26738: [SPARK-30082][SQL] Do not replace Zeros when replacing NaNs

AmplabJenkins commented on issue #26738: [SPARK-30082][SQL] Do not replace Zeros when replacing NaNs URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26738#issuecomment-561179450 Test PASSed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #26080: [SPARK-29425][SQL] The ownership of a database should be respected

AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #26080: [SPARK-29425][SQL] The ownership of a database should be respected URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26080#issuecomment-561179529 Test PASSed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins commented on issue #26738: [SPARK-30082][SQL] Do not replace Zeros when replacing NaNs

AmplabJenkins commented on issue #26738: [SPARK-30082][SQL] Do not replace Zeros when replacing NaNs URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26738#issuecomment-561179443 Merged build finished. Test PASSed. This is an

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins commented on issue #26080: [SPARK-29425][SQL] The ownership of a database should be respected

AmplabJenkins commented on issue #26080: [SPARK-29425][SQL] The ownership of a database should be respected URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26080#issuecomment-561179519 Merged build finished. Test PASSed. This is

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #26738: [SPARK-30082][SQL] Do not replace Zeros when replacing NaNs

AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #26738: [SPARK-30082][SQL] Do not replace Zeros when replacing NaNs URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26738#issuecomment-561179443 Merged build finished. Test PASSed. This is

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #26080: [SPARK-29425][SQL] The ownership of a database should be respected

AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #26080: [SPARK-29425][SQL] The ownership of a database should be respected URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26080#issuecomment-561179519 Merged build finished. Test PASSed.

[GitHub] [spark] SparkQA commented on issue #26080: [SPARK-29425][SQL] The ownership of a database should be respected

SparkQA commented on issue #26080: [SPARK-29425][SQL] The ownership of a database should be respected URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26080#issuecomment-561178796 **[Test build #114782 has

[GitHub] [spark] SparkQA commented on issue #26738: [SPARK-30082][SQL] Do not replace Zeros when replacing NaNs

SparkQA commented on issue #26738: [SPARK-30082][SQL] Do not replace Zeros when replacing NaNs URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26738#issuecomment-561178762 **[Test build #114781 has started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/114781/testReport)**

[GitHub] [spark] Ngone51 commented on a change in pull request #26736: [SPARK-30098][SQL] Use default datasource as provider for CREATE TABLE syntax

Ngone51 commented on a change in pull request #26736: [SPARK-30098][SQL] Use default datasource as provider for CREATE TABLE syntax URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26736#discussion_r353190853 ## File path:

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #26644: [SPARK-30004][SQL] Allow merge UserDefinedType into a native DataType

AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #26644: [SPARK-30004][SQL] Allow merge UserDefinedType into a native DataType URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26644#issuecomment-561176991 Test FAILed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):

[GitHub] [spark] SparkQA removed a comment on issue #26644: [SPARK-30004][SQL] Allow merge UserDefinedType into a native DataType

SparkQA removed a comment on issue #26644: [SPARK-30004][SQL] Allow merge UserDefinedType into a native DataType URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26644#issuecomment-561143971 **[Test build #114774 has

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins commented on issue #26644: [SPARK-30004][SQL] Allow merge UserDefinedType into a native DataType

AmplabJenkins commented on issue #26644: [SPARK-30004][SQL] Allow merge UserDefinedType into a native DataType URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26644#issuecomment-561176985 Merged build finished. Test FAILed. This

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins commented on issue #26644: [SPARK-30004][SQL] Allow merge UserDefinedType into a native DataType

AmplabJenkins commented on issue #26644: [SPARK-30004][SQL] Allow merge UserDefinedType into a native DataType URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26644#issuecomment-561176991 Test FAILed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):

[GitHub] [spark] SparkQA commented on issue #26644: [SPARK-30004][SQL] Allow merge UserDefinedType into a native DataType

SparkQA commented on issue #26644: [SPARK-30004][SQL] Allow merge UserDefinedType into a native DataType URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26644#issuecomment-561176906 **[Test build #114774 has

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #26644: [SPARK-30004][SQL] Allow merge UserDefinedType into a native DataType

AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #26644: [SPARK-30004][SQL] Allow merge UserDefinedType into a native DataType URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26644#issuecomment-561176985 Merged build finished. Test FAILed.

[GitHub] [spark] Ngone51 commented on a change in pull request #26736: [SPARK-30098][SQL] Use default datasource as provider for CREATE TABLE syntax

Ngone51 commented on a change in pull request #26736: [SPARK-30098][SQL] Use default datasource as provider for CREATE TABLE syntax URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26736#discussion_r353188855 ## File path:

[GitHub] [spark] cloud-fan commented on a change in pull request #26656: [SPARK-27986][SQL] Support ANSI SQL filter clause for aggregate expression

cloud-fan commented on a change in pull request #26656: [SPARK-27986][SQL] Support ANSI SQL filter clause for aggregate expression URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26656#discussion_r353188452 ## File path:

[GitHub] [spark] cloud-fan commented on a change in pull request #26656: [SPARK-27986][SQL] Support ANSI SQL filter clause for aggregate expression

cloud-fan commented on a change in pull request #26656: [SPARK-27986][SQL] Support ANSI SQL filter clause for aggregate expression URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26656#discussion_r353187588 ## File path:

[GitHub] [spark] yaooqinn commented on a change in pull request #26080: [SPARK-29425][SQL] The ownership of a database should be respected

yaooqinn commented on a change in pull request #26080: [SPARK-29425][SQL] The ownership of a database should be respected URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26080#discussion_r353187344 ## File path: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/ddl.scala

[GitHub] [spark] Ngone51 commented on a change in pull request #26736: [SPARK-30098][SQL] Use default datasource as provider for CREATE TABLE syntax

Ngone51 commented on a change in pull request #26736: [SPARK-30098][SQL] Use default datasource as provider for CREATE TABLE syntax URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26736#discussion_r353186380 ## File path:

[GitHub] [spark] cloud-fan commented on a change in pull request #26656: [SPARK-27986][SQL] Support ANSI SQL filter clause for aggregate expression

cloud-fan commented on a change in pull request #26656: [SPARK-27986][SQL] Support ANSI SQL filter clause for aggregate expression URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26656#discussion_r353186171 ## File path:

[GitHub] [spark] yaooqinn commented on a change in pull request #26080: [SPARK-29425][SQL] The ownership of a database should be respected

yaooqinn commented on a change in pull request #26080: [SPARK-29425][SQL] The ownership of a database should be respected URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26080#discussion_r353185129 ## File path:

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #26412: [SPARK-29774][SQL] Date and Timestamp type +/- null should be null as Postgres

AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #26412: [SPARK-29774][SQL] Date and Timestamp type +/- null should be null as Postgres URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26412#issuecomment-561172877 Merged build finished. Test PASSed.

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #26412: [SPARK-29774][SQL] Date and Timestamp type +/- null should be null as Postgres

AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #26412: [SPARK-29774][SQL] Date and Timestamp type +/- null should be null as Postgres URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26412#issuecomment-561172887 Test PASSed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins commented on issue #26412: [SPARK-29774][SQL] Date and Timestamp type +/- null should be null as Postgres

AmplabJenkins commented on issue #26412: [SPARK-29774][SQL] Date and Timestamp type +/- null should be null as Postgres URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26412#issuecomment-561172887 Test PASSed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins commented on issue #26412: [SPARK-29774][SQL] Date and Timestamp type +/- null should be null as Postgres

AmplabJenkins commented on issue #26412: [SPARK-29774][SQL] Date and Timestamp type +/- null should be null as Postgres URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26412#issuecomment-561172877 Merged build finished. Test PASSed.

[GitHub] [spark] SparkQA commented on issue #26412: [SPARK-29774][SQL] Date and Timestamp type +/- null should be null as Postgres

SparkQA commented on issue #26412: [SPARK-29774][SQL] Date and Timestamp type +/- null should be null as Postgres URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26412#issuecomment-561172314 **[Test build #114780 has

[GitHub] [spark] cloud-fan commented on a change in pull request #26656: [SPARK-27986][SQL] Support ANSI SQL filter clause for aggregate expression

cloud-fan commented on a change in pull request #26656: [SPARK-27986][SQL] Support ANSI SQL filter clause for aggregate expression URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26656#discussion_r353181853 ## File path:

[GitHub] [spark] yaooqinn commented on a change in pull request #26080: [SPARK-29425][SQL] The ownership of a database should be respected

yaooqinn commented on a change in pull request #26080: [SPARK-29425][SQL] The ownership of a database should be respected URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26080#discussion_r353181827 ## File path:

[GitHub] [spark] yaooqinn commented on a change in pull request #26080: [SPARK-29425][SQL] The ownership of a database should be respected

yaooqinn commented on a change in pull request #26080: [SPARK-29425][SQL] The ownership of a database should be respected URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26080#discussion_r353181827 ## File path:

[GitHub] [spark] cloud-fan commented on a change in pull request #26656: [SPARK-27986][SQL] Support ANSI SQL filter clause for aggregate expression

cloud-fan commented on a change in pull request #26656: [SPARK-27986][SQL] Support ANSI SQL filter clause for aggregate expression URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26656#discussion_r353181927 ## File path:

[GitHub] [spark] cloud-fan commented on a change in pull request #26736: [SPARK-30098][SQL] Use default datasource as provider for CREATE TABLE syntax

cloud-fan commented on a change in pull request #26736: [SPARK-30098][SQL] Use default datasource as provider for CREATE TABLE syntax URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26736#discussion_r353179186 ## File path:

[GitHub] [spark] cloud-fan commented on a change in pull request #26736: [SPARK-30098][SQL] Use default datasource as provider for CREATE TABLE syntax

cloud-fan commented on a change in pull request #26736: [SPARK-30098][SQL] Use default datasource as provider for CREATE TABLE syntax URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26736#discussion_r353178060 ## File path:

[GitHub] [spark] cloud-fan commented on a change in pull request #26736: [SPARK-30098][SQL] Use default datasource as provider for CREATE TABLE syntax

cloud-fan commented on a change in pull request #26736: [SPARK-30098][SQL] Use default datasource as provider for CREATE TABLE syntax URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26736#discussion_r353177380 ## File path:

[GitHub] [spark] cloud-fan commented on a change in pull request #26736: [SPARK-30098][SQL] Use default datasource as provider for CREATE TABLE syntax

cloud-fan commented on a change in pull request #26736: [SPARK-30098][SQL] Use default datasource as provider for CREATE TABLE syntax URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26736#discussion_r353176791 ## File path:

[GitHub] [spark] cloud-fan commented on a change in pull request #26736: [SPARK-30098][SQL] Use default datasource as provider for CREATE TABLE syntax

cloud-fan commented on a change in pull request #26736: [SPARK-30098][SQL] Use default datasource as provider for CREATE TABLE syntax URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26736#discussion_r353175740 ## File path:

[GitHub] [spark] yaooqinn commented on a change in pull request #26080: [SPARK-29425][SQL] The ownership of a database should be respected

yaooqinn commented on a change in pull request #26080: [SPARK-29425][SQL] The ownership of a database should be respected URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26080#discussion_r353175204 ## File path: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/ddl.scala

[GitHub] [spark] cloud-fan commented on a change in pull request #26736: [SPARK-30098][SQL] Use default datasource as provider for CREATE TABLE syntax

cloud-fan commented on a change in pull request #26736: [SPARK-30098][SQL] Use default datasource as provider for CREATE TABLE syntax URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26736#discussion_r353174981 ## File path:

[GitHub] [spark] cloud-fan commented on a change in pull request #26736: [SPARK-30098][SQL] Use default datasource as provider for CREATE TABLE syntax

cloud-fan commented on a change in pull request #26736: [SPARK-30098][SQL] Use default datasource as provider for CREATE TABLE syntax URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26736#discussion_r353173922 ## File path:

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #26716: [SPARK-30083][SQL] visitArithmeticUnary should wrap PLUS case with UnaryPositive for type checking

AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #26716: [SPARK-30083][SQL] visitArithmeticUnary should wrap PLUS case with UnaryPositive for type checking URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26716#issuecomment-561162784 Merged build finished. Test PASSed.

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins commented on issue #26716: [SPARK-30083][SQL] visitArithmeticUnary should wrap PLUS case with UnaryPositive for type checking

AmplabJenkins commented on issue #26716: [SPARK-30083][SQL] visitArithmeticUnary should wrap PLUS case with UnaryPositive for type checking URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26716#issuecomment-561162784 Merged build finished. Test PASSed.

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #26716: [SPARK-30083][SQL] visitArithmeticUnary should wrap PLUS case with UnaryPositive for type checking

AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #26716: [SPARK-30083][SQL] visitArithmeticUnary should wrap PLUS case with UnaryPositive for type checking URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26716#issuecomment-561162797 Test PASSed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins commented on issue #26716: [SPARK-30083][SQL] visitArithmeticUnary should wrap PLUS case with UnaryPositive for type checking

AmplabJenkins commented on issue #26716: [SPARK-30083][SQL] visitArithmeticUnary should wrap PLUS case with UnaryPositive for type checking URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26716#issuecomment-561162797 Test PASSed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #26748: [SPARK-29392][CORE][SQL][FOLLOWUP] Avoid deprecated (in 2.13) Symbol syntax 'foo in favor of simpler expression, where it generated de

AmplabJenkins removed a comment on issue #26748: [SPARK-29392][CORE][SQL][FOLLOWUP] Avoid deprecated (in 2.13) Symbol syntax 'foo in favor of simpler expression, where it generated deprecation warnings URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26748#issuecomment-561161956 Test PASSed.

<    5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   >